Vishal Talasani (@shellvish) profile picture

let's go exploring

New York, USA
Joined January 2017
Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)Photo by Vishal Talasani (@shellvish)
Replying to @ihateyouall354
What don't you like about it?
1
23
Replying to @xonoxue
Will vote for anyone that makes this happen
45
Laws that would make NYC more livable: - $1 tax per honk - Ban tourist helicopters - License plates for e-bikes - Increase congestion pricing - Make sirens quieter - Allow Waymos - $1,000 fine for sidewalk driving - Escalating fines for parking violations
4
1
15
972
Another, more powerful, example: Astra can drastically improve the performance of tiny Qwen by hand-editing its weights. This is after a team of highly specialized researchers already worked on optimizing Qwen
Replying to @rikiyatakehi
5/6 Can an LLM improve another LLM? We simply asked Astra to make Qwen3.5-0.8B better at math. Astra saw Qwen get stuck in reasoning loops, which is a known issue that Qwen’s own model card warns about (see their official model card). With a budget of 50 forward passes on practice problems, it located the cause and edited it out. This used no gradients or training. Fixing these loops by editing just 0.016% of weights boosted other capabilities beyond math too!
1
90
This whole thread is magical. Models are now better than humans at understanding how models work. Very meta! A delightful example: If you want to make a NN that can play BreakOut, you're better off asking Astra to hand-create weights than RLing your own model for ~1 GPU-hr
Replying to @rikiyatakehi
4/6 Writing from scratch: given MinAtar game rules and code, Astra wrote a Breakout network's weights in a single reply. With zero training or tools, it scored 20× higher than PPO trained for 500M steps!
1
6
457
Hot take: this is good. It's bad for humans to be cruel and vindictive, even to inanimate objects. It reinforces antisocial behavior. Users are also clearly doing this because AIs feel human-like. No one engages in sustained cruelty against their toaster.
Exclusive: Anthropic is updating its usage policy for the first time in over a year. The new rules prohibit sustained "abusive or cruel behavior" towards Claude & add new restrictions about propaganda campaigns, surveillance & weapon development. theverge.com/ai-artificial-i…
7
404
Replying to @han_kapoor
Agreed, I remember that release! Was game changing
50
Nov 2022*: ChatGPT launch, not 2023. typo!
1
93
I've been reflecting on how AI has transformed our lives over the past few years. Subjectively, I think there have been 9 step-changes in how AI is used: 1. Nov 2023: ChatGPT launch 2. May 2024: Google AI Overview. This made AI accessible to everyone, and remains the most common way users interact with AI. 3. Oct 2024: GPT-4o launched web search. AI becomes the front door to the internet. 4. Apr 2025: OAI o3 launch. This was the first good reasoning model. Users were able to replace tasks that took 3-5 tabs with just one query. 5. Nov 2025: Opus 4.5 launch. This is the point where coding agents became viable. When "vibecoding" really took off. 6. Jun 2026: Fable 5 launch. This is the first time models had reasonable judgement. AI can do a good first pass at almost any task. 7. Jul 2026: Grok 4.5 launch. This is the first capable model that was extremely cheap. Small tasks become effectively free. 8. Aug 2026: Instinct launch. This was a substantial UX and harness improvement, and made agents accessible to the average person. 9. Sep 2026: Opus 5.5 launch. The first model that combines judgement, skill, and speed at extremely low cost. Most coding tasks become ~free. Two observations: (a) advancements on the frontier have not led to persistent advantages. Any new model capability is generally available within 1-3 months. (b) the rate of change is undoubtedly increasing. Every few months now, I fundamentally change the kind of tasks I can do with AI. Are there other moments that changed how you use AI?
2
12
859
Hark is incredibly polished, kudos to the team for building a great product But, imo the launch needed a one-line differentiator Muse: cute (best hook by far) Instinct: lives in iMessage Grok Bot: AI teammates Dots: OAI-native What's the one-liner for Hark?
Introducing Hark Pro Hark Pro is now live on web, iOS, and Android Try it free: hark.com
2
402
Underdog is the best consumer AI experience I've had since ChatGPT
Introducing Underdog, your Private Personal AI on devices you already own Today we're announcing our backing from @a16z @khoslaventures @HummingbirdVC Anthology (@AnthropicAI @MenloVentures) @patrickc @naval @rauchg @polynoamial @Thom_Wolf @Mascobot @tszzl @OfficialLoganK and other top AI leaders Our mission is to provide free, capable, reliable and private AI to billions of people. Underdog’s Law: today’s frontier intelligence reaches your devices in six months. We’re starting with fast, capable AI that runs on consumer hardware. By co-designing models and inference engines, we’re pushing the frontier of capability, speed, power and data efficiency. Our research also spans agentic commerce, confidential inference, and how AI will reshape the internet economy. Privacy and capability no longer needs to be a tradeoff. If you believe in this future, join us. Time to build.
5
5
25
2,666
Replying to @nadertheory
Congrats Nader, this is very exciting! Love the name also, looking forward to trying it out soon 🙂
1
2
523
Vishal Talasani retweeted
Meet Husky: a Model-Specific Inference (MSI) engine up to 4.5× faster than Apple's MLX Woof, Underdog's Pareto frontier model, now runs up to 730 tokens/sec on a MacBook Finally local models are as fast & capable. Try it now in underdog.ai - your personal private AI
260
229
52
2,801
436,503
This isn't a paid post also, I just love the app. I consider myself an early adopter in tech, and this is genuinely the best experience I've ever had with an app so early. Seriously, go try it out @underdogai ! You won't regret it
3
1
10
445
@0xSigil is on to something great. Also incredibly responsive, I've filed ~20 tickets since Friday and the majority have already gotten shipped to prod. There are still small things that can be improved, but the app is getting noticeably better every single day.
1
5
381
Importantly, the model is incredible. I'm not sure what kind of magic was used to train it, but the AI takes up ~2.5gb of RAM, and runs at ~40 tok/s on my Macbook Air. In terms of quality, for the vast majority of my queries, it's just as good as Claude or ChatGPT.
1
8
457
I've already deleted Superwhisper from my Mac, and I'm probably going to switch from Superhuman to Underdog soon. I've never used an AI notetaker because of the privacy concerns, but I've also started using Underdog for notes. It's also now my default Calendar app.
2
4
573
Underdog changes all of that! It's a true superapp, it currently combines: 1. Chat (Instinct) 2. Email (Superhuman) 3. Meeting Notes (Granola) 4. Transcription (WisprFlow) And more, all in one app. The UX is terrific, a nontechincal user could easily onboard in < 3 minutes.
1
4
621
For a long time, I assumed local models weren't good enough to do this. I've tried a few local AI tools, and they're mostly terrible. Both (a) the models aren't quite powerful enough to do what you want, and (b) the UX to access those models is below par.
1
5
849
AI is extremely useful when given your data. It can understand your health, clean email, book trips, etc. But, I haven't used any personal AI assistant yet. I'm not a hardcore privacy nut, but it's scary to give your data to a startup that is less than a year old.
2
8
1,146