narmi retweeted
I think you’re quite funny. Leave the kids alone
Before you do anything, use your brain and think it through clearly. I’ve already put up with it once. Do not take advantage of kid's kindness. Don't try to hurt the kids!There are people who know what you’ve done🙃And don't make your intentions so obvious
#shellybenda #shellypundao #pundao
narmi retweeted
When looking back at the sequence of events that has unfolded up to this point, it is clear that there are several points where the information conflicts with itself. That is likely one of the main reasons why fans have begun to question the situation.
Before I explain my own perspective, there is one important premise that needs to be established first: Shelly and Pundao were in a romantic relationship. However, I want to make it clear that whether they are still in a relationship now is not relevant to the point I am making here.
In Shelly’s first statement, she clearly referred to that person as her “ex-partner.” She maintained the same position when she later addressed the matter during her livestream.
If that is the case, why did MME choose to specifically use and emphasize the term “overlapping relationships” in its official announcement?
And why did the company tell fans that Pundao was the one who decided to discontinue their future activities as a pair?
This leads to another contradiction.
If Pundao truly informed the company that very same day that she could no longer continue working with Shelly, why did she later tell reporters at her next scheduled appearance that she had learned about the situation at the same time as the fans and had still not received a clear explanation from Shelly?
If Pundao had not yet heard Shelly’s explanation, does it really make sense that within just 76 minutes, she had already decided to end their activities as a CP?
Would it not have been more natural for her to first hear a clear explanation from the other person, take time to process the situation and organize her thoughts, and only then decide what position she wanted to take?
Personally, I am not particularly interested in what intentions MME may have had in handling this situation.
Because regardless of their intentions, it does not change the fact that the decisions they made and the way they handled the situation were wrong.
What I cannot understand, as a consumer, is how I am supposed to view the behavior of a CEO whose company is supposed to protect its artists, yet leaves both of its own artists exposed to public attacks and pressure while acting as if none of it is the management’s responsibility.
I also do not understand how we are supposed to interpret the behavior of an employee who appears to repeatedly undermine the image of artists under their own company.
And there are still far too many unanswered questions.
Why is Pundao’s November schedule completely empty?
Does the company intend to give Shelly another work schedule at all?
Why did the company choose this particular timing to plan Pundao’s solo fan meeting?
And regarding that fan meeting, did the company actually discuss the event properly and directly with the artist herself?
As the head of a company, I hope you take the time to reflect on whether you are truly carrying out your responsibilities and handling your work appropriately.
And as an individual, and as an adult, I also hope you take a moment to ask yourself whether you are truly fulfilling your role in a responsible and proper way.
narmi retweeted
The contradictions between the two statements cannot be explained away as “different perspectives.”
The company's explanation is that Shelly's statement was written from her personal perspective, while the company's official announcement was based on the evidence it had gathered and the information provided by Shelly.
But first, let's establish one important rule: according to company requirements, any official clarification or public statement issued by an artist must first be reviewed and approved by the company.
In her October 10 post, Pundao explicitly stated that she had published her message without the company's permission. This further supports the existence of such an approval requirement.
Now, let's go back to the two statements released on October 1.
The company has never claimed that Shelly's clarification that day was published without authorization. This suggests that Shelly's statement had been reviewed and approved by the company before being made public.
Yet just **76 minutes later**, the company released its own official announcement, and the two statements contained major contradictions on a crucial issue.
The company's announcement introduced a key characterization: **“overlapping relationships.”** This became the central justification for Shelly's suspension and the termination of the ShellyPundao professional partnership.
However, Shelly's clarification, which had supposedly already received company approval, **never once mentioned “overlapping relationships.”**
If both statements were based on information provided by Shelly, and the only difference was their respective perspectives, then such a crucial characterization should not simply disappear from one statement and suddenly appear in the other.
This strongly suggests that **the company added the term “overlapping relationships” on its own and came to that conclusion without Shelly confirming it.**
So the question is: **Why did the company do this?**
Was it simply because management was incompetent?
Or, as previously speculated, had the company intended to separate ShellyPundao from the very beginning, and this unexpected incident happened to provide the perfect opportunity?
Could Shelly's initial statement have been a trap deliberately designed by the company?
So what exactly does the company mean by **“different perspectives”?**
Shelly's perspective was to clarify the facts, while the company's perspective was to declare its own artist guilty?
