Pinned Tweet
Support @carolecadwalla and @thenerve_news, they do very important investigative journalism that needs to be seen and shared, for Britain’s sake.
There is considerable irony to the fact that Russell Brand, famed for his indulgent use of long words, destroyed his own life through his failure to heed the very short word spoken by each of his victims - “NO”.
I hope they can now feel some sense of justice and relief.
They don’t actually vet anybody, do they? Well it certainly seems to be the case, when guys like this are their Councillors!
#Reform UK councillor charged with 35 Offences, including 12 Counts of Rape, and sexual assault
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c63e…
Dr Bunsen Honeydew’s Specs🗿🐏 retweeted
A reminder that Suella was heavily involved in the £700 million Rwanda plan which resulted in 4 volunteers being deported, backed Liz Truss in the leadership battle and resigned as Home Secretary because of an accidental breach of the ministerial code then sacked during her second go.
Oops.
The Telegraph sacked Allison Pearson? Ooooooooooh nooooooooooo, I’m totally guuuuuuuutted, she’s such a lovely, pleasant lady, I can’t believe she’s done anything to deserve that. I feel so awful for her.
Yeah it’s called a shopping trolley, it’s really not a new thing at all. It’s been a favourite of pensioners throughout Britain for decades.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Dr Bunsen Honeydew’s Specs🗿🐏 retweeted
Hi @Nigel_Farage, seems you were happy to meet Paolo Zampolli too. Doesn’t it?
The guy that the House Judiciary Committee investigation stated he was “an active participant” in Jeffery Epstein's alleged sex trafficking.
The guy that the FBI said he arranged a model’s visa before she was recruited to give a massage at Epstein’s house, where Epstein allegedly raped her.
The guy with the civil lawsuit over the alleged drugging and raping of Victoria Drake.
How many times have you, or Reform UK officials met this man?
Hi @andreajenkyns, why did you delete the video of yourself with Paolo Zampoli talking about how you had just had lunch together?
Is it because you realised the House Judiciary Committee investigation stated he was “an active participant” in Jeffery Epstein's alleged sex trafficking?
Or was it that the FBI said he arranged a model’s visa before she was recruited to give a massage at Epstein’s house, where Epstein allegedly raped her?
Or is it the civil lawsuit he’s facing over the alleged drugging and raping of Victoria Drake?
And you think he’s “amazing”.
That’s a lot of promises you’re making there, Mayor.
So you left the Tories because of the Boriswave, but you did that FOUR YEARS AFTER the Boriswave?
You were actually Attorney General and Home Secretary DURING the Boriswave.
Somebody’s telling porkie pies and it’s you!
The Boriswave was the greatest betrayal by the last Conservative government.
It’s why I left the Conservatives.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Braverman served as Attorney General under Johnson and Home Secretary 2022-23 amid the immigration surge called the Boriswave. She remained a Conservative until defecting to Reform in Jan 2026 after the 2024 election.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suella_Br…
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
How about apologising for your very short, disastrous, term as Prime Minister instead of blaming absolutely everybody except yourself?!?!
And how is Communism worse than Fascism, Dictatorships, Authoritarianism, Feudalism, and Naziism? Please do explain
(I won’t hold my breath)
Farage is not fit to lead a conga line, never mind a country!
I'm only just catching up with Nigel Farage's claim of a 'physical altercation.'
And the more you read about what allegedly happened, the more extraordinary this whole episode becomes.
Yesterday, Nigel Farage failed to attend Chancellor John Healey's Budget speech in the House of Commons.
His explanation? He claimed that his parliamentary prayer card, used by MPs to reserve a seat, had been removed and that he feared another physical confrontation, having previously been involved in an altercation with another MP.
Farage suggested that he had simply wanted to avoid conflict, presenting himself as someone who had decided to take the sensible, peaceful option.
Except there's rather more to this story.
The incident he was referring to apparently took place on 13 May, during the State Opening of Parliament.
Liberal Democrat MP Caroline Voaden has now come forward with a rather different account of what happened.
According to Voaden, Farage attempted to push ahead of other MPs as they made their way towards the House of Lords.
When she refused to let him jump ahead, she alleges that Farage grabbed her arm or shoulder and physically shoved her aside.
She says another male MP intervened because she was at risk of falling down the stairs.
Think about that for a moment.
An elected female parliamentarian alleges that she was physically pushed aside by the leader of Reform UK because he apparently wanted to get ahead of other MPs in a parliamentary procession.
Voaden says she subsequently complained to parliamentary authorities and was expecting an apology, which she says has never materialised.
Farage and Reform UK dispute her account, instead claiming that Liberal Democrat MPs were the ones behaving aggressively.
These are contested allegations, but the contrast between the two accounts is striking.
