🚨 Roy Keane doesn’t hold back on the Glazers and the state of Manchester United:
“People say I’ve made a career out of criticisms. Fine. Call me miserable, call me bitter. I couldn’t care less. I’m not going to sit on television and tell supporters everything is wonderful when the club is falling apart.
And I’m sick of people pretending this started with the last manager.
A manager comes in promising standards. Two years later he’s gone. Another arrives with a new plan. He’s gone too. And we spend months arguing about formations while the same problems survive every appointment.
Meanwhile, the people who have overseen this mess are still there.
When I played for United, you were expected to win. The manager had authority. The dressing room knew the standards. Everybody understood what the club was trying to do.
Now tell me, what exactly is Manchester United trying to do?
Don’t give me a bloody presentation about a three-year plan. Tell me what happens on the pitch. Tell me why players arrive looking like they’ve got everything to prove and leave looking like they’ve forgotten why they came. Tell me why every new manager seems to inherit the same problems with different names on the shirts.
People say, ‘But Roy, they’ve spent money.’ Of course they’ve spent money. That’s what makes it worse. Spend hundreds of millions without a plan and you build nothing.
And let’s talk about the Glazers. This club was saddled with debt because of how they bought it. Years of interest payments, dividends, all of it. Money that could have helped the club went into servicing that arrangement. And I’m supposed to clap because Manchester United can still announce another commercial partnership?
It’s disgraceful.
Yes, INEOS now run the football side. They have their own decisions to answer for, believe me. But the Glazers haven’t disappeared. They still hold the controlling stake. You can’t oversee years of decline and pretend it has nothing to do with you.
Look at this Fermin Lopez story. United are reportedly asking about him. Fine. But put yourself in the boy’s position. He’s at Barcelona. He wants to play the biggest matches and win the biggest trophies. Somebody tells him Manchester United are interested.
What’s the sales pitch?
‘Come here, son. Beautiful history. Great supporters. And if things go wrong, we’ll sack the manager and start the whole thing again.’
You’d be embarrassed saying it out loud.
I’m not saying Fermin has rejected United. I don’t know what he’s thinking. That’s the point. Manchester United should be a club where the football argument makes itself. Instead, supporters see a top player linked and their first reaction is, ‘Why would he come?’ Think about how far you’ve fallen when your own fans struggle to answer that question.
And I feel sorry for the kids.
A father tells his son about Ferguson, Robson, Cantona, Scholes and Rooney. About what that badge demanded. Then the boy watches another season of excuses and another manager blamed for old problems.
What do you tell him? Be patient for another 10 years?
Supporters have spent their money, travelled everywhere and watched the people at the top escape accountability.
I’m not telling anybody to abuse people. But protests, organised pressure, demanding proper accountability? Absolutely. Because if the supporters don’t keep asking difficult questions, who will?
And sometimes I wonder whether the people running this club have become so comfortable with the revenue coming in that finishing nowhere near the top no longer frightens them enough.
That should terrify every United supporter.
Manchester United wasn’t built so that people could own a valuable business and occasionally remember there’s a football match on Saturday.
It’s a football club. Start treating it like one.
And if you can’t, get out of the way and let somebody who actually understands what it means take responsibility.”
You love to moan @ANDYDB7 any comments? lnkd.in/p/eQHe4c4j
Pierre Blampied retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 Great post…
Anyone defending Tommy Robinson needs to explain exactly what they think he should be allowed to get away with.
A man who claims to be a great British patriot, lives in Spain and spends the majority of the year on holiday at the expense of his “donors” was sitting in a holiday resort in Cyprus while stirring up civil unrest in Britain. Journalists reported on it. That is their job. It was a legitimate national story.
And because Robinson didn’t like the scrutiny, he sent private investigators after the journalists, had them tracked and photographed, exposed their home addresses and their families, and threatened to turn up at their homes, saying “I’m coming to get you”. One journalist needed personal security. Another had to remove his family from their home.
If you believe that is acceptable behaviour, that a man can threaten journalists and expose their families to intimidation simply because he dislikes their reporting, then you aren’t defending free speech. You’re defending intimidation. A jury heard the evidence and convicted him. Stop pretending this was a conspiracy because you don’t like the verdict.
Pierre Blampied retweeted
This might force Andrew Burnham MP to tackle his welfare spending if not he may have to abandon his dreams of joining the European Union due to his lack of control of spending.
Look at his face at the end of the clip it says it all.🧐
Pierre Blampied retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 They say, “Tommy was protecting his family.” “They did it to him first.”
Two excuses. A jury heard and rejected both.
The Mail wrote about a public figure on holiday. Tommy hired private investigators to photograph journalists’ homes, then told a million followers “I will find you.”
