I know it’s only the first week of this one being on sale but putting so much work into something over weeks and months and having zero sales is quite demoralising
My new erotic & smutty short story “Home For Christmas” is out now!
books2read.com/u/mZAJVB
6
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
Sex workers don't owe you cheap content just bc you're horny.
Do you have any idea how much work goes into making these videos? The filming, editing, equipment, marketing, & everything else?
If you think an OF creator charges too much, don't buy their content. It's that simple.
For those of you saying $1 a minute is a lot of money, let’s do a quick lesson.
Let’s say you have a 10 minute video and you price it at $9.99. Most sites take 40%. That’s $6 left and then after taxes, that number goes down to $4.20.
So no, that’s not “$60 an hour,” (since so many of you want to think of it this way) that’s $25.20 an hour. Mind you, we don’t get benefits.
Except the 10 minute video didn’t take 10 minutes to film. I don’t wake up with my hair, nails and make up magically done. I don’t wake up in lingerie with a studio next to me just ready to go. All of that takes HOURS.
So why would I EVER adhere to a dated and demeaning price of $1 a minute for clips, streaming, anything?
That would mean I’d be getting paid drastically below minimum wage.
🤦🏼
OnlyFans livestreaming must be banned say UK MPs in 'e-pimps' warning
mirror.co.uk/news/politics/o…
1
112
They are coming for the whole adult industry at this point.
I joked a couple of weeks ago that the Labour government were one step away from banning OF and JFF…
avn.com/news/legal/u-k-lawma…
1
107
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
So far the only active petition I can find against the recent changes to the obscene porn laws in the uk is the one below.
I know there are others which are in the review stage. When they are live again, I'll share them
petition: Repeal sexist anti-porn laws in the UK share.google/Mj5hyJSvFjQPYAU…
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
UK legit ruined porn for me, because anytime there's facesitting or dicksucking or maybe a little hand over mouth all I can think about is "this video is illegal in the UK" 😭😭😭
My new erotic & smutty short story “Home For Christmas” is out now!
books2read.com/u/mZAJVB
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
The UK porn ban should scare the shit out of you. The government has decided that face sitting IS on the same level as age play. There is no line to what is and what isn’t acceptable for them, it’s all ‘degeneracy’. At some point, this will come for gay porn as well.
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
My mistress has just gone to sit on my face and as she did, Burnham appeared at my window and said "can't park there mate"
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
She needs to be recalled. She has admitted she has no idea how the law she wrote herself, that affects us all, will be applied because she didn’t consult lawyers or experts before putting it forward and voting on it. Flagrant incompetence and abuse of her position.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
They've basically put every onlyfans creator in the country on a government watchlist???
Replying to @JackDunc1
Not seen many people consider this yet. The choice of sentence length gives the gov lawful basis to use the snooping laws to monitor content creators
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
In Scotland and Northern Ireland, only the new strangulation and suffocation pornography offence applies - the new incest and under-16 roleplay offences do not apply
Read the Government's guidance here: gov.uk/guidance/crime-and-po…
Honestly - it may be safer to just stop creating content at this point.
I have no fucking idea anymore
Replying to @JackDunc1
Not seen many people consider this yet. The choice of sentence length gives the gov lawful basis to use the snooping laws to monitor content creators
1
2
175
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
there it is. just like the osa was never about protecting kids and all about creating the foundations for digital id, the blowjob laws arent about womens safety but about creating a legal pretext for invasive surveillance
Replying to @JackDunc1
Not seen many people consider this yet. The choice of sentence length gives the gov lawful basis to use the snooping laws to monitor content creators





















