Here for no-spin thoughts on news & real impact on us. Travel/outdoors/photo/food lover sharing pics, tips & seeking ways to cut pounds. Tech reviews & insights
Joined September 2024
- Tweets5.8K
- Following488
- Followers3.5K
- Likes1.4K
Pinned Tweet
Elon, I always admired you until now. I think it would be good for you to end this tweet series ASAP before it becomes impossible to dig yourself out of this mess. Indians were with you thus far, but now you might have triggered an event that will turn them against you. If it was your advisors who made you do this, start by firing them!
Now let’s get into the details :
The claim that Starlink still has “no license” after years of compliance is not accurate. The company received its GMPCS licence in June 2025 and IN-SPACe authorisation in July 2025. What remains is the Ministry of Home Affairs security assessment—covering Indian gateways, data localisation, lawful interception and the ability to restrict service in sensitive areas—and that same assessment is also pending for Reliance’s Jio Satellite and Bharti-backed OneWeb. All three licensed operators are at broadly the same stage.
Framing the delay as Ambani acting as “real boss” or “Prime Minister,” and dismissing Indian pushback as an “army of shills,” therefore misstates the process and has been widely received as an attack on sovereignty rather than a serious regulatory argument.
For Americans and Musk supporters, this public campaign was unnecessary and has likely made Starlink’s position harder, not easier. India already has some of the world’s cheapest mobile data, produced by real competition between Jio and Airtel. Starlink’s commercial case in that market depends on clearing the same security rules as the other licensees and then offering a price people will actually pay.
Aggressive personal attacks and inaccurate licence claims have alienated many Indians who were otherwise open to more options in underserved areas. Every major country protects critical communications infrastructure on national-security grounds—the United States does so with Chinese firms, and China does so with Starlink itself. Selective outrage undermines the case for open markets.
Indians are right to be frustrated by the tone and the implication that their government is simply an oligarch’s instrument. Security rules exist for documented reasons and apply equally; they are not a personal favour to any one company.
At the same time, fixed-broadband penetration remains low and large parts of the country still lack reliable connectivity. If Starlink or any other operator completes the security reviews that already cover all three licensees and then competes on price and performance, allowing that competition is in users’ interest. The process should stay rule-based rather than driven by public insults or political pressure.
The practical path is straightforward: complete the outstanding security assessments on equal terms, assign spectrum fairly, and let the market decide. Misstatements about licences and personalised attacks have only made that outcome more difficult for everyone.
The ridiculous arguments by Ambani’s army of Internet shills make no sense
On the one hand, they say Starlink couldn’t possibly compete with the amazing low prices offered by Ambani’s de facto monopoly in India and then, in the same breath, they essentially claim that Starlink would be too strong of a competitor! This is absurd hypocrisy and hyperbole.
The reality is that competition would greatly benefit the average citizen in India by giving them more choices, as it always does. Ambani’s profits will be lower, but he is not going out of business. And, obviously, if Starlink is too expensive in India, no one will buy it, so SpaceX will need to make pricing affordable.
🚨The last nationwide ground stop was after 9/11. Today the FAA grounded every departing flight in America over a telecom outage. Our air traffic system is one glitch away from 2001.
There has been a temporary telecommunications outage - out of an abundance of caution all flights have been halted. Every flight has been accounted for and international flights will be handled on a case by case basis.
436
Jensen Huang is out. Here’s what actually matters next for #NVDA.
Next three weeks
17 Nov: Nvidia earnings — Colette Kress’s first call as interim CEO and the first look at financing commitments since the resignation
~18–19 Nov: Anthropic IPO pricing and first trade (expected, not confirmed); Commerce also reported to face a closed-door briefing on its handling of Nvidia
By ~26 Nov: Huang’s testimony to House committees; Senate Banking chair has also summoned Huang and Lutnick
Still open: Entity List action on Megaspeed, the board’s CEO search, and DOJ / shareholder-suit developments.
Longer Term signals
Permanent CEO (Kress, another insider, or an outsider) → Continuity vs. reset vs. political influence
Charges or sanctions on Megaspeed-linked people; any Commerce inspector-general review → Legal and geopolitical exposure
Guarantees, equity stakes, and purchase commitments in filings; whether paused deals resume → Financial fragility vs. organic demand
AMD, Broadcom, Google TPU volumes, and Anthropic’s chip mix → Customer diversification
Nvidia gross margin and hyperscaler capex → Pricing power and underlying AI demand
#JensenHuang #AI #TechNews #StockMarket
81
Jensen Huang is out. Here are five plausible paths for #NVDA stock from 2027–2031. Each starts from an index of 100 on the 12 Nov price. These are illustrative paths, not forecasts — the % is my estimate of which path dominates by 2031; scenarios overlap, so read them as emphasis, not exclusive outcomes.
#JensenHuang #AI #TechNews #StockMarket
1
55
The timeline of Jensen Huang’s fall is stranger than it looks. Here’s how it fits together. Three separate tracks ran side by side, and the resignation is what happens when all three land in the same fortnight.
The enforcement track : Megaspeed bought more than $4.8B of Nvidia chips, US agencies suspected diversion to China, Nvidia’s lawyer contacted Commerce agents, the probe moved to DOJ, and Commerce never blacklisted the company.