That isn’t the same thing. And it isn’t protection.
Here’s what the jury actually heard.
What happened
In August 2024, while England was rioting, Robinson was on holiday in Cyprus, posting about the riots to his followers. The Mail found him there and ran a story: “Stoking riots from his sunbed.”
Over the next three days he went after the two reporters, Jacob Dirnhuber and Andrew Young.
🔺5 August: a direct message to Dirnhuber. “I’ll be knocking at your door.”
🔺5 August: a phone call to Young. Robinson told him he’d be coming to his home and that he’d “have to move house.”
🔺6 August: a post naming Dirnhuber, saying he and the other Mail journalists had “today been located.”
🔺7 August: a video to around a million followers. He said he had details of where they and their families lived. He told them to abide by “men’s rules.” Then: “The men, on the other hand, I will find you.”
He also hired private investigators to photograph their homes. He admitted it in court.
The result: Dirnhuber moved house. Young was given a close protection officer.
The law
The charge was harassment causing fear of violence. The prosecution had to prove a course of conduct that made each man fear violence on at least two occasions, and that Robinson knew or ought to have known it would.
That last part is an objective test. What Robinson says he meant doesn’t decide it. What decides it is what a reasonable person would expect a million followers to do with “I will find you.”
His defence
He said he was protecting his family. That is a real defence in law, if the conduct is reasonable for protecting someone. Police had given him four threat-to-life warnings. The jury heard all of it.
Why it failed
He admitted the aim was pressure. Telling a million people where journalists live doesn’t protect your children. It endangers theirs.
🔺He didn’t dispute that they were frightened. Asked in evidence, he said no.
🔺He never complained to the press regulator. He never asked the Mail to change or remove the story. The legal route was there. He skipped it.
🔺His own words. “Men’s rules” is not the language of protection.
One is journalism, however much you dislike it. The other is a threat.
The jury
He chose this. At the magistrates’ court he was offered a trial there. He opted for a jury instead, saying he wanted 12 members of the British public to hear the evidence.
They did. They convicted on both counts.
Sentencing is on 16 December.
Pierre Blampied retweeted
Andrew Neil takes down Andy Burnham's budget in under 30 minutes youtu.be/7TsjdxYvpM8?is=Ilmz… via @YouTube
Pierre Blampied retweeted
Replying to @ANDYDB7
That was done nearly 2 years ago and will have saved them a considerable amount compared to wages in Guernsey and Alderney. Available 24/7. I used it several times.
Pierre Blampied retweeted
Football legend Kevin Keegan will become the first person to be posthumously awarded Newcastle's highest honour 🖤🤍
📲 Read more here: bbc.in/4yVErnW
#NUFC
Pierre Blampied retweeted
🚨 The United’s hierarchy took note of the strong support Michael Carrick received from fans during and after the Bournemouth defeat, with much of their frustration aimed at the players.
(Source: @ESPNFC)
Pierre Blampied retweeted
So Michael Carrick stays for now, according to reports. Good – because he cares deeply about the Club and, whatever his limitations as a manager, Carrick is not the real problem at United. The problem patently lies in recruitment/ownership. Recruitment needs addressing with a clear-out and proper investment in players with the right character as well as the right ability (and in the right positions, starting with defence).
But the concerns are obvious. Will the players who doubt him raise their game? What will happen if they surrender again, this time at Chelsea? Will Bruno Fernandes start or remain captain? Is it also simply a case of the club playing for time while they pursue potential successors?
It seems an uneasy truce, a temporary ceasefire. Let's hope the players, whatever they think of Carrick, look in the mirror, realise they are very much part of the problem, take responsibility and fight for the cause. United players owe it to the fans. #MUFC
Pierre Blampied retweeted
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: The Manchester United executives want there to be a response from Michael Carrick and the Manchester United squad at Stamford Bridge at the weekend.
(Source: @samuelluckhurst)
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Michael Carrick is set to be given the opportunity to turn things around at Manchester United.
(Source: @MKeegan_Overlap)
Pierre Blampied retweeted
Replying to @gavinstpier
@gavinstpier quite correct to point out that with Jersey and IoM receiving Royal Assent for assisted dying, opponents here cannot claim the legislation is too risky or uncertain.
Time finally for Guernsey to implement a similar option.
bbc.com/news/articles/cmje5k…
Lions sponsor Howden lines up ex-Goldman partner for board amid fundraising
trib.al/hJguboD
Pierre Blampied retweeted
One of the most powerful videos I’ve ever seen as a United supporter. The shift in atmosphere as soon as Carrick goes down the tunnel is exactly what the players need to hear. 👏


























