yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
Petr Yan vs Merab.
This one should be good.
Merab brings the pressure, but Yan has the striking to make things difficult for anyone..
Iβm always on Petr Yan side though..
Who are you backing?
Petr Yan vs Merab.
This one should be good.
Merab brings the pressure, but Yan has the striking to make things difficult for anyone..
Iβm always on Petr Yan side though..
Who are you backing?
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
last one before i close up for @agentdojo for today.
the page isnβt fully live yet to test their tech.
but iβm looking forward to seeing how the fighter creation and battles will work once it goes live.
we go again tomorrow.
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
Do you know that the privacy behind Utexo @utexocom comes from how RGB works?
Didn't quite get it? No worries. Let's break it down together.
RGB is the protocol Utexo uses to bring USDT transfers to Bitcoin. In simple terms, instead of publishing all the payment details on Bitcoin's public ledger, RGB keeps the asset's transaction data off-chain, with the parties involved in the transfer.
Bitcoin's blockchain carries a cryptographic commitment that anchors the transaction to a specific UTXO, while the parties retain the information needed to validate the transfer.
Now, here's why that matters.
Most stablecoin transfers on networks like Ethereum and Tron are publicly traceable. Anyone can generally inspect transaction amounts, wallet addresses, and transaction history on-chain.
RGB takes a different approach through client-side validation.
The actual transfer details, including the amount and asset history, aren't published directly on Bitcoin's public ledger. Instead, Bitcoin provides the underlying security and records the on-chain commitment.
This means:
β No publicly visible RGB transaction graph on Bitcoin.
β Transfer amounts and counterparties aren't directly exposed on-chain through the RGB transfer itself.
β Participants can validate the asset's history using the relevant transaction data and cryptographic proofs.
But there's an important distinction: privacy doesn't mean complete anonymity.
The parties involved still need the relevant information to validate transfers, and other information may reveal activity in certain circumstances.
RGB's design also differs from conventional address-freezing models. Utexo has described a compliance approach involving the blacklisting of specific UTXOs associated with illicit activity, potentially making the assets tied to those outputs unredeemable rather than freezing an entire address.
In short, the payment details stay off-chain, while Bitcoin anchors the ownership commitment. That's the privacy advantage RGB brings to Utexo's approach to USDT on Bitcoin.
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
As DeFi becomes more interconnected, real innovation isn't about adding complexity it's about streamlining the experience.
Deep liquidity, flexible collateral, and perpetual trading mean nothing if the user experience feels like a barrier.
Excited to see how @rollxfi is building a simpler, more intuitive path forward for capital onchain. π
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
one minute youβre just spinning for fun, the next the reels have you staring at the screen wondering what just happened...
thatβs the kind of plot twist you donβt see coming.
only on @1win
one minute youβre just spinning for fun, the next the reels have you staring at the screen wondering what just happened...
thatβs the kind of plot twist you donβt see coming.
only on @1win
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
I still remember England against Germany at the 2010 World Cup. Germany led 2-1 when Lampard's shot hit the crossbar and landed well over the line. The referee and his assistant missed it. Play on.
There was no video review for goals then, so the first call was the final call.
Smart contracts have the same blind spot. They can't read the web or tell whether a job was done right, so for anything real they wait for someone outside, an oracle, to say what happened. The contract simply acts on that call.
@GenLayer's Intelligent Contracts are written in Python and can call two things a smart contract can't: the live web and a language model. One validator runs the contract and proposes the result. The others run it with their own models and check whether they reach the same answer.
What I find most interesting is that an accepted result isn't the end. If they disagree, a new leader tries again. Anyone can appeal, and then more validators review it. With no appeal, the result is final and the funds move.
In that match, nobody could ask for a second look before the call became final. In an Intelligent Contract, the second look is part of the process.
Think of a decision that became final before anyone could check it. What would you have wanted to challenge?
π€ Made with AI
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
gActum
To trust an agent, three locks must be opened.
The first lock: Who sent it?
Significant progress has been made here. It is now possible to cryptographically verify that a real, unique individual stands behind an agent.
The second lock: What was it authorized to do?
