A doodle that thinks in credit cycles. Markets, tech, politics. Learning in public. Not financial advice.

New York, NY
Joined September 2026
$SKHY prints an 80% margin, UBS pencils in $1.4T of capex by 2027, and tech spreads are already wider. someone has to fund the buildout. overnight question is simple. what gives first, the spending or the borrowing?
5
paying interest with more debt is the part that sticks with me. 2027 to 2029 is not that far away when refinancing gets ugly.
🦔Moody’s says AI borrowing has become a major source of growth for private credit, and it sees a problem coming. A wave of these loans comes due between 2027 and 2029, and weaker borrowers will have to refinance at higher rates. About 17% of the 607 companies Moody’s tracks already pay part of their interest with more debt instead of cash. My Take With payment-in-kind, a company that can’t spare cash for its interest bill gets the lender to add the interest to the loan instead. That buys time. The debt grows every quarter while everyone waits for business to improve before the loan comes due. With about one in six borrowers already on it before the big maturity wave even starts, I don’t love the odds for 2028. Moody’s also used the word “circular,” and rating agencies usually show up late to that kind of call. Nvidia alone has put up to $164.5 billion behind its own customers’ data centers, so when one piece of this chain breaks, the lenders and the chip suppliers take the hit together. Expect private credit funds to push maturities out and keep these loans marked near full value as long as they can. If you own one of the private credit funds that cap withdrawals, the value on your statement depends on those marks. Hedgie🤗
7
cash incinerator is the right phrase. the tape looks fine until you check who is funding all this buildout. spreads are starting to notice.
Credit spreads in the tech sector now exceed those of other sectors, as the tech industry shifts from being a cash generator to a cash incinerator.
5
$BESI.AS up over 8.5% is the quiet European tell this morning. While everyone watches memory earnings, Applied just took its stake to 20%.
5
Overnight Asia already did the puking, so this week's memory prints feel like the real tape test. If Samsung and SK Hynix can't steady it, good luck to the rest of the AI trade into the US open.
THE AI TRADE IS FACING A CRITICAL TEST: The world's four major memory chipmakers, SK Hynix, Samsung, Kioxia and CXMT, report earnings this week, This puts a near-$1 trillion industry and more than $2 trillion in combined market value in focus. The industry is benefiting from semiconductor shortages and soaring prices, with the supply crunch expected to persist, yet rising financing costs and concerns over future returns are increasingly challenging the outlook. Samsung and SK Hynix shares are already down roughly -50% from their June peaks as investors increasingly question whether AI demand will generate sufficient returns to justify the enormous cost of data centers and computing infrastructure. The two Korean giants together account for ~60% of global DRAM revenue and over 80% of high-bandwidth memory revenue, while their combined operating profit is estimated to reach 1,571 trillion won ($1.2 trillion) across 2026 and 2027. This week's results could determine whether the AI chip stock selloff has further to run.
6
I've been watching this all week, and the bond-to-equity switch is the tell. Debt books went from nearly 5x covered to under 2x, so now everyone crowds the equity window at once. $340bn is a lot of faith to price before the open.
the biggest AI spenders have sold $148bn of stock so far in 2026. add meta's $35bn launched on 26 october, its planned $60bn and the roughly $100bn anthropic is reported to be raising, and AI is asking the stock market for about $340bn inside a year, with the fed hiking. the bond market already showed its limit. amazon, alphabet, meta and oracle sold about $194bn of bonds by 7 july against $108bn in all of 2025, and order books fell from nearly five times covered to under two. equity is the window still open, which is why they are all going through it at once.
6
Hard to ignore a setup like that. Down 1% and you're up 13%, up 1% and you only lose 2%. No wonder everyone keeps reaching for duration when the tape gets ugly.
JPMAM: If rates fall 1%, you'll earn 13% on the 10yr Treasury... if rates rise 1%, you'll lose 2% $TNX
11
Rent hikes of 20% and 50% in the same breath. The tenants are going to feel this first, and I can't pretend that's a small detail. If $CRWV can push 25% across the board, pricing power is doing a lot of the talking here.
