people in my replies saying 'stop being so negative, be constructive, what would you change' etc etc, so to summarise things I've said across many different tweets over a very long time: 1) structural changes to bonding curves and liquidity post bond to fix the paper thin liquidity on coins deployed into pumpswap pools. 2) meaningful support from top brass on long-lasting, culturally important memecoin communities, both through comms and capital invested into (see glass full foundation, an initiative they abandoned as soon as they started it) to promote sustainable narratives. deeper liquidity would also prop up these coins to absorb volatility and not be subsumed by the diddy spiral, to borrow a term. 3) the severing of ties to extractive KOLs and serial deployers through their retainer scheme and those given pumpfun badges 4) reworking of callout payment scheme to stop funding KOLs who abuse it on incredibly short median hold times) - callout payments should be big for those who buy early, shill to an audience, and then hold it long term as it appreciates in value over longer timeframes. these are just a few of the meaningful changes in approach that would seriously help a positive pivot imo. the liquidity issue is the most egregious, and has been from the jump since they migrated away from raydium pools.

stress testing how many enemies on screen before fps is nuked