Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
Imagine telling someone in 1850 that you’re opposed to machines replacing human labor because people need jobs.
They’d probably think you were insane.
People weren’t working 14-hour days in factories because they loved employment.
They were working because they had no alternative.
Yet here we are, nearly 200 years later, treating the preservation of human labor as some kind of moral obligation.
The objective was never to create jobs.
The objective was to create prosperity.
Somewhere along the way, we confused the two.
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
Making Jewish babies still remains one of the best strategies we’ve got for the future.
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
"AI makes mistakes."
So does your doctor.
So does your accountant.
So does the guy who did your plumbing.
The difference is AI gets better every three weeks.
Your doctor doesn't.
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
Fun Fact:
The former President of the Int'l Court of Justice said, "The ICJ did NOT claim or find that Israel committed a genocide.... They didn’t even find it plausible that genocide has taken place."
Translation, for the 'Useful Idiots':
➡️ ➡️ THERE WAS NO GENOCIDE‼️ ⬅️ ⬅️
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
In recent months, the idea has emerged that Gadi Eisenkot is a nice, well-meaning guy, but inexperienced and a little naïve.
Yet Eisenkot is neither nice nor naïve. He is the most Deep State politician currently in the game, and all the more dangerous because he has never had an original thought in his life.
As a young soldier in the spokespersons unit, he was technically my commanding officer at the rank of Major General. I had no personal interactions with him, but I saw him speaking in conventions and such. Already then I saw a man who is unable to articulate an idea beyond the talking points given to him. He was apparently a good combat soldier, but entirely uninspiring as an officer.
As IDF Chief of Staff, he did not deviate one iota from the ideas of his predecessors. In fact, the only reason he was chosen for the position was because he was a protégé of Gabi Ashkenazi - another general-turned-politician, but at least one with original ideas and a strong character.
After retiring from the army, he co-authored a study of Israel’s macro-strategy under the auspices of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (washingtoninstitute.org/medi…). As could be expected, it combined all the usual platitudes about Israel’s security doctrine, many of which failed and were rejected on October 7 and its aftermath.
Since becoming a politician, he has proven himself to be exactly what he has always been: a tool of advisors, a reader of talking points written by others. Many right wing Israelis point out that his English is terrible, no match for Netanyahu’s. But I am much more concerned about his native Hebrew, which is entirely unidiomatic and shows very average vocabulary. The only reason his linguistic and intellectual abilities are not the object of higher scrutiny in the Israeli press is because the left beliefs he could serve their purposes.
At the end of election day - in which he declared himself victor, for some reason - the first thing he did was to tell the chiefs of Israel’s security forces that they owe no allegiance to Netanyahu. In other words, he called for mutiny. And yet I doubt he fully understands the implications of his directive.
If he ever became premier, then, the country would be run by Obama- and Biden-affiliated officials and advisors. Israel would become a Middle Eastern branch of the US Democratic Party.
At least the other leaders of Israel’s opposition have some original opinions, even if I disagree with most of them. This guy? Nada.
NEW
Gadi Eisenkot, Benjamin Netanyahu's main rival and leader of the Yashar party, says a majority of Israelis — by more than half a million votes — voted against "the government of October 7 and draft-dodging," and that any Knesset member willing to sign on to his four principles is a potential partner in a new government.
He also warns that some are working to cast doubt on the results.
His principles:
— Recognize Israel as a Jewish, democratic, liberal and egalitarian state.
— Uphold the values of Israel's Declaration of Independence.
— Support mandatory military, national or civilian service for all Israeli citizens.
— Recognize Hamas as a terrorist organization and support destroying its military and governing power in Gaza.
Eisenkot also says he intends to use the parliamentary majority immediately to establish a state commission of inquiry into October 7, advance mandatory service for all Israelis and expand the number of people serving in the IDF, and repeal Netanyahu's judicial overhaul laws, which he calls "regime-coup laws."
On the war, he says it is not over and its goals have not been achieved — but until a new government is sworn in, he will back military operations only against direct, immediate threats to Israel that cannot wait.
He says a supreme effort must be made to avoid another election, that the decision on the next government belongs to Israeli citizens alone "without involvement and manipulation," and warns the coming weeks will be full of spin and lies.
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
Just a reminder, because a hell of a lot of people still seem to not understand this very simple fact…
The ICJ did NOT claim or find that Israel committed a genocide. They didn’t even find it plausible that genocide has taken place.
THERE IS NO GENOCIDE.