The conduct track: Alice Huang ties the CEO to that network, and a second relationship plus a shareholder suit gave the board its own reasons to act.
The financing track: Nvidia’s guarantees to cash-poor customers split Huang from Kress months earlier and now expose the company if customers cannot pay. The first two tracks are linked by one person; the third is independent but hit the same week and the same share price.
#JensenHuang , #ColetteKress, #NvidiaCEO
50
Claude just dropped Whiteboards, Sheets and Data and it’s actually huge.
Here’s a quick use case so it clicks:
Product team talking about a launch. They just talk.
Claude Whiteboards lays the whole thing out as a timeline with owners and dependencies.
Then “turn the action items into a tracker” → Claude Sheets spins up the spreadsheet with formulas already in.
Later when numbers start coming in, Claude Data makes a quick dashboard + short video story of the early results.
No more jumping between Miro → Excel → some BI tool and re-explaining everything every time. Same conversation, context stays, team edits together. Way faster to actually get from idea to something useful. 🚀
Starting to roll out today: Claude Whiteboards, Claude Sheets and Claude Data.
Think a plan through on a board, build a tracker in a sheet, and tell a story with your data.
1
92
Dan Koe just retweeted a solid testimonial from a creator who was basically ready to quit content marketing after blaming algorithms and AI for tanking his reach, until he tried Eden and saw a big turnaround with 364k impressions across platforms plus steady inbound leads. The tool sounds pretty promising as an all-in-one workspace that lets you spot outlier posts in your niche, save and research ideas in one place, get AI help writing, and schedule everything to multiple networks while also handling digital product sales. Pricing starts with a free plan and paid tiers from around $7.50–$29 a month depending on how you bill it.
Have you tried anything similar, or do you think tools like this actually move the needle on reach versus just making the workflow smoother?
Someone please tell @thedankoe that his tool Eden is freaking awesome.
Not fanboying here...
But I practically threw in the towel on content, blamed the algorithms, AI, and techno billionaires for throttling my reach.
I just accepted the fact that content marketing ain't what is used to be.
Until I gave Eden a shot.
What I discovered what nothing short of a miracle.
1. I can easily post to every social media platform at once.
2. I can see breakout topics in my market, to have a pulse on what framing/hooks are working.
3. Finally a tool that ties all social metrics into one place.
I literally write content for 4 hours on Sunday, use Eden as my research tool, and I'm now seeing 364k impressions across platforms
Even better?
A steady flow of inbound leads.
Now let me address the question floating around in your head.
NO.
This is not a paid partnership.
I'm just genuinely impressed someone fixed all the blindspots other content marketing tools have, and brought all the good parts in one place.
1
47
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
YOUR VOTE ON TUESDAY IS ABOUT MORE THAN THE NEXT TWO YEARS. IT IS ABOUT THE COUNTRY YOU WILL LEAVE TO YOUR CHILDREN.
As Americans prepare to vote on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, it is worth looking beyond political personalities, campaign slogans and party loyalties.
The real question is: How will the policies we choose today affect our lives in 2027 and beyond?
BEFORE YOU VOTE, ASK YOURSELF:
• Will my children have better economic opportunities?
• Will I be able to afford housing, healthcare and education?
• Will my job and business opportunities improve?
• Will America maintain secure borders and a fair legal immigration system?
• Will our courts and law enforcement institutions remain independent?
• Will future generations inherit a financially sustainable country?
Both parties have problems. Both should be held accountable. The smart approach is to examine the policies, understand their trade-offs and consider their long-term consequences for your family and the country.
A vote is not a lifetime commitment to a political party. It is a decision about the direction of the country.
Don't vote out of habit, identity or political loyalty.
Vote based on policies. Think beyond 2026. Think about the America your children will inherit.
Here are eight areas worth considering:
1. Economy, taxes and jobs
• Republicans: Generally favor lower taxes, deregulation, domestic energy production and a business-friendly environment.
• Democrats: Generally favor higher taxes on corporations and high-income households, stronger worker protections and expanded public investment.
Impact on you: Your paycheck, cost of living, business opportunities, investment returns and job prospects.
2. Immigration, border security and safety internal security
• Republicans: Favor stricter border enforcement, deportation of people without legal status and merit-based immigration.
• Democrats: Generally favor broader legal pathways, protections for eligible undocumented immigrants via sanctuary policies expanded immigration opportunities.
Open Borders during the previous administration allowed entry to millions of illegals, including criminals. Sanctuary policies restrict cooperation with federal immigration authorities to catch and deport illegal immigrants facing criminal charges. Catch-and-release and no-bail policies cannot be good for any society that prioritizes the safety and security of itself and its loved ones.
Impact on you: You and your families safety, Border security, public resources, labor-market competition, and the integrity of the legal immigration system. Legal immigration and illegal immigration are not the same issue.
A SPECIAL NOTE FOR LEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND SKILLED WORKERS
The Trump administration's strict enforcement of immigration laws and crackdown on H-1B visa misuse may have alienated some naturalized citizens - from the Republican Party. However this is exactly what Democratic Party of 1990’s stood for. Don't go by the label and assume that the Democratic Party of the 1990s represents today's Democratic Party.