We're talking about the exact same incident. Shelly's statement made no mention of “overlapping relationships,” yet the company rushed to introduce this characterization, one serious enough to destroy her reputation, and then left her to face the overwhelming public backlash and abuse on her own.
**Is this what you call “different perspectives”? Or is it simply that, in your eyes, the artist's perspective doesn't matter at all, and the only version that matters is the one the company wants the public to believe?**
**Are you supposed to be protecting your artists, or sacrificing them?**
narmi retweeted
Our Demands
We firmly demand that the company:
- Treat its artists fairly.
- Acknowledge its own problems.
- Take responsibility for its decisions and mistakes.
- Stop making artists bear the consequences of management's failures.
We reject this toxic pattern of "the company makes mistakes, but the artists take the blame."
Shelly and Pundao deserve fairness, respect, protection, and accountability from the very company that is supposed to support them.
narmi retweeted
So the two CEO aunties' idea of ‘gratitude’ is forcing their artists to take the blame for them?
Looking back at the many incidents that have happened this year, fans have developed serious doubts about how the company handles problems. Every time the company's negligence, lack of action, or unfair decisions cause controversy, it is always Shelly and Pundao who have to step forward, take responsibility, and calm the fans down. Meanwhile, the company stays completely out of sight and refuses to take responsibility.
1. May 2, 2026 — Racial Controversy
Shelly became involved in a controversy related to race and was attacked by antis. Fans demanded that the company step forward, defend her, and make a public statement.
However, the company told fans to stop arguing, claiming that it had already compiled a list of those making accusations and would handle the matter itself.
Yet the company then had Shelly go live to publicly apologise and repeatedly explain the controversy.
On one hand, the company wanted fans to stop discussing the issue. On the other, it made Shelly face all the public pressure alone. Its actions were completely contradictory, and it failed to fulfil its responsibility to protect its artist.
2. Stalled Projects and Lack of Work Opportunities
Fans repeatedly questioned the company's prolonged inactivity, lack of progress on new projects, absence of resources, and lack of scheduled activities for the artists, while the management team frequently appeared to be travelling and enjoying leisure activities.
Despite widespread criticism from fans, the company remained silent and took no action.
In the end, it was Shelly who had to explain the situation during a livestream.
3. September 21, 2026 — Mid-Autumn Festival Event
The Mid-Autumn Festival event included only Shelly and Gen 2 members, while Pundao was left out.
This upset fans, who questioned whether the company was deliberately sidelining Pundao and treating its artists unfairly when arranging schedules.
Once again, the company offered no response or explanation.
In the end, Pundao had to personally post on X and later hold two livestreams to explain the situation and reassure fans.
A Repeated Pattern of Artists Taking the Blame
Every public controversy, management mistake, and questionable company decision has ended with the two artists stepping forward to explain, comfort fans, and calm the situation.
Because this has happened repeatedly, we have reason to suspect that the company may be using psychological pressure and subtle forms of control to force Shelly and Pundao to act as shields, covering up management's failures and absorbing all the negative public attention on the company's behalf.
What makes fans even more disappointed is that after Shelly's livestream on October 7, while fans continued demanding that the company correct its unfair statement, both CEOs repeatedly liked and interacted with sarcastic or negative posts that appeared to discredit the two artists, seemingly tolerating and encouraging this behaviour.
We Have a Question for Both CEOs
Is this what you mean when you demand that your artists show "gratitude"?
Shelly and Pundao have repeatedly protected the company, taken the blame, stepped forward to calm controversies, and silently endured unfair treatment.
They have cooperated fully with their work and have never let the company down.
Yet instead of being treated with kindness and respect, their genuine efforts have been met with unequal treatment, deliberate exclusion, criticism behind their backs, and what appears to be intentional targeting.
Are artists' efforts simply something the company takes for granted?
A healthy working relationship requires responsibility and appreciation from both sides.
It should never mean exploiting artists, forcing them to compromise unconditionally, or repaying their loyalty with betrayal while taking advantage of their sincerity.
narmi retweeted
não tinha pensado por esse lado, mas faz muito sentido. querendo ou não, existia uma diferença de poder aquisitivo e de realidade entre elas, e talvez ela até tivesse vergonha de falar sobre isso. e outra coisa é que acho que ela mesma ainda não consegue entender tudo o que viveu, muito menos dar nome a certas coisas.
narmi retweeted
Replying to @JinsomniaJ @shellypdao
exactamente, porque quieras o no tenía que hablar con ella sobre toda su situación, que su madre la utilizo como moneda de cambio para pagar los años que ese hombre las ayudo económicamente, es decir, solo pónganse en sus zapatos, realmente es difícil contar eso a quien sea.
narmi retweeted
We are sorry that we failed to protect you from this ugly world—a world full of wicked people and hypocrites who were just waiting for an opportunity to stir up hatred against you. Now, stand behind us; we will be your shield. 🛡️ 💔
#shwllybenda
narmi retweeted
They made promises in front of people and confessed their love.