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
FACTS
The numerous travellers who documented their journeys to Palestine through the centuries somehow never came across the Palestinians . Here are just a few of those who travelled and wrote about the land and its peoples and all managed to miss the ‘indigenous Palestinians’.
Siebald Rieter 1426 – 1428 Maps to Jerusalem
Bernard von Breydenbach 1440 - 1497 Pilgrimage
Felix Fabri 1451 - 1502 Pilgrim and Preacher
Martin Kabatnik 1428 – 1503 From Jerusalem to Cairo
Arnold van Harff 1471 – 1505 The Pilgrimage
Father Michael NaudDied circa 1604 The Jerusalem Connection
Adrian Reland 1676 - 1718 Palastina Monumentis Illustrata
John Bowles 1701 - 1779 The Twelve Tribes Map
William Thackeray 1811 – 1863 From Jaffa to Jerusalem
Edward Robinson 1794 – 1863 Biblical Researches
Sir George Gawler 1795 - 1869 Syria And its Near Prospects
Alphonse de Lamartine 1790 – 1869 From Marseilles to Jerusalem
Sir George Adam Smith 1856 – 1942 Jerusalem
The above are just a small example of those who recorded their travels through the geographical area throughout the centuries who all seemed to have missed the existence of the Palestinians. Perhaps they were subject to Zionist or Jewish threats. Other itinerant scribes who similarly missed the Palestinians were
Gunnar Edward Webbe, 1590;
the British archaeologist Thomas Shaw, 1750;
Count Constantine Francois Volney,
18th century French author and historian and the author Mark Twain in The Innocents Abroad 1867. The absence of the Palestinians and the presence of Jews is the common theme within all these journals.
So am I correct in my belief that just like silicone breast implants an invention of the 1960’s and totally artificial , the Palestinians were a similar invention……
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
Quick super important reminder:
All the crap you see happening around the world - protests in France, other European countries, now Indonesia, other places, it's all noise.
None of this matters in the grand scheme of things. Even short term.
The only thing that really matters is AI progress. The fact that we know there is no moat, that more compute = bigger breakthroughs in mathematics and physics, and soon in biology, medicine, materials science, engineering, and anti aging progress.
The trend is crystal clear. This isn't some science fiction prediction anymore. We're being presented with new data and evidence almost every hour.
Acceleration is real.
Doom and gloom grifter media are doing their job, manipulating you into believing everything is getting worse.
In reality, these are the best times in human history. Nothing else even comes close.
100s of years of scientific and technological progress in a single year may actually become possible (thanks to AI)
The concept of a country of geniuses in a data center is already becoming a reality. Soon, we'll have 10x more compute, more AI geniuses, more discoveries, and even faster progress.
And this is just the beginning.
***Ignore the noise. Focus on the acceleration.****
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
Somehow, Ben Gvir taking cupcakes and Snickers bars away from Hamas prisoners is treated as more extreme than calls to wipe Israel off the map "from the river to the sea." That's what happens when people let a media obsessed with clicks do their thinking for them.
One of the ways that you can judge the downstream effects of a decision is to explore boundary conditions. Let us suppose that the entire US government were populated with the likes of @Ilhan, @RashidaTlaib, and @AbdulElSayed. Would this be an existential threat to the US or is it Islamophobic to ask this question, @JessicaTarlov? Cultures, societies, religions, and civilizations are not interchangeable and indistinguishable entities. American Exceptionalism is rooted in an utter rejection of the fundamental principles that animate Islam. Wake up and recognize this or your grandchildren will hate you.
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
My dear American friends, in my last post I showed you a number that should terrify you: 70% of Millennials say they're pro-socialist. Today I want to show you why. Not with emotion. With pure logic. Step by step, A plus B, until the conclusion is impossible to escape.
Adults, this one is for you. Read it, then explain it to the young people in your life.
Start with Peter Thiel. Years ago he summed up our era in one line: we wanted flying cars, instead we got 140 characters. His thesis is that since the early 1970s, the world of bits has kept racing forward while the world of atoms has stalled. Computers, phones, software, the internet: incredible progress. Housing, energy, transportation, medicine, education: stuck. We build almost nothing physical faster or cheaper than our grandparents did.
Why would progress stop in some places and not others? Same country, same people, same capitalism. The only thing that differs is how much the state is involved.
Here is the proof.
Step one: look at prices. Since 2000, in America, the price of TVs has fallen by more than 90%. Software, phones, toys, clothing: cheaper and better every year. Over the same period, college tuition, hospital services, childcare and housing have more than doubled.
