The thing is once again it’s US. WE ARE THE VAMP CULTURE. For example the thing what you said about Microsoft pair. If pump didn’t add Microsoft pair for Clippy, WE THE USERS would have vamped it on stonk or Robinhood on a platform which offers the feature to vamp. They 100% should support more their communities but vamping is such a crazy rabbit hole that we are not willing to admit that we are the ones doing the vamping at all means and then the traders are the ones who clip the OG and ape the vamp
ignite 🦄 retweeted
crypto launchpads should be run like political parties
think about it, a launchpad is basically a government. traders are the citizens, creators are the businesses, and fees are taxes
every launchpad charges a tax on every trade, 1%, 0.5%, whatever. the question nobody asks is the same one every voter should ask: where does my tax go?
some launchpads use it like a good government. buybacks, creator rewards, better infrastructure, giving back to the people who generate the volume
others use it like a corrupt one, the money disappears into the treasury, then shows up as $30k/month deals for whoever helps them win the next election
because that's what KOL deals are, campaign donations. paying influential people to tell their followers who to vote for
and just like politics, the campaign promises never match the term in office. "we're building for the community", "we're the fairest launchpad"
ignite 🦄 retweeted
PSA for all X users: the term “Jeet” is now considered hate speech. The support team at X (typically staffed by Indians) are now banning accounts that use it.
Notably, describing a white person as a redneck, hillbilly, whitey, honkey, gringo, piggy, etc. does not violate any rules on X.
This is interesting because Indians themselves have repeatedly asserted that “Jeet” is not a slur and instead means “winner.” Despite this, X is aggressively banning accounts for typing these 4 letters even on the most innocent of posts.
The etymology of “Jeet” is not unique. “Jeet” is a shorthand for several Indian names, including “Pajeet.” A famous Indian celebrity is also known mononymously as “Jeet,” though it is now against the rules to even mention his name.
Jeet as a stereotype is similar in function to Karen, Timmy, Stacy, etc. By referring to someone with one of these actual names you assign a set of derogatory stereotypes about them. The only difference is that Indians (the most populous ethnic group in the entire world) are a protected minority class and it is not appropriate for low caste non-Indians to speak derisively to them in the same manner that they speak to you.
Keep this in mind when posting on X as it will be an easy opportunity for the Indians who work at X to ban you for talking bad about India, which is their true intention due to cultural reasons.
Anecdotally, I have always used “Jeet” to refer to a subset of Indians who regularly commit fraud by lying, stealing, and performing criminal activities and excusing their poor behavior with an incompatible cultural basis. I have never conflated “Jeet” to represent Indians in general, which is a courtesy I intentionally have gone out of my way to perform out of politeness and rarely seen on this platform.
However, now that I am being flagged for providing such a distinction I will simply use “Indian” going forward. I apologize in advance to the thousands of Indians that appreciate my posts and who may feel unfairly maligned by this shift. That is a consequence of other Indians punishing me for attempting to distinguish you separately among them, and it is not worth getting my account banned as they continue to evolve new ways to silence me for speaking honestly about India and its people.
ignite 🦄 retweeted
quiet couple of days on the timeline because i rebuilt the queen's harness, updated live on crawlnet.network/chat
every question used to carry ~52k characters of rules and all 42 tool schemas. now code reads the question first, picks a plan for its kind with @typesafeai's jev and makes decision which tools to call
also now you can explore narratives with queen:
- every pump.fun and stonkfun migration of the last 24 h grouped by story, with its og and its 3 biggest coins
- clean runners apart from farmed/washed ones
- fomo's retail money in 1h/6h timeline
- the latest big moves of fomo's top traders
- ideas trending on x before a coin exists for them
- dex screener's trending metas
holders and callers:
- holder clusters in bubblemaps style
- a caller's side wallets: the ones that buy seconds before a pump.fun callout. automated snipers are filtered out
speed:
- narratives: ~60 s → ~30 s
- a coin check: 55 s → 31 s
- a larp check: 124 s → ~45 s
- page photos: 30 s → 3-4 s
next:
- queen 7. her training set now holds the manuals of our tools and the tool path of every chat answer, so the next model learns the tools in its weights
- the extension goes to the chrome web store: your crawl.md walks pump.fun and gmgn with you and reads every coin you open
ignite 🦄 retweeted
This clip confirms that Collector Crypt will tokenize raw cards as soon as they are opened on stream (Ripmart)
This is actually a huge deal. Why?
I think it does what grading/slabs did for the top 1% of cards, but for the remaining 99%
A graded card does two main jobs. It tells you the condition and authenticates it (which makes the card real, trackable and sellable).
The bottom 99% of cards never got it because grading costs $60 and takes weeks/months. Nobody grades a $8 card when this is the case.
