Between Ahlul Sunnah and you Khawarij and Asha’irah are the books and Athar of the Salaf
Joined February 2022
- Tweets4.5K
- Following93
- Followers434
- Likes3.5K
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
I urge my brothers to donate what they can to the people of Gaza in their dire situation.
Our brother Muhammad is a trusted individual living there. If you are able to, please message him privately to gain access to his PayPal ID for donations.
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
Reminder of what the Najdi Imams before us were upon and how
Shaykh Fawzan
Shaykh Sulayman al-Ruhayli
Shaykh AbdulAziz al-Rayyis
are the closest to their Manhaj and inherited their Aqeedah
As for the Khawarij who wanted to rebel or those imprisoned they were all FORGOTTEN
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
Sh. Ibn Bāz رحمه الله was asked, “Who should we ask after you?” He responded, “Shaykh Sālih al-Fawzān.”
Sh ‘Uthaymīn رحمه الله: “The Heart is at ease with the rulings of Sh. Fawzān”
He is the ‘Allāmah, the Muftī Shaykh Sālih Ibn Fawzān Ibn ‘Abdullāh Al-Fawzān حفظه الله
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
إخوانكم المسلمون في اليمن يجاهدون في معركة قوية ضد الرافضة في هذا الوقت.
لا تهمنا حساباتُ غيرنا، ما دام الجهاد هذا يحقق المصلحة للإسلام والمسلمين.
فادعوا لهم بالنصر والثبات، وأن يوفقهم الله لحفظ دينهم وأعراضهم ودمائهم، ويمكنهم من إقامة شرع الله، وينصرهم على القوم الكافرين.
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
do not slander or revile the Muslim rulers!
Abū ʿUmar [Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr al-Maliki] رحمه الله said:
"If advising the ruler is not possible, then [the obligation is] patience and duʿāʾ, for indeed, they [the Salaf] used to forbid reviling the rulers:
Muḥammad ibn Khalīfah informed us, saying: Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥusayn al-Baghdādī narrated to us, saying: ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd narrated to us, saying: Abū Hishām al-Rifāʿī narrated to us, saying: Yaḥyā ibn Yamān narrated to us, saying: Sufyān narrated to us, from Qays ibn Wahb, from Anas ibn Mālik, who said:
"The elders among the Companions of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) used to forbid us from reviling the rulers."
And Muḥammad ibn Khalīfah narrated to us, saying: Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥusayn narrated to us, saying: Abū Bakr ibn Abī Dāwūd narrated to us, saying: ʿĪsā ibn Muḥammad Abū ʿUmayr al-Ramlī narrated to us, from Ḍamrah, from Rajāʾ ibn Abī Salamah, from ʿUbādah ibn Nusayy, who said:
"Abū al-Dardāʾ stood at the door of Muʿāwiyah, but he was shielded from entering due to an occupation Muʿāwiyah had. It was as if Abū al-Dardāʾ felt something in himself, so he said: 'Whoever approaches the doors of the ruler will stand and sit; and whoever finds a closed door will find beside it an open door: if he asks, he is given, and if he seeks refuge, he is granted refuge. And indeed, the beginning of a person’s hypocrisy is his slandering of his ruler.'"
Al-Tamhīd (21/287)
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
Consensus of Najdi imams in affirming Islam for the rulers, from them is King AndulAziz
"We do not see anything from Imam AbdulAziz that would require rebelling against him or removing the hand from obedience to him"
This comes from a collective Fatwa of the following scholars:
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
This guy's all over the place, he's basically saying that what Hatib رضي الله عنه did was kufr.
So let's examine what the scholars said regarding the actions of Hatib:
Shaykh ʻAbd al-Laṭīf ibn ʻAbd al-Raḥmān Āl al-Shaykh said:
"Although the noble Ayah contains what suggests that Hatib's action was a type of Muwalat, and that he conveyed affection to them, and that the one who does such a thing has indeed strayed from the right path, nonetheless, the statement of the Prophet ﷺ:
'He has told you the truth; let him go' is clear in that a person does NOT become a disbeliever by such an act if he is a believer in Allah and His Messenger, without doubt or suspicion, and only did that for a worldly purpose." al-Durar al-Saaniyah (1/473)
We also find Imam al-Shafi'i saying that informing the Mushrikeen of the plans and secrets of the Muslims isn't clear disbelief
Imam al-Shāfi‘ī رحمه الله was asked regarding the one who takes the Mushrikeen as allies, and exposes the vulnerabilities of the Muslims by informing the Mushrikeen of their secrets, does this make his blood permissible to spill?