Step two: look at which is which. The goods getting cheaper are the ones where companies compete freely and the state mostly stays out. The goods exploding in price are the ones where the state regulates the most, subsidizes the most, or controls who is allowed to sell.
Step three: look at what young people complain about. They don't complain about TVs. They complain about rent, student debt and healthcare. Exactly the three sectors the state controls the most.
That's not a coincidence. That's a pattern. Let's go one by one.
Housing. In many American cities, most residential land is zoned for single-family homes only. Building an apartment building can take years of permits, hearings, environmental reviews and lawsuits from neighbors. When you make it nearly illegal to build, supply can't keep up, and prices go up. The young don't have a capitalism problem. They have a permission problem.
Education. Washington hands out loans without asking whether the degree is worth it, so universities raise prices because they can. The money doesn't go to better teaching. It goes to layers of administrators that have grown faster than the faculty. And the accreditation system makes it extremely hard for a new, cheaper school to compete. The incumbents are protected. The students pay.
Healthcare. In many states, if you want to open a new hospital or even buy a new MRI machine, you need a "certificate of need," permission from a board where your future competitors often have a say. The number of residency slots that train new doctors is effectively capped by Medicare funding. Getting a new drug approved costs billions. Every rule adds a layer. Every layer adds a cost. Every cost lands on the patient.
Energy. America built dozens of nuclear reactors in the 1970s. Since then, only a handful, years late and billions over budget. Not because physics changed. Because the rulebook did.
Now step four, the most important one. Who benefits from all these layers?
Not the young. Not the poor. The incumbents. The big hospital systems, the big universities, the big developers, the big pharma companies, the big unions. Every complex regulation is a wall that only the giants can afford to climb. So they lobby for more of it. They fund the politicians who write it. They hire the regulators when they leave office. That's not capitalism. That's cronyism. Capitalism is a newcomer allowed to compete. Cronyism is an incumbent paying the state to stop him.
Step five: so what do young people see? They see prices going up, a system rigged for insiders, and no way to build anything for themselves. Their anger is legitimate. Their diagnosis is wrong. They look at the result of the state's capture and call it capitalism.
Step six: and what cure are they offered? Socialism. Which means giving the state even more power over housing, education, healthcare, energy. Giving the keys of the house to the exact institution that locked them out of it.
Follow the logic to the end. If regulation creates cronyism, then total regulation creates total cronyism. If a little state control makes things expensive, total state control makes them scarce. That's not theory. The Soviet Union had a ruling class with its own shops, cars and dachas while ordinary people stood in line for bread. Stalin's collectivization caused a famine that killed millions in Ukraine. Mao's Great Leap Forward caused a famine that killed tens of millions. Venezuela went from one of the richest countries in Latin America to a nation where millions fled. Every time the state got all the keys, the insiders ate and the people starved.
So here's the conclusion, and there's no escaping it:
Where entrepreneurs are free to compete, prices fall and life gets better. Where the state controls, prices rise and insiders get rich. Young people are suffering in the sectors the state controls. Socialism means handing the state everything. So socialism gives you more of the very thing that's hurting you.
The enemy is not capitalism. The enemy is a state captured by insiders, blocking the builders who would solve your problems.
Adults, this is your job now. Don't tell the young they're stupid. Don't tell them their anger is fake. Tell them they're right to be angry, and show them where to aim it. Ask them: what got cheaper in your lifetime, and what got more expensive? Who controls each one? Let them do the math themselves.
The real counter-revolution isn't against the young. It's with them. Free the builders. Let people build homes, open schools, open clinics, build reactors. Give the next generation a stake in the system, and they'll defend it with their lives.
I come from your future. We gave the state the keys. Don't make the same mistake.
My dear American friends, I've shown you where the disease came from and who sells it. Now I want you to look at this email.
January 5, 2020, 2:44 in the morning. Peter Thiel writes to Mark Zuckerberg, Nick Clegg, Sheryl Sandberg and Marc Andreessen. It became public years later, in a lawsuit between the state of Tennessee and Meta. The subject line is one word: Millennials.
Thiel starts from a number: 70% of Millennials say they are pro-socialist.
Read that again. Seven out of ten young adults in the richest, freest, most innovative country in human history say they want the system that ruined every country that tried it.
And Thiel, one of the sharpest minds in Silicon Valley, says something important. Don't just dismiss them as stupid or brainwashed. Understand why. His answer: when you're crushed by student debt and housing is unaffordable, you have no capital and no way to build any. And if you have no stake in capitalism, you turn against it.
