Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde) header
Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde) profile picture

Content Writer | Olympic Sports Reporter - London 2012 & Rio 2016 | Tokyo 2020 | Beijing 2022 | Paris 2024 | Milano Cortina 2026 - @olympics

South Africa
Joined May 2009
Photo by Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde)Photo by Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde)Photo by Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde)Photo by Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde)Photo by Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde)Photo by Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde)Photo by Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde)Photo by Ockert de Villiers (@ockertde)
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
AI psychosis is getting worse
304
848
177
5,246
458,952
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
Guillermo del Toro declares “f*ck AI” while accepting a #GothamAward for “Frankenstein”: “I’d like to tell the rest of our extraordinary cast and our crew that the artistry of all of them shines on every single frame of this film that was willfully made by humans, for humans. The designers, builders, make-up, wardrobe team, cinematographers, composers, editors, this tribute belongs to all of them. I would like to extend our gratitude and say: Fuck AI.” variety.com/2025/film/news/g…
56
516
42
3,791
200,539
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
“This film was wilfully made for humans, by humans… F*** AI.” — Guillermo del Toro while accepting the Vanguard Tribute Award for ‘Frankenstein’ at the Gotham Awards.
210
12,921
652
107,780
1,394,134
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
🚨 Sudan: We're working in Tawila, 60 km from El Fasher, where people are fleeing horrific violence. On 28 October, 100% of children under 5 who we saw at our health post were malnourished. Our teams are hearing terrifying stories, like that of 3 siblings who arrived alone after losing their family.
20
386
21
563
40,496
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
Oxford researchers just confirmed what we feared: The internet as we knew it is dying. AI content went from ~5% in 2020 to 48% by May 2025. Projections say 90%+ by next year. Why? AI articles cost <$0.01. Human writers cost $10-100. But the real crisis is model collapse. When AI trains on AI-generated content, quality degrades like photocopying a photocopy. Rare ideas disappear. Everything converges to generic sameness. It's recursive. Today's AI slop becomes tomorrow's training data, producing worse output, which becomes training data again.
684
2,716
735
11,662
1,515,007
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
You may remember an article in a South African newspaper [I don't remember which one, but they did interview me then] a few months back reporting that my books and those of Nadine Gordimer were used to train ChatGPT without our permission. Some of you who are bo-tsebanyane (know-it-all) sneered when I posted that we were going to sue for compensation. Well, we did sue and there was a case - what they call class-action in the USA - called Bartz v. Anthropic which we [fellow writers whose books were used without our permission] won. I received an email from my agents in London which partly reads: "There was a major copyright lawsuit in the US brought by authors against AI company Anthropic for using books without permission to train large language models. A settlement agreement was preliminarily approved in September 2025. The settlement would see authors whose US publications have been used by the company to train AI-models receive a share of $1.5bn." Whereas the newspaper article had only mentioned Ways of Dying, it turns out that six of my novels were used to train AI and I was none the wiser: The Heart of Redness, The Madonna of Excelsior, The Whale Caller, She Plays with the Darkness, Sometimes there is a Void. Don't be deceived by the billions. They are not all coming to me. They are shared by many writers in the USA. But at least, however little, I will be compensated for each of the books that were used. Damn! I didn't know of my contribution in the development of AI. But the only reason I am telling you this story is to ask the question: what about our South African writers? You can't tell me that these AI developers only used books published in the USA. Does South African law allow South African-based writers to fight for their intellectual property rights in South African courts? Or does the so-called "fair use" doctrine leave them out in the cold from enjoying the fruits of their labour? Find out from those who know.
91
879
46
2,216
123,611
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal. If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist. If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian. If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
15,615
137,261
8,038
605,124
26,918,467
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
As slop floods the Internet and as humans start relying on generative AI more and more, it's inevitable that future models will be mostly trained on slop (except for verifiable reasoning tasks where the training will be done in sims). Culture will turn into slop remixed from slop remixed from slop
208
149
58
1,266
116,434
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
𝐰𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝘯𝘰𝘶𝘯 “an adult female human being” — source: THE UK SUPREME COURT
163
1,249
96
9,715
405,991
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
The elections results are in! Kirsty Coventry (@KirstyCoventry) elected IOC President, the first female President in IOC history.
481
1,522
565
4,554
938,088
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
Animal lessons with @TonyJohnstone56 🇿🇦 #DunhillChamps
4
14
87
20,883
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
UNBELIEVABLE SCENES 🙌 South Africa produce a spectacular chase to stun Australia in Dubai 🔥 SCORECARD: es.pn/T20WC24-Semi1 | #T20WorldCup
29
83
16
835
21,023
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐊-𝐓𝐎-𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐊 𝐅𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐒 🗣️ 🗣️ South Africa beat Australia for the first time in a #T20WorldCup to book their ticket to the final 😤🇿🇦 #HereForHer
165
1,535
266
5,285
224,180
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
We believe the key points are these. One must recognize why female sport exists, and that it fails to achieve its purposes (inclusion, fairness & safety for women) unless male development is excluded. Legal/passport sex cannot do this.