To which he replied:
"The blood of a person who has attained the sacred inviolability of Islam is not permissible to spill except if he commits murder, or commits adultery after being married, or commits clear disbelief after his Iman and then remains steadfast upon that disbelief. Exposing the vulnerable secrets of a Muslim, or aiding a disbeliever by warning him that the Muslims intend to launch a surprise attack against him so that he may take precaution, or giving him advance notice to cause harm to the Muslims, does not constitute clear disbelief."
.
.
.
And he goes on to prove this by mentioning the narration of Hatib
Kitab al-Umm ( 4 / 263)
1) Hatib رضي الله عنه himself clarified that he didn’t send the letter to side with the kuffar, rather to warn them that the Prophet ﷺ and his army is after them, in order to save his own family.
2) Umar رضي الله عنه made takfir on Hatib.
3 The Prophet ﷺ nullified the HUKM of the takfir AFTER Hatib clarified himself.
4) Umar رضي الله عنه was NOT condemned for labeling him a Munafiq, followed by threatening death penalty; since his initial Takfir on apparent was a valid ijtihad to what he knew of the matter.
He was prevented from applying the hadd when he asked to strike Hatib’s neck, thus, only the application of the punishment was lifted off AFTER Hatib رضي الله عنه clarified his stance. Which is what the normal stance is in takfir of labeling vs punishment.
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
Imam Sulaymān ibn Saḥmān said in his Diwan:
"[We triumphed] by Abdul Aziz, son of the Imam, son of Faisal, the ally of high glory, descendant of the noble and pure-hearted.
A brilliant, sharp-witted, and eloquent master, who commands his military squadrons as he pleases."
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen رحمه الله affirmed Islam for the Algerian ruler in the 1990s simply because he prays. He also warned against the youth who at that time were making takfir of the Algeria
youtube.com/watch?v=Yn1JBHWb…
below is the transcript of this audio😁
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
To silence the barking Khawārij and the Surūriyyah, here is 5 scholars from al-Da'wah an-Najdiyyah, including Shaykh Muḥammad bin Ibrāhīm Āl al-Shaykh and Shaykh Sa‘d bin Ḥamad bin ‘Atīq refuting those who publicly defame the Muslim ruler instead of privately advising him!
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
This @ProjectGuiding is nobody new to running, many brothers say he has done this in private discussions and he also blocked me after I made a thread confronting him. What can you expect when his Youtube videos are all cut out clips from scholars that he doesn’t even take from yet doesn’t clarify this in order to appeal to his miskeen audience
As expected, the K͟hārijī runs away and declines the debate offer. However, so that he does not look completely shameless in doing so, he throws out the “mubāhalah” cop out as a counteroffer instead.
Typical.
I did not expect him to accept, and for two main reasons:
Firstly, because this k͟habīth is not fit for debating. He knows he cannot answer a shubhah that is posed to him in real time that he’s never seen before, (and we have many new ones, from their scholars and from the Salaf and the Khalaf that we haven’t shown for possible future debates ). He would be shocked and dumbfounded, and would begin stuttering on the spot, just like he did on that live around two years ago. The only way this guy can operate on this topic is by hiding behind 2+ hour videos where he monologues and PDFs that take him months to produce while he attempts to find a way to give Jahmī taʾwīl to the clear āthār of the Salaf.
Secondly, because the people upon his manhaj, and those who share his beliefs, know that he is not fit for it. They know he would embarrass them, and that it would be a complete bloodbath. He knows how to dodge a bullet, I’ll give him that.
I’ll let these images speak for themselves.
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
As expected, the K͟hārijī runs away and declines the debate offer. However, so that he does not look completely shameless in doing so, he throws out the “mubāhalah” cop out as a counteroffer instead.
Typical.