He's right. But follow the thread one step further, because that's where it gets interesting.
Who made college unaffordable? Washington flooded universities with easy federal loans, and universities raised their prices year after year, because they could. The same universities that then taught those students, for four years, that capitalism is the problem.
Who made housing unaffordable? Zoning rules, permits, environmental reviews, endless regulation that makes it nearly illegal to build. Remember Piketty's famous rise of capital? It was mostly housing. Scarcity created by the state.
So here's the full picture. The state creates the scarcity. The universities teach that capitalism caused it. The politicians sell socialism as the cure. The arsonist is selling fire insurance.
That's why 70% is not a natural opinion. No generation wakes up one morning wanting central planning. It takes decades of teaching, a captured culture, and an economy rigged to give young people no stake in it. In a healthy country, that number would trigger a serious public investigation into what American universities have been teaching for fifty years. This is not a debate. It's the result of a long, patient operation, exactly the war of position Gramsci described from his prison cell.
Now let me tell you what history says happens when an ideology captures a generation and turns it against everything that came before.
China, 1966. Mao unleashes the Cultural Revolution and hands it to the youth. Students become Red Guards. Their mission: destroy the "Four Olds," old customs, old culture, old habits, old ideas. Temples, books, art, centuries of history, smashed.
In August 1966, at a girls' school in Beijing, students beat their vice principal, Bian Zhongyun, to death. She was one of the first. Teachers across the country were humiliated, tortured, killed by the children they had taught.
In 1970, a 16-year-old boy named Zhang Hongbing denounced his own mother for criticizing Mao. She was executed. He spent the rest of his life trying to apologize for it.
Children were taught that loyalty to the Party came before loyalty to their parents. Historians estimate the Cultural Revolution killed somewhere between hundreds of thousands and millions of people.
The Soviet Union did it first. It turned a boy named Pavlik Morozov into a national hero for denouncing his father. Generations of Soviet children were raised on his story.
Cambodia, 1975. The Khmer Rouge declare Year Zero. Teenagers with rifles empty the cities. Wearing glasses was enough to mark you as an intellectual. In four years, roughly a quarter of the population was dead.
Every time, the same pattern. Take the young. Teach them that the past is guilty. Teach them that their parents, their teachers, their history are the enemy. Then give them power.
So when you see statues pulled down, words banned, books rewritten, and parents treated as obstacles in their own children's schools, understand what you're looking at. It's not the end of the story. It's the opening act. It always starts with the young, and it always starts with good intentions.
If the West ever gets its Marxist youth revolution, it won't end in Scandinavia. It will end the way it has ended every single time it was tried for real. And we will have learned nothing.
Thiel saw the number. I'm telling you where it leads.
The answer is not to hate the young. It's to give them back a stake in the system. Let them build. Let them buy a home. Make college worth its price or skip it. Let them start companies instead of drowning in debt. A generation that owns something defends it. A generation that owns nothing will burn it down.
I come from your future. Don't let your children write the next chapter of this story.
How Many Times Was A Palestinian State Offered? youtube.com/shorts/7MxFxeSiN… via @YouTube
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
X is flooded with love for Israel and the Jewish people from all around the world right now, and I’m here for it. God bless every single one of you. We see you, and we are grateful. Israel does not stand alone.
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
This is what apartheid looks like.
Every single Arab Muslim living inside Israel will be able to exercise their right to vote and just 16 days from now.
Not a single Arab Muslim living under the Palestinian authority or Gaza will have a right to vote any time in the future because Mahmoud Abbas and Hamas are denying them that right.
Where is the international outrage???
Why have Democrats not implemented socialized medicine in California?
They have the governor's office. They have a supermajority in the House and a supermajority in the Senate.
Nobody is stopping them.
They studied it, they examined it, and they discovered that it would destroy the economy, cause billions of dollars of economic damage, and cause small businesses to flee the state.
Even the wild-eyed socialists in California said they couldn't afford it.
Daniel J Morris 🇮🇱 retweeted
Am 07. Oktober starb meine Sympathie für die Palästinenser. Nach dem unvorstellbaren barbarischen Akt gegen Frauen, Männer, Kinder und Babys haben sie für immer jegliches Anrecht auf mein Mitgefühl verloren. Wer Abschlachten, Vergewaltigen und Entführen feiert und tanzt, hat seine Maske endgültig fallen gelassen.
Nie wieder ist jetzt. #NeverForget #7Okt





