In 1996, Under Bill Clinton, Democrats supported tougher border enforcement and signed the 1996 immigration law. The 2000 Democratic platform also supported limiting H-1B increases to genuine skilled-worker shortages and penalizing employers who exploited immigrant workers.
Today's Republicans emphasize merit-based immigration, stricter enforcement and secure borders which is similar to 1990’s Democrats. On the contrary today's Democrats support open borders attracting millions of illegals, aid illegal immigrants and support finding legal pathways for certain undocumented populations.
Immigration policy has consequences that can last for generations. For people who left their countries of origin to build a future in America, the issues include more than border enforcement: they include legal stability, opportunity, fairness, public resources, and the future their children will inherit.
Don't vote out of habit, identity or political loyalty. Examine what each party stands for today—and what its policies could mean for the next generation.
3. Lawfare, justice and institutional independence
January 6 illustrates the importance of due process. Violence against police officers deserved prosecution, but the treatment of nonviolent participants also raised questions about proportionality. Political expression, social-media activity or wearing a MAGA hat should never, by themselves, constitute grounds for criminal scrutiny.
The concern extends beyond America. Brazil's Flávio Bolsonaro left the country following a Supreme Court order restricting his travel amid investigations his supporters characterize as political persecution. In the US, Trump's civil litigation and criminal investigations, the Mar-a-Lago search, and comparisons with the handling of classified documents by Biden and Pence have fueled concerns about selective enforcement.
Senator Elissa Slotkin's comments about investigating Trump administration officials add to the debate.
Nobody is above the law, but nobody should be selectively targeted by the law either.
Impact on you: Judicial independence, constitutional protections, freedom of political expression and protection against government overreach.
4. Election integrity and checks and balances
• Republicans: Generally support voter ID requirements, documentary proof of citizenship when registering, and stricter election verification.
• Democrats: Generally oppose the SAVE America Act's additional documentary-proof-of-citizenship requirements, arguing that they could create unnecessary barriers for eligible voters.
In everyday life, we routinely verify identity or eligibility before allowing someone to complete certain transactions. We may be asked to show ID when cashing a check, picking up a prescription, or donating blood. In my town, residents must even prove they are eligible to use the bulk-waste drop-off facility.
The principle is straightforward: prove who you are, establish that you are eligible, and then proceed. These examples are not identical to voting, but they illustrate why identity and eligibility checks are familiar safeguards in daily life.
Voting is one of the most consequential rights in our democracy. Reliable identity verification, citizenship checks, and accurate voter rolls help ensure that only eligible citizens vote and that every lawful vote is counted. At the same time, safeguards must be accurate and fairly administered so eligible citizens are not mistakenly blocked from voting.
Without public confidence that elections are secure, accurate, and accessible, trust in representation and government legitimacy can erode.
Impact on you: Public confidence in elections, fair representation, and the balance of government power.
5. Government spending and national debt
• Republicans: Generally emphasize spending restraint, tax reductions and smaller government, although Republican administrations have also increased deficits.
• Democrats: Generally support a larger federal role in healthcare, education, infrastructure and social programs.
Impact on you: Taxes, inflationary pressures, interest rates, mortgage costs and the debt inherited by your children.
6. Energy and the environment
• Republicans: Favor expanding domestic oil and gas production and prioritizing energy affordability.
• Democrats: Favor renewable energy investment, emissions reduction and clean-energy incentives.
Impact on you: Electricity bills, gasoline prices, energy-sector jobs and long-term energy security.
7. Education and parental rights
• Republicans: Generally favor school choice, parental involvement and local control.
• Democrats: Generally favor stronger public-school funding and expanded federal education programs.
Impact on you: School quality, educational choices, taxes and opportunities for your children.
8. Checks and balances
Proposals such as expanding the Supreme Court, making Washington, D.C., a state and changing the structure of federal institutions deserve careful scrutiny. Supporters have arguments for these proposals, but voters should also consider their consequences for political competition and institutional balance.
Venezuela offers a warning about how weakening judicial independence and concentrating political power can undermine democratic institutions. France's experience also illustrates why immigration policy must consider integration and assimilation alongside humanitarian commitments.
Neither country is a perfect comparison with America, but both offer lessons worth examining.
THE BIGGER PICTURE: THINK BEYOND THE NEXT ELECTION
Consider the possible long-term consequences of today's policy choices:
• Unsustainable government spending can leave future generations with higher debt.
• Poorly managed immigration can strain public resources and undermine confidence in legal immigration.
• Expanding government power without adequate safeguards can weaken institutional checks and balances.
• Retaliatory investigations can erode trust in law enforcement and the justice system.
• Uncompetitive energy and economic policies can affect household budgets and employment opportunities.
These outcomes are not inevitable. Examine the actual proposals, their safeguards and the evidence.
ONCE AGAIN BEFORE YOU VOTE, ASK YOURSELF:
• Will my children have better economic opportunities?
• Will I be able to afford housing, healthcare and education?
• Will my job and business opportunities improve?
• Will America maintain secure borders and a fair legal immigration system?
