Fiona

The @marksandspencer advert works because it’s Christmassy, has a story, familiar song, shows you the products the store wants to sell and an attractive couple at the heart of it. Never underestimate the power of lovely things that appeal to our senses.

Excellent commentary by RD Wolstencroft: Russell Brand was a cad and a sex addict, admittedly. But he had so much voluntary and consensual sexual activity as a 00s sex symbol, I find it totally hard to believe he ever moved beyond that. Given the fact he has taken on a Christ like archetype of a hippie guru of the right in recent ten or so years, it’s fairly obvious to me and anyone with common sense that he has been politically set up, like Julian Assange. His anti vaccine stance, his conspiracy support, his hanging out in right wing circles combined with his strong new Christian faith is the reason he has been taken down. His Christianity was uniting people and Christ pilling young men and women with the millions he reached. That is not allowed in the Epstein globalist satanic world order. Brand’s case - a concoction of bribed anonymous women from nearly 20 years ago - is obviously a political take down and had received an extraordinary amount of press! Where as Rotherham rape scandal that was well proven and huge with over a million incidents, covered up. The Jewish judge in Brand’s case has tried him unfairly and next week he will be crucified with a long sentence. Speak out against the Matrix and NWO and reach millions with your message of Christ - they crucify you - just like they did our Lord and Saviour 2000 years ago. It’s just that simple. Brand has been a reformed character for many, many years and an amusing and delightful online presence in the Freedom movement - these accusations appear out of nowhere when it’s politically expedient to shut him up and silence him. We live in an evil and unjust world and it’s a very sad thing such railroading like this is allowed to happen. Richard Wolstencroft

I'm a firm believer that when two men are talking, the children should never interrupt. And if they interrupt, the mother of that child should generally be the one to intervene -- not the father. This is how I was raised, and it's how we'll raise our kids. We're old-school. I notice, for example, a massive difference when talking to Amish men versus non-Amish men. Amongst Amish fathers, if a toddler fusses, his wife immediately and reflexively grabs the child and soothes it. The man does not lose his train of thought; he can engage his guest in deep, prolonged conversation that is never "choppy" or broken up. This is exceedingly refreshing after spending time with so many non-Amish fathers -- who often allow themselves to be interrupted and diverted endlessly by screaming toddlers and so on. The "egalitarian" mentality so many men now espouse can result in conversations of such low quality that business relations and friendships actually suffer (or even fail to form in the first place) because Dad is always mothering the unruly kids. There are exceptions of course; some old-school Italians, Mexicans, and some Eastern Europeans seem not to have gone for this stuff. But by the by, it seems to me that the conversational ability of fathers has tanked off a cliff ever since modern feministic parenting roles have been mainstreamed.

A large percentage of men are not leaders. Someone needs to work on that before making them in charge of anything.

Spank her when she does it and tell her that is not acceptable behavior. If you love her, you will not allow her to grow up thinking that that behavior is acceptable or that it doesn't have real consequences. Redirecting or rewarding the behavior is doing her a great disservice

This is because men are thinking about attraction the way that they experience it. True attraction is instant, and if a woman doesn't meet the bar for sex right away, she never will. That's why they think that a woman who becomes attracted to a man over time is actually using him for his resources and only faking the attraction. They simply can't imagine attraction working this way.

Since women got the right to vote you all have slowly made men more and more slaves to the government because you’re weak. Weak people are the worst when they get any power

This was a good convo. It's a hard hypothetical to wrap your head around.

Men: if you don’t have a low body count we won’t date you! Also men: If you don’t sleep with us within 3 dates we’re dumping you. Talk about unreasonable standards.