Palmer Luckey says analysts claiming it's too expensive to manufacture in the US are lying to protect megacorps
"I think I have a more realistic view than almost anybody. One of the problems with all these analysts that are telling you that it's going to cost $37,000 to build an American iPhone or $100,000 to buy an American computer."
"They're trying to prop up a status quo that the megacorporations want to keep going. They want to outsource everything. They want to hire cheaper non-American labor."
"They are willing to say and do anything to convince you that it can't be fixed, that it can't come back, that America is this helpless, neutered, post-relevant empire, and it is just not the case."
"How do I know that? Because I have to make stuff in America every day because I work in the defense industry. The stuff that Anduril makes every day is not actually that different from a computer. My drones are basically computers. They have memory, a GPU, a CPU, sensors, batteries, a rugged integration."
"The only difference between an Anduril attack drone and a laptop is a keyboard and a screen. That is not that hard to figure out, especially for a guy like me who started Oculus and comes from the consumer electronics space."
"We're not going to let people lie about what America can and can't do anymore. We're just going to do it."
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Translation: The US is preparing to engage in Masonic war theatre with other countries who are apart of the same club in an effort to destroy the current systems of today and bring in a βnew,β more-draconian, inherently digital system
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Replying to @AngryCops
Shoot him? That's a bit extreme of a punishment for vandalism.
You do know that our George Orwell 1984 permawars are because we had our banking system hijacked by the Rothschild London bankers of the former British empire right? You do understand why the American revolution happened to begin with that established the country? You do realize that to start many of these wars, the government committed false flag treason against our families, citizens, and military members?
I like you, but you're being dumb right now.
youtu.be/9Zl4NpPLV3I
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Government claims the AI race, is an arms race. I agree.
Because as an arm, we the people have the right to keep & bear it, a right that shall not be infringed.
Government seeking to centralize, control, and have the monopoly on AI and compute is therefore a 2A violation.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon explains why socialism is gaining popularity among young Americans and Democrats: βPeople see others getting unbelievably wealthy while theyβve been left behind. Shame on us.β πΊπΈ
βWe have truly left people behind. You have these slogans about how the rich caused all this stuff, which is not true. But there is some truth to the frustration.
If youβre the average citizen and you see these people getting unbelievably wealthy while your segment of society has been left behind, thatβs kind of annoying.
America has been doing much better over the decades, including for lower-income people. But relatively, theyβve been left behind.
Your school isnβt doing well. You donβt have jobs. A plant closes in your town. Those were real consequences.
Look at the towns that lost those plants. Unemployment went up. Suicide went up. Depression went up.
And we didnβt fix it. Shame on us.
But letβs figure out how we fix it going forward. Crying over spilled milk isnβt my nature.β
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Make infanticide popular
Use courts to destroy fathers
Make women insufferable
Print fake money to give women fake jobs
Freeze wealth with the old and rent seekers
Use pigs to enforce the destruction
Wait 50 years until female fertility is gone
Replace population w/ slaves
Yes
Humans are a pack animal.
This may be hard to understand if you are evangelical and think the book of genesis is literal rather than allegorical, but humans are a pack animal.
What this means is that the human desire for the acceptance and support of a tribe is as fundamental as the desire for food, for air, for water, for sex, for sunlight, for love.
If you tell young men that they cannot have a tribe, they're not going to accept that.
Ever.
Especially if you tell that only to the young men of one tribe in particular. They're going to wonder why everybody gets to have a tribe and they don't.
And they're eventually going to decide that you are the enemy.
Because you are. Anyone who stands between young men and what they need for a healthy, fulfilled life is their enemy.
That includes you.
And if you manage to convince them that god doesn't want them to have a tribe, it will also include god.
The more you push back against their healthy and natural desire for a tribe, a homeland, and a birthright, the more they will hate you, and the more exclusive their definition of that tribe will become.
There is no way you can stop this. The only thing you can control is how far they have to go, how radical they have to become, in order to get it.
