Here for no-spin thoughts on news & real impact on us. Travel/outdoors/photo/food lover sharing pics, tips & seeking ways to cut pounds. Tech reviews & insights
Joined September 2024
- Tweets5.8K
- Following488
- Followers3.5K
- Likes1.4K
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
YOUR VOTE ON TUESDAY IS ABOUT MORE THAN THE NEXT TWO YEARS. IT IS ABOUT THE COUNTRY YOU WILL LEAVE TO YOUR CHILDREN.
As Americans prepare to vote on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, it is worth looking beyond political personalities, campaign slogans and party loyalties.
The real question is: How will the policies we choose today affect our lives in 2027 and beyond?
BEFORE YOU VOTE, ASK YOURSELF:
• Will my children have better economic opportunities?
• Will I be able to afford housing, healthcare and education?
• Will my job and business opportunities improve?
• Will America maintain secure borders and a fair legal immigration system?
• Will our courts and law enforcement institutions remain independent?
• Will future generations inherit a financially sustainable country?
Both parties have problems. Both should be held accountable. The smart approach is to examine the policies, understand their trade-offs and consider their long-term consequences for your family and the country.
A vote is not a lifetime commitment to a political party. It is a decision about the direction of the country.
Don't vote out of habit, identity or political loyalty.
Vote based on policies. Think beyond 2026. Think about the America your children will inherit.
Here are eight areas worth considering:
1. Economy, taxes and jobs
• Republicans: Generally favor lower taxes, deregulation, domestic energy production and a business-friendly environment.
• Democrats: Generally favor higher taxes on corporations and high-income households, stronger worker protections and expanded public investment.
Impact on you: Your paycheck, cost of living, business opportunities, investment returns and job prospects.
2. Immigration, border security and safety internal security
• Republicans: Favor stricter border enforcement, deportation of people without legal status and merit-based immigration.
• Democrats: Generally favor broader legal pathways, protections for eligible undocumented immigrants via sanctuary policies expanded immigration opportunities.
Open Borders during the previous administration allowed entry to millions of illegals, including criminals. Sanctuary policies restrict cooperation with federal immigration authorities to catch and deport illegal immigrants facing criminal charges. Catch-and-release and no-bail policies cannot be good for any society that prioritizes the safety and security of itself and its loved ones.
Impact on you: You and your families safety, Border security, public resources, labor-market competition, and the integrity of the legal immigration system. Legal immigration and illegal immigration are not the same issue.
A SPECIAL NOTE FOR LEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND SKILLED WORKERS
The Trump administration's strict enforcement of immigration laws and crackdown on H-1B visa misuse may have alienated some naturalized citizens - from the Republican Party. However this is exactly what Democratic Party of 1990’s stood for. Don't go by the label and assume that the Democratic Party of the 1990s represents today's Democratic Party.
In 1996, Under Bill Clinton, Democrats supported tougher border enforcement and signed the 1996 immigration law. The 2000 Democratic platform also supported limiting H-1B increases to genuine skilled-worker shortages and penalizing employers who exploited immigrant workers.
Today's Republicans emphasize merit-based immigration, stricter enforcement and secure borders which is similar to 1990’s Democrats. On the contrary today's Democrats support open borders attracting millions of illegals, aid illegal immigrants and support finding legal pathways for certain undocumented populations.
Immigration policy has consequences that can last for generations. For people who left their countries of origin to build a future in America, the issues include more than border enforcement: they include legal stability, opportunity, fairness, public resources, and the future their children will inherit.
Don't vote out of habit, identity or political loyalty. Examine what each party stands for today—and what its policies could mean for the next generation.
3. Lawfare, justice and institutional independence
January 6 illustrates the importance of due process. Violence against police officers deserved prosecution, but the treatment of nonviolent participants also raised questions about proportionality. Political expression, social-media activity or wearing a MAGA hat should never, by themselves, constitute grounds for criminal scrutiny.
The concern extends beyond America. Brazil's Flávio Bolsonaro left the country following a Supreme Court order restricting his travel amid investigations his supporters characterize as political persecution. In the US, Trump's civil litigation and criminal investigations, the Mar-a-Lago search, and comparisons with the handling of classified documents by Biden and Pence have fueled concerns about selective enforcement.