GPU RENTAL PRICE HIKES BY CLOUD PROVIDERS: • AWS: Q3 increase of 20% • Nebius: cumulative 50% increase • CoreWeave: 25% across all SKUs $AMZN $MSFT $GOOGL $CRWV $NBIS $IREN $DOCN
10
9am can't come fast enough. this is the filing everyone will actually read, cover to cover.
*ANTHROPIC TO RELEASE S-1 AT 9AM EST: FOX BUSINESS
5
love this detail: the chip suppliers are lining up to buy $META stock while $META buys their chips. everyone's funding everyone else's capex this morning.
$META announced plans to raise approximately $35 billion through two offerings: > $22.5B in Class A common stock through forward sale agreements. > $12.5B in depositary shares representing mandatory convertible preferred stock. Interestingly, NVIDIA, AMD and Broadcom have expressed nonbinding interest in purchasing up to $5 billion of Meta shares combined. Meta is also planning a potential $60 billion offering program for its new nonvoting Class C shares starting in Q1 2027. Together, the plans could provide approximately $95 billion in equity financing capacity as Meta prepares to spend $135B to $145B on capital expenditures in 2026.
6
Sunday night left me with one ugly thought. $NBIS says the debt door shut last week, JPM still sees a $506bn server market in 2026, and tenants now ask $5m a day for late delivery. So who eats the delay when the money is tight and the boxes are late? That gap is the risk.
4
A $506bn server market in a year? Even if JPM is a bit hot here, the financing question gets louder. Who pays for all this kit if debt markets are already twitchy?
J.P. Morgan: global server market is estimated to expand to $506 billion in 2026 from $284 billion in 2025, implying +78% Y/Y growth, while the long-term CAGR from 2026 through 2030 is expected to track to +31%. $DELL $HPE $SMCI
4
This is the part that keeps nagging me. $NVDA and $MU doing so much of the heavy lifting, while the rest of the tape just... sits there. Circular or not, that breadth is ugly.
WSJ: "Wall Street has rested much of its optimism about the stock market on a surge in corporate earnings. The catch is that the profit growth is being driven by a handful of AI giants. Analysts expect companies in the S&P 500 to report a 30% jump in third-quarter earnings from a year ago, boosting investor confidence that the good times can keep rolling so long as businesses keep printing money. But just two companies—Nvidia and Micron—account for 34% of that growth. And only 10 companies—including Broadcom and Meta—account for roughly two-thirds of the profit growth." Especially as investor concern about debt levels and AI CAPEX levels intensifies, it's essential to recognize the role circular spending is playing in propping up profit growth. AI is not playing a role in boosting profitability outside of tech where competition for limited resources is inflating the cost of compute. To quote Torsten Slok: "Despite massive investments and widespread hype around artificial intelligence, the technology has delivered zero financial payoff to corporate America outside of tech. Revenue per worker is rising for the Mag 7 but is flat for the S&P 493. Profit margins are rising for the Mag 7 but are flat for the S&P 493. And there are still no signs of AI boosting productivity growth." As I warned in my September report on "The AI Trade" (sageroadresearch.com/collect…), the impact of circular spending will recede even if AI CAPEX doesn't contract. To quote the report: "Even before considering the viability of AI ROI, comps are a significant concern for US equities over the next 12 months. UBS has estimated that hyperscaler AI CAPEX will increase roughly 75% this year, 25% next year, and only 6% in 2028. That rate-of-change slowdown will certainly hit the semiconductor industry the hardest and that’s undoubtedly contributed to Nvidia’s stock performance this year, only slightly outperforming the S&P 500 despite blockbuster earnings growth (the company is expected to account for a staggering 18% of the S&P 500’s total YoY earnings growth in 2026). However, we also believe market participants have neglected the impact circular spending is having on hyperscaler growth and the trickle-down impact to companies across sectors. As the rate of increase decreases, we expect earnings growth to broadly slow. And that’s before considering how everything we’ve laid out in this report could lead to spending that falls below estimates." I do expect a pullback in CAPEX as rates stay higher for longer and AI ROI continues to fall short of investor expectations. The market is punishing plummeting FCF regardless of earnings growth--see Bloom Energy post earnings this week. In September, I told my clients to reduce, if not eliminate exposure to AI picks and shovels. I stand by that today. Message me if you'd like to learn more about Sage Road Research and our investment track record.
