
#girldad • Attorney @USCClitigation • Capitalist • Libertarian • Originalist • Zionist 🇮🇱 Views mine alone!
Washington, DC
Joined November 2009
- Tweets3.5K
- Following1.4K
- Followers1.7K
- Likes117K
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
America and Israel have spent decades jointly developing advanced defense technologies, strengthening both countries' security and defense industries. This has nothing to do with foreign aid. This is about America being dominant in emerging technologies and winning the century.
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
At Northwestern, three major student affinity groups—Alianza NU, MENA Northwestern, and NU APAC—are openly consumed by bigotry.
What, if anything, should the school do about it?
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Floating the largest tax hike in modern history
Mr. November. ✡️
It is heartbreaking to see antisemitism in my hometown. I was born in Wyncote, near Philadelphia, and it makes me angry and ashamed to see hatred tolerated there.
The numbers show this is not an abstract concern. The Anti-Defamation League recorded 465 antisemitic incidents across Pennsylvania in 2024, an 18% increase over 2023. It tracked 189 incidents in Philadelphia and 51 in Montgomery County. These reports include harassment, vandalism, and assault; they are not all classified as crimes. (adl.org, philadelphia.adl.org)
Hateful expression harms more than its immediate target. In a 2025 survey of Jewish Americans, 79% said they were concerned about antisemitism, and 52% said they had worried about their personal safety because of their identity. Nearly half reported taking steps to increase their security. A research review also found that exposure to hate is associated with worse psychological well-being, more negative stereotypes, and less trust between groups. (philadelphia.adl.org, pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
It takes me back to the racism I experienced in the 1960s: signs throughout the South declaring that Black people could be refused service, along with separate “white” and “colored” signs on bathrooms and drinking fountains,”no niggers”. I remember what that hatred looked and felt like. We cannot accept it in any form, directed at any people.
I wish I could be there to stand with those protesting HATE. I am asking elected officials and other leaders in Philadelphia: Where are the clear statements condemning antisemitism? When hateful language is excused or repeated, it can make hostility seem acceptable and deepen fear and division. Leaders should speak plainly and consistently: antisemitism and hate have no place in our communities.
What the hell? We have to speak up.
Reggie Jackson
The Mr. October Guy
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Wow. Senator John Kennedy.
How is this not everywhere.
Seriously. This is insane. Listen to what he’s actually saying.
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Some myths that refuse to die:
1) The poor are getting poorer
2) Unions have been the primary driver of the reduction in work hours
3) Social spending is decreasing
4) Government officials could massively increase revenue by raising taxes on billionaires
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Mr. Vice-President,
Please allow me to present a different perspective.
The problem was not the Iran War. It was the cease fire.
If you start a war, you need to win it and finish it – otherwise don’t start it.
This war should have been over six months ago, with the Strait of Hormuz wide open and oil flowing. The second and third tiers of Iranian leadership should have been destroyed, and we should have supported the pro-western forces who could have taken leadership. We stood on the brink of a new, more peaceful Middle East - and then we blinked. We had a chance not only to deny Iran nuclear weapons, but to get rid of the world’s biggest supporter of terrorism.
Instead, we had a cease fire, which was followed by months of will we or won’t we finish the job. Every day was a different message. There still is. Is the war over? Is it about to begin? No one knows. There is confusion and inconsistency.
In June 2025, America was not involved. This was an Israel vs Iran issue.
No one forced the United States to attack Iran then, or in February of 2026. It was a decision made by President Trump. In my opinion, it was the right decision.
Once the decision was made, we should not have stopped until the regime fell. But instead, you negotiated a cease fire that didn’t last, didn’t work and left us in no man’s land, with higher prices and our troops still deployed.
Our troops could have been home, the Navy returned to its bases, a peaceful regime in place , new alliances forged, and gas prices below $3.00 a gallon.
No, Mr. Vice President. It’s not the war. It’s the so-called cease fire.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Two Senators tell me the Vice President is right that the GOP turned against the Iran war in the Senate GOP’s own polling. But they say what the VP leaves out is that the turn came after the VP negotiated a bad deal with the Iranian regime that repulsed the GOP.
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Coming soon to an inbox near you: "it wasn't the tariffs" and "real tariffs haven't been tried." Don't buy it.
A) It wasn't ONLY the tariffs, but the polls/results are clear: they were a BIG anchor.
B) This IS real tariffs. They raise prices BY DESIGN, fuel cronyism/carveouts, hurt smallbiz & many manufacturers, alienate allies, & cause many other problems/distortions - especially when done by executive action (which boosts uncertainty).
There's a reason these taxes have been mostly abandoned - by the US and every other rich country. The GOP should stop listening to the protectionist fundamentalists (and cronies) and abandon them too.
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
A lot of people in the grifter class prefer to be in the minority. They don’t want to govern because they sell victimhood.
That’s why you don’t see them showing any anger at the doomer crowd that actively pushed to demoralize right-wing voters. They are fine with Dems in charge.
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Republicans- you can win anywhere if you'll drop the Trumpy insanity. He's a loser. Drop him like a sack of bricks.
Democrats- you can lose anywhere if you embrace radicalism and lean into degrowth.
Moderation and growth- that is the way.
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
In the bluest state in the country, in the bluest tsunami you can imagine, Phil Scott still won. By being a pro-growth moderate. Aided by Democrats picking a candidate who is an anti-growth radical.
I am BEGGING both parties to learn from this!
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
President Trump, today: We'll end US aid to Israel.
PM Netanyahu, six months ago on 60 Minutes: I asked President Trump to end US aid to Israel.
