Former avionics technician US Navy, commercial fisherman, casino dealer, computer programmer, Musicians Institute RAP graduate, Guitar player, rancher. β€οΈNLI
Gonzales, TX
Joined October 2022
- Tweets33.2K
- Following887
- Followers976
- Likes41.7K
The primary forces that are destroying society are as follows:
1. Eugenics. No, not the idea that the human gene pool should be improved. The hijacking of that idea by psychopaths and sociopaths, who use it as an excuse to destroy potential competitors. Everyone wants the gene pool improved, but proliferating the genes of psychopaths and sociopaths has not improved the world at all. If anything, consistent weeding out of those through warfare and such is the reason for the existence of civilization.
2. Malthusianism. It's a lie that the world is overpopulated. What this really means is that the population is too large for tyrants to control with violence, and/or they want to murder and sterilize people that they don't have a use for. That ties in perfectly with Eugenics.
3. The fiat currency Ponzi scheme. It's a caste system which disadvantages the public by advantaging those who are in control of the money supply. If you cannot "borrow" money created out of thin air at 0% interest then you are not in the upper caste. Too big to fail organizations clearly have preferential treatment through bailouts, quantitative easing, stock buybacks, etc.
I will even go so far as to say that these people who say that they want Eugenics, want the complete opposite. They don't want competitors, they want docile, obedient who are the minimum necessary intelligence to accomplish their assigned task. These people are not only noncompetitive, they are EXTREME anti-merit. They don't want to be better than you, they just want you to be less than them.
Hey everyone, apparently normal people who prop up the entire economy with their every day labor should not reproduce..
This right here is why there is no such thing as a "leftist" woman.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Palmer Luckey says analysts claiming it's too expensive to manufacture in the US are lying to protect megacorps
"I think I have a more realistic view than almost anybody. One of the problems with all these analysts that are telling you that it's going to cost $37,000 to build an American iPhone or $100,000 to buy an American computer."
"They're trying to prop up a status quo that the megacorporations want to keep going. They want to outsource everything. They want to hire cheaper non-American labor."
"They are willing to say and do anything to convince you that it can't be fixed, that it can't come back, that America is this helpless, neutered, post-relevant empire, and it is just not the case."
"How do I know that? Because I have to make stuff in America every day because I work in the defense industry. The stuff that Anduril makes every day is not actually that different from a computer. My drones are basically computers. They have memory, a GPU, a CPU, sensors, batteries, a rugged integration."
"The only difference between an Anduril attack drone and a laptop is a keyboard and a screen. That is not that hard to figure out, especially for a guy like me who started Oculus and comes from the consumer electronics space."
"We're not going to let people lie about what America can and can't do anymore. We're just going to do it."
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Translation: The US is preparing to engage in Masonic war theatre with other countries who are apart of the same club in an effort to destroy the current systems of today and bring in a βnew,β more-draconian, inherently digital system
How many of you who are in the military actually think you work for βthe peopleβ and for βnational defenseβ?
New logical fallacy pattern recognized:
I'll call it a "totality" fallacy. My former Bulwark fallacy is a subset of this one.
Examples:
*If you were to protest a specific *use* of technology, and then someone says you are antitechnology or a "luddite", that's a totality fallacy
*If you were to protest a specific vaccine, and then someone claims you are against ALL vaccines or "antivax", that's a totality fallacy
Bulwark fallacies are kind of a subset of this one.
I see this pattern all the time. Its use is to frame someone as being unreasonable, or illogical.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Shoot him? That's a bit extreme of a punishment for vandalism.
You do know that our George Orwell 1984 permawars are because we had our banking system hijacked by the Rothschild London bankers of the former British empire right? You do understand why the American revolution happened to begin with that established the country? You do realize that to start many of these wars, the government committed false flag treason against our families, citizens, and military members?
I like you, but you're being dumb right now.
youtu.be/9Zl4NpPLV3I
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Except when I publish an entire book on this they put me on a DHS terrorist watch list.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Government claims the AI race, is an arms race. I agree.
Because as an arm, we the people have the right to keep & bear it, a right that shall not be infringed.