Senator Elissa Slotkin's comments about investigating Trump administration officials add to the debate.
Nobody is above the law, but nobody should be selectively targeted by the law either.
Impact on you: Judicial independence, constitutional protections, freedom of political expression and protection against government overreach.
4. Election integrity and checks and balances
• Republicans: Generally support voter ID requirements, documentary proof of citizenship when registering, and stricter election verification.
• Democrats: Generally oppose the SAVE America Act's additional documentary-proof-of-citizenship requirements, arguing that they could create unnecessary barriers for eligible voters.
In everyday life, we routinely verify identity or eligibility before allowing someone to complete certain transactions. We may be asked to show ID when cashing a check, picking up a prescription, or donating blood. In my town, residents must even prove they are eligible to use the bulk-waste drop-off facility.
The principle is straightforward: prove who you are, establish that you are eligible, and then proceed. These examples are not identical to voting, but they illustrate why identity and eligibility checks are familiar safeguards in daily life.
Voting is one of the most consequential rights in our democracy. Reliable identity verification, citizenship checks, and accurate voter rolls help ensure that only eligible citizens vote and that every lawful vote is counted. At the same time, safeguards must be accurate and fairly administered so eligible citizens are not mistakenly blocked from voting.
Without public confidence that elections are secure, accurate, and accessible, trust in representation and government legitimacy can erode.
Impact on you: Public confidence in elections, fair representation, and the balance of government power.
5. Government spending and national debt
• Republicans: Generally emphasize spending restraint, tax reductions and smaller government, although Republican administrations have also increased deficits.
• Democrats: Generally support a larger federal role in healthcare, education, infrastructure and social programs.
Impact on you: Taxes, inflationary pressures, interest rates, mortgage costs and the debt inherited by your children.
6. Energy and the environment
• Republicans: Favor expanding domestic oil and gas production and prioritizing energy affordability.
• Democrats: Favor renewable energy investment, emissions reduction and clean-energy incentives.
Impact on you: Electricity bills, gasoline prices, energy-sector jobs and long-term energy security.
7. Education and parental rights
• Republicans: Generally favor school choice, parental involvement and local control.
• Democrats: Generally favor stronger public-school funding and expanded federal education programs.
Impact on you: School quality, educational choices, taxes and opportunities for your children.
8. Checks and balances
Proposals such as expanding the Supreme Court, making Washington, D.C., a state and changing the structure of federal institutions deserve careful scrutiny. Supporters have arguments for these proposals, but voters should also consider their consequences for political competition and institutional balance.
Venezuela offers a warning about how weakening judicial independence and concentrating political power can undermine democratic institutions. France's experience also illustrates why immigration policy must consider integration and assimilation alongside humanitarian commitments.
Neither country is a perfect comparison with America, but both offer lessons worth examining.
THE BIGGER PICTURE: THINK BEYOND THE NEXT ELECTION
Consider the possible long-term consequences of today's policy choices:
• Unsustainable government spending can leave future generations with higher debt.
• Poorly managed immigration can strain public resources and undermine confidence in legal immigration.
• Expanding government power without adequate safeguards can weaken institutional checks and balances.
• Retaliatory investigations can erode trust in law enforcement and the justice system.
• Uncompetitive energy and economic policies can affect household budgets and employment opportunities.
These outcomes are not inevitable. Examine the actual proposals, their safeguards and the evidence.
ONCE AGAIN BEFORE YOU VOTE, ASK YOURSELF:
• Will my children have better economic opportunities?
• Will I be able to afford housing, healthcare and education?
• Will my job and business opportunities improve?
• Will America maintain secure borders and a fair legal immigration system?
• Will our courts and law enforcement institutions remain independent?
• Will future generations inherit a financially sustainable country?
Both parties have problems. Both should be held accountable.
The smart approach is to examine the policies, understand their trade-offs and consider their long-term consequences for your family and the country.
A vote is not a lifetime commitment to a political party. It is a decision about the direction of the country.
Don't vote out of habit, identity or political loyalty.
Vote based on policies. Think beyond 2026. Think about the America your children will inherit.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
Probably a good time to share this again...so what's this I hear about a Government Digital Wallet..?