@tabletmag, looking boldly into the future in July of 2023:
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Unironically, this is absurdly brave.
Her political career is over in the Democratic party because of this.
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
Just as a reminder, Sinwar deceived Israel into believing he wanted long-term quiet, and in return Israel was gradually easing up on Gaza, including allowing massive aid to flow into Gaza from Qatar and allowing tens of thousands of Gazans to work in Israel, with plans for a lot more.
Hamas could have actually done this for real, and over time lived peacefully and prosperously next to Israel.
But again, it was a ruse to cover up a longstanding plan to invade Israel, murder civilians, and hopefully stir an uprising in the West Bank and military intervention by Hezbollah and Iran, leading to Israel's defeat.
Actually, I shouldn't say just a reminder, because depending on what media sources you utilize, you may not be aware of any of that.
CNN's @ScottJenningsKY: "It's not Netanyahu's fault that Israel was attacked on Oct. 7."
@davidaxelrod: "Actually it may be."
CNN is blurring the line between fact and political spin.
Jonathan D. Urick 🟦🇮🇱🎗️ retweeted
💯
It’s just the motions docket.
Some thoughts on Justice Jackson’s piece in the latest YLJ issue:
Can we please just call it the Supreme Court’s motions docket. This is what appellate motion practice looks like. Most folks who push something else simply don’t litigate. I wish academic were less fixated on inventing terms. Not every phenomena merits special terms.
yalelawjournal.org/pdf/136-1…
What has Israel ever done that helped the US?, part 157.
Mossad agents broke into a diplomat’s hotel room in Vienna, cloned his laptop in under an hour, and discovered dozens of color photos showing North Korean scientists inside an unmarked box-shaped building in the Syrian desert—triggering a stealth air raid that wiped out a covert plutonium reactor minutes before midnight.
The reason might surprise you.
In early 2007, Israeli intelligence was tracking suspicious cargo shipments between Pyongyang and Damascus. While Western agencies assumed Syria was merely modernizing ballistic missiles, Mossad Director Meir Dagan suspected something far more dangerous.
In March 2007, an operational window opened in Vienna:
Ibrahim Othman, head of the Syrian Atomic Energy Commission, arrived for an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) conference.
When Othman left his hotel for a dinner engagement, a specialized Mossad Kidon team breached his suite.
Operatives cloned his laptop's hard drive, planted Trojan spyware, and left the room completely undisturbed before his return.
When analysts back in Tel Aviv cracked the files, they were stunned:
The drive held dozens of high-resolution digital photographs taken inside a remote facility near Al-Kibar, in the Deir ez-Zor desert along the Euphrates River.
The images showed a gas-cooled, graphite-moderated nuclear reactor identical in design to North Korea's Yongbyon plutonium reactor.
Pictured side-by-side inside the facility were Chon Chiboo, a leading North Korean nuclear official, and senior Syrian engineers.
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert immediately dispatched Mossad and defense officials to Washington to brief President George W. Bush.
While US intelligence confirmed the facility was indeed a plutonium-production reactor built with North Korean assistance, Washington favored diplomatic pressure via the UN rather than kinetic military action.
Olmert refused to wait. Under the Begin Doctrine, an operational reactor in a hostile state could not be tolerated:
Once loaded with nuclear fuel rods, an airstrike would blanket the Euphrates Valley and downstream populations in lethal radioactive fallout. The countdown to strike was measured in months.
The mission was codenamed Operation Orchard (also referred to as Operation Outside the Box).
Before the airstrike, commandos from the elite Sayeret Matkal were covertly inserted by helicopter near Al-Kibar to collect soil samples, photograph perimeter defenses, and verify nuclear signatures.
On the night of September 5, 2007, the strike package took flight:
Four F-15I Ra'am fighters and four F-16I Sufa jets from the 69, 119, and 253 Squadrons departed Ramat David and Hatzerim airbases.
Instead of flying east over Jordan, the aircraft headed west over the Mediterranean, climbed north, and banked east along the Turkish-Syrian border.
Israel's electronic warfare and cyber units deployed an airborne algorithmic weapon codenamed Suter: they hacked and fed false-sky data directly into Syria’s modern Russian-built radar network. The screens showed tranquil, empty airspace while eight strike fighters roared beneath radar shadows.
Shortly after 11:30 PM, the strike package dropped down onto Al-Kibar:
Diving out of the dark sky, the jets unleashed 17 tons of precision-guided ordnance, including AGM-65 Maverick missiles and 500-pound laser-guided penetration bombs.
The cubic concrete containment building was completely flattened, collapsing into its subterranean foundations in seconds.
At 12:01 AM on September 6, the mission commander radioed the prearranged Hebrew code word back to the subterranean command bunker in Tel Aviv: "Arizona." All eight Israeli aircraft returned to base completely undamaged.
What followed was one of the most remarkable diplomatic silences in modern warfare:
Neither Israel nor Syria acknowledged what had occurred. Prime Minister Olmert imposed a strict military gag order on Israeli press, preventing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from facing public pressure to retaliate.
Desperate to conceal the illicit program from the IAEA, Syrian authorities deployed excavators within weeks, bulldozing the remaining rubble, scraping the topsoil, and erecting an innocuous civilian warehouse over the footprint.
The veil broke in April 2008 when the CIA briefed the US Congress with unclassified surveillance footage and photos, confirming North Korea's covert nuclear proliferation. Israel officially lifted its censorship and confirmed the raid in March 2018.
































