J Dubb

The climate crisis agenda was built upon a predicted global warming scenario, now widely recognised as 'implausible'. The Earth is not facing runaway warming. First introduced in 2011 to guide policy, this extreme high-emissions projection - known as RCP8.5 (and later SSP5-8.5) - predicted a 5.5°C temperature rise by 2100. This misleading scenario was used to create subsequent dramatic news headlines for over a decade. With the retirement of the extreme 5°C baseline ahead of the 7th Assessment Report (AR7), the ceiling for high-emissions projections has dropped significantly. The IPCC’s high-end baselines have been downgraded towards a 3.3°C ceiling - but even this appears to be implausible. The flaws in this runaway warming scenario lies in the record of Earth's long climate history. The world exists within a long-term ice age regime that has spanned 34 million years. Current temperatures are actually 9°C 'colder' than the planet's 24°C average across the past 485 million years (Judd et al., Science 2024). The current average temperature stands at approximately 15°C. This already low ceiling reflects a modest increase of up to 1.4°C over the past 250 years since the start of the Industrial Revolution. It also shows that increases in CO₂ do not automatically trigger runaway temperatures. Earth’s climate system is amazingly complex, and is driven by multiple interacting variables. The principal driver of our current ice age cycle lies in orbital anomalies known as Milankovitch cycles, while global surface temperatures remain a composite of distinct regional dynamics. Far from causing ecological collapse, the atmospheric CO₂ rise of just over 100 ppm has actually driven a substantial expansion of global leaf area across previously sparse terrain. Certain crop yields have surged, a phenomenon confirmed worldwide via NASA satellite vegetation data. At roughly 420 parts per million, CO₂ remains a trace gas - still among the lowest concentrations in geological history. The atmosphere is more than 99.9% nitrogen, oxygen, and argon, while atmospheric water vapor exceeds CO₂ concentrations many times over. A deceptive, anthropogenic CO₂-driven warming narrative had been heavily promoted by the United Nations and it's agencies, the World Meteorological Organization and the IPCC. This served as the foundational justification for Net Zero mandates. In practice, it forced the premature dismantling of reliable hydrocarbon energy infrastructure across most Western nations. The downstream result has been widespread economic decline and a historic transfer of industrial capacity to Beijing. China now produces roughly 90% of the world's wind turbines, solar panels and critical processing components. Many consider this to be the greatest transfer of wealth in world history. However, it also suggests the world faces a vast and unpredictable geopolitical shakeup.

By severing weather reporting from historical perspective, every heatwave, storm or seasonal shift is now an unprecedented anomaly rather than part of a complex, naturally variable planet. This high-alarm narrative persists because mainstream media has fundamentally collapsed as an independent watchdog. What is entirely missing from modern climate discourse is context. News broadcasts and scientific press releases consistently fail to compare current weather events with geological history or the broader cycles of the Late Cenozoic Ice Age - the same epoch in which humanity evolved and which continues to dominate Earth's climate today. The newspaper industry has been in a state of implosion for thirty years, reducing historical broadsheets to empty boutique shopfronts clinging to past prestige. The electronic media has also hollowed out into a shadow of authentic news reporting. Journalism has quieted down, morphing into slick public relations. This institutional decay explains why climate panic has become the default setting for almost every current event. The legacy media's capture aligns neatly with two driving forces: Political alignments support the broad agenda of international globalism; and it operates in a digital landscape where fear directly translates into online clicks, views, and advertising revenue. Today’s news outlets are activist PR arms for global climate agendas. Entirely absent is any meaningful self-analysis, critique or investigation into the invisible, highly funded framework that generates and bankrolls the crisis narrative. Perhaps the most telling evidence of a biased media narrative is what it actively chooses not to cover. For decades, NASA satellite data has documented the phenomenon of 'global greening' - a significant, measurable expansion of fresh vegetation across the planet. This planetary greening is overwhelmingly driven by elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), a powerful biological fertiliser for plant life. Despite its massive ecological significance, this reality is virtually omitted from mainstream news reporting. A greener planet driven by CO2 directly contradicts the collapse narrative, threatening the foundational premise of the global warming agenda. The crisis state of modern weather reporting is not an accident of sensationalist reporting; it is the direct, international product of a highly coordinated systemic framework anchored by the WMO and the UN. By substituting historical context and empirical observation with speculation and PR rhetoric, this machinery maintains a permanent state of public fear - and avoids any accountability for the bureaucracy that profits from it.