Funny how "conspiracies" keep turning into policy.
This is lengthy, because the system they’re building is too.
You don’t really think it’s scrapped, do you?
You honestly believe the globalists just shrugged, sighed, and abandoned a decades-old plan because Keir Starmer stood at a podium and said the magic word?
Please tell me you don’t actually trust what he’s saying… right?
“Scrapped.”
Oh, please.
This is the plan.
It starts up here, with this graph: WEF rhetoric for the vision, UN for the moral perfume. Then it’s filtered down through “consultations” with Big Tech, financiers, and the friendly pilot-runners at ID2020, before being quietly handed to our government like a finished script.
Then comes the policy laundering.
Documents carefully written to make it look like a homegrown solution. A British idea. A sensible response to immigration. A practical modern upgrade.
And the sales pitch?
So you don’t have to rummage through a drawer looking for a utility bill.
Imagine how wonderful it will be… to never have to rummage through a drawer ever again.
No more scrambling for paperwork. No more proof of address. No more “sorry, we can’t verify you.”
Because instead you’ll be:
Geofenced inside your 15-minute city.
Tracked in your online activities.
Forced to prove you are who you are for access to anything; services, travel, banking, purchases, even basic participation in society.
Your money will be programmable.
Your permissions will be conditional.
Your identity will be a switch someone else controls.
But hey… at least you won’t have to rummage through a damn drawer.
So, back to basics we go.
That circle diagram?
It isn’t a neutral picture.
It isn’t “just a concept map.”
It isn’t a harmless infographic.
It’s a strategy map.
On page 10 of the WEF Insight Report 2018, you’ll find it laid out in polite corporate language: a future of Digital control disguised as convenience.
And the part people miss is simple:
The designers expect Digital ID to plug into every part of everyday life.
Read it literally.
Because they wrote it literally.
The centre is the key: DIGITAL ID
Not “an ID card.”
Not “a right to work check.”
Not a single credential.
The plan for the UK (each state will have their own ‘branding’):
DIGITAL ID = OneLogin account + UK Gov Wallet
A wallet designed to host multiple credentials and tokens.
And that’s the point.
The now-abandoned “BritCard” right to work/rent credential was never the whole thing.
It was one token.
Just one small element of a single spoke.
A test run.
A red herring.
Let’s clarify the trap:
Right to work and right to rent checks REMAIN MANDATORY by 2029 (will be much sooner) via OneLogin.
And there will be another token for RTW/RTR.
It will slip back in.
Quietly.
With new branding.
With new “safeguards.”
With the same function.
The diagram: what it literally shows
Centre: DIGITAL ID (Entities, People, Devices, Things):
This is the part that should make your stomach drop.
Identity isn’t just for humans.
It’s for:
people
organisations
devices
machines
goods
“things” on the supply chain
In other words:
Everything gets tagged.
Everything gets verified.
Everything gets logged.
The spokes: where they expect Digital ID to be used:
Healthcare.
Financial services.
Food and sustainability.
Travel and mobility.
Humanitarian response.
E-commerce.
Social platforms.
E-government.
Telecommunications.
Smart cities.
Each spoke is a sector where they expect the same identity system to be accepted.
Not “optionally.”
Not “in some cases.”
As infrastructure.
What each spoke means in practice:
Healthcare:
Digital ID to access insurance, link wearables and medical devices, and let providers “prove qualifications” while accessing patient records.
Translation:
Your medical history becomes a persistent digital key tied to you forever.
Financial services:
Open accounts, authorise transactions, automate KYC.
Translation:
Your ability to use money or credit becomes dependent on a credential check — tracked, logged, and tied into a permanent audit trail.
Food and sustainability:
Provenance tracking. Supply chain credentials. Consumer records.
Translation:
What you buy becomes traceable.
And carbon score?
Score exceeded = no meat, no travel, no energy.
Travel and mobility:
Booking, border control, cross-border checks.
Translation:
Not just international travel.
Local travel too.
15-minute cities.
Facial recognition.
Geofencing.
Biometric gates.
Passports on a ledger.
Tied to carbon permissions.