• Will our courts and law enforcement institutions remain independent?
• Will future generations inherit a financially sustainable country?
Both parties have problems. Both should be held accountable.
The smart approach is to examine the policies, understand their trade-offs and consider their long-term consequences for your family and the country.
A vote is not a lifetime commitment to a political party. It is a decision about the direction of the country.
Don't vote out of habit, identity or political loyalty.
Vote based on policies. Think beyond 2026. Think about the America your children will inherit.
Tucker Carlson is warning that Trump is “within days” of launching a nuclear strike on Iran’s Pickax Mountain.
He’s been saying essentially the same thing every single month since April.
Watch the compilation.
Congratulations, Bill. Most people need years of poor decisions to lose billions. You managed it with one trade. Truly efficient philanthropy.
🤖 Made with AI
39
YOUR VOTE ON TUESDAY IS ABOUT MORE THAN THE NEXT TWO YEARS. IT IS ABOUT THE COUNTRY YOU WILL LEAVE TO YOUR CHILDREN.
As Americans prepare to vote on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, it is worth looking beyond political personalities, campaign slogans and party loyalties.
The real question is: How will the policies we choose today affect our lives in 2027 and beyond?
BEFORE YOU VOTE, ASK YOURSELF:
• Will my children have better economic opportunities?
• Will I be able to afford housing, healthcare and education?
• Will my job and business opportunities improve?
• Will America maintain secure borders and a fair legal immigration system?
• Will our courts and law enforcement institutions remain independent?
• Will future generations inherit a financially sustainable country?
Both parties have problems. Both should be held accountable. The smart approach is to examine the policies, understand their trade-offs and consider their long-term consequences for your family and the country.
A vote is not a lifetime commitment to a political party. It is a decision about the direction of the country.
Don't vote out of habit, identity or political loyalty.
Vote based on policies. Think beyond 2026. Think about the America your children will inherit.
Here are eight areas worth considering:
1. Economy, taxes and jobs
• Republicans: Generally favor lower taxes, deregulation, domestic energy production and a business-friendly environment.
• Democrats: Generally favor higher taxes on corporations and high-income households, stronger worker protections and expanded public investment.
Impact on you: Your paycheck, cost of living, business opportunities, investment returns and job prospects.
2. Immigration, border security and safety internal security
• Republicans: Favor stricter border enforcement, deportation of people without legal status and merit-based immigration.
• Democrats: Generally favor broader legal pathways, protections for eligible undocumented immigrants via sanctuary policies expanded immigration opportunities.
Open Borders during the previous administration allowed entry to millions of illegals, including criminals. Sanctuary policies restrict cooperation with federal immigration authorities to catch and deport illegal immigrants facing criminal charges. Catch-and-release and no-bail policies cannot be good for any society that prioritizes the safety and security of itself and its loved ones.
Impact on you: You and your families safety, Border security, public resources, labor-market competition, and the integrity of the legal immigration system. Legal immigration and illegal immigration are not the same issue.
A SPECIAL NOTE FOR LEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND SKILLED WORKERS
The Trump administration's strict enforcement of immigration laws and crackdown on H-1B visa misuse may have alienated some naturalized citizens - from the Republican Party. However this is exactly what Democratic Party of 1990’s stood for. Don't go by the label and assume that the Democratic Party of the 1990s represents today's Democratic Party.
In 1996, Under Bill Clinton, Democrats supported tougher border enforcement and signed the 1996 immigration law. The 2000 Democratic platform also supported limiting H-1B increases to genuine skilled-worker shortages and penalizing employers who exploited immigrant workers.
Today's Republicans emphasize merit-based immigration, stricter enforcement and secure borders which is similar to 1990’s Democrats. On the contrary today's Democrats support open borders attracting millions of illegals, aid illegal immigrants and support finding legal pathways for certain undocumented populations.
Immigration policy has consequences that can last for generations. For people who left their countries of origin to build a future in America, the issues include more than border enforcement: they include legal stability, opportunity, fairness, public resources, and the future their children will inherit.
Don't vote out of habit, identity or political loyalty. Examine what each party stands for today—and what its policies could mean for the next generation.
3. Lawfare, justice and institutional independence
January 6 illustrates the importance of due process. Violence against police officers deserved prosecution, but the treatment of nonviolent participants also raised questions about proportionality. Political expression, social-media activity or wearing a MAGA hat should never, by themselves, constitute grounds for criminal scrutiny.
The concern extends beyond America. Brazil's Flávio Bolsonaro left the country following a Supreme Court order restricting his travel amid investigations his supporters characterize as political persecution. In the US, Trump's civil litigation and criminal investigations, the Mar-a-Lago search, and comparisons with the handling of classified documents by Biden and Pence have fueled concerns about selective enforcement.
Senator Elissa Slotkin's comments about investigating Trump administration officials add to the debate.
Nobody is above the law, but nobody should be selectively targeted by the law either.
Impact on you: Judicial independence, constitutional protections, freedom of political expression and protection against government overreach.
4. Election integrity and checks and balances
• Republicans: Generally support voter ID requirements, documentary proof of citizenship when registering, and stricter election verification.