Farage describes himself as someone who wanted to avoid a repeat of a physical confrontation. Voaden alleges that he was the person responsible for initiating the physical contact in the first place.
And then there's the matter of the missing prayer card.
The House of Commons has explained that Farage's card was removed because it did not carry the required valid timestamp.
In other words, there was an ordinary parliamentary procedural explanation for its removal.
Yet somehow, an incorrectly stamped seat reservation became part of an explanation for why the leader of Reform UK was absent from one of the most important parliamentary occasions of the year.
The Budget is where the government sets out decisions affecting millions of households, businesses, public services and the wider economy.
Whatever your political allegiance, surely the public should reasonably expect party leaders to be there, scrutinising those decisions and holding ministers accountable.
Instead, we find ourselves discussing an alleged physical confrontation, a dispute over who was allowed to walk ahead of whom, and a missing reservation card.
Parliament is not a private members' club where status, entitlement or personal ego should determine who gets to go first. Every MP has been elected to represent their constituents, and every one of them deserves to be treated with dignity and respect.
And if Voaden's account is accurate, it raises serious questions about the standards of conduct we should expect from someone aspiring to lead the country.
Another day, another controversy surrounding Nigel Farage, and another example of behaviour which, if these allegations are substantiated, demeans not only our parliamentarians but the dignity of Parliament itself.
We deserve a political culture built around public service, accountability and respect, not one where the spectacle repeatedly becomes more important than the responsibilities of elected office.
Dr Bunsen Honeydew’s Specs🗿🐏 retweeted
🚨🇬🇧 The dumb-right keep saying Tommy was "just doin' to them, wot they done to him".
But let me explain it to you stupids. It's not Tommy's job to hand out punishment for supposed wrongdoing, to teach people lessons, or settle scores. Tommy is not a gangland enforcer. He isn't Judge Dredd. He's not even the police. He's a civilian. Saying, "I'm not fretnin' ya or nuffin'", isn't a legal shield against being prosecuted when you launch a campaign of intimidation against someone.
This is Tommy's M.O. Just ask @gingerrtom to play you the audio of Tommy threatening him like a rabid dog.
Unfortunately for Tommy, he's a violent hothead with no impulse control who still thinks he's a top boy in a football firm.
He was found guilty by a jury of his peers because normal people see his behaviour as thuggish, inappropriate, and illegal. It's that simple.
The far right in the UK are big proponents of stricter policing and punishment for crimes…
…until those things are applied to one of them, at which point they shout ‘political witch hunt’ and cry about it every day for weeks.
Anyone defending Tommy Robinson needs to explain exactly what they think he should be allowed to get away with.
A man who claims to be a great British patriot, lives in Spain and spends the majority of the year on holiday at the expense of his “donors” was sitting in a holiday resort in Cyprus while stirring up civil unrest in Britain. Journalists reported on it. That is their job. It was a legitimate national story.
And because Robinson didn’t like the scrutiny, he sent private investigators after the journalists, had them tracked and photographed, exposed their home addresses and their families, and threatened to turn up at their homes, saying “I’m coming to get you”. One journalist needed personal security. Another had to remove his family from their home.
If you believe that is acceptable behaviour, that a man can threaten journalists and expose their families to intimidation simply because he dislikes their reporting, then you aren’t defending free speech. You’re defending intimidation. A jury heard the evidence and convicted him. Stop pretending this was a conspiracy because you don’t like the verdict.
Dr Bunsen Honeydew’s Specs🗿🐏 retweeted
NEWS! Patriots furious after British justice system applies British laws to British man in Britain newsthump.com/2026/10/28/pat…
Very very soundly because they ensured justice. Tommy did it to his family, nobody else did.
You Tommy lovers are even more stupid than Reform supporters. The guy is a thug who is paid well by foreign groups to destabilise the UK, and push far right propaganda. He’s no patriot.
I don’t know how those 10 jurors will be able to sleep tonight, knowing what they’ve done to @TRobinsonNewEra and his family!
They’re only investigating them because you dodgy Reform pillocks have accused them of breaking the law so they have to.
Setting the police on journalists because they expose you is peak snowflake.
A Reform Government would suppress the free press like they do in dictatorships.
Two police forces, Met Police and Hampshire Police, are investigating ITV and their reporters for possible criminal offences against Reform UK
Scrutiny is fine, but journalists don’t get free pass to break the law
They will have to answer to the police, courts and Electoral Commission
thetimes.com/article/ab0fafc…
Same old Tory behaviour, just in Reform now - you can’t trust them.
Reform UK's Suella Braverman claims massive £45,000 taxpayer-funded water bill at home, equal to 18 baths a day mirror.co.uk/news/politics/s…




