Humanitarian response:
Aid distribution. Work authorisations. Recognised credentials.
Translation:
No Digital ID?
No assistance.
No recognised credential?
No humanitarian aid.
E-commerce:
Payments. Shopping. Identity for buyers and sellers.
Translation:
Commerce becomes credential-based, not cash-based.
And when money becomes programmable?
Then purchases become permissioned.
Social platforms:
Single sign-on. Third-party services tied to one identity.
Translation:
Your online activity becomes tied to your offline permissions.
What you do online becomes your social credit file.
And punishment becomes frictionless.
E-government:
Taxes, voting, benefits, passports, licences, company directorships.
Translation:
The entire state service stack plugs into the same ID.
Everything civic becomes conditional.
Telecommunications:
SIM registration. Device ownership. Network monitoring.
Translation:
Your phone becomes another identity anchor.
Your internet use becomes surveilled, tracked, and logged.
Smart cities:
Sensors, energy systems, transport, congestion systems, facial recognition.
Translation:
The smart/15 minute city becomes a machine that recognises you, logs you, and profiles you from the moment you wake up.
“Personalised services” is the marketing term.
Control is the function.
Key ugly truths the graphic reveals:
1) One wallet, countless gates
This isn’t a system designed for one purpose.
It’s designed for universal re-use.
Once it exists, it becomes the obvious route for everything.
2) Not just people, “things” too
By including devices and things, it foreshadows the Internet of Identity:
Your devices.
Your appliances.
Your transport.
The infrastructure around you.
All identifiable.
All trackable.
3) Interoperability = scale of control
The entire purpose is interoperability.
Meaning:
Public systems and private systems can all accept the same credential and share the information with each other.
And public and private bodies share and log the same data, about YOU.
4) Audit trails baked in
Every verification becomes a logged event:
Who checked you.
When.
Where.
Why.
Normal life becomes an auditable history.
5) Mission creep is not a bug, it’s the plan
They map the full universe of uses because they expect the spread.
From:
“right to work”
to:
mortgages
benefits
pensions
school places
healthcare
travel
employment
payments
energy
All via the wallet.
6) Infrastructure before consent
The sequence is always the same:
Build the stack.
Normalise the use.
Then argue about safeguards later.
By then, consent is not requested, it is coerced through exclusion.
7) Vendor and state capture
Whoever controls the wallet, registries, APIs, and certification becomes the gatekeeper.
Public-private delivery doesn’t reduce power.
It embeds private firms as civic infrastructure.
And the worst part?
If you don’t comply with directives…
nudges…
orders…
restrictions…
Or if you say something they don’t like on social media?
They can switch you OFF.
No wallet.
No access.
No purchases.
No travel.
No participation.
This graphic is their plan:
To make one digital ID the universal key that opens (or closes) access to every part of life.
In a nutshell:
The UK Gov Wallet is the all-encompassing Digital ID.
The people tracking super cookie.
The wallet will host multiple tokens including the right to work and right to rent credential.
It has not been scrapped.
And to have that wallet, you will be forced to use OneLogin which will host your biometrics.
OneLogin Account + UK Gov Wallet = Digital ID.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
@grok Why did President Trump start this war, given his claim that last June’s Operation Midnight Hammer obliterated Iran’s nuclear program?
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
FRIDAY NIGHT THOUGHTS
Many critics have correctly noticed I've worked closely with the Chinese.
I've been an atheist most of my adult life. But for the most part I've been sympathetic with the right wing. And at a point in time, that brought me close to the "China is awesome" wing.
When I traveled to Beijing in 2008, even then, I was amazed at how everything just ... worked. There was no homeless. Society was extremely high trust. China just ... worked. And every visit since confirmed that.
My father, who traveled all over the world for the military, confirmed the same. China ... just works.
Except ... on the last day of the visit wherein I was ready to move to China, which @data_republican can asset to, we got sequestered in a hotel room and we were told to not to peek out out blindfolds. So we did anyway, and saw a very scary military parade of China's missile capability and all that. We witnessed this at the threat of being prisoned for even peeking behind window blinds.
What's the point of this story?
Fast foward to 2020: my husband and I were constrained from the government in everything, in the COVID-19 era.
We had young, restless children.