• Democrats: Generally oppose the SAVE America Act's additional documentary-proof-of-citizenship requirements, arguing that they could create unnecessary barriers for eligible voters.
In everyday life, we routinely verify identity or eligibility before allowing someone to complete certain transactions. We may be asked to show ID when cashing a check, picking up a prescription, or donating blood. In my town, residents must even prove they are eligible to use the bulk-waste drop-off facility.
The principle is straightforward: prove who you are, establish that you are eligible, and then proceed. These examples are not identical to voting, but they illustrate why identity and eligibility checks are familiar safeguards in daily life.
Voting is one of the most consequential rights in our democracy. Reliable identity verification, citizenship checks, and accurate voter rolls help ensure that only eligible citizens vote and that every lawful vote is counted. At the same time, safeguards must be accurate and fairly administered so eligible citizens are not mistakenly blocked from voting.
Without public confidence that elections are secure, accurate, and accessible, trust in representation and government legitimacy can erode.
Impact on you: Public confidence in elections, fair representation, and the balance of government power.
5. Government spending and national debt
• Republicans: Generally emphasize spending restraint, tax reductions and smaller government, although Republican administrations have also increased deficits.
• Democrats: Generally support a larger federal role in healthcare, education, infrastructure and social programs.
Impact on you: Taxes, inflationary pressures, interest rates, mortgage costs and the debt inherited by your children.
6. Energy and the environment
• Republicans: Favor expanding domestic oil and gas production and prioritizing energy affordability.
• Democrats: Favor renewable energy investment, emissions reduction and clean-energy incentives.
Impact on you: Electricity bills, gasoline prices, energy-sector jobs and long-term energy security.
7. Education and parental rights
• Republicans: Generally favor school choice, parental involvement and local control.
• Democrats: Generally favor stronger public-school funding and expanded federal education programs.
Impact on you: School quality, educational choices, taxes and opportunities for your children.
8. Checks and balances
Proposals such as expanding the Supreme Court, making Washington, D.C., a state and changing the structure of federal institutions deserve careful scrutiny. Supporters have arguments for these proposals, but voters should also consider their consequences for political competition and institutional balance.
Venezuela offers a warning about how weakening judicial independence and concentrating political power can undermine democratic institutions. France's experience also illustrates why immigration policy must consider integration and assimilation alongside humanitarian commitments.
Neither country is a perfect comparison with America, but both offer lessons worth examining.
THE BIGGER PICTURE: THINK BEYOND THE NEXT ELECTION
Consider the possible long-term consequences of today's policy choices:
• Unsustainable government spending can leave future generations with higher debt.
• Poorly managed immigration can strain public resources and undermine confidence in legal immigration.
• Expanding government power without adequate safeguards can weaken institutional checks and balances.
• Retaliatory investigations can erode trust in law enforcement and the justice system.
• Uncompetitive energy and economic policies can affect household budgets and employment opportunities.
These outcomes are not inevitable. Examine the actual proposals, their safeguards and the evidence.
ONCE AGAIN BEFORE YOU VOTE, ASK YOURSELF:
• Will my children have better economic opportunities?
• Will I be able to afford housing, healthcare and education?
• Will my job and business opportunities improve?
• Will America maintain secure borders and a fair legal immigration system?
• Will our courts and law enforcement institutions remain independent?
• Will future generations inherit a financially sustainable country?
Both parties have problems. Both should be held accountable.
The smart approach is to examine the policies, understand their trade-offs and consider their long-term consequences for your family and the country.
A vote is not a lifetime commitment to a political party. It is a decision about the direction of the country.
Don't vote out of habit, identity or political loyalty.
Vote based on policies. Think beyond 2026. Think about the America your children will inherit.
Americans: If you vote Democrat this midterm, you are aligning with the same forces responsible for the 1979 revolution in Iran. Those same forces are driving the student uprisings in Serbia, Albania, France, India, Indonesia, and beyond.
Do not be the useful idiots of 2026. Demand accountability for real problems without handing power to the red-green machine that purges its partners once the old regime falls. Learn from Iran. Protect your future.
Today’s Democratic Party proudly calls itself socialist, platforms globalists, and gives open support to communist-Marxist and Islamist networks. It chants “Free Palestine” and openly backs the Islamist side of the red-green alliance (the Communist–Islamist alliance). You don’t have to take my word for it—look at the facts: The overwhelming majority of candidates with documented Islamist ties or strong Muslim Brotherhood-adjacent network support run as Democrats. Every current Muslim member of Congress (Omar, Tlaib, Carson) is a Democrat. Voting Democrat is a bet on the 1979 playbook.
In 1979 Iran, the Islamists allied with Marxists, socialists, and college students against the Shah. The leftists thought religion was backwards and that they would share power; the Islamists wanted theocracy. They used the students as useful tools to tear the system down. Once in power, the universities were closed, students and professors purged, leftists tortured and executed, women controlled, and the result was a “Death to America” theocracy—not the liberation the students hoped for.
While Iran purged its leftist and student allies after they helped seize power, under the Biden administration Democrats ran a softer version of the same purge: January 6 prosecutions that jailed non-violent participants, and Jack Smith’s office collecting personal data on 639,000 Republican donors, voters, and supporters—including people who simply bought red MAGA hats—destroying the lives of those who did not politically align.
