Thomas Chavez

Negative, just have motion.

I will go mailbox for mailbox with you right now. Jk Yeah, fully aware of that you’re incentivized to sell more in boxes so technically speaking what I’m saying would go against what you would profit from. But based on the data that I’ve seen and the limits that are publicly available on Google. This should be a perfectly viable option. The issue within Cold email is that generally speaking the “gurus” That push cold email to the masses previously. Were either ill informed, or not the sharpest crayons in the box. And then that trickle down to just being a standard today. I’m asking if anybody actually has tried this because what we do is already against the status quo. And it works phenomenally for us. Nobody else has ever said send 50 warm-up emails and 5 in the campaign. Too expensive. There was a cost constraint. At three dollars an inbox the only people consistently winning are the resellers generally speaking*. So the only option was to figure out a different way to get volume at scale, previously. I own Google infrastructure you’ve never heard of. But honestly, if you look at the fundamental logic of cold email, and how spam complaints work. You need to dilute the amount of spam complaints each mailbox gets, you send more warm-up emails to do that. We do a 90% warm-up to 10% cold rule of thumb and I burn through less than 1% of our infrastructure a month.

Every ESP has their own formula for regulating spam. And it’s specific to that ESP. Google monitors the spam complaints on Google. Microsoft monitors the spam complaints on Microsoft. It takes 3/1000 emails on Google to get marked as spam for the domain to essentially get blacklisted. So why the fuck would you send all of your volume on your email accounts to one ESP? Diversify. 500 to Google, 500 to Microsoft, etc for example. The odds of getting blacklisted are cut in half. Keep in mind each ESP monitors the blacklist. So the second that Google Microsoft blacklist your domain you’re fucked everywhere. Email deliverability is all about DILUTING THE SPAM RATE, AND DIVERSIFYING SENDS. Fundamentals 101 that are not talked about enough tbh. Thx for coming to my ted talk

Yes agreed. If token expense was not a constraint, everyone would pick fable.

I feel like most “hot takes” nowadays are just common sense, which is not so common lol

Yes, here is evidence that your TAM can handle it lol. 16.4 million emails in the last 60 days, 18.1 k leads.