@lllib (@lllib) profile picture

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool.” — Richard Feynman.

CZ/SK(Europe)
Joined May 2014
Photo by @lllib (@lllib)Photo by @lllib (@lllib)Photo by @lllib (@lllib)Photo by @lllib (@lllib)Photo by @lllib (@lllib)Photo by @lllib (@lllib)Photo by @lllib (@lllib)Photo by @lllib (@lllib)Photo by @lllib (@lllib)Photo by @lllib (@lllib)
I don't think that it's about protecting economy, I think it's about skepticism that trying to suppress gangs using force which failed many times in past in Mexico will work this time around and have lasting effect worth the casualties.
1
30
Bukele and his allies managed to create sustainable environment for their efforts(effectively government of national unity), and conditions for success. That's not something that can be assumed easily/automatically accomplished elsewhere.
1
15
Mr. @brett_mcgurk regarding your heavily quoted interview. Mr. Khan issued specific warnings to Israel regarding restricting humanitarian aid in Gaza and what such behavior if continued (which it did) mean, on 29th October 2023. Indictments took place on 21st November 2024.
I knew former ICC prosecutor Karim Khan from his work investigating ISIS crimes against the Yazidis. On May 19, 2024, I helped secure the access he sought in Israel. Israel agreed. The next day, he announced his application for warrants. Here’s the story. From my conversation with @IgnatiusPost on BRINK at @AtlanticCouncil.
2
124
ICC may well be dead (which if it is, is wrong). But, anyone thinking that it can clean the perception of Israel (which would be a possible pragmatic reason to kick ICC's corpse), is completely delusional. Geanie is out of bottle, and many people realized many things about Israel
1
4
And not in major way due to ICC, but due to actions of Israel. Thus, attacking ICC does even more harm to Israel.
3
Wendy, allies started invasion/offensive into Normandy on 6th June 1944. That doesn't make allies responsible for WW2 either. Purpose of the document was to cover investigation of stuff Israel did during specific timeline. That line merely limits the timeline.
This clearly is a lie. It is Hamas that entered Israel on October 7
2
98
This should be obvious from reading the name of the document, or from looking into the document. I can't reply to you in the thread, because @HillelNeuer same as others spreading that lie blocks when pointed out since this is best they could find to smear Nobel prize winner.
35
By the way, the best way to defeat terrorists is to not become them
95
311
13
2,921
35,898
WE COUNT THE ENEMIES WE KILL. WE RARELY COUNT THE ONES WE CREATE. Nidal Hasan was a patient on my floor in the surgical trauma ICU at Brooke Army Medical Center. I wasn't there when he arrived. I had just left for my deployment to Mosul, Iraq. But the nurses and doctors who cared for him were my peers and my friends, and I know exactly what that required of them, because every one of us had done some version of it before. Before anyone tells me what strength looks like, understand what that work demands. I have cared for a drunk driver who wiped out an entire family and landed in our ICU himself. I have cared for gang members who shot up a block while children were stepping off a school bus, then ended up on our unit with bullets of their own. I have kept alive people who murdered their own families and failed at taking their own lives. And in Iraq, I saved the lives of the very enemy fighters who had just tried to kill us and miraculously survived our response. Every one of those patients got our best. Not because we felt anything for them, but because of who we were. You set aside anger, grief, prejudice and every personal feeling you have, because a life in front of you is a life in front of you. That's the oath. That's the duty. So when Hasan came through those doors, my colleagues did what we had always done. They preserved the life of a man who murdered thirteen people and would have killed them too, given the chance. He killed those men and women in one of the very same buildings many Soldier's like myself have been in when I was stationed at Fort Hood. He is alive today because they did their jobs. That was not sentiment. It was a hard, tangible expression of the values this country claims to stand for. Our principles had to mean something even when the person benefiting from them had violated everything we believed in. Now the Pentagon plans to livestream his execution by firing squad on Dec. 3, and our leaders apparently believe turning his death into a public spectacle will demonstrate American strength. I think it demonstrates how little they understand the enemy they claim to be fighting. We kept Nidal Hasan alive, now our leaders want to make him a martyr. Hasan walked