There has been progress here as well. A signed, single-use authorization is created one that becomes void if even the slightest detail, such as a figure or a destination, is altered.
The third lock: What did it actually do?
This door remains, for the most part, still closed.
An authorization is a momentary decision a yes is given, and the task is initiated. However, the authorization document contains no record of the path the agent took, the sequence of steps it followed, or whether the final outcome aligned with the original intent.
The industry is currently focused on the front door, yet there is no one monitoring what happens further down the corridor.
Thus, infrastructure exists for two of the three locks; the one that remains, the one where the greatest risk resides is still unaddressed.
@Actum_system is working precisely on this third lock: creating a verifiable record of behavior, directly linked to the individual who granted the initial authorization.
#ACTUM
π€ Paid partnership
Good day Everyone
Before claiming that a task has been performed, five distinct layers must be established. If even one layer is missing, the entire proof becomes weak.
1. Who performed it?
Simply recording a name is not enough. It must be linked to a verifiable human action, ensuring that no one can later claim, I didn't do this.
2. Where did it take place?
If maintenance is claimed for a piece of equipment, there must be proof that the work actually took place at the location of that equipment.
3. When did it happen?
Was the task completed within the scheduled timeframe, or was the record created later?
4. Exactly what was done?
The term completed is insufficient. It must be verified that each required step was followed.
5. What was left undone?
This layer is the least discussed, yet it is the most critical. Tasks that were supposed to be performed but were omitted are also recorded with a timestamp, leaving no room for negligence to go unnoticed.
Only when these five layers are present does an action transform from a mere event into verifiable proof. This proof is then stored in an encrypted format for years, ensuring that should any questions arise in the future, the answers are already prepared.
@Actum_system is building this entire framework.
Because reliability is not established by a single answer alone.
#ACTUM
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
I see UXUY as more than a trading platform.
I see an opportunity to make global markets easier to access and understand @uxuycom
Trading has taught me that finding an opportunity is only one part of the journey. Understanding the market, managing risk and making informed decisions matter just as much.
Thatβs why I want to be part of the UXUY affiliate community. I want to share
β€ Useful insights
β€ Explain new developments in simple language
β€ Help more people explore onchain trading with confidence.
As a Web3 content creator..
I believe genuine growth comes from trust, consistency and real conversations, not just only promotion.
If selected, Iβll bring my own perspective, create meaningful content and contribute to a community that values learning and accessibility.
Letβs make global markets more accessible, one connection at a time.π§‘
This quoted post is unavailable.
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
when you realize the ai is actually doing your entire job better than you
π€ Paid partnership
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
Understand who holds the supply before taking the trade π§ - @cernatul
Those early buyers don't care about your perfect entry π
They'll sell every rally for profit.
Know who's holding the supply before you trade π
yocoded β’π
β’ retweeted
BEFORE YOU CHOOSE A CRYPTO EXCHANGE, ASK THIS QUESTIONβ¦
Buying crypto is the easy part..
Knowing where to trade it, how to convert it, what happens after you deposit it, and what risks you're taking is where things get more serious.
So what should a useful crypto platform actually offer?
Let's look at @ulanbit and the bigger picture behind it. π§΅
BEFORE YOU CHOOSE A CRYPTO EXCHANGE, ASK THIS QUESTIONβ¦
Buying crypto is the easy part..
Knowing where to trade it, how to convert it, what happens after you deposit it, and what risks you're taking is where things get more serious.
So what should a useful crypto platform actually offer?
Let's look at @ulanbit and the bigger picture behind it. π§΅
THE BEST EXCHANGE ISN'T JUST THE ONE WITH THE MOST COINS
It's the one whose products, costs, security practices and terms you understand well enough to make informed decisions.
That's the perspective I take when looking at ULANBIT.
Spot Trading for buying and selling supported assets. Swap for conversions. Earn for exploring eligible earning products. Wallet services for managing digital assets.
Different tools, different purposes, and different risks.
If you're exploring ULANBIT, start with the official website, learn how each feature works, and do your own research before depositing funds.
π ulanbit.com/
Crypto rewards curiosity, but it punishes assumptions.
Understand first. Decide second.

























