Pinned Tweet
The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn
โ Alvin Toffler.
QOTD: โWe live in a world of accelerating change. The best founders reinvent themselves over and over again. We must do the sameโ
1
1
174
๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ท๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฆ๐บ retweeted
ADHD is a superpower.
"The problem isn't that I can't focus; it's that I can't focus on stuff I don't care about."
"On stuff I care about, I can lock in and youโre not going to find me for months."
So if you have ADHD ...
"The first thing you have to do is reframe the task to find the autonomy."
My conversation with @steven_kotler on flow, cognitive performance, and doing your best work.
Kotler is the executive director of the Flow Research Collective, where he studies flow and the science of peak performance.
In this episode, youโll learn:
โข How to get so absorbed in what youโre doing that distractions fade.
โข How to find a challenge that holds your attention without overwhelming you.
โข Why a hobby you gave up might be worth picking up again.
โข What frustration tells you when youโre learning and how to respond.
โข How to focus on work you donโt feel like doing.
โข How to think clearly when thereโs too much information, and youโre unsure what to trust.
Listen and Learn
(Includes paid partnerships.)
๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ท๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฆ๐บ retweeted
Payday Super reduced working capital for the average SMB by $124k.
Many SMBs replaced working capital with credit cards.
Now the ATO refuses to accept credit but charges 11.5% interest on unpaid taxes.
This doesnโt end wellโฆ
๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ท๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฆ๐บ retweeted
I left Silicon Valley 6 years ago
Why?
Because it's a monoculture
The most extreme group think of any place on the planet
Show up to a dinner party and everyone is in tech
So what do they do? They start stack-ranking each other
And it's a totally ordered set: being founder of co $100B market cap > founder of co with $50B market cap > managing partner of tier 1 venture firm > hired CEO of $50B public co > founder of $10B co > etc etc
Pure toxicity that nerfs creativty
And then as a corollary, people are especially afraid to speak truth to power as everyone knows their place in
"The Hierarchy"
Reject this nonsense. Stay weird. Think independently. Be honest with yourself. Have fun.
"I don't think they're necessarily evil. They're just they have a sixth sense about how to respond when they're put on the spot like that"
โ @bgurley on Searchers and Blockers
89
[We analysed performance data from 3,000 US venture capital firms. Over the past two decades, only 20 firmsโfewer than 1%โhave produced three or more funds with a net TVPI of at least 3x.]
โ @aramverdi of Accolade Partners
1
1
153
QOTD:
"We need a venture capital industry that will get off its arse and start putting serious risk capital to work..."
โ @MrKRudd via @PressClubAust
mrkrudd.substack.com/p/navigโฆ
Another Aussie company passed up by Australian VCs went on to raise $4m seed from @foundersfund.
Not massive by todayโs standards, but massive if you know the backstory of @paul_conyngham at @gamgeevetmed
This is becoming more than a coincidence, itโs becoming a pattern. By my count ~40+ companies have been missed by Australian VCs including @airtreevc @blackbirdvc and @SquarePegCap. The real question to ask is why?
Why do so many Australian founders get passed by Australian VCs who then go on to raise from US VCs?
5
834
QOTD: "the mission itself should provide some mechanism to reduce the big problem into smaller ones that are solvable, and on the critical path to the bigger one."
โ @DavidCahn6
dcahn.substack.com/p/they-buโฆ
1
179
If you are so lucky and fortunate to do soโฆdismiss Fads!
Eat well.
Be kind.
Do the work.
Be intellectually honest.
And maybe, if you are lucky, you will end up exactly where you were meant to be!
111
๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ท๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฆ๐บ retweeted
It feels like we've hit diminishing returns on intelligence for many tasks
We may no longer see every product auto-switch to the next frontier model upon release
This is great for app-layer builders (many opportunities to bring down COGS!)
QOTD:
โwhat happens when agents start writing the kernels and new model architectures keep appearing?โ
โ @chamath
Replying to @jacobpeake
wow. this is super super good. thank you for writing this.
one thought:
what happens when agents start writing the kernels and new model architectures keep appearing?
I think a lot of todayโs chips become meh. they were designed by humans for humans.
brute-force approaches that use massive memory and compute in ways that only make sense when AI (ie not humans) are doing the mapping will emerge is my bet. memory wall matters but gets solved differently.
225
๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ท๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฆ๐บ retweeted
Turns out you can't change human behavior and decades of habit to suit your IPO timeline
Sam Altman admits he was wrong on AI's timeline and says society and the economy will adapt more slowly
"I thought when we got to GPT-4, which was back in 2023, that very quickly after that there was going to be much more disruption, software businesses up for grabs right away, than it turned out to be."
"I think I was wrong about a few things, but one in terms of the speed: the economy just has so much inertia."
"People keep doing the same things, buying from the same company, wanting to use their tools the same way. I think this is actually a positive in many ways, and it's going to make this big transition go smoother and slower. I'm grateful for it."
"But it means we've all been too ambitious on timelines. Even with this incredible technology, society and the economy will adapt more slowly."
If youโre thinking about AI 2.0, and the below is even directionally right, one of the hardest disciplines for founders will be knowing when not to listen to their investors.
Counterintuitive, yes. But many investors are optimising for FUM/DPI, not for discovering what comes next. And many have no proprietary insight beyond what they read, hear and see from everyone else.
Have a thesis. Make a plan. Listen carefullyโbut donโt outsource conviction.
Trust your judgment.