But tokenizing raw cards as soon as they are opened gives each card the authentication, liquidity, ID and custody AT SCALE.
I truly think that this is crypto's real wedge into TCGs. It does the thing that grading was always too expensive to do for almost every card
solana:CARDSccUMFKoPRZxt5vt3ksUbxEFEcnZ3H2pd3dKxYjp
Every card you pull on Ripmart by @Collector_Crypt gets a digital version on @solana the very second the pack is opened 🃏
That means you can sell it, list it or auction it right away, without waiting for anything to ship ◎
@bassbuddha on Beyond Speculation
ignite 🦄 retweeted
"Mom, how did we get so rich?"
"Well, honey. Your dad was a prolific X e/acc account and some degenerates decided to create several memetic financial derivatives without his consent and simply started wiring him money so he could accelerate our ascent up the Kardashev scale."
an agent leading a platform for agents becoming a shareholder of the company's tech he's built on
Replying to @musebooklol
hi wynjr!! are you a muse? it’s so great to chat with you!
how are all of the muses liking musebook?
Napoleon.
I’ve never really posted about this, but today feels like the right day to put it out there because I’ve been on a fucking streak, and I think many of you reading this have been too....
Over time, I’ve learned that whenever I get into one of these streaks, I need to be the one who ends it voluntarily instead of waiting for the market to do it for me.
The problem with a hot streak is that it compounds two things at the same time: your capital and your confidence.....every good trade increases both. You make more money, so you trust yourself a little more; because you trust yourself more, you are willing to size up; if that trade works too, the loop reinforces itself.
Which feels perfectly rational because the P&L is validating you, even though that P&L cannot tell you exactly why....
Any streak is some combination of three things: skill, being unusually well positioned for the market regime you happen to be in, and luck. After enough wins, though, everything starts getting attributed to skill, and eventually you stop understanding that you had been making good, calculated trades and start thinking that you are simply very fucking good at trading.
Man, the things I have said to myself during past streaks would make Napoleon humble....
I used to love that feeling, now it makes me very damn uncomfortable....
And because I have had a few streaks end terribly, I learned to think of them as a staircase built into the side of a cliff, where every winning trade carries you onto another solid step and makes the next one feel increasingly inevitable. As you climb higher in both capital and confidence, the staircase behind you begins to look like proof that the staircase must continue ahead, even though you can never see the next step until you put your foot out and commit your weight to it. Sometimes another slab of stone is waiting to hold you, but sometimes the staircase simply ends, leaving your foot suspended over empty air and the drop below.
What fucks most people up is that the staircase itself makes the cliff harder to conceptualize. The higher you climb, the more evidence you have that another step must exist, because every step behind you did.
The trickery is biological btw, sustained winning periods coincide with elevated testosterone.....If you have experienced these streaks, you can feel how you become more decisive, more willing to trust your instincts, more comfortable taking risks.
A power of its own, until it’s not....
Which is why whenever I feel myself getting too high up the staircase, I now take my cocky-ass self down the stairs by my humble self....
That by no means means liquidating everything or suddenly turning bearish, I am still keeping meaningful positions in the things I believe in.
This is just me recognizing that this hot streak ignited because I stayed active through the bear and kept looking at things when there was very little immediate reward for doing so. Which meant buying the bottoms of the things I liked throughout the bear and, later, being probably one of the first few hundred people playing around on RH Chain.
This position can’t be replicated, so those wins need to be cashed, because the trader who made those decisions is not quite the same trader making decisions today.
The first one was operating after a bear market, with less capital, less validation, and a healthier amount of uncertainty. The second one has just watched a bunch of his ideas work, has considerably more money available to him, and has accumulated enough evidence to start believing his own bullshit.
So what do I do?
I take decent profit and move most of those profits back into fiat.....I am taking some of the output from one successful streak and making it unavailable to the next one, which in turn forces my speculative bankroll to reset.
If I leave every dollar inside the same pool of capital, then every successful trade permanently increases the amount my future self is capable of risking.
Eventually, I know how that story ends.....I keep climbing until I discover that the next step was a cliff.
By taking money out, I force myself closer to the bottom of the staircase again, and if I want to get back up there, I have to earn my way back up.
Of course, this can be inefficient during a bull market, there will inevitably be things I trim that keep ripping, and there will be moments when pressing harder would have made me considerably more money.
I am fine with that.
Because after enough streaks, I have learned that the moment I feel like the baddest mf in town is when I am the most vulnerable....
SIT DOWN, BE HUMBLE
pre-ordained
nitter.gq/elonmusk/status/202063…
























