pekac retweeted
two employees at nvidia talking about huang's affairs, each pretending they didn't also have an affair with him
pekac retweeted
The decline of civilization: the path to the used books is blocked by piles of remainders.
pekac retweeted
Vou antecipar:
Ele é quem fazia mais frente ao Dario e Sam pra travar politicas contra as IAs Open-Source que tanto Anthropic e OpenAI apoiam
Com ele fora do caminho, estamos a mercê de uma "era das trevas". Vamos ver um corporativismo nunca antes visto
Me cobrem em 5 anos
pekac retweeted
說句實在話:如果黃仁勳最後被政治風暴拉下台,那不是輝達的損失,而是美國國運到頭的訊號。
一個移民之子,從丹尼餐廳的一張桌子起家,三十年把一家顯卡公司做成整個 AI 時代的地基。
這種人是美國夢最好的廣告,也是美國在科技競賽裡最難被複製的資產。美國的對手不必研發出更好的晶片,只要看著美國自己把最會做晶片的人推下台就夠了。
一個國家強盛的時候,會把人才捧在手上;開始衰落的時候,才會把人才當成政治祭品。
pekac retweeted
Thrilled to announce that our @GoogleDeepMind team has cracked a major challenge in software engineering and cybersecurity: formally verifying a real-world implementation of the #Signal cryptographic protocol at the machine-code level. This proof was done using AlphaProof Code, our new AI framework for formal specification and verification.
* Paper: deepmind.google/documents/36…
* Lean code: github.com/google-deepmind/c…
* DeepMind blog post: deepmind.google/blog/introdu…
A huge shoutout to my amazing teammates: @tchajed,
@FerrousAndrew, Jonathan Katz, @pushmeet, @antonkovsharov, Karn Seth, Sam Schlesinger, @RandomlyWalking.
I started working on formal software verification 20+ years ago as a grad student. I was persuaded by Dijkstra and other computer science pioneers’ vision of programming backed up by mathematical theorems. At that time, we had to choose between automated code analysis algorithms that scaled but could only prove shallow properties, and deep manual verification that took decades of expert human work.
Thanks to progress in AI for mathematical reasoning, we don’t have to make that choice any more. Over four weeks in October 2026, AlphaProof Code agents generated more than 6 million lines of machine-checked Lean proof. We proved deep computational and symbolic security properties of the entire protocol core of Signal, all the way down to the ARM machine-code level.
This is just the first step, of course, because our goal is nothing short of verifying the world’s software infrastructure. Most cyberattacks, including the AI-powered ones recently in the news, happen because of preventable code bugs. I expect that agents for formal code analysis will eliminate these bugs one category at a time.
As our paper explains in more detail, this doesn’t at all mean humans are out of the picture! Proofs are now largely automated, but human experts will need to decide what is proved with AI assistance. AlphaProof Code offers an early glimpse of what such human-AI collaboration could look like, but many other proposals of this nature will emerge.
We have released all our Lean specs and proofs and plan to work with the open-source community on improving them. If you are building critical software and would like to apply these ideas, come talk to us!
pekac retweeted
to protect the global economy, we must revive the ancient mesopotamian practice of castrating every high-ranking man
pekac retweeted
Claude Fable 5.2 is live on Venice.
Fable 5.2 coded every scene in this video, each from a single sentence. And it costs 20% less than Fable 5.1 on the Venice API: $8 in, $40 out per 1M tokens.
Available anonymously.
pekac retweeted
🤖 Made with AI
Turns out we could have just written 6 million lines of Lean to verify Signal instead of messing with these papers and symbolic models this whole time deepmind.google/blog/introdu…
Playboy and Intel went public on the same day in about 1970. A year later, Intel's market valuation was about twice that of Playboy. A market analyst wag said, "The markets have spoken: memories over mammaries".
pekac retweeted
Weekend hack: HackerTube. I was annoyed with YouTube's recommendations so I had Claude filter down 43M comments over 20 years of HN to 6,454 videos that keep being recommended. *Significantly* better viewing experience, ~2 hours with Opus 5.5:
hackertube.org/
- Excellent recs without any logins (state is kept in local browser session)
- Thumbnail is a representative frame from middle of the video instead of the super duper A/B test hyper-optimized user uploads
- Underlying data from the comment analysis as one zip file, point your Claude at it and ask for your own version
- HackerTube Longs ✊
A bit more on the process:
I use Claude Code (desktop app for Mac), Opus 5.5 on Medium effort as my default. I only talk to Claude and have it do everything, the only "manual work" I helped with in tandem was in the browser (reminiscent of MenuGen): 1) I had to create some kind of API key from Google Cloud UI to query YouTube for video metadata, 2) I booted up a VPS box for serving and 3) I bought the domain name. Once the box was up I gave Claude the IP and told it update, secure, harden, deploy and optimize the code, and it did the whole thing.
Many awesome projects that would have normally taken weeks/months even can now be few-shotted for breakfast. What else are we not thinking of.
pekac retweeted
china could "honeypot" me with a free house in a walkable neighborhood. i'd give up every US pant-making secret
pekac retweeted
JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 Nvidia $NVDA CEO Jensen Huang sends letter to employees after being targeted by female Chinese spy:
"I was unfaithful to my wife. My actions hurt her and our children. There is no excuse for what I did."
"I am fully committed to NVIDIA and will work to earn back your confidence."
pekac retweeted
People thought I was crazy when I wrote “Computing without Processors” in 2011.
I’ve long dreamed of one way to program everything that computes. You’d write a single program and compile it automatically to any mix of hardware and software, with the split shifting to fit your performance and cost targets.
That’s been hard. Hardware and software use different languages, semantic models, and abstractions. The people who build them come from different university departments with very different cultures. These divisions exist because of how humans organize themselves, and because of the limits of human brains.
AI doesn’t care about any of this turf marking. It relentlessly synthesizes hardware and software together, integrates them, and formally verifies the result, or makes it correct by construction by deriving it from a formal spec. In some cases we may not need CPUs at all: an application’s control logic gets “partially evaluated” and dissolved into the computation itself.
I’m hoping to get the last laugh, probably sometime in 2027.
dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/19785…



