Government seeking to centralize, control, and have the monopoly on AI and compute is therefore a 2A violation.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon explains why socialism is gaining popularity among young Americans and Democrats: βPeople see others getting unbelievably wealthy while theyβve been left behind. Shame on us.β πΊπΈ
βWe have truly left people behind. You have these slogans about how the rich caused all this stuff, which is not true. But there is some truth to the frustration.
If youβre the average citizen and you see these people getting unbelievably wealthy while your segment of society has been left behind, thatβs kind of annoying.
America has been doing much better over the decades, including for lower-income people. But relatively, theyβve been left behind.
Your school isnβt doing well. You donβt have jobs. A plant closes in your town. Those were real consequences.
Look at the towns that lost those plants. Unemployment went up. Suicide went up. Depression went up.
And we didnβt fix it. Shame on us.
But letβs figure out how we fix it going forward. Crying over spilled milk isnβt my nature.β
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Make infanticide popular
Use courts to destroy fathers
Make women insufferable
Print fake money to give women fake jobs
Freeze wealth with the old and rent seekers
Use pigs to enforce the destruction
Wait 50 years until female fertility is gone
Replace population w/ slaves
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Yes
Humans are a pack animal.
This may be hard to understand if you are evangelical and think the book of genesis is literal rather than allegorical, but humans are a pack animal.
What this means is that the human desire for the acceptance and support of a tribe is as fundamental as the desire for food, for air, for water, for sex, for sunlight, for love.
If you tell young men that they cannot have a tribe, they're not going to accept that.
Ever.
Especially if you tell that only to the young men of one tribe in particular. They're going to wonder why everybody gets to have a tribe and they don't.
And they're eventually going to decide that you are the enemy.
Because you are. Anyone who stands between young men and what they need for a healthy, fulfilled life is their enemy.
That includes you.
And if you manage to convince them that god doesn't want them to have a tribe, it will also include god.
The more you push back against their healthy and natural desire for a tribe, a homeland, and a birthright, the more they will hate you, and the more exclusive their definition of that tribe will become.
There is no way you can stop this. The only thing you can control is how far they have to go, how radical they have to become, in order to get it.
Because this can go all the way from enforcing immigration law, and shutting down corrupt visa programs right now, to gangs of young White men in balaclavas with Ar15s going door to door ten years from now.
We have to do something about the 14th amendment. I don't care if that makes you uncomfortable or unhappy. It's not a choice. The constitution exists to serve Americans, not the other way around. If that sentence confuses you, read the first paragraph of the constitution.
If we do not, young men of the future, the same little boys who are being radicalized right now by your malicious indifference, will treat a piece of paper that says they cannot have a homeland the way they would treat a piece of paper that says that can't eat food, or a piece of paper that says they can't own a home, or have a wife and children.
You may think that you offer them a tribe in the form of the universal kingdom of god, the community of all believers, but that's just a word game and you know it, which is why you are so defensive about the whole thing.
Where was the universal community of believers when these young men needed help? When they needed not just the surface appearance of a tribe, but someone to do the things that tribes actually do for younger generations they care about?
The pack serves a concrete set of functions in the life cycle of the human species, and you cannot perform those functions with a cardboard cutout.
Young men are sick of religion that offers them responsibilities with no rights, lectures with no help, demands with no love or empathy.
It's odd, in a way ironic, that, I, the man of zero faith, should have to be the one standing here telling self-styled religious leaders how they failed both their people and their god.
But having no faith does give me one advantage. It frees me from the delusion that Jesus is a puppet that I can pull out of my pocket, slip over my right hand, move his mouth and make him say what I want.
I used to wonder, as a child, what the phrase "taking the name of the lord in vain" actually meant.
But I no longer wonder, because when I became a man, I looked around me and saw all these people who talk to god and somehow get told exactly what they want to hear.
Then I understood that the key phrase here wasn't "in vain". It was "taking". Taking the name of god and using it as a tool for one's own goals.
Joel, here, is sad that his friend is getting sent home. This personally inconveniences both him and his friend, which effects Joel in a way that young men being denied their birthright does not.