into Fort Hood expecting to die. He believed his death would be rewarded. At his trial, he called no witnesses and offered no defense, and his own court-appointed lawyers worried he was seeking execution. He failed at martyrdom once. Now we're about to hand it to him, in high definition, for every extremist with an internet connection to replay, manipulate and celebrate. We supply the footage. They supply the meaning. Long after the politicians finish congratulating themselves, that video will still exist. Their moment of bravado becomes somebody else's recruiting material for decades. And this failure to think past the immediate display of power reaches far beyond one execution. We count the enemies we kill. We rarely count the enemies we create. Look at the school in Minab, Iran, where multiple investigations attributed the strike that killed more than 100 children and their teachers to us. You cannot bury people's children beneath the rubble of their classrooms and expect a speech about American intentions to decide how they remember you. No denial brings those children home. No claim of good intentions makes their parents forget whose weapons killed them. If those were our children, we would remember for the rest of our lives. We would demand accountability. Many of us would want vengeance. We would tell their stories to the next generation. We know this because we did exactly that after September 11. Why do we imagine other people love their children less, grieve less deeply, or remember less clearly? We have developed a horrifying talent for creating more terrorists than we will ever stop. We inflict suffering, evade responsibility, and then act as though the anger that follows came out of nowhere. Think back to the first time you saw one of those al Qaeda videos of an American being beheaded. Remember the sickness in your stomach. Remember the rage. Remember thinking that only savages would film a killing and send it out for the world to watch. Now ask yourself what the rest of the world will see when the camera is ours. Terrorist organizations stage executions for the cameras. Authoritarian regimes make death a public spectacle to feed fear and rage. Watching our own leaders reach for those same tools should force us to confront how much of ourselves we are surrendering in the name of defeating them. The line separating us from the people we condemn has to live in our conduct. A flag cannot hold it for us. Neither can a uniform, a title, or a declaration that we are the good guys. On that ICU floor, on a bloody street in Mosul, and in trauma bays across this country, people like my colleagues hold that line every day under circumstances most will never face. They keep monsters alive because their duty and their humanity are bigger than their hatred of what those monsters have done. Execute him if that's the sentence. But do it the way a confident nation does; quietly, lawfully, and without giving him the stage he always wanted. Let him be forgotten. I expect our leaders to show at least as much discipline as the nurses who had to care for him. They keep telling us they are defending what makes America different. Every day, they make that difference harder to see. Robert W. Burns III is the editor and publisher of The Space Coast Rocket, an Army veteran and a retired trauma nurse. The views expressed in this column are his own.
650
3,020
476
9,827
607,702
Replying to @RChrastekova
Hele, ty blbko- na valku musi byt dva. I kdyz jeden nechce (my), ten druhy ji chtit muze. V takovem pripade je tve prani, ze ji nechces, uplne k hovnu, a ten druhej te zabije nebo zotroci.Jestli tak dopadnou nechces, musis se chystat a branit. Dokazes to pochopit?
1
12
203
Well, would you look at that. The Japanese police don’t need to murder people to keep the peace.
68
62
3
758
48,557
Bývalý americký velvyslanec v Dánsku to řekl poměrně výstižně.
99
1,256
71
6,197
213,790
Podle Beneše, špičkového neurochirurga, před vámi tají oteplování Měsíce. Prý to boří klimatické „náboženství". Nesmysl — ale naletí na něj i neurochirurg. A to je problém. S Danem Kortusem jsme se proto spojili, ať v tom uděláme trochu pořádek. A teď potřebujem pomoct ⤵️
42
181
8
1,178
46,566
@lllib retweeted
LOL😂 ty ses ale skutečně zoufalej tragéd Filípku 😂😂🤡
1
14
2
153
2,287
Podporovatel Motoristů, který šel ze střední rovnou na MŽP, měl ve středu takovou slabší chvilku, ve které potřeboval světu sdělit (samozřejmě ne hlasem MŽP, přestože video hodil ven v pracovní době), že je nějaké divné, že na Ukrajině nejsou volby. Být Adamem, asi bych do tématu Ukrajiny nezabrušoval, přesto jsem pro něj udělal takové edukativní video a nabízím mu seminář na téma Ukrajina, kdy si klidně udělám hodinku čas, aby dostal nachytření právě v tomto směru.
63
188
6
1,831
50,757