2
39
2
248
11,534
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
The IOC asked for solutions. Here is a paper with a brief description of ours. But it starts by recognizing the purpose of women's sport, and then that it needs protected boundaries that exclude male advantage. Screening then achieves fairness & safety: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
25
285
25
1,063
64,640
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
Our cohort of Masters in Journalism and Media studies graduated today! Ockert De Villiers, supervised by Gillian Jones Rajiv Kamal, supervised by Shaun De Waal Quadsiya Karrim, supervised by Alan Finlay
2
2
1
7
817
Tatjana Smith just swam a 2:19.92 in the heats of the 200m breaststroke at the SA champs. That's fast!
1
1
5
401
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
You’ve asked me several questions on this thread and accused me of avoiding answering, so here goes. I believe a woman is a human being who belongs to the sex class that produces large gametes. It’s irrelevant whether or not her gametes have ever been fertilised, whether or not she’s carried a baby to term, irrelevant if she was born with a rare difference of sexual development that makes neither of the above possible, or if she’s aged beyond being able to produce viable eggs. She is a woman and just as much a woman as the others. I don’t believe a woman is more or less of a woman for having sex with men, women, both or not wanting sex at all. I don’t think a woman is more or less of a woman for having a buzz cut and liking suits and ties, or wearing stilettos and mini dresses, for being black, white or brown, for being six feet tall or a little person, for being kind or cruel, angry or sad, loud or retiring. She isn't more of a woman for featuring in Playboy or being a surrendered wife, nor less of a woman for designing space rockets or taking up boxing. What makes her a woman is the fact of being born in a body that, assuming nothing has gone wrong in her physical development (which, as stated above, still doesn't stop her being a woman), is geared towards producing eggs as opposed to sperm, towards bearing as opposed to begetting children, and irrespective of whether she's done either of those things, or ever wants to. Womanhood isn't a mystical state of being, nor is it measured by how well one apes sex stereotypes. We are not the creatures either porn or the Bible tell you we are. Femaleness is not, as trans woman Andrea Chu Long wrote, ‘an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank, blank eyes,’ nor are we God’s afterthought, sprung from Adam’s rib. Women are provably subject to certain experiences because of our female bodies, including different forms of oppression, depending on the cultures in which we live. When trans activists say 'I thought you didn't want to be defined by your biology,' it’s a feeble and transparent attempt at linguistic sleight of hand. Women don't want to be limited, exploited, punished, or subject to other unjust treatment because of their biology, but our being female is indeed defined by our biology. It's one material fact about us, like having freckles or disliking beetroot, neither of which are representative of our entire beings, either. Women have billions of different personalities and life stories, which have nothing to do with our bodies, although we are likely to have had experiences men don't and can't, because we belong to our sex class. Some people feel strongly that they should have been, or wish to be seen as, the sex class into which they weren't born. Gender dysphoria is a real and very painful condition and I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who suffers from it. I want them to be free to dress and present themselves however they like and I want them to have exactly the same rights as every other citizen regarding housing, employment and personal safety. I do not, however, believe that surgeries and cross-sex hormones literally turn a person into the opposite sex, nor do I believe in the idea that each of us has a nebulous ‘gender identity’ that may or might not match our sexed bodies. I believe the ideology that preaches those tenets has caused, and continues to cause, very real harm to vulnerable people. I am strongly against women's and girls' rights and protections being dismantled to accommodate trans-identified men, for the very simple reason that no study has ever demonstrated that trans-identified men don't have exactly the same pattern of criminality as other men, and because, however they identify, men retain their advantages of speed and strength. In other words, I think the safety and rights of girls and women are more important than those men's desire for validation. I sincerely hope that answers your questions. You may still disagree, but as I hope this shows, I’m more than happy to have this debate.
11,958
32,541
6,479
175,248
20,094,841
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
One thing we learnt very quickly at Toulon was that nothing was EVER Jonny’s fault 🤣🤣
Jonny ‘The Golden Child’ Wilkinson 🏆 is the guest on the show this week & we learnt even when he threw intercepts it wasn’t his fault 😂 Drew & Gits share a classic story from their time playing with him in Toulon. Full episode here - youtube.com/watch?v=CFV6ZB7Y… #TheKOKOShow
5
25
2
463
337,938
Ockert de Villiers retweeted
What are the actions that South Africa has taken to strengthen its measures to tackle #moneylaundering and #terroristfinancing? Read more in the latest follow-up report : fatf-gafi.org/content/fatf-g… @Treasury_RSA
1
16
26
3,047