So he finds an interpretation of scripture that says that god wants him, Joel Berry, to get his way, and that god wants all the young men who want a homeland and a birthright to go get fucked.
I'm not terribly impressed.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Perfectly stated,
And, he has a British accentβ¦
Unlike my American accent
This means take him more seriously
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
A 90 day power grid collapse would wipe out 75 million Americans. 22% of the population.
FORTRESS: The Pentagon is preparing every major U.S. military base to survive 90 days without outside support β no civilian power grid, no global supply chains, no outside fuel or water.
The initiative, revealed in documents reviewed by Fox News Digital, envisions portable nuclear reactors, massive battery storage, and microgrids that can disconnect installations from civilian electricity entirely. Strategic reserves of munitions, fuel, critical minerals, and medical supplies would be stockpiled based on wartime consumption rates. Civilian factories are being pre-identified to shift to defense production during a crisis.
Pentagon chief spokesperson Sean Parnell put it bluntly: "Power is combat now. Without electricity, you lose communications, water, logistics, assembly lines and just basic military command structures."
Full story here foxnews.com/politics/inside-β¦
The state in its current form, in tandem with the central bank, is the final boss of slavery. Even the worldβs wealthiest man is being slated for shackles and chains.
Sick of these attacks on the empathy of people of European descent.. and Americans are not responsible for the survival of the ENTIRE rest of the world.
At some point, peoples have to take responsibility for their OWN successes and failures.
Zero guilt. Not my fault, not my problem. If it were my problem, I would fix it for myself. No doubt my people would help me as well.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
This is how to get a Communist proletarian revolution going in the West:
1. Create a proletarian class by making people dependent on government welfare and importing unlimited Third-World poor.
2. Bankrupt the welfare state to create the crisis.
3. Mobilize the disenfranchised by funding and organizing the movement.
4. Overthrow the government and existing social order.
5. Bring a Communist βutopiaβ to earth, where a new ruling class emerges while everyone else is equally poor and unfree.
The new ruling class is the Globalist elites!
π«π· France's protests are turning into something MUCH BIGGER than a weekend of unrest.
Huge crowds are flooding the streets over soaring living costs and concerns about democracy.
In Paris alone, police counted 110,000 demonstrators.
And the movement isn't winding down.
Protest organizers are already building toward a nationwide GENERAL STRIKE on November 5.
What started as street protests is becoming a sustained challenge to the French government.
Writer: Oliver
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Correct.
Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be.
Starshield, a different system, is controlled by the US government. What they decide to do is up to them.
Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week.
Starlink remains critical to the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only system that cannot be jammed or blown up, at least for now. Were Starlink to be turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately. This is NOT a threat, it is simply a statement of fact.
Starlink was also crucial to preventing Russia from overrunning Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other means of communication were destroyed or jammed by Russia.
SpaceX has done more to defend Ukraine than any private company on Earth BY FAR.
That said, I have nothing but UTTER CONTEMPT for the virtue-signaling evil warmongers who push for endless slaughter and offer no realistic solution to the conflict. May you burn in hell.
End of story.
Rock is so naive, it's scary. It's also terrifying how many people are blissfully unaware that Malthusians are making war against them all day every day in efforts to reduce the world population. Trying to get people to abort babies. Trying to get teens to spay/neuter themselves, or commit suicide. Malthusians CAUSE starvation and misery as an excuse to prevent starvation, but Malthus was WRONG. The coming famine and scarcity are the result of warfare intervention into markets, and the financial system intentionally cutting off energy supply to most people, while government prevents people on purpose from generating their OWN energy.
You've correctly identified a problem with politically connected elites privatizing profits while socializing losses.
That's cronyism, not capitalism. Capitalism requires that those who enjoy the profits also bear the losses, without forcing taxpayers to rescue them.
But you've gone from a legitimate criticism of political favoritism to an extraordinary conspiracy about billionaires plotting mass depopulation.
You don't need an imaginary global extermination plot to explain corruption, greed, and government favoritism.
And the solution certainly isn't handing even more economic power to the political institutions enabling that favoritism.
You had a legitimate grievance. You buried it under a conspiracy theory.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
He just described every war of the modern era.