Please come back together We miss you so much💔🩶
@shellypundao @shellybenda @_pundao
narmi retweeted
Eu vivi pra ver uma conta que supostamente apoia casais lésbicos dizer que a história que a própria vítima contou sobre ter sido aliciada desde criança é mentira e acusar uma ADOLESCENTE de algo inadequado. Acho que aqui há a linha que separa o tipo de credibilidade que se dá
Replying to @bluukmj
this is fictional and heasey 🥴
but what is confirmed is she was partying when she was teen adult with her other ex who likes to party as well 🥴
narmi retweeted
เห็นข้อความนี้ ของขึ้นเลย , เดี๋ยวนะเจ๊ … จะมาแฉอะไรน้องก่อน?? สิ่งที่เกิดขึ้นเกี่ยวกับน้องไม่ว่าจะเรื่องอะไรก็ตาม มันไม่ใช่เรื่องเลวร้ายอะไรขนาดนั้น น้องไม่ได้ไปโกงเงินใคร ไม่ได้ไปทำร้ายใคร ไม่ได้ทำผิดกฎหมาย, สิ่งที่เกิดขึ้นเป็นแค่ความผิดพลาดส่วนบุคคลที่เล็กน้อยมากๆ, แล้วเจ๊เอาอะไรมาพูดว่าน้องอาจจะหมดอนาคตในวงการนี้?? น้องอายุพึ่งแค่ยี่สิบต้นๆ น้องสวย น้องเก่ง และดี, อนาคตน้องยังไปได้อีกไกลและสดใสกว่านี้แน่นอน ถ้าน้องอยู่ถูกที่ .. อ้อ ทุกวันนี้เจ๊คงจะเอาคำว่า “น้องจะหมดอนาคต” นี้สินะ มาขู่มาบีบน้องทุกวันให้เดินตามเกมส์ของเจ๊ ?? ผู้นำองค์กรแบบไหนว่ะ มาพูดแบบประจานบุคลากรของตัวเอง 🤬🤬
narmi retweeted
I write as fan who loves Shelly and Pundao, and who once believed in the company that brought them to fandom. For weeks, nearly everything I have learned has come from staff members' private messages, not from any official channel. That alone shows something is wrong.
I. WHAT HAS HAPPENED
1. A statement that harmed the company's own artists.
The company's public statement damaged Shelly's reputation and affected Pundao as well. When Shelly later went live and presented facts that contradicted it, no correction followed. Some fans were simply told, privately, that "nothing could be done."
2. Silence where there should be care.
This situation has taken an emotional, mental and physical toll on both artists. Pundao said in an interview how hurt she was to be the last to know what was happening. Fandoms worldwide organized projects to support them. The company made no visible move.
3. Private messages instead of official communication.
Staff replied to selected fans with vague and sometimes negative remarks about their own artists. This is not transparent, it leaves fans in different countries with different versions of the truth, and the screenshots always circulate in the end.
4. Schedules that ignore demand.
Pundao's engagement keeps growing, yet she has no scheduled work in November apart from a newly announced paid solo fan meeting. Shelly has one event for the whole month. When demand rises and schedules stay empty, fans deserve an explanation.
5. Unequal treatment.
Many fans have noticed that some staff in positions of authority appear to treat artists differently. The founder, once a fan herself, should know how painful it is to watch an artist you love treated this way.
6. Using authority to shape opinion against its own artist.
A management company controls official statements, press access and direct lines to fans. That power exists to protect artists. Here, a public statement framed Shelly in a damaging light, and private messages spoke negatively about her and spread through the fandom. Whether intended or not, the effect was the same: the public's view of Shelly was shaped by the company's version of events before she could speak. That is not crisis management. It is a misuse of authority, and it puts an artist's honor at risk in ways that are hard to undo.