Because this can go all the way from enforcing immigration law, and shutting down corrupt visa programs right now, to gangs of young White men in balaclavas with Ar15s going door to door ten years from now.
We have to do something about the 14th amendment. I don't care if that makes you uncomfortable or unhappy. It's not a choice. The constitution exists to serve Americans, not the other way around. If that sentence confuses you, read the first paragraph of the constitution.
If we do not, young men of the future, the same little boys who are being radicalized right now by your malicious indifference, will treat a piece of paper that says they cannot have a homeland the way they would treat a piece of paper that says that can't eat food, or a piece of paper that says they can't own a home, or have a wife and children.
You may think that you offer them a tribe in the form of the universal kingdom of god, the community of all believers, but that's just a word game and you know it, which is why you are so defensive about the whole thing.
Where was the universal community of believers when these young men needed help? When they needed not just the surface appearance of a tribe, but someone to do the things that tribes actually do for younger generations they care about?
The pack serves a concrete set of functions in the life cycle of the human species, and you cannot perform those functions with a cardboard cutout.
Young men are sick of religion that offers them responsibilities with no rights, lectures with no help, demands with no love or empathy.
It's odd, in a way ironic, that, I, the man of zero faith, should have to be the one standing here telling self-styled religious leaders how they failed both their people and their god.
But having no faith does give me one advantage. It frees me from the delusion that Jesus is a puppet that I can pull out of my pocket, slip over my right hand, move his mouth and make him say what I want.
I used to wonder, as a child, what the phrase "taking the name of the lord in vain" actually meant.
But I no longer wonder, because when I became a man, I looked around me and saw all these people who talk to god and somehow get told exactly what they want to hear.
Then I understood that the key phrase here wasn't "in vain". It was "taking". Taking the name of god and using it as a tool for one's own goals.
Joel, here, is sad that his friend is getting sent home. This personally inconveniences both him and his friend, which effects Joel in a way that young men being denied their birthright does not.
So he finds an interpretation of scripture that says that god wants him, Joel Berry, to get his way, and that god wants all the young men who want a homeland and a birthright to go get fucked.
I'm not terribly impressed.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Perfectly stated,
And, he has a British accentβ¦
Unlike my American accent
This means take him more seriously
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
A 90 day power grid collapse would wipe out 75 million Americans. 22% of the population.
FORTRESS: The Pentagon is preparing every major U.S. military base to survive 90 days without outside support β no civilian power grid, no global supply chains, no outside fuel or water.
The initiative, revealed in documents reviewed by Fox News Digital, envisions portable nuclear reactors, massive battery storage, and microgrids that can disconnect installations from civilian electricity entirely. Strategic reserves of munitions, fuel, critical minerals, and medical supplies would be stockpiled based on wartime consumption rates. Civilian factories are being pre-identified to shift to defense production during a crisis.
Pentagon chief spokesperson Sean Parnell put it bluntly: "Power is combat now. Without electricity, you lose communications, water, logistics, assembly lines and just basic military command structures."
Full story here foxnews.com/politics/inside-β¦
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
This is how to get a Communist proletarian revolution going in the West:
1. Create a proletarian class by making people dependent on government welfare and importing unlimited Third-World poor.
2. Bankrupt the welfare state to create the crisis.
3. Mobilize the disenfranchised by funding and organizing the movement.
4. Overthrow the government and existing social order.
5. Bring a Communist βutopiaβ to earth, where a new ruling class emerges while everyone else is equally poor and unfree.
The new ruling class is the Globalist elites!
π«π· France's protests are turning into something MUCH BIGGER than a weekend of unrest.
Huge crowds are flooding the streets over soaring living costs and concerns about democracy.
In Paris alone, police counted 110,000 demonstrators.
And the movement isn't winding down.
Protest organizers are already building toward a nationwide GENERAL STRIKE on November 5.
