Transition is hope with its sleeves rolled up (Rob Hopkins) | Climate solutions: https://xitter.cf/t.co/mRbgXKnpn7 | https://xitter.cf/t.co/NPqoFWeE6n

New Zealand
Joined August 2014
#nzpol geeks, which is the best MMP calculator? Why in the comments.
25%elections.nz
25%election2026.nz
12%theprogressreport.co.nz
38%building a spreadsheet 😬
8 votes • Final results
2
1
309
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
In case you haven’t seen one before, here is a baby bison…
100
393
29
5,619
60,880
They never say what the person tweeted/posted/emailed. Never.
In November 2022, Waikato GP Dr David Smylie received a dinner invitation from a sales rep that opened “Ate Marie Everyone”. Late that night, he fired back a four-sentence private reply, joking about the typo and grumbling about the amount of te reo in her email. You might not agree with what Dr Smylie said, but it wasn’t sent to a colleague or a patient. Her manager complained to the Medical Council. Within days, Dr Smylie had written an apology. The Council never passed it on, at one point claiming it would “interfere with an active investigation”. When the rep was later interviewed and the committee chair floated a meeting with him, another member warned her off: “it’s tough calling out racism.” The Professional Conduct Committee found his comments “objectively racist, offensive, and insensitive”. Whether he meant any harm was “of little consequence”. His four sentences had “the potential to contribute to current health inequities”. The penalty was a year of what the Council called an “Educational Programme”: monthly sessions with a supervisor who reported back on him, readings on colonisation and institutional racism, and strategies for managing his “implicit biases (which are inevitable)”. He was expected to pay for it, at $125 an hour plus GST. To finish, he had to write two essays, including 1,000 words on structural racism in New Zealand health care. In almost 40 years of practice, nobody had complained about his care. The committee’s ruling noted he had “not yet” received a complaint. He sat through all twelve sessions and refused to write the essays, on a matter of principle. Dr Smylie now practises overseas. Health NZ is short of doctors and recruiting from abroad. The Medical Council has driven one out over a private email. Dr Smylie tells the full story on Free to Speak: In November 2022, Waikato GP Dr David Smylie received a dinner invitation from a sales rep that opened “Ate Marie Everyone”. Late that night, he fired back a four-sentence private reply, joking about the typo and grumbling about the amount of te reo in her email. You might not agree with what Dr Smylie said, but it wasn’t sent to a colleague or a patient, and was remarkably minor. Her manager complained to the Medical Council. Within days, Dr Smylie had written an apology. The Council never passed it on, at one point claiming it would “interfere with an active investigation”. When the rep was later interviewed and the committee chair floated a meeting with him, another member warned her off: “it’s tough calling out racism.” The Professional Conduct Committee found his comments “objectively racist, offensive, and insensitive”. Whether he meant any harm was “of little consequence”. His four sentences had “the potential to contribute to current health inequities”. The penalty was a year of what the Council called an “Educational Programme”: monthly sessions with a supervisor who reported back on him, readings on colonisation and institutional racism, and strategies for managing his “implicit biases (which are inevitable)”. He was expected to pay for it, at $125 an hour plus GST. To finish, he had to write two essays, including 1,000 words on structural racism in New Zealand health care. In almost 40 years of practice, nobody had complained about his care. The committee’s ruling noted he had “not yet” received a complaint. He sat through all twelve sessions and refused to write the essays, on a matter of principle. Dr Smylie now practises overseas. Health NZ is short of doctors and recruiting from abroad. The Medical Council has driven one out over a private email. Dr Smylie tells the full story on Free to Speak: youtu.be/Hn1ahDIwf6k?si=eeHh… Promoted by Free Speech Union, PO Box 91811, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142. youtu.be/Hn1ahDIwf6k?si=eeHh… Promoted by Free Speech Union, PO Box 91811, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142.
6
2
19
920
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
National's been on a steady downward slide in the polls for 3 years so their go-to phrase "stick with the plan that's working" is probably the worst thing they could be saying at the moment. People know the plan isn't working.
4
19
64
915
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
Labour has committed to building 1500 state houses a year. McAnulty says they don’t know the state of Kāinga ora so can’t commit to more until they “lift the bonnet”
18
72
658
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
We'll have the latest 1News Verian poll results at 6pm tonight.
49
11
7
128
10,065
Nicky Hager say in "Dirty Work", the Sensible sentencing trust was revived by Jordan Williams as an astroturf front for the far right TU. Their base is a desk in TUs office space. Williams revels in malicious hit jobs against the Greens. He's a #dirtypolitics agent. @rnz_news
6
11
162
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
193
535
47
9,724
180,621
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
And here we have it. National is funnelling taxpayers money into private health services. Money that should be going into our public health services. Private sector gets 80% of increase in public health funding, unions' report finds | RNZ share.google/1qRRucc1V5avbjg…
13
98
12
240
4,733
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
Replying to @its_sahilio
Its not good. Its stupid to privatise state housing like that and the govt should not have a preference towards ownership as social policy.
