May Allah have mercy on Shiekh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyya and Shiekh al-Mujaddid Muhammad Ibn Abd al Wahab.
May Allah reward them both with Al-Firdaws al-A'la.
44
Replying to @ly957194227756
What’s the issue? Are you saying Allah has no boundary because he’s mix within creation? Or just that Allah AWJ doesn’t exist at all?
2
66
Replying to @Opti_prime87
What he negated was the Tawīl (false interpretations/meanings) of ahl-Bid’ah.
We have no issue diverting from the apparent meaning as long as it’s via proper evidence.
1
2
122
Ahmad retweeted
This guy @WajdiAkkari thinks it’s impermissible for a Muslim to speak negatively about American politicians
He thinks US politicians are comparable to the olden-day Caliphs.
This is extremism. His friend @FarisHammadi even said it’s wrong for Muslims to criticize Non-Muslim Rulers like Trump, even if you don’t live in America and aren’t under their authority.
You would have to be a dimwit to take such a position.
If you don’t speak the truth in an age of falsehood, then the truth will be lost and the common people will be corrupted by bad ideas.
Ahmad retweeted
It’s a mark of shame that Muslims today aren’t willing to deal with China on military terms.
Any Muslim who talks about China as an ally has betrayed his Deen. They are an open enemy.
Not a SINGLE Muslim-majority nation has even acknowledged the Uyghur Genocide, and Uyghur Muslim refugees hiding in the Middle East are frequently deported back to China where they are tortured into abandoning Islam.
Our Uyghur Muslim brothers and sisters are forced to abandon Islam at the point of a gun, and their children are brainwashed to become Chinese Communist Atheists.
One of the greatest betrayals in human history. We refuse to fight, we refuse to put our trust in Allah, so we are condemned to an endless series of attacks and humiliations.
Replying to @AhmedSheriffdin
.
1
14
Replying to @AhmedSheriffdin
.
1
20
Replying to @AhmedSheriffdin
You seem to be getting slower every time we speak 😅
Replying to @bahlul_majnun @Hanbali2024
What a cope! “It’s my definition” what the 🤣 are you the exception? 🤡
Dictionary definition are based on what we’ve seen and know.
I swear by Allah you’re the dumbest “real Athari” I’ve spoken to.
Keep running. What a waste of time.
1
36
Replying to @bahlul_majnun @Hanbali2024
U’ve lost the plot.
Where did u get that definition from? Not from fulan bin fulan?
I want clear proof from Quran that the يد verses are mutashbihat.
Where’d I say I don’t want to use clear Arabic? Apparently, not using dictionary definitions means I don’t use clear Arabic? 🤡
1
26
Replying to @bahlul_majnun @Hanbali2024
No proof as usual.
Bring proof the verses about يد are mutashabihat? Not the understanding of fulan bin fulan 🤡
Which fool uses dictionary definitions for Allah? That’s ur tajsimi framework at play.
U can’t run from this. Throwing the Salaf under the bus isn’t good for u.
1
20
Replying to @bahlul_majnun @Hanbali2024
The clear Arabic tongue is the proof. That’s the apparent meaning. You moved away from it, so the burden of proof is on you.
And the verses you’re using, (وما يعلم etc..) bring proof that it’s referring to the apparent meaning of the يد verse.
1
19
Replying to @bahlul_majnun @Hanbali2024
You absolute fool.
Allah clearly attributes a hand (with meaning and not an empty word) to himself in that verse and others in a clear Arabic tongue.
However, your tafwīd is actually following the statements of fulan bin fulan and not the Quran.
“Real Athari” 🤡
1
22