What started as street protests is becoming a sustained challenge to the French government.
Writer: Oliver
Correct.
Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be.
Starshield, a different system, is controlled by the US government. What they decide to do is up to them.
Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week.
Starlink remains critical to the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only system that cannot be jammed or blown up, at least for now. Were Starlink to be turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately. This is NOT a threat, it is simply a statement of fact.
Starlink was also crucial to preventing Russia from overrunning Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other means of communication were destroyed or jammed by Russia.
SpaceX has done more to defend Ukraine than any private company on Earth BY FAR.
That said, I have nothing but UTTER CONTEMPT for the virtue-signaling evil warmongers who push for endless slaughter and offer no realistic solution to the conflict. May you burn in hell.
End of story.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
He just described every war of the modern era.
Whatβs actually going on in Ukraine is that there is a massive incentive difference between the elites and the people.
The former have grown very rich off the hundreds of billions flowing to Ukraine, while the latterβs children are conscripted to die in trenches.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Replying to @pnwguerrilla
Simping is when men expect a transactional exchange of money/resources for sex.
Women who canβt be bought rightfully resent such men, and squeeze them for all they will give in exchange for nothing.
Women who can be bought are not worth simping for.
Itβs ironic, actually.
A good woman has no price tag and canβt be appraised: priceless.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
We work and toil and sweat and bleed for our money.
They steal it from us.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
A good definition of a slave is someone whose tax rate is 100%.
All the fruits of their labor, all of them, 100%, go to a tax authority, the slave master.
On the other side of that spectrum, someone with a 0% tax rate would be someone thatβs fully self-owned, someone thatβs fully sovereign. They keep all the fruits of their labor and they trade them freely with other self-owned people. Thatβs the opposite of a slave. You could call that a sovereign.
We donβt have many of those people in the world today. Theyβre mostly what we refer to as sovereign nations.
Most of us normal people just have some effective tax rate that we pay across all the activities in our life. Buying, investing, consuming, dying, everything gets taxed at every transaction in the modern world.
So if you do all that math and figure out your effective tax rate, letβs say itβs 30%, my argument would be that you now know what percentage of a slave you are. Youβre 30% slave and 70% sovereign, or free man.
Iβve said it this way in the past and it triggers a lot of people, but I think itβs hard to argue with.
Weβve come a long way. Today, something like slavery rubs all of our moral intuitions wrong, and most normal people would consider it abhorrent.
Slavery still exists, less so in the whips and chains of traditional chattel slavery and more so in the less visible version called taxation, inflation, and statism.
The Bitcoin mission and the Bitcoin thesis is all about creating a world with more sovereigns and ideally no slaves at all.
Ideally, we want to get to a world where inflation is at zero, the central bank has been eliminated, and the market for money, the biggest and most important market in the world, is free.
People are free to choose whatever money suits them best, interest rates are discovered freely in the marketplace, and slavery is finally reduced to 0% worldwide.
Thatβs what we call the big bright orange future.
Replying to @LogKa11
I can only hope western men get the message from Ukraine that your own government will also drag you naked from bed to die an ignominious death to a 17 dollar temu drone in a trench. Every single constitution is worthless if it permits the state murder you via conscription
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
If you've felt like the Western world has gone insane over the last decade, you're not wrong.
The madness has a name: Political Ponerology.
πΏππππ πΏπππππππ retweeted
Even if a man goes on to a white-collar career, I think it is beneficial for him to have experience building things with his hands and caring for living things, whether that means growing vegetables or other plants as a farmer, or looking after animals as a stockman or herder.
The same applies to hunting, fishing, and basic outdoor survival skills.
There are certain skills that, even if you never need to use them again, teach you something important about the reality of the world.
They keep you grounded. They prevent you from becoming so comfortable in your white-collar existence that you forget you are only able to do your job because millions of other men are doing blue-collar work.




























