아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging) profile picture

CS 박사과정 / 컴공이지만 코딩보다 수학을 많이 합니다 / 프사는 100x100님 / 이 계정은 모든 팔로잉의 리트윗을 끄고 있어요

Joined October 2021
Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)Photo by 아둔 코딩계 (@AdunDebugging)
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
How do we understand neural nets with so many interacting params that we can’t describe what they do in words? Our take: objective functions and regularizers offer a concise description of "what models learn" Can we *empirically* study implicit regularization in DL?🧵
2
14
53
3,498
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
The key idea is gradient matching: if learned weights minimize loss + a regularizer, their gradients must cancel. (see gif in opening tweet) Holding the weights fixed, we fit the parameters of a candidate regularizer to balance the residual loss gradient.
1
2
5
203
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
Day 25/ We are doubling all usage limits for all Pro 100/200/500 tiers and Business Premium, effective today. We heard your kind feedback and won’t be reducing usage limits for Pro 200, so your Work and Codex usage will stay the same. We’re also going to continue offering extended limits for dots for now, and usage of your dot will still continue to be separate from your default usage. And we'll of course also keep shipping better models and other efficiency improvements that increase your effective usage over time.
7,397
2,703
3,647
39,171
7,528,795
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
The most important sentence of the GitHub repository: "On average, each result used three hours of ChatGPT Pro thinking compute with that model." The important result on that list I will publish with my collaborator on arxiv tomorrow was found in a session where Astra thought 6 hours in total and probably used my local context. The main problem solving step was done in 2.5 hours. If results on this level are possible with one-shot solutions in three hours, that is insanely impressive.
3
9
87
11,124
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
This year at @iclr_conf, we've policies where reviewers would be required to (a) disclose AI tools used for assisting in writing peer reviews, and (b) report original self-written assessment and any LLM interactions.
3
12
7
67
18,151
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
So, someone came up with an AI-generated formal proof, in Lean, of a solution to the Collatz problem, and it turned out that the “proof” was merely exploiting a bug in the Lean kernel (allowing you to prove anything).
93
193
88
4,016
321,323
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
hello there the jacobian conjecture is false thanx to my close friend akhil for asking about it and my other close friend fable for working during the world cup final ((1+xy)^3 z + y^2 (1+xy) (4+3xy), y + 3 x (1+xy)^2 z + 3 x y^2 (4+3xy), 2 x - 3 x^2 y - x^3 z): \C^3\to \C^3, has jacobian determinant -2, and sends (0, 0, -1/4), (1, -3/2, 13/2), and (-1, 3/2, 13/2) to (-1/4, 0, 0)
1,693
5,370
3,152
43,734
40,111,224
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
Replying to @Someody42
Hi! We answered Jack and Christian in detail on Zulip, but TL;DR: - We agree, and clearly state, that the code is not perfect: each book has a completion percentage, and each statement has quality scores. Some books have a low completion percentage, and some statements are flagged as low quality. Most of Geometry of Manifolds is flagged as bad. We released all our outputs, including the weaker ones, on purpose; now our goal is to keep raising the code quality over the coming months. - There is a separate issue of whether the eval harness used to score the code is trustworthy. In most cases, we find that it is. When it does fail, it is often because it spots the error but judges it to be less severe than it is (this was the case with the error highlighted by Jack). Overall, our goal is to explore both the potential and the limitations of autoformalization at scale with the current generation of models, and community feedback is very helpful - we will build upon it to improve the project.
1
3
1
23
4,371
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
Here's a "theorem" in the complex variables section proved by sorry: "If g is complex differentiable at every point with Re z \geq 0, then g is complex differentiable everywhere." This is then used in the proof of another theorem in Lecture21.lean. All of this is marked as a "pass".
Our team at @AIatMeta is excited to announce ATLAS: one of the largest automated formalization efforts to date. ATLAS contains Lean 4 formalizations of both statements and proofs from 25+ mathematics textbooks, spanning dozens of domains, for a total of 500k lines of code. We are also releasing a flexible formalization harness and a companion paper. External contributions are welcome! Joint work spearheaded by our amazing PhD student Ahmad Rammal (@Ahmad3Rammal), together with Niket Patel (@niketnpatel ), Fabian Gloeckle (@FabianGloeckle), Amaury Hayat (@Amaury_Hayat), Remi Munos (@MunosRemi), Julia Kempe (@KempeLab), Vivien Cabannes, and myself from @AIatMeta, @NYUDataScience , and Ecole des Ponts. This is an ongoing effort; more details in the thread below. (1/9)
14
36
6
329
49,257
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
Really cool When they trained GPT3 they had loss spikes because they scraped from a subreddit of microwave noises That training batch was literally text like "mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm"
Before and after cleaning up the dataset. Big loss spikes just went away.
38
344
40
8,953
693,334
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
there will soon be no point in playing Slay the Spire 2, as superintelligent AI will be able to play it better than you, and will have more fun doing so than you ever could have
35
80
5
1,781
57,105
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
ICML journal editors have added hidden prompt injections to every paper sent to reviewers, to detect when reviewers are using AI It secretly tells the AI to use 2 specific phrases in the review A reviewer found it & was about to desk reject, assuming the author did it
19
97
27
1,649
246,491
아둔 코딩계 retweeted
The Geometry of Algorithmic Stability: A Hodge Theoretic View on Structural vs. Statistical Insta... Karen Sargsyan. Action editor: Alberto Bietti. openreview.net/forum?id=rFqs… #robustness #stability #instability
2
9
825
TIME copied this iconic photo of the workers who built our cities to crown the tech billionaires who are using AI to decimate and destroy the working class.
2025 was the year when artificial intelligence’s full potential roared into view, and when it became clear that there will be no turning back. For delivering the age of thinking machines, for wowing and worrying humanity, for transforming the present and transcending the possible, the Architects of AI are TIME’s 2025 Person of the Year. time.com/7339685/person-of-t…
119
10,145
80
56,275
1,009,217