We went to the local playground, which was closed down.
What did we do?
We tore off the tape. That's all we did.
In China, we would have been shot on the spot. That is the price of trading safety for freedom.
When I hear others speak of Qatar in this way, it hurts at a visceral level.
Qatar is a slave state.
Qatar trades freedom for safety.
Anyone who says Qatar is "good" simply hasn't stayed long enough to see that trade-off.
America is flawed for sure. But America is still the best country in the world.
The only way to center your morality is not in a country, or in an authority. You have to center it in God. There's no other option that solves the cognitive dissonance the world hands to you.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
Pulling out at the right time!
It is time for the United States to pull out of NATO and refocus on enemies that are inside of our gates.
NATO nations minus the U.S. is essentially the European Union (EU).
They want globalism.
They want fascism.
They want Islamism.
They want open borders.
They want censorship.
They need our money.
They need our military.
They need us, we don’t need them.
@realDonaldTrump
They HATE you. Stop kidding yourself.
Everything “they” do is adverse to U.S. interests and our national security.
Before we face civilizational suicide, let’s stop pretending and rip the euro-centric bandaid off and start focusing on our real enemies.
AMERICA FIRST (AF) means, among others, laser focusing on our Homeland.
Five priorities for AF now!
1. Dismantle the welfare state.
2. Cultivate the nuclear family, childbearing and communities.
3. Reclaim our education system from the red-washed narratives.
4. Radically reform the USIC.
5. Recover our sense of moral coherence (stop perverting our children).
6. Start an education campaign about Marxism movements in America (not witch hunts, and instead clarify the existing dangers they create (take their mask off).
Six (6) existing dangers:
1. Divisive political parties
2. Avoid revenge but demand accountability.
3. Reexamine all permanent foreign alliances.
4. Avoid foreign entanglements.
5. Urge neutrality in all endeavors but be prepared to wield a steel sword.
6. At all times, emphasize national unity.
Prepare our military for an entirely new war to come.
@POTUS Keep Providence close to your chest at all times. Think strategically and create opportunities in order to PRESERVE our constitution and our way of life. This latter statement is principally why we voted for you.
@Amerifuture
@GoldInstituteIS
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
This "leaked report" is just a hit piece from bitter FBI lifers who hate that Kash Patel and Dan Bongino are cleaning house.
Of course the old guard doesn’t like them — they’re the swamp that’s been running the place for decades. They loved the FBI when it was chasing parents at school boards and hiding Hunter’s laptop. Now that it’s actually locking up murderers, child predators, and cartel members, they cry.
Here are the real results in plain English:
- Violent crime arrests doubled
- Murder rate is dropping fast — heading to the lowest ever
- Over 1,600 child predators arrested, 4,700+ kids rescued
- Took 1,500 kilos of fentanyl off the streets (enough to kill 120 million people)
- Deported 18,000+ dangerous illegal aliens
- Caught 4 of the FBI’s Top 10 most-wanted terrorists (Biden got zero in 4 years)
- Moved 1,500 agents out of D.C. offices and back into the field where they belong
- Ended DEI nonsense and focused on real police work again
The crybabies wrote a 20-page whine letter because someone finally made them do their jobs. Good. Keep it up, Kash and Dan. 🇺🇸
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
It is concerning that DoJ is pursuing lower-level individuals while the primary instigators—the major figures—remain unaddressed. This approach will not be effective in stopping this menace. No high-profile Democrat or deep-state figure has been arrested in nearly 10 months.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
Absolutely, I agree! We should strongly support Trump for his outstanding successes on tariffs, historic tax cuts, tough border security, cracking down on crime, mass deportations, and the Build America, Buy America Act — but we must not hesitate to call out his shortcomings: inaction on election integrity, cozying up to Big Pharma, failing to arrest high-profile traitors, the shortsightedness of cozying up with terrorist states such as Pakistan while alienating the world’s largest democracy and key regional power, India, and continuing to issue visas to Chinese students.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
🫡 to you Jon. Gavin Newsom has failed to protect California—cities are spiraling into chaos! Instead of taking action, he wastes time with lawsuits targeting Trump, whose bold deployment of the National Guard and Marines will crush the criminals looting stores, wrecking our cities, and disrupting the lives of everyday Americans.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
🇺🇸🤝🇮🇳 This is historic. For the first time US is openly supporting India which has been battling Pakistan sponsored Is la mist terrorism for decades now. Hopefully India will be able to root it out once and for all.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
In a bombshell 🔥 interview with Tucker Carlson, Dan Caldwell dropped a jaw-dropping revelation: even after 91 days of President Trump being in office, Obama and Bush era holdovers who are incredibly hostile to @SecDef, President Trump's or VP Vance's world view are still on the Defense Policy Board.