1
15
197
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
Just a reminder the govt halted new state houses even though the waitlist was over 20,300. The waitlist is about 24,000 now. They cancelled 60% of projects last year. Every house up until June 2026 was funded by Labour. No new funding at all in 3 years. interest.co.nz/public-policy…
2
42
1
70
723
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
Fantastic Call. #RentToOwn Housing Scheme.
1
15
64
783
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
Hipkins is right. He is using cost per kid in the school. We spend 5 times more on kids in charter schools. Public: $9000 per student Charter: $46500 per student
𝗛𝗶𝗽𝗸𝗶𝗻𝘀’ 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗹𝘀 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀 “Chris Hipkins’ opposition to charter schools is based on claims that have been proven false. ACT is challenging him to accept the facts, change his position, and let children learn in the way that works best for them,” says ACT Leader David Seymour. “Hipkins has gone on Newstalk ZB this morning and repeated the same false claims that charter schools cost more than state schools, despite official figures showing otherwise. “At the NZ Herald Leaders’ Debate, Ryan Bridge asked Hipkins whether he’d ever lied. Hipkins said not deliberately, but acknowledged making incorrect statements based on outdated information and claimed he had always corrected them. “Last week we asked him to prove that. The figures are publicly available on the Charter School Agency's website, but Hipkins has chosen to keep spreading false claims. “The figures show charter schools receive broadly the same funding as state schools, and slightly less for staffing and operations. Compared like for like the number are: Primary schools: $8,762 per student at state schools, compared with $8,278 at charter schools. Secondary schools: $11,040 per student at state schools, compared with $10,741 at charter schools. “Even the establishment funding figures show charter schools receive less. A new primary charter school with 100 students receives $401,675 in staffing and operating funding, compared with $638,249 for an equivalent state school. “If Hipkins can't accept these facts, it suggests the real reason he opposes charter schools is that he and the unions are afraid they're becoming too successful. “Since the first charter schools opened last year, enrolments have grown from 215 to more than 2,100. Five of the original seven schools exceeded their attendance targets in their first year, and five exceeded their achievement targets. “Families are choosing these schools because they offer something different. For many students, the traditional system simply wasn't working. Now they're attending school, learning, and getting opportunities they didn't have before. “Charter schools are contracted to deliver results. If they fail to meet their attendance and achievement targets, they risk losing their funding. That's a level of accountability not seen elsewhere in the state school system. “Chris Hipkins should be celebrating schools that are helping students succeed, not threatening to abolish the model to keep his union mates happy. “He now has the opportunity to put the interests of students ahead of the unions by accepting the facts and letting families choose the education that works best for their children.”
5
44
2
273
4,479
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
The targets the government has met were achieved using private hospitals. They implemented a hiring freeze and then poured 80% of new health funding into private hospitals. There is no private replacement for ED, unfortunately. That is the state of hospitals.
Just last week I fronted up to RNZ to debate Labour’s health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall, head to head and on the record. I’d encourage everyone to have a listen, because the contrast could not be clearer. In that debate she conceded that Labour would keep National’s health targets. Finally, an admission that they are working. Today Chris Hipkins has torn up that promise. This is the same Chris Hipkins who, as Health Minister and then Prime Minister, oversaw exploding waiting times, worsening emergency department performance, and a serious decline in childhood immunisation. Now he wants to scrap the very targets fixing the mess he left behind, targets his own health spokesperson committed to keeping only days ago. In that debate, I stood behind the progress we’ve made as a country over the past three years in our healthcare system, while acknowledging there’s more work to do. Chris Hipkins should be far less comfortable defending his record, and clearly he knows it. That’s why he’s so desperate to distract from Labour and their mates' nine new taxes, which Kiwis are rightly concerned about. New Zealanders remember the mess he left behind, and no amount of spin will convince them he’s the one to fix it. Perhaps he missed the debate. He should go back and watch it.
1
14
70
660
Voted Green party Red electorate Up the workers 💪🏽🖖🏽
31
12
1
165
2,998
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
Nats will sell our state assets in the next term. Boot them out at this election.
The National Party said they would take privatisation to the election. They’ve gone silent on it. They did not campaign on cancelling pay equity or the ferries, means testing jobseeker benefit, increasing social housing rents, selling state houses, repealing smoke free, etc etc
1
2
2
80
National haven't finished fleecing us yet.
Tens of millions to spend on advertising and the National Party portrays kiwis as sheep that they want to continue to fleece. This is so incompetent that I reckon it is Luxon’s work.
2
110
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
No voter id. Permanent residences voting. Same day enrollment. These things make New Zealand the most democratic country in the world and I think that is something to be proud of.
9
10
2
163
6,579
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
The important question for the PM and his noddies is: how many disenfranchised legitimate voters is the correct number to ensure a marginally faster and cleaner count At what point would you regard the number as being too high? 10k? 50k? 100k? It appears to depend who they are
1
1
7
160
weka 🐬 ✊🐬 retweeted
A govt that did not wish to be constantly accused of using an election-count pretext to justify skewing the rules in its own favour would simply ensure that the changes did not in fact favour it But this govt was warned and unilaterally went ahead anyway, and we can all see why
2
2
18
653