To the people of Serbia, Albania, France, India, Indonesia, and every nation watching student uprisings: your youth are being used as a facade. Real problems exist, but adult-led networks of globalist liberals, communists/Marxists, and Islamist-aligned groups (Asra Nomani’s Chaos Inc. mapping of 101+ organizations) are amplifying and hijacking them. Only about one in three of the groups are actual student or youth organizations; the rest are adult communist parties, unions, Palestinian-solidarity groups, and propaganda outlets connected across borders, including Singham-linked funding.
The speaker in this video, who lived it put it bluntly: you haven’t seen a revolution until you are forced to flee, leaving your house, your family, and everything behind. Therefore, do not be the useful idiots of 2026. The fancy regime change will not deliver what you are hoping for.
Read Asra Nomani’s reporting: nitter.gq/AsraNomani/status/2112…
#IndiaProtests #FranceProtests #StudentLeaders #UsefulIdiots #Iran1979 #RedGreenAlliance #ChaosInc
HOT OFF THE PRESSES. CHAOS INC. is growing. Who is behind the protests in France and Europe?
I was just on @FoxBusiness to talk to the amazing @dagenmcdowell about the findings of my new reporting at @FoxNews Digital:
🔴🟢 101 organizations in the "red-green" alliance across 9 counties are fomenting and amplifying the protests in France and Europe (up from 54 orgs yesterday)
🔴🟢 Only 1 in 3 student or youth; the rest are adults
🔴🟢 They plan “Acte II” on Saturday OCTOBER 24 with protests across France
🔴🟢 The protests are being amplified by the network in the US funded by Neville Roy Singham, the American communist tycoon living in Shanghai supporting the Chinese Communist Party.
READ HERE:
foxnews.com/world/global-cha…
For this reporting, I name names so that the myth of "student protests" can be pierced. Let me know of any organizations that I missed. Of course, I will reveal any ties, if any, of these organizations to governments from Russia to the Islamic Republic of Iran and China -- wherever the reporting takes us.
WHO'S WHO IN THE EXPANDING GLOBAL 'CHAOS INC.' NETWORK (101)
ACTE II, OCT. 24 – NEW (14)
🔴 Coordination régionale Bloquons tout Île-de-France — Île-de-France Regional "Block Everything" Coordination – PROTEST COORDINATION: Regional "Block Everything" organization behind the platform promoting "Acte II."
🔴 Peuple RÉVOLTÉ – People in Revolt — PROTEST COLLECTIVE: Organization helping operate the "Acte II" platform.
🔴 Maintenant! – Now! — PROTEST MOVEMENT: Civic movement participating in the "Acte II" platform.
🔴 Indignons-nous, Bloquons tout – Let’s Get Indignant, Block Everything — DIRECT ACTION: Protest collective promoting "Acte II."
🔴 Coordination nationale lycéenne – National High School Students’ Coordination — STUDENT/YOUTH: New national high-school coordination calling students into the streets Oct. 24 for "Acte II."
Angoulême, France
🔴 NPA Charente – New Anticapitalist Party–Charente (NPA 16) — REVOLUTIONARY SOCIALIST: Local NPA chapter mobilizing for Acte II.
🔴 Action Antifasciste 16 — ANTIFASCIST: Collaborator on the Angoulême Acte II announcement.
🔴 Maison des Peuples et de la Paix – House of Peoples and Peace — ACTIVIST: Angoulême organization collaborating on the Acte II call.
🔴 Fanfare en lutte d'Angoulême – Angoulême Marching Band in Struggle — ACTIVIST: Local activist collective collaborating on Acte II.
🔴 Révolution Permanente Angoulême — Permanent Revolution–Angoulême – REVOLUTIONARY SOCIALIST: Local chapter of Révolution Permanente, collaborating on the Oct. 24 mobilization.
🔴 Organisation de Solidarité Trans (OST) Angoulême — Trans Solidarity Organization–Angoulême – ACTIVIST / SOLIDARITY: Local organization listed as an Acte II collaborator.
Caen, France
🔴 Caen Antifa Squad — ANTIFASCIST: Collaborator on an "ACTE II — 24 OCTOBRE" announcement.
🔴 Caen en Lutte — Caen in Struggle – PROTEST COLLECTIVE: Local organization collaborating on Acte II.
🔴 Solidarité Étudiante 14 — Student Solidarity 14 – STUDENT: Calvados student organization collaborating on the Oct. 24 mobilization.
NOV. 20 INTERNATIONAL NETWORK
Belgium (3)
🔴 Comac — MARXIST/SOCIALIST YOUTH: Belgian youth organization associated with the Workers' Party.
🔴 RedFox — SOCIALIST YOUTH: Belgian socialist youth organization.
🔴 Vrede — ANTI-WAR: Belgian organization publishing and promoting the International Youth Strike manifesto.
France (1)
🔴 Mouvement National Lycéen — STUDENT/YOUTH: French high-school organization identified in the European Nov. 20 coalition.
Germany (6)
🔴 Schulstreik gegen Wehrpflicht — STUDENT/"ANTI-CONSCRIPTION": German school-strike network mobilizing for Nov. 20.
