Pinned Tweet
One side would make war rather than condemn Nazis, and the other side would accept war rather than allow the Nazis to go uncondemned.
And so the war came.
No, but I do think that I can hold you up as an example to all of what autotheistic retardation looks like.
Replying to @janedoe7S
You think you can shame me, demoralize me. I laugh in all of your faces. Children, all of you.
shubzilla retweeted
I feel like I should explain my participation in this expose of bad behavior.
I have known Megan to some degree for around four years and have been friendly, even distantly, professionally friends. She did what looked like very good work in 2022 on issues of Woke in Christianity, and I was impressed and grateful.
Later, skipping ahead a bit, I met Megan in person, and at a dinner with five or six of us at the table, we got to know each other some. We were pretty quick friends. I'm trying to remember what year this was--2024, I think--and it was in West Palm Beach.
In between, like several other associates of mine, I saw Megan being pulled into the recruitment of the very Christian Nationalists and New Right guys I was dedicated to warning about, upon which I have been strongly vindicated. I spent some time, but less than others, in long conversations with her (overwhelmingly by text/DM), trying to explain why I thought these guys were trouble and would lead her to playing into a deceptive dialectic. One such frustrating conversation was in early spring 2023 while I was in the St. Louis airport waiting for a flight.
I spent much of that time, if you can believe me, trying to explain to her what the dialectic is, and my explanations were simply inadequate. Some of the spiral graphics you've seen me and others share about the dialectic were ones I created specifically for her to communicate what it is and how it works.
I watched her drift further and further into this, more to the frustration of my Christian associates than my own, but I found it disappointing. Later, when I met her, I found her likable, despite the disagreement, which was not significant between us.
Some time later, she shared with me that she considered me a friend but was "done" with the others at one point because of their attempts to talk to her about the issues, her colleagues, the path she was on, and problems in her book. I kept communication open, though it was always infrequent, like normal.
Her accusation was always the same when it came up: these people, who were trying to steer her away from the path she was on with those colleagues, were trying to ruin her career, which is simply untrue and unfair. It might have been the case that the people who had made her would destroy her if she changed course (ask me how I know), but the intentions were never malicious or harmful like that.
Later, however, she got further into this line of thinking than I could tolerate, but she had also fallen seriously sick. I had no intention of criticizing a friendly while she was dangerously ill, so I didn't. I was distantly supportive but made no particular efforts one way or the other. She said many things I normally would have said something about, but I left it out of respect, even though it kept getting beyond my own tolerance.
Finally, though, the behavior documented in this thread, which has been a constant for many months and especially through the last month, crossed enough of a line where I said something. Thus, I became implicated. I tried to be firm but gentle and respectful, maintaining a solid boundary: no misrepresentation. That's it.
The reason I stepped in was, in fact, that. She would frequently pile on smaller accounts, many who respected her, many others who had become critical but who are good people doing good work, and go full attack-dog. I abhor unfairness. It was extremely frustrating to watch, but I stayed out of it, trying to maintain friendship and peace.
The moment I stepped in, which was in response to further vigorous misrepresentation of people she was arguing with online--again, mostly good people with small accounts--it was immediately my turn. The public record is available. I set the boundary in advance and asked her not to do it with me. She said something to the effect of "we're going to do this." Ok.
Since then, I have been questioned many times, in person, on the phone, and my message, about why I "attacked" Megan, which means someone is telling that story because I most certainly did not attack her. Another misrepresentation. It's intolerable.
When this thread appeared, I therefore shared every one of the posts and many of the posts by people who have chimed in. That's my story and my explanation.
I tried to dissuade her from taking a bad path, but it failed. I made a friendship and kept it, and I tried to keep the peace for a long time, even after it crossed several red lines. The moment I said anything, I became the bad guy. Like I said, ok. So be it.
That's my piece.
Look, there is no right time to post this series I'm about to post. Before the midterms was definitely not the right time, and immediately after isn't either, but it's less wrong. So, without further ado, here we go…
𝗠𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗻 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗺 (@megbasham) 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗤𝘂𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆.
Does anyone need the backstory?
On October 7, the Fantastic Four delivered some highly problematic speeches at NatCon Jerusalem, for which they were rightly criticized. One of the speakers was Amanda Milius (@AmandaMilius), who is friends with Megan. Over the following weeks, Megan went on an X crusade to defend, among other things, her friend's speech. In doing so, she repeatedly demanded that others adhere to moral standards that she herself failed to uphold in the slightest.
𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗣𝗟𝗘 𝟭: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 "𝗢𝗽" 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲…
Megan repeatedly criticized people for seeing an "op" behind every disagreement, arguing that accusing others of being part of an op simply because they hold different opinions is paranoid and conspiratorial. Yet she herself suggested that people creating divisions within the right-wing coalition ahead of the midterms were part of an "op."
