Warwick (@xerxes5th) header
Warwick (@xerxes5th) profile picture

Scottish Politics. List(s) = Block

Glasgow, Scotland
Joined February 2016
Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)Photo by Warwick (@xerxes5th)
Replying to @edinburghpaper
Traffic convenor claimed a 75% reduction in nitrogen dioxide thanks to the LEZ - but this is based on computer modelling. Monitoring shows Covid resulted in the largest reduction and there was little change when the LEZ was enforced. Euro 6 engines saved the day, not the LEZ.
1
3
14
230
This is the current state of the cuntry. Listen in full.
Vile scenes from the Commons Chamber as the monster that is Tony Vaughan (a labour MP of course) admits the utterly disgusting things he has done. ** Viewer Discretion Advised**
3
117
😳 Wow! Robert Jenrick just turned the tables on the BBC live on air while being grilled over Reform’s candidate vetting. Asked about the ITV undercover exposé on some Reform councillors and candidates, Jenrick made the obvious point that there’s only so much any organisation can do when it comes to screening people. Then he flipped it straight back at the interviewer: “Look at the BBC for example. Can you now give a guarantee to your listeners this morning that no BBC presenter in the future will be exposed as a paedophile, as a number have been in the recent past? No, of course you can’t. Because you can’t know absolutely everything about every individual in your organisation.” Absolutely ruthless from Robert! 🔥 Does he know something about someone at the BBC that the rest of us don’t? 🤔 You can practically hear the panic behind the scenes. 😂 Jenrick’s right, though. No amount of vetting can guarantee you know everything about every single person in a large organisation. That’s just reality.
268
1,663
114
9,587
312,165
Warwick retweeted
URGENT APPEAL This Christmas we're asking people on benefits to donate £10 per month to help the working families across the UK.
96
1,385
36
13,625
217,761
What would you do if a migrant was running about in your child’s school with a knife? This happened TODAY, in Clydebank, Scotland. No children were harmed. THIS TIME. We cannot allow there to be a next time. Enough. Is. Enough.
46
289
8
1,076
16,317
An individual who has attended these meetings over a number of years has come forward regarding Rosehill Housing Association in Pollok. They report that the council sought 75 per cent of vacant lets for migrants. They say Rosehill proposed a 50/50 split as fair, that this was rejected, and that grants, the licence and subsidy were then threatened. They say the association relented, and that three in four lets will now go to migrants first. This is one account from inside the meetings. It does not appear in the published allocations policy. We are asking for the relevant minutes, and for the claim to be confirmed or denied. Anyone with information of this kind is asked to come forward. Full anonymity is guaranteed. Do not include your name. Local families remain on the waiting list. Housing capacity must come first. There should be no special lane, and no use of grant conditions to force one. @GlasgowCC @RuairiKelly_ @scotgov @SHR_news
18
200
7
540
13,987
This smug fool is Antoinette Fernandez, the Green Party reparations officer. She stupidly believes Britain should pay billions in repatriation for slavery action many centuries ago. Her grandad is Nigerian slave trader, recently posting his wealth at just over 2 billion dollars (he now strip mines Nigeria for oil and gas). His family wealth is entirely built from generations of selling Nigerian men and women into slavery. Mental left wing hypocrisy at its best.
381
4,565
132
18,262
197,507
Warwick retweeted
Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this: The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay £1. The sixth would pay £3. The seventh would pay £7. The eighth would pay £12. The ninth would pay £18. And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.  So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20.” Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free but what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33, but if they subtracted that from everybody’s share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.  So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage. They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay. And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a 100% saving). The sixth man now paid £2 instead of £3 (a 33% saving). The seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7 (a 28% saving). The eighth man now paid £9 instead of £12 (a 25% saving). The ninth man now paid £14 instead of £18 (a 22% saving). And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59 (a 16% saving).  Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.  But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got £1 out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got £10!“  “Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a £1 too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”  “That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”  “Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!” The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.  The next week the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important – they didn’t have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!  And that’s how it works. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.  For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
179
1,083
128
4,673
229,589
Why are we paying for this?
The Scottish Parliament tonight voted 3 - 1 to rejoin the EU in response to the PM reopening the question. Good to have cross party support. No wonder, Brexit has been a disaster. - Expensive - Throws up barriers - Takes away rights
3
37
Warwick retweeted
Imagine going to, say, Japan and proclaiming the native Japanese don’t really exist because anybody can be Japanese and if you suggest otherwise then you are “racist”. This is the level of debate among leftists in the UK.
Tonight on Question Time, I debated Suella Braverman on what it means to be English. I think there’s one word for her position
512
1,251
46
10,371
287,846
Nachdem nun einige Accounts "Russland ist nicht mein Feind" gepostet haben, sollten alle, die das anders sehen, "Ich melde mich freiwillig an die Front" schreiben und den Nachweis dafür bringen. Politiker bitte zuerst!
318
1,143
49
6,780
54,524
Brilliant news! It is only thanks to the SNP Government that the SNP have stopped the SNP from firing and rehiring these people. John Swinney - OUR first minister - the blessed saviour of Glasgow!💛
11
14
1
103
1,995
Said it before and I'll say it again, do not plead guilty to a politically motivated charge. You'll be told that if you do 1/3rd of your sentence will be knocked off and that you'll get bail pending trial. Well you won't, no matter what you say, no matter how petty your offence you will be kept in custody pending trial - and if you've plead guilty you will be given an grossly excessive sentence justified on the basis that it will serve as an example to others. Don't be tempted, if you're charged with a politically sensitive offence you will suffer prison time. On the other hand juries can and do see through the political posturing of the state and more often then not will find you not guilty. So I'll say it again, if the prosecution against you is politically motivated never, ever plead guilty - or you will do 2 years inside for throwing an empty plastic bottle and telling a copper what you think of him.
21
507
7
2,773
35,762
Warwick retweeted
The NGOs end up increasing the number of homeless people they manage, because that’s the only way to increase their revenue! Incentives drive outcomes. “Homeless” is a propaganda word used to describe people on the street who are mentally ill or severely addicted to drugs. The word implies that this is someone who fell a little behind on their mortgage payment and they’re one job offer away from getting back on their feet, which is obviously false if you’ve ever tried talking to a “homeless” person in SF, LA, NY, Austin or anywhere else. The honest reality is that we need to bring back asylums for extreme mental illness or drug addiction for those who are a serious danger to themselves or others.
Incentives determine outcomes If you give an NGO a certain number of dollars per homeless person, they will never solve homelessness SF spends more than $1b/yr (up 5x) and the homeless population has only grown NGO fraud is so insane, man.
4,074
16,826
957
75,122
5,180,951
It's pretty wild to be honest. If you need to set up a ministry of truth to fight Russian misinformation, you'd think you'd go on TV with at least one example in your pocket.
“What piece of Misinformation has been seeded in the Minds of British people by Vladimir Putin?” “I’ll ask you again - What piece of Misinformation was seeded in the Minds of British people by Vladimir Putin?” “I’ll ask you again - What piece of Misinformation was seeded in the Minds of British people by Vladimir Putin?” MUST WATCH & SHARE He can’t answer because the whole premise is just another LIE But soon you won’t be able to read this - and you’re only source of information will be the BBC & CNN
36
320
4
1,568
31,408
🚨NEWS: ANOTHER NO GO ZONE IN THE UK Glasgow's 'Four Corners' is now a complete no-go zone for women and girls after 4 rapes in just 3 weeks in the heavily migrant area We should not have to live like this
168
2,413
57
9,082
141,559
Soon you will be arrested in the UK for sharing this Why? Because George Orwell was right
303
6,792
164
18,591
172,187