- Susan Rice (Obama, National Security Advisor, 2013)
- Michèle Flournoy (Obama, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, 2009)
- Dr. Eric S. Edelman (Bush (G.W.), Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, 2005)
This would be a great place to start to identify where the leaks come from
Dan Caldwell was one of the strongest voices at the Pentagon opposing war with Iran. Then he was falsely accused of leaking classified documents and fired.
(0:00) Introduction
(1:10) What Would Happen if the US Went to War With Iran?
(9:13) The Real Reason the US Invaded Iraq
(15:38) The Military Power of Iran
(22:25) The Global Coalition Iran Has Formed Because of the US
(26:37) Is This Evil or Stupidity?
(31:10) How Trump Exposed Regime Change Wars
(41:37) Caldwell’s Experience in the Marine Corps
(50:31) The Impact of the Iraq War on Veterans
(1:00:59) How Caldwell Helped Pete Hegseth Become Secretary of Defense
(1:08:21) The Real Reason Caldwell Was Fired
(1:11:30) Was Caldwell the Source of the Leaks?
(1:22:09) How Caldwell Was Escorted Out
(1:23:41) Who Are the Real Culprits of the Pentagon Leaks?
(1:28:58) Caldwell’s Reaction to His Ousting
Includes paid partnerships.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
Impeach John Roberts now! A Chief Justice unwilling to rein in rogue judges is fueling the destruction of our nation’s faith in the judicial system. His failure to uphold accountability demands swift action.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
400k is like a reward for the murder this kid just did (irrespective of how and why).
Not a good sign for America. Some steps need to be taken to curb this practice permanently, so that criminal actions do not get rewarded no matter how much clout one may have on social media due to political, racist or cultural alignment.
Calling on @elonmusk as he is our only hope in these times - Elon any thoughts on how this can be achieved?
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
Yeah, I am glad, and it's not that tough to get it. The U.S. wants to buddy up with countries and leaders who put their nation first, no matter if they're democratic or autocratic. Europe's been selling out their people's freedoms to globalists and pushing Islamization, which is all about stirring up chaos. It's already dragged them back back to barbarism, where stabbings and rapes by Islamists are just the new normal. Islamists can blast their prayers on old speakers, while locals praying in their homes is illegal. Speaking out against tyranny or posting on social media is treated as a bigger crime than child rapists, who just get a slap on the wrist.
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
Hopefully @realDonaldTrump or someone in his administration will help.
South Dakota ranchers Heather and Charles Maude, a young couple with two kids, face 10 years in prison and $250,000 fines each over a century-old fence dispute with the Forest Service.
The fence, built between 1910 and 1950, has marked their family’s ranch boundary for 114 years—recognized by the USDA since 1960. Indicted in June 2024 for “theft of government property,” they’re under a gag order, with trial set for April 29.
It started with an unnamed hunter’s complaint about a “No Hunting” sign, escalating within 87 days to federal charges. Heather’s parents, Randi and Tom Hamilton, are urging the Trump Administration to intervene, calling it government overreach.
“They’re busy making a living,” Randi says. “This fence was here before they were born.” The local ranching community fears they’re being targeted, with some suspecting a hidden agenda tied to a wildlife corridor. “They’re making an example of them,” Randi warns. “If they lose, it affects us all.”
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
This is why the far-left is freaking out about @DOGE
It was supposed to be their little secret
PutThinkingCap 🇺🇸 retweeted
Elon Musk: “There is a massive amount of corruption… effectively there’s a giant fraud loophole where the government can send money to an NGO that is then no longer the government by the laws of the U.S., let’s just say there are a lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress..”