Pinned Tweet
Consensus of Najdi imams in affirming Islam for the rulers, from them is King AndulAziz
"We do not see anything from Imam AbdulAziz that would require rebelling against him or removing the hand from obedience to him"
This comes from a collective Fatwa of the following scholars:
Shaykh Muqbil and Shaykh ibn Baz both called Shaykh al-Albani a Mujadid, Muhadith and his gradings to be accepted
As for al-Alwan ive seen young scholars who are not specialized in Hadith out grade him in Hadith
Hes over hyped by a group only because he agrees with their Takfir
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
I urge my brothers to donate what they can to the people of Gaza in their dire situation.
Our brother Muhammad is a trusted individual living there. If you are able to, please message him privately to gain access to his PayPal ID for donations.
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
You can make up sunnah prayers even if you missed them on purpose. Sheikh abdul aziz ar rayyisحفظه الله
How Umar ibn al-Khattab would deal with newly built churches and displayed crosses
shaykh refutes those saying this is a new opinion invented by ibn Taymiyah, see quoted tweet for detail
by Shaykh Dr. AbdulAziz al-Rayyis
Ruling on building churches/places of worship in Muslim lands?
Shaykh Dr. AbdulAziz al-Rayyis
Student of Ibn Baz (studied major large sunan with him) ibn al-Uthaymin and al-Albani who visited his home
If you love the Shaykh theres a compilation of Fiqh benefits on this insta
He also said anyone who makes Takfir on Saudi ruler or insults Shaykh Fawzan is a Khariji so accept this fatwa as well
Shaykh al-Ghunaymān was asked:
Q: Our Shaykh, Someone said, that regarding ruling by man-made laws, the scholars are in agreement that one who rules by man-made laws is not takfired unless he deems it permissible (meaning istiḥlāl), alters the law or rejects the ruling of Allah.
Is this, may Allah preserve you, Shaykh, correct?
A: It is not correct. This is the speech of the Murjiʾah.
AMJ is a Khariji for making Takfir on Muslims based on a false Tawil
Like on the rulers the Najdi scholars had consensus of their Islam and in obeying them since 1903, opposing AMJ who said all of them are Kuffar and all “Madkhalis” who differ are also Kuffar
إياك والتلون في دين الله
تَعَلَّمْ أُصُولَ الدِّينِ تَحْظَ بِالثَّبَاتِ
وَكُنْ رَاسِخًا فِي الْقَوْلِ وَالِاعْتِقَادِ
فَمَنْ جَهِلَ الْأُصُولَ تَلَوَّنَ كُلَّمَا
تَقَلَّبَتِ الْأَهْوَاءُ بَيْنَ الْعِبَادِ
كَمَا يَتَلَوَّنُ الْحِرْبَاءُ حَيْثُ تَكُونُ
يَكُنْ بِلَا أَصْلٍ أَسِيرَ الْفَسَادِ
فَالْزَمْ كِتَابَ اللهِ وَالسُّنَنَ الَّتِي
جَاءَتْ عَنِ الْهَادِي بِغَيْرِ عِنَادِ
3
9
917
a good thread on the Asha’iras opinion on Imam Ibn Abd al-Barr
Ibn Abd al-Barr is one of the most influential greatest Maliki Imams
His book al-Tamhid is recognized as the best work ever written in Islam, and Ibn Hazm is from the scholars who claimed this
Some Ashʿarīs and their opinion of Imām Ibn ʿAbdul-Barr رحمه الله:
Abul-Faraj Ibnul-Jawzī said:
I am indeed astonished by a man from al-Andalus, known as Ibn ʿAbdul-Barr, who authored the book At-Tamhīd. In it, he mentioned the ḥadīth concerning the descent (of Allāh) to the
2
9
1,046
The Nabi ﷺ said there will be a people who dont even know the Shahadas meaning
They only say it because their fathers say it, and it will save them from hell
Ibn Taymiyah used this Hadith as evidence to excuse the ignorant ones amongst the Qalandariya, an extremist Sufi sect
My point is the King DID rule by Shariah
But its easy for Khawarij to claim he did not rule by it over matters here and there like they do today
They see taxes and riba in banks and say even 1 mistake means you dont rule by Shariah
I pray that King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz takes your good deeds on the Day of Judgement for slanderously accusing him of abandoning the Sharīʿah and allying with the kuffār against Muslims.