I did not expect him to accept, and for two main reasons:
Firstly, because this k͟habīth is not fit for debating. He knows he cannot answer a shubhah that is posed to him in real time that he’s never seen before, (and we have many new ones, from their scholars and from the Salaf and the Khalaf that we haven’t shown for possible future debates ). He would be shocked and dumbfounded, and would begin stuttering on the spot, just like he did on that live around two years ago. The only way this guy can operate on this topic is by hiding behind 2+ hour videos where he monologues and PDFs that take him months to produce while he attempts to find a way to give Jahmī taʾwīl to the clear āthār of the Salaf.
Secondly, because the people upon his manhaj, and those who share his beliefs, know that he is not fit for it. They know he would embarrass them, and that it would be a complete bloodbath. He knows how to dodge a bullet, I’ll give him that.
I’ll let these images speak for themselves.
This Mudallis attempts to score a cheap “win,” after I’ve been openly saying debating Madkhalis is a waste of time, since they’re not sincere. I’ve discussed with him multiple times and went back and forth, very cordially I might add, and I even tried to get him to discuss things privately, multiple times. I was even making Duā for his Hidāyah at one point. The fact that he’s saying I refused to discuss with him publicly and privately is a blatant lie, which even Madkhalis can attest to, but this individual is a known liar, so I’m not surprised.
Many who have seen our discussions left Madkhalism, by the Fadhl of Allah. The brothers and I have refuted every Shubuhah these Zanadiqa have brought, by The Fadhl of Allah Alone, so to waste further time on these clowns is likely sinful.
All in all, I found him to be insincere, arrogant, and quite frankly, stupid — which is why I stopped engaging with him. This seems to have struck a nerve. He’s allegedly heard my Hujjah, and I have heard his, and I’ve even taken the extra step and skimmed through most of his pathetic and sloppy book that allegedly, even Ar-Rayyis was “too busy” to read and endorse, lol. It comprises of recycled arguments that have long been refuted, as well as new arguments which even the Dawud bin Jarsis (Ar-Rayyis) of our time wouldn’t dare make. The Ikhwah and I have refuted them none-the-less.
At this stage, all that’s left is a Mubahalah. Imam Ibn Al Qayyim رحمه الله said in Zād Al-Ma’ād:
أن السنة في مجادلة أهل الباطل إذا قامت عليهم حجة الله ولم يرجعوا بل أصرُّوا على العناد أن يُدعَوا إلى المباهلة.وقد أمر الله سبحانه بذلك رسولَه ولم يقل: إن ذلك ليس لأمتك من بعدك، ودعا إليه ابن عمِّه عبد الله بن عباس لمن أنكر عليه بعض مسائل الفروع (٢) ولم يُنكِر عليه الصحابة، ودعا إليه الأوزاعيُّ سفيانَ الثوريَّ في مسألة رفع اليدين (٣) ولم ينكر عليه ذلك؛ وهذا من تمام الحجة.
If you need help with the translation let me know insha’Allah. Cut the fake tough guy postering, put your money where your mouth is (don’t worry the Mubahalah will be free of charge, no gofundme or $ 20 paywall required), and we’ll do a Mubahalah on whether my Aqeedah is the Aqeedah of the Khawarij or not. We will make Duā that Allah destroy the liar and incorrect amongst us, and that Allah make us a sign for His Curse and Punishment among the people. You can invite any one of your buddies and they can join in on the Mubahalah. I can bring my brother Abu Dujanah, who has discussed this matter with you and your heretical ilk prior, multiple times.
We can do so on a neutral live (that we both agree on). Not on yours, or any one of your buddies’ panel. Let’s get this organized Insha’Allah. Don’t be a chicken.
Muslim 🇸🇩 retweeted
ʾImām ʾIbn Bāz:
“Some of the people of knowledge held the view that whoever deliberately lies about the Prophet ﷺ has committed kufr.
However, the majority of the scholars held otherwise, unless he deems it lawful. If he deems it lawful, then he has committed kufr by ijmāʿ.”
![Majmūʿ Fatāwā wa Maqālāt Mutanawwiʿah [26/316]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKi5oeNWIAA2HR0.jpg?name=orig)
ALT Majmūʿ Fatāwā wa Maqālāt Mutanawwiʿah [26/316]