7. Judging before understanding.
A manager's first duty is to hear every side before reaching a conclusion, especially in matters of emotion, relationships and reputation. The company appears to have formed its view early, acted on it publicly, and refused to reconsider when Shelly explained what happened. Condemning your own artist without the full story is not leadership. It is decision-making driven by one person's feelings in the moment. No single person should be able to decide an artist's reputation alone, and so far only one side has had the weight of the company's name behind it.
II. EVERY ACTION HAS CONSEQUENCES
Brands judge the company, not just the artist.
Before booking a face, brands study the management company behind them: how it handles crises, how clearly it communicates, how consistently it acts. Most will only work through an agency they trust. A company that releases damaging statements, refuses to correct them and explains itself through private messages is exactly the kind of partner brands avoid. That cost falls on every artist under the same roof.
Partners need clarity to commit.
Event organizers, sponsors and collaborators plan months ahead. When a company gives no official position on its own artists, no clear schedule and no coherent direction, partners cannot plan around them, and opportunities quietly go elsewhere. Empty schedules are often not a sign of low demand. They are a sign that the company is not doing the work of securing it.
Talent left undeveloped is an investment wasted.
A company invests in artists to develop and showcase what makes them unique, and the return comes from that work. Shelly and Pundao each have distinct strengths and a deeply engaged audience. Leaving that potential unused, without strategy or direction, is not only unfair to them. It means the company is failing at its own core business.
Decisions driven by emotion are not management.
Professional companies decide through process: hearing all parties, checking facts, measuring outcomes, sharing responsibility. When one person's feelings can shape an artist's public image, and when staff discuss artists informally with fans, the company signals that it has no reliable process at all. Partners, media and future talent all notice.
The media cuts both ways.
It can make an artist shine or take everything away, and a company's own words are the most powerful material the media has. The Thai industry has seen enough examples of how quickly unprofessionalism can undo years of reputation building.
III. WHAT WE ASK
1. Issue an official statement addressing the original announcement in light of Shelly's clarification, and correct the public record.
2. Review how that decision was made: who approved it, what it was based on, and whether both artists were heard first.
3. Establish fair process. Future statements about any artist should come only after the artist has been heard, be approved by more than one person, and be released through official channels.
4. Stop discussing artists in private messages. Communicate officially, in English as well as Thai.
5. Share a clear plan for Shelly's and Pundao's activities, with real work opportunities beyond paid fan events, and visible care for their well-being.
6. Treat all artists fairly and respect their private lives. Matters of the heart belong to Shelly and Pundao and should be resolved privately.
7. Decide with evidence, not emotion. Look at engagement, trends and audience response before deciding an artist's future.
We are not asking for perfection. We are asking for honesty and clarity. What we cannot accept is ambiguity.
IV. TO FELLOW FANS
Some of us have travelled to Thailand just to see Shelly and Pundao for a few minutes. That love is still here, even if it has been hurt. Let's put it to work: show up for their work, engage with their posts, support the brands that work with them, and share only verified information. Stay firm but respectful.
This will be a long fight. Let's keep going while taking care of ourselves. Everyone is tired, but we are in this together.
#MotionmindstreatShellyPundaobetter #shellybenda #pundao #shellypundao
narmi retweeted
too many people demand for accountability but when the person they’re asking it from apologizes it’s never good enough. it’s like those ppl that try to “educate” you but are actually just talking down on you and trying to make you feel stupid instead of trying to change ur mind
narmi retweeted
I don't like how y'all took the phrase "taking accountability" and turned it into a completely knew thing where you witchunt someone even after they've apologized and left or gone on hiatus. That's not taking accountability, that's fucking harassment.
narmi retweeted
“While her ex was beside her, taking pictures of her” Ohhh..were you actually there with them? Because her friend was with her too, so how can you confidently claim that it was her ex taking the pictures? Did you witness it yourself or are you simply making assumptions?
The moment she didn't tell her partner that her ex was tagging along and FaceTiming Pundao while her ex was beside her, taking pictures of her, was WRONG.a
She could have told her MOTHER “NO” and confronted her ex to stop his shenanigans, or at least notified her partner that she was with her ex, but NO.
How are you posting pictures on social media that were taken by your EX? Insane 🥴
Stop making excuses for her actions, that’s an adult not a 15year old 🥴
narmi retweeted
Replying to @shellypdao @taengggbas
If it was so easy she could have said no when her mom said to start dating with that pedo


