What’s ironic about this is that the
aʾimmah ad-daʿwah who sided with King ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz made takfīr of Fayṣal ad-Duwaysh and the Ikhwān who sided with him because they accused them of coming under the authority of the British and the apostate regimes under their authority and fighting the Muslims on their behalf.
Why do I see people calling Hassan as-Somali a Hizbi?
Do you know how serious that is? You say hes a Hizbi for association with Abu Khadeejah
But ur falling into the same mistake as AK by labelling someone misguided for something that doesnt make someone deserving of that label
3
13
3,440
Shaykh Sulayman bin Sahman supported loved and sided with King AbdulAziz for almost 30 years
Shaykh Ibn Baz then continued this until the Kings death
The next inheritor of this Manhaj was Shaykh Fawzan whom Khawarij Takfir but is upon the same Manhaj as bin Sahman
Some Khawarij make Istihlal of crimes like theft and oppression in Kaffir lands that they have a contract under
Well those same people likely say it is Shirk to go to courts, so if they really feared Shirk they would make Tahrim on these things for Sad al Dhara’i
179
Is it allowed to cut off relatives that harm me?
Very beautiful video with great life advice
PHD in Usul al-Fiqh, student of Ibn Baz and ibn al-Uthaymin, attending gatherings of the scholars since before 6 yrs old, the Muwahid Sulayman al-Ruhayli
“Ijtihadi issue” like they disagreed or something
Only people disagreeing is you Khawarij
And its not Ijtihad when its us, its straight to Takfir
Shaykh al-Ruhayli and al-Rayyis are the inheritors of the Najdis not those who do Takfir
nitter.gq/alelislam/status/20919…
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
3
295
Ibn Abd al-Barr transmitted consensus Ahlul Kalam are not scholars
Theres also thousands of opposing scholars with better works + Asha’irah are only transmitting knowledge from Ahlul Sunnah
But when all you know is 2 scholars its easy to make these claims
One who worships a known Taghut is not given Udhr because it is a well known matter
The one who thinks Allah allows them to slaughter for something other than him, like prophets, due to liars who told them it is Islam, they can be given Udhr
youtube.com/shorts/WiZA9lNHI…
This individual declared me a khariji over one directing worship to other than Allah. Just as his imām Dāwūd ibn Jirjīs declared the imams of najd as a khariji and mubtadiʿ for the same topic, and declared their blood ḥalāl. These people behave the same as their forefather.
The question remain. Is this specific individual, who is clearly ignorant, a Muslim excused with ignorance until proof is established and conditions are fulfilled.
Tell us oh you, and those like you who dares raise their voice like the mushrikīn who claimed to be Muslim before you all did over this topic, is this your brother in Islām, who you will make du‘āʾ for when they die, marry your sisters and women too, inherit from, and bury amongst the Muslim.
This is the religion of Allah and tawḥīd to you? Tell us, you criminal, when Allah says: “Then will We treat the Muslims like the criminals?” (al-Qalam: 35), you claim he will? And when he says he doesn’t forgive shirk, you say he is forgiven and excused and is a Muslim, may Allah humiliate you and those upon his speech and defend it as the religion of Allah.
In the video I linked ibn al-Uthaymin says the one who is ignorant can be given Udhr
You can not pray over a Kaffir, if she was considered to be a Kaffira in this world, but we dont know her Akhira (cope Tawil invented by Khawarij) we would not pray over her
1
3
196