𝗠𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗻:
"I think the people who are suddenly very interested in creating massive fights within the rightwing coalition right before the midterms are the people you should suspect of being an 'op.'" [1]
𝗔𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗠𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗻:
“I am so sick of people who don’t know how to debate any policy or election result without calling things an “op.“ It’s the last refuge of idiots and grifters.” [2]
“Yes, I’m sure Mollie and Matt and me and everyone else who is saying that he is behaving out of his mind with this stuff are ops of some fashion.” [3]
“They’re not running a dialectical hegemonic op or whatever.” [4]
“And they call anyone who doesn’t agree with them part of an op.” [5]
“Everything ends up in an 8000 word insane rant about ops and dialectics and not just a normal discussion.” [6]
“Just because people disagree does not mean its an ‘op’.” [7]
“The problem is you. Not secret ops.” [8]
“I have to have been bought. I have to be part of an op.” [9]
“Exactly.” (Reply to: “…denouncing everyone who disagrees with them as secret Marxists or ‘woke right’ ops.”) [10]
shubzilla retweeted
Only if you ignore the fact that God did in fact die on a hill as a biological male.
shubzilla retweeted
Don’t mistake this as some principled stand for Christendom.
Joel is ok with demon worshippers in his party. He has welcomed neo-Nazi pagan worshippers of Thor, Odin, Tyr, Freya, and Wotan into his political coalition. He has welcomed those who blaspheme the Holy Spirit like Alex Stein into his coalition.
Dont make mistake this for a shrewd political calculation either. Harmeet has been a champion for defending the civil rights of young white Christian men in the DOJ.
Is is obviously political and electoral suicide, but pride blinds people. And this is prideful bigotry.
Such behavior was condemned by George Washington, who said this of foreign religions living in the United States: “For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens.”
It is also condemned by scripture, which calls which condemns the sins of pride and partiality.
Joel Webbon has become the pagan he claims to fight. He has, in the words of the Apostle Paul, “exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen.”
Joel is a flesh-worshipper. He is a self-worshipper. And inward worship always breeds insanity and destruction. He will accomplish nothing for his movement or his country. He will destroy everything around him. And when everything is ashes, he’ll still have his god, which is himself, which is all he wants anyway. Don’t follow him to your own destruction.
shubzilla retweeted
NEW:
The campaign of now Senator-elect Annie Andrews received a poll in early October showing her with a three-point lead over Darline Graham.
But the Democrat's campaign decided against publicly releasing the poll — or any subsequent internal poll — showing Andrews with a lead over Graham, wary of drawing too much attention from national Republicans and jeopardizing a peak at the right time.
By the time Republicans noticed, it was too late to turn Graham's campaign around.
Full Story: bit.ly/3WPGEnj
In 1998 Serena Williams competed in tennis’ “Battle of the Sexes” and lost to Karsten Braasch, a smoker, after he played golf and had two drinks.
You’ve never heard of Braasch bc he was the 203rd ranked man.
Replying to @constans
The science shows there's no biological advantage. People really really need to stop obsessing about this one issue. It is too politicized for facts to get through to anyone.
shubzilla retweeted
I don’t think the war itself was per se a mistake.
I think half-assing the war was a mistake. We started without a real strategy. We didn’t have enough missiles. We put it into limbo. That’s not on any of us. That’s on Trump and his team, who want to now blame shift to those who backed him up.
Getting rid of Iranian nukes is good. Doing it the way we did it was bad.
Someone in the Administration should lose their job over a botched war. Americans hate losers and we lost to a third world regime because of our own strategy.
shubzilla retweeted
Well, I don’t know, man, but looking back at that February 2025 Oval Office shitshow, some 20 months later, one guy from that meeting is bombing Moscow and St. Petersburg on a daily basis, another has suffered a spectacular failure in Iran and a crushing electoral defeat, and the third, the one with the big mouth, may well have kissed his presidential ambitions goodbye.
So, who had the cards?
shubzilla retweeted
This is cope: 760k net people moved to Texas since 2020
Even if EVERY SINGLE ONE voted Dem it would not account for the 1.2 million margin that Talarico is winning the state by
This was a *Texan* referendum on the entire GOP
shubzilla retweeted
Trump: “I’m making these midterms all about me. I’ll endorse all the candidates and we’ll even hold a convention in Texas starting me.”
[Republicans lose—especially in Texas.]
Trump:
shubzilla retweeted
Republicans take note:
Closing border - Good
Showboat roundups - Not good
Tax breaks - Good
Tariffs and trade wars - Not good
Eliminating nuclear threat - Good
MOU purgatory - Not good
Taking on cartels - Good
Kissing ass of Xi and Putin - Not good
Kicking ass with allies - Good
Alienating allies - Not good
Taking red dye out of food - Good
Allowing measles to return - Not good
Removing Maduro - Good
Making Canada an enemy - Not good
So many own goals to ruin otherwise winning strategies. Mostly the protectionist and isolationist ones.
shubzilla retweeted
Tariffs and ballrooms and caulking mall pools
Big marble arches encrusted with jewels
Renaming oceans and great lakes and streams
These are a few of my favorite things






























