To feel better about ourselves, we Californians can always look to British Columbia
northernbeatnews.substack.co…
Great insights into California court system, one of the most opaque and under estimated influences on every day life.
laist.com/news/politics/vote…
Why would we do this?
@chamath
SAM CEO @KevinSabet and former AG Bill Barr let it rip in the pages of the @wapo today:
The trauma industry is alive and well.
It's depressing that 28 years after Judith Rich Harris's The Nurture Assumption, psychologists are conducting, and journalists credulously reporting, useless correlational studies of people's decades-old memories of childhood abuse & their adult relationships, presented as evidence for causality. No controls for (among other things) more neurotic adults spinning childhood memories as traumatic; abusive parents passing on genes for cantankerousness to their kids; more obstreperous children growing into more obstreperous adults. | "Childhood Trauma Echoes Through Romantic Relationships" nautil.us/childhood-trauma-e…
The reality has not sunk in with policy makers and the courts: High THC cannabis triggers psychosis.
The downstream effects of pot commercialization will long haunt us.
@chamath
@dcposch
@garrytan
@mattdorsey
@Twolfrecovery
@Gina_McDee
@StopDrugDeaths
"The research could not be more glaring: combining supercharged marijuana with firearms endangers families, law enforcement, and communities."
Press release: learnaboutsam.org/2026/06/sa…
British Columbia is always two steps ahead!
open.substack.com/pub/northe…
Amazing how dense and tidy old-fashioned prose cuts through an ocean of AI slop.
There was a secret speech prepared for Nixon in case the Apollo 11 astronauts died on the moon.
It was never read publicly, but for Memorial Day I used @ElevenLabs to generate a Nixon-read broadcast of the declassified transcript:
ineventofmoondisaster.org
It’s Becoming Impossible to Know How Your Kid Is Doing in School nytimes.com/2026/05/26/opini… via @NYTOpinion
ellen.grantz retweeted
Very important lesson for Blue Cities here: Every change Lurie has made has been opposed by screaming, bullying activists -- ignoring them has been the path to policy success and extremely high popularity. @skaushik100
sfchronicle.com/election/art…
Prescription for restoring trust in human subject research. 👍 Good one, @TheFIREorg!
eternallyradicalidea.com/p/h…
We could be entering a golden age for the arts.
New essay on the economics of structural change and the post-commodity future of work.
1. Almost any question about the impact of advanced AI on the economy needs to start at the same place: what is still scarce? Answer that, and the analysis becomes pretty straightforward. This essay explores what becomes scarce if AI really can replicate most of what humans do in production, and what this mean for the future of jobs.
2. My conjecture, working through the economics: labor reallocates across sectors, and the sector it reallocates to has properties that keep labor a meaningful share of the economy. Ultimately this is about the structure of demand itself. For this, we have to go back to Girard, Augustine and Rousseau: once people's base needs are met, their preferences shift to comparative motives (e.g., status, exclusivity, social desirability). This motive is inherently non-satiated.
4. The key paper is Comin, Lashkari, and Mestieri (Econometrica 2021). As people get richer, they don't buy proportionally more of everything. They shift spending toward sectors with higher income elasticity. They estimate income effects account for 75%+ of observed structural change.
5. The ironic consequence: the sector that gets automated becomes a smaller share of the economy, not a larger one. Agriculture got massively more productive and its share of employment collapsed. Manufacturing too. The "stagnant" sectors absorb the spending and the jobs.
6. So the question is: which sectors have high income elasticity in a post-AGI world? I argue it's what I call the relational sector. Categories where the human isn't just an input into production, it is part of the value.
7. Why does the relational sector have high income elasticity? Because human desire has a mimetic, relational dimension. We don't just want things for their intrinsic properties. We want what others want, and we want it more when others can't have it. Girard, Rousseau, Augustine, and Hobbes all saw this.
8. In work with Kristóf Madarász, we showed this experimentally: WTP roughly doubles when a random subset of others is excluded from the good. And in new work with Graelin Mandel, AI involvement kills the premium. Human-made art gains 44% from exclusivity; AI-made art only 21%.
9. This all comes together for the core argument. The sector that absorbs spending as AI makes commodity production cheap is one where human provenance is part of the value, and demand for it grows faster than income. Exactly the profile that keeps labor meaningful.
10. To be clear about the claim: I'm NOT saying aggregate labor share must rise. It may fall. The claim is about sectoral composition, i.e., where expenditure and employment go once commodities get cheap, and the fact that the sector that will absorb reallocated labor maps to a substantial component of human preferences and desire.
11. If you're interested in the formal model, a linked companion technical note works out all the economics.
Read the essay here: aleximas.substack.com/p/what…
If you hate “waste fraud and abuse”, you’d love Matt Mahan for CA governor!
Yet one more reason we need Matt Mahan for California Governor.
In 2022, LA shut down a former hotel to convert it into permanently supportive housing for the homeless. Four years and $20 million later, the 32 units are still empty.
This is the homeless industrial complex in action.
gli.st/ck48h6ms
Thanks to the Bay Area Council for standing up against the regressive California mandate to convert gas-powered water heaters and furnaces to electric. Our grid is already unstable, with half a million experiencing a "Public Safety Power Shutoffs" in 2025.
mailchi.mp/bayareacouncil/th…
Give the people what they want. sfchronicle.com/sf/article/h…
ellen.grantz retweeted
America’s political landscape is more complicated than it used to be. Here’s my attempt to depict what I see as the seven broad camps today. Most people I know fall pretty cleanly into one of these circles (each of which has some common ground with the two adjacent circles).
Some additional points:
- The top two circles (green/yellow) are concerned first and foremost with the rise of illiberalism—disregard for the constitution, cancel culture, mob behavior, political violence. They see liberal vs illiberal as more critical right now than left vs right. In 2020, they agreed that wokeness was bad but today they’re divided on whether Trump or Harris/Biden are the lesser of two evils.
- For the middle two circles (blue/red), left vs right is the main thing. They’re not illiberal themselves but tend to focus on illiberalism from the other side while ignoring or condoning illiberalism from their own team. Both skew older and are the main consumers of traditional media, whether it be cable news or newspapers.
- The two lower circles (pink/orange) share a strong sense of grievance, place utmost importance on identity, tend to view identity groups (race, religion, sex, etc.) as monoliths, and are prone to believing conspiracy theories that fit with their worldview. Both skew younger, with woke skewing feminine and upper class and groyper skewing masculine and lower class. Both use revolutionary rhetoric, seeing the establishment as rotten to the core, and readily employ illiberal tactics under the belief that desperate times call for desperate measures.
Thoughts?
California’s public‑sector unions are the most powerful political special interest in the state and nakedly partisan. They don’t just bloat payrolls, they block reforms that would redirect taxpayer dollars from fraud, abuse, and homelessness toward safety and accountability.
ellen.grantz retweeted
This was an eye opener from Jensen Huang
When asked whether he would rather relive his 20s or be 20 years old today, this is what he had to say:
"I thought our 20s were happier than these 20s. I think everyone deserves some time to be oblivious, and not wear all of the world's problems on their shoulders on Day 1
We are raising a generation that is very cynical and too informed
They are cynical, not because they are inherently cynical. They are cynical because they see so much stuff. It is too much stuff
You have to build up some internal reserve of optimism. You have to build up some reserve of goodness."


















