I've used DeFi for years and always called it trustless. Then I looked at how a DAO grant actually gets paid. The money sits in a contract. The milestone says dashboard shipped. So three people in a multisig open the link, nod and sign. That multisig is an oracle with profile pictures. The contract can't open the page or judge whether the work matches the brief, so it takes their word. This is exactly where the trustless part ends and I never noticed because it looks like normal governance. @GenLayer Intelligent Contracts are written in Python and can fetch the live page themselves and ask a language model whether the milestone holds up. One validator proposes a verdict, the others run it with their own models and if they don't land on the same answer, a new leader tries again. Anyone can still appeal. What I find interesting is that the judgment becomes part of the protocol instead of a favor from three people. Bad evidence can still mislead it, but the decision is no longer one person's word, and anyone can challenge it. Would you rather your grant be judged by a multisig you know, or by validators running different models you don't?