The impulse to "solve homelessness" is actually the most evil possible thought a human can have. It is, once again, based on blank slate disease, which is the #1 liberal psychosis. The idea that "we have enough for everybody," which I call "everybodyism," originates from a low level of thinking usually occupied by women and children. This idea of "sharing the snacks equally" is intended to be applied to small family or clan groups (like a household or a kindergarten classroom) and not to all "humans" (which are actually several species). The reason this thought is evil is the same reason it would be evil to elect a baby president or put a cripple in the Olympics; the situation does not match the individual. (I will be creating maps to depict this and selling a book of them. I have developed a system that describes the conscious grasp of reality in simple terms. That was the easy part. The hard part is depicting it.) The homelessness situation is much more complicated than President Baby because it is made of many individuals arranged in a system. However, each of these individuals has their own situation relative to the system. Some of the individuals in the system are homeless and can improve with help. Most homeless individuals do not improve with help. We already learned this a long time ago. Most of what you give to them will go to waste, or worse. Some of the individuals in the system wish to give up some of their own wealth to help the homeless. Most of the individuals in the system do not wish to give up very much if any. This creates a system where most of the people paying to help the homeless are actually being robbed since they do not want to contribute, and most of the people being "helped" are actually just being enabled to continue causing typical homeless problems. In other words, by "solving homelessness, you're doing almost nothing but robbing the honors student and the average Joe to buy groceries and e-bikes for illiterate criminals. If you try to explain this to kindergarten mommy spinsters like Claire, they will have feminine, emotional screeching fits about it. This is because they don't care about what's true or what's good. They only care if they get their feelings satisfied, no matter how much harm it does. And if you want to see how much harm it's done, go to any American city or suburb. There's nothing left because we let people like this keep talking. It is long past time to criminalize free speech for the undeveloped. People who cannot grasp an issue should not be allowed to speak about it.

If you do something really well (like let's say you build a really cool sand castle at the beach), other people will notice and walk right up to you and try to be a part of what you're doing. They didn't do a goddamn thing. They don't have any of the skills to do the goddamn thing. They just want credit and they want to be at the party. If you let too many of them get close, they will mess with what you did and ruin it. They will try to build new parts on the sand castle, but they don't know how to do it and they will wreck it. They will climb on it like it's a real castle. If you tell them to stop ruining it, they'll say it's not yours anymore or it never was. That's what it's like being white in a white country right now.