Hello. Russell Boone here: Adventurer and 6'8" supernerd. 42 out of 50 states visited. content creator apparently writer of fantasy? https://nitter.gq/t.co/KpZOzoWdyq
United States of America 🇺🇸
Joined January 2021
- Tweets68.3K
- Following295
- Followers986
- Likes64.8K
And they never do have an answer. All they do is say well historically every time there's been a new technology new jobs have come out of it. They are using past occurrences of a pattern as a deterministic predictor of the future.
It's stupid that under the hood doesn't tell you immediately what posts can put a label on your account. It's also really stupid that they don't probably Define what posts can put labels on your account. It should be required by law that they are transparent with you at the moment of posting so that you have a chance to delete it before anything bad happens
I need a new job.
I hate my current one.
Too much uncertainty about hours.
Working on a 6am-2pm shift on Saturday and Sundays.
Exactly this monopolies are illegal for a reason
This is insanely malicious, and some dumbasses are defending him
Lets make this clear
If any one of these companies hoards the worlds compute, they will become Compute Barons
Your $20 sub will become $2000, for every application beyond ai.
You wont be able to game, browse the web, anything
Sam literally means he wants it ALL
The only way forward are local compute models that are good at a few things rather than trying to be great at everything
Never give up your sovereignty
Happy Halloween everyone I just saw a mother dressed as malfoid trick or treating with her kids! You love to see it
You're wrong. RAM used by private individuals on their personal computers is not a waste. What you are talking about is collectivism. Filthy, tyrannical collectivism. Sam Altman is a piece of slime
Sam Altman is actually right about this, and most people are missing the bigger picture.
Think about how much RAM sits unused in hundreds of millions of personal computers every single day. People buy machines with 16GB, 32GB, or 64GB of RAM, yet most of that capacity is barely utilized for much of the day.
Meanwhile, AI research, scientific computing, and cloud infrastructure are competing for the same limited global supply of memory.
From an economic perspective, this is an incredibly inefficient allocation of resources.
In a data center, memory can be pooled, shared, and continuously utilized by thousands of workloads. Instead of expensive hardware sitting idle for most of its lifespan, that same capacity can support services used by millions of people.
Higher utilization means more computing output from the same physical resources, potentially lower costs per workload, and less pressure to manufacture additional hardware.
This doesn't mean everyone should give up owning a computer. Local computing still matters for privacy, independence, latency, and offline access.
But the fundamental principle is correct: maximizing individual ownership of scarce hardware isn't necessarily the same thing as maximizing its usefulness to society.
The future of computing isn't just about who owns the most powerful hardware. It's about how efficiently we use the hardware humanity already has.
>Add a sharper counterargument>Make the opening more attention-grabbing⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮
That is a lie that you people tell yourselves.
Do folks understand that anti-communism is pro fascism?
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
This post commits a false dilemma by claiming anti-communism is pro-fascism. It forces a binary choice, ignoring that a vast spectrum of democratic ideologies—like liberal democracy and social democracy—strongly reject both communism and fascism.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dil…