RT: โ95% of the companies riding this wave will not be there. OpenAI, Anthropic and SpaceX are the Metas and Googles of this era, and the wreckage around them will be enormous.โ
โ @dafrankel
via @gokulr
The AI Bubble will create Roadkill
@DaFrankel (David Frankel), Managing Partner, @fcollective (Founder Collective), interviewed by @HarryStebbings (@20VC)
Summary: David Frankel has written seed checks into Uber, Coupang, PillPack, SeatGeek, Whoop, Shield AI and Suno across 18 years at Founder Collective, and he expects this AI wave to leave more wreckage behind it than any wave he has seen. The money at the top of the market is competing for a handful of trillion-dollar names while the returns math sits far below that, in companies nobody is bidding on yet. His case is for getting in early, staying patient, and holding your frameworks loosely enough that they don't cost you the deal of the decade.
1. The $2.6 Billion Median. Fewer than 100 companies created in the last 25 years are sustainably worth over $10 billion. The median of the top 500 companies from that period is $2.6 billion, and owning 5% of one of those returns a seed fund. Frankel says venture has narrowed into a pyramid because Cambridge Associates and the funds of funds are selling access, and a fund that misses the $3 trillion names gets hard to sell. The returns math works at a fraction of that scale, which is why he says you don't have to be in the one.
2. Hollywood Odds. 95% of the companies riding this wave will not be there. Frankel believes OpenAI, Anthropic and SpaceX are the Metas and Googles of this era, and that the wreckage around them will be enormous. He has heard "this time is different" from Harry Stebbings and everyone else for 11 years, across the internet, SaaS and mobile waves that produced fewer than 100 companies over $10 billion between them. Asked whether another crash is coming, his answer is definitely, and nobody knows when.
3. Everyone Is AI Now. Saying you're not an AI company today is like saying you don't use the internet. Frankel's live example: a founder who spent 20 years in SAP consulting, built a platform, knew which part of it was still bad, started playing with Claude Code alongside his CTO, and came back raising at a $20 million cap. Founder Collective does those deals all day long. The AI label stopped carrying information, so what matters is what the founder knows that nobody else does.
4. The Insurance Policy. Founders are inviting small seed funds into $8 to $9 million rounds for $500K to $1 million as protection against being abandoned. The junior partner who championed you at the big fund leaves, starts their own fund, or moves, and your mandate goes with them. Nobody is left to argue for turning over another card, and the partnership goes back to its real winners. Frankel hates thinking of Founder Collective that way, and says the last 20 deals looked exactly like it.
5. Fewer Entrepreneurs. There are more founders than ever and fewer entrepreneurs. YC professionalized company founding into a norm for people leaving certain colleges, and Frankel thinks many of them lack the fortitude for the learning curve that follows. He watches the trajectories of CEO and CTO split: a good co-founding CTO stays useful in different roles up to 50 people, while the CEO has to learn to manage and to put bums on seats. Mikey Shulman told him 30% to 40% of his time at Suno is recruiting, and Jeff Bezos told a lunch table decades ago that it was 50% of his.
6. CEO-CTO Alchemy. Frankel wants the CTO to be a magician and the CEO to be a good salesperson. In 18 years he has seen that alchemy 4 or 5 times, and it comes from the interplay between 2 specific people rather than from either resume. He prefers co-founders who are different from each other, aligned on direction, and confident in each other's competence. He has said no more often than yes when the second founder looked weak, and he regrets some of those.
7. Ownership Cost Hundreds Of Millions. Founder Collective passed on ElevenLabs, Granola, StarCloud and Fractile purely because the ownership would have been 1% to 2%. Frankel calls it hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars of lost returns, and it is the mistake he names first. He has never turned a founder down over percentage when he was all in: with Shulman he took the dilution the founder was willing to give, wrote every cent of the first round, and showed the deal to other people. His rule now is that when you meet the right people, you get what you get.
8. I Love It Because. Every Founder Collective team meeting starts with someone completing the sentence "I love it because." If you can't finish it, you can't invest. Valuation comes last in the sequence, after opportunity, market and founders, and Frankel says the price is rarely comfortable. The endings that work sound like insight into a vertical, or an edge nobody else can match in a commoditized business.
9. Vertical Nepo Babies. Frankel is writing a piece on why he loves funding nepo babies, and his definition is founders who grew up inside a vertical. TJ Parker was working in his father's pharmacy at 14, years before PillPack. Evan at Rebar worked for his uncle's HVAC company, one of 10 rolled up by private equity, was told to go find the AI for blueprint quoting, found none existed, and started the company. Over 100,000 US mechanical engineers make at least $100K a year doing that quoting by hand.
10. The Theme Before The Theme. Founder Collective's second fund reads as an applied AI fund today, and applied AI was not a theme when those checks were written. Shield AI was already called Shield AI in 2016. Drones, video cameras and the rest of that hardware are commoditized now, some of it down to $20, and the value came from putting AI around commoditized platforms. Frankel's job is to be in the next theme 5 or 10 years early, and he points out those companies are never the expensive ones.
11. The Last 5%. The SaaS apocalypse is overdone for embedded software and real for everything else. Frankel's test is what runs inside your system: billions of orders in real time, or mission-critical biotech research. Veeva and Olo are much harder to rip out than a horizontal tool a customer can rebuild in Claude over a weekend, which is why he thinks the market threw the baby out with the bathwater. The contrarian trade he does not run would be buying a basket of top SaaS stocks that have lost most of their market cap.
12. Disruption Comes From China. OpenAI and Anthropic will be disrupted, and Frankel thinks there is an excellent chance it comes from China. He is watching the strength of the Chinese open models and notes those labs have not had time to establish incumbency before being taken down. Underneath that, he expects photonic computing to come for Nvidia, because every connectivity piece in a data center that can be fiber already is, and the chip is the last piece that isn't. His broader worry is that the US has cut DARPA and university R&D, which is the money that produced all of this in the first place.
2
363
