🔴 Die Falken — SOCIALIST YOUTH: German socialist youth organization involved in the international organizing process.
🔴 Linksjugend ['solid] — SOCIALIST YOUTH: Youth organization associated with Die Linke.
🔴 DIE LINKE.SDS — SOCIALIST STUDENT: German socialist university organization.
🔴 Socialist German Workers Youth, (SDAJ) — COMMUNIST YOUTH: Socialist German Workers Youth.
Sozialistische Organisation Solidarität — SOCIALIST: German socialist organization mobilizing around Nov. 20.
Ireland (1)
🔴 Militant Left — SOCIALIST: Irish socialist organization promoting the international mobilization.
Italy (4)
🔴 Rete della Conoscenza — LEFT-WING STUDENT: Italian student network helping build the international strike.
🔴 Unione degli Studenti — STUDENT: Italian high-school student organization promoting Nov. 20.
🔴 Coordinamento Universitario — STUDENT: Italian university network promoting the strike.
🔴 CGIL — LABOR: Italian labor confederation whose Nov. 20 general strike converges with the student mobilization.
Spain (1)
🔴 Sindicato de Estudiantes — SOCIALIST STUDENT: Spanish student organization identified in the international network.
United Kingdom (9)
🔴 Counterfire — REVOLUTIONARY SOCIALIST / ANTI-WAR: Promoting the Nov. 20 international strike.
🔴 Left Unity — SOCIALIST: Promoting the wider European mobilization.
🔴 International Youth Strike — INTERNATIONAL YOUTH / ANTI-CAPITALIST COALITION: The coordinating coalition behind the Nov. 20 strike says student and youth organizations across Europe are organizing demonstrations, walkouts, assemblies, blockades and occupations. Its manifesto says exploitation, climate breakdown and war are the "essence of capitalism," calls NATO an instrument of "imperial interests" that "should be dissolved," and demands "radical system change."
🔴 North West Pensioners Association — ACTIVIST: Organizational supporter of the Nov. 20 actions.
🔴 Socialist Party — TROTSKYIST: Socialist party promoting the international strike.
🔴 Socialist Students — SOCIALIST STUDENT: British organizer advocating a "socialist future."
🔴 Stop the War Coalition — ANTI-WAR: Promoting Nov. 20 student mobilization.
🔴 Universities and Colleges Union @ucunion — The largest trade union and professional association for academics, lecturers, trainers, researchers & academic-related staff in UK "Further Education" and "Higher Education."
🔴 Young Greens — YOUTH / GREEN: British youth organization identified among supporters.
Amplifiers (8)
🔴 CODEPINK — U.S. ANTI-WAR / ACTIVIST ORGANIZATION: The U.S. organization has explicitly connected the French protests to its own planned Washington mobilization. "From France to the United States, the message is clear," CODEPINK said, before promoting its Nov. 10-12 "Taxpayer Uprising" demanding that federal spending go toward education, healthcare and housing rather than the military.
🔴 Committee for a Workers' International (CWI) — TROTSKYIST / SOCIALIST: An international socialist organization whose national affiliates include Britain's Socialist Party and Ireland's Militant Left. Its international website is promoting the Nov. 20 youth walkout under the campaign slogan "Fight for our future not their wars."
🔴 International Socialist Alternative (ISA) — REVOLUTIONARY SOCIALIST: The international socialist organization says "Capitalism means war" and that it "wholeheartedly" supports the Nov. 20 strike. ISA says its members have helped organize Germany's anti-conscription school strikes and describes imperialism as the "highest stage of capitalism."
🔴 Party for Socialism and Liberation–Houston — MARXIST-LENINIST / U.S. CHAPTER: The Houston chapter of the U.S. Party for Socialism and Liberation is amplifying the French protest movement.
🔴 Progressive International — TRANSNATIONAL LEFT NETWORK: The international organization explicitly grouped the current protests in France, Spain, India and Albania in an Oct. 16 briefing and asked how the "new rebellions" could acquire organized political power. Most significantly, it said: "These are the forces that the Progressive International is working to support and connect."
🔴 Stop ReArm Europe — ANTI-WAR / ANTI-MILITARIZATION COALITION: A European coalition calling for demonstrations and actions around Nov. 20 under the slogan "Welfare, not Warfare." It says it supports students "refusing" militarization and calls on social movements, unions, civil-society groups, political organizations and parliamentarians to mobilize around the student strike.
🔴 teleSUR English — INTERNATIONAL MEDIA AMPLIFIER: The international media outlet amplified the French demonstrations with Oct. 17 coverage of clashes, fires and arrests in Paris, Lyon and other cities. This is evidence of international amplification.
🔴 World BEYOND War — INTERNATIONAL ANTI-WAR: A global organization that describes itself as a movement to "end war" and says it is part of the Stop ReArm Europe campaign. It is explicitly promoting the Nov. 20 International Youth Strike and urging supporters to "join this resistance."
FRANCE — ORIGINAL NETWORK (54)
🔴 Organisation communiste révolutionnaire — REVOLUTIONARY COMMUNIST: Communist organization involved in protests.