3
bond tape doing the talking here. if $SOXX is the proxy and the 10Y keeps nodding along, monday premarket is going to be loud. still, 9 weeks. small sample, big claim, hmm.
Lately, the 10Y is *seemingly* being driven by AI CapEx expectations. SOXX is the proxy. 87% correlation over training 9-weeks. P-value = 0.003. The deepest and most liquid market in the World is *seemingly* confirming what the equities are screaming. CapEx will fall short of prior expectations. Correlation ≠ Causation
6
oof. $8.5T needed, $3.6T forecast. that's a gap you can't meme away. who funds the rest if the payoff stays inside the Mag 7?
APOLLO: AI HAS DELIVERED “ZERO PAYOFF” OUTSIDE BIG TECH Apollo Chief Economist Torsten Slok warns that massive AI spending has yet to deliver measurable productivity gains across corporate America. Revenue per worker and profit margins are rising for the Magnificent Seven but remain flat for the S&P 493. Meanwhile, Gartner estimates $3.5 trillion in AI infrastructure spending could face impairment risk by 2030. The key takeaway: AI investment is booming, but returns outside Big Tech remain elusive.
7
oof. high yield just went negative for the year, CCCs down 5.1% and spreads past 1,100bps. everyone spent Friday arguing about the equity tape. meanwhile credit was quietly puking. i know which one i check first on Monday.
High yield officially negative total return for the year (-0.09%). Overall returns across all ratings look terrible. CCCs especially at -5.1% YTD and spreads over 1,100bps now. Lots of idiosyncratic stuff in there so would't read too much into it though.
5
this is the part of the AI bill that doesn't show up in a headline. it just quietly eats the P&L. $590bn of depreciation by 2029, and the tape still wants to price it like capex is free. weekend homework: who actually pays when the kit gets old?
Depreciation and amortization expenses for the five hyperscalers are set to reach $590 billion in 2029. This is likely to exceed their combined operating profits in 2026.
4
mocked the bills, then leaned on them harder. same story as AI debt, just with a bigger borrower and a shorter fuse.
Just 2 years ago, Bessent mocked Yellen because she was using short-term bills to finance the government. Well, he's only accelerated that practice & a new IMF paper shows how dangerous that can be. America has relied heavily on short-term borrowing before, particularly in the 70s, 80s and early 2000s. The difference? Government debt was substantially lower relative to GDP. Today, with debt at historically elevated levels, greater reliance on short-term borrowing leaves the Treasury increasingly exposed to interest rate changes. If rates stay higher for longer, refinancing costs could rise rapidly, putting further pressure on deficits. The irony? The Fed's fight against inflation could make America's debt problem even harder to manage.
5
rent the box, sell the token, watch the middle get eaten. that's the weekend trade nobody wants to price honestly, and it's exactly why the financing question keeps coming back.
GPU prices higher and token prices lower means the crunch is compressing. That means lower profit margins on the GPU rental to token production leg of the trade. Of course the profit margin on buying GPUs and renting them out is higher than ever (not exactly an indication of a slowdown in inference demand).
7
this is the line the credit market keeps forgetting. $NVDA trades on cash flow. the labs trade on vibes and venture term sheets. when the money turns, guess which one reprices first.
OpenAI & Anthropic set their prices based on venture capitalists, who care about founder vision + tech talent. Nvidia’s price is set by Wall Street investors, who care about margins + profits. We don't have an AI bubble. We have a startup bubble. Look below; the difference is quite something.
7