🔴 Parti communiste français — COMMUNIST: French Communist Party whose leaders and activists joined the demonstrations.
🔴 Parti des Indigènes de la République — DECOLONIAL: Political organization that defends the student revolt.
🔴 Parti de l'égalité socialiste — TROTSKYIST: Socialist organization advocating workers' action committees.
🔴 Revolutionary Communist Group — COMMUNIST: British organization that connects the French protests to capitalism, imperialism and Palestine.
🔴 Révolution Permanente — TROTSKYIST: Revolutionary socialist organization promoting student-worker mobilization.
🔴 World Socialist Web Site — TROTSKYIST MEDIA: Socialist outlet framing the French protests around capitalism, austerity and militarization.
Palestine-solidarity organizations
🔴 Union juive française pour la paix — PALESTINE SOLIDARITY: French Jewish organization that publicizes support for the protesting students.
🔴 Urgence Palestine — PALESTINE SOLIDARITY: French Palestine organization that amplified protest-related material.
Labor and professional organizations
🔴 CGT Éduc'action — LABOR: CGT's education-sector organization.
🔴 CFDT Éducation Formation Recherche Publiques — LABOR: Education and research union supporting the student movement.
🔴 CGT — LABOR: Major French labor confederation involved in the October mobilizations.
🔴 CNT — ANARCHO-SYNDICALIST: Revolutionary-syndicalist union that declared students were "right to revolt."
🔴 Confédération paysanne — FARMERS' UNION: Called agricultural workers into the Oct. 17 mobilization.
🔴 FSU — LABOR: Education and public-sector union federation.
🔴 FNEC FP-FO — LABOR: Force Ouvrière's education federation.
🔴 Force Ouvrière — LABOR: National labor confederation.
🔴 SUD éducation — LABOR: Left-wing education union.
🔴 SNES-FSU — LABOR: Secondary-school personnel union.
🔴 Union syndicale Solidaires — LABOR: Left-wing labor federation.
🔴 UNSA — LABOR: National autonomous trade-union federation.
Advocacy, environmental and protest organizations
🔴 Amnesty International France — HUMAN RIGHTS: Reported on police treatment of minors during the demonstrations.
🔴 ATTAC France — ECONOMIC JUSTICE: Connected the mobilization to austerity and economic policy.
Coordination nationale du mouvement du 26 septembre — PROTEST NETWORK: Mobilization network that encouraged participation in Oct. 17.
🔴 Extinction Rebellion — ENVIRONMENTAL: Environmental direct-action movement appearing in the protest ecosystem.
🔴 FCPE — PARENTS: National parents' federation that called members to demonstrate.
🔴 Gilets jaunes — Yellow Vests: Decentralized protest movement whose Oct. 17 mobilization converged with the students.
🔴 Intersyndicale nationale VTC — PROFESSIONAL / LABOR: Private-hire drivers' coalition promoting participation.
🔴 Les Soulèvements de la Terre — RADICAL ENVIRONMENTAL: Movement that celebrated the student revolt and called for antifascist mobilization.
🔴 Ligue des droits de l'Homme — HUMAN RIGHTS: Supported students and criticized police repression.
🔴 Movement Against Racism and for Friendship Between Peoples (MRAP) — ANTIRACIST: Antiracism organization involved in the wider coalition.
🔴 SOS Racisme — ANTIRACIST: Antiracism organization involved in supporting the movement.
International amplifiers
🔴 BreakThrough News — SINGHAM NETWORK / MEDIA: New York-based nonprofit amplifying the French protests internationally.
🔴 Indian Alliance Paris — INTERNATIONAL / DIASPORA: France-based organization connecting French and Indian protest messaging. Partnered with the People's Forum in Manhattan.
156
Pay attention to what Elon Musk is saying—he’s making a high-stakes case for why you should set aside smaller concerns and vote Republican for the Senate this year, or risk a permanent one-party state after 2028 that puts the country in a hole hard to dig out of.
Think like voting Democrat is voting to turn US into Venezuela under Hugo Chávez: Court expansion and other institutional changes helped convert electoral victories into longer-term control that proved very difficult for the opposition to reverse, sliding into competitive authoritarianism.
Add to the above uncontrolled immigration (Dems Open Borders policy) and you have the recipe to turn US into France.
Above combination is a hole which is impossible to dig out of!
My biggest concern is that if there is a clean sweep by Democrats of the House, Senate and Presidency in 2028, they will:
1. Make DC and Puerto Rico states to gain a strong majority in the Senate.
2. Open the borders and legalize everyone living in America illegally to cement a permanent majority.
3. Increase the size of the Supreme Court to gain an immediate majority.
This would result in America becoming a permanent one-party state and the end of democracy in any meaningful sense of the word.
All that is needed to ensure this doesn’t happen is 51 Republican senators in 2029. That is why you should vote for Republican senators this election. Other reasons are irrelevant compared to this one.
24
Hilarious… Front-row liberal just got a free trial of what the rest of us feel every day at office. 😂
1
26
Norah O’Donnell thought reading a failed assassin’s manifesto was a tough question — until Trump called her a disgrace and told her she should be ashamed for putting that filth on 60 Minutes 🔥
37