Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX) header
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX) profile picture

Non-binary married content creator & erotic author. JFF, erotic fiction & wishlist on link. Side/Btm/Switch. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🏳️‍⚧️ 18+ 🔞Often in Bristol

Glasgow, Scotland
Joined June 2022
Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)Photo by Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF (@AltMikeXXX)
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
Sex workers don't owe you cheap content just bc you're horny. Do you have any idea how much work goes into making these videos? The filming, editing, equipment, marketing, & everything else? If you think an OF creator charges too much, don't buy their content. It's that simple.
For those of you saying $1 a minute is a lot of money, let’s do a quick lesson. Let’s say you have a 10 minute video and you price it at $9.99. Most sites take 40%. That’s $6 left and then after taxes, that number goes down to $4.20. So no, that’s not “$60 an hour,” (since so many of you want to think of it this way) that’s $25.20 an hour. Mind you, we don’t get benefits. Except the 10 minute video didn’t take 10 minutes to film. I don’t wake up with my hair, nails and make up magically done. I don’t wake up in lingerie with a studio next to me just ready to go. All of that takes HOURS. So why would I EVER adhere to a dated and demeaning price of $1 a minute for clips, streaming, anything? That would mean I’d be getting paid drastically below minimum wage.
93
377
28
1,629
78,168
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
So far the only active petition I can find against the recent changes to the obscene porn laws in the uk is the one below. I know there are others which are in the review stage. When they are live again, I'll share them petition: Repeal sexist anti-porn laws in the UK share.google/Mj5hyJSvFjQPYAU…
15
54
2
247
14,283
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
UK legit ruined porn for me, because anytime there's facesitting or dicksucking or maybe a little hand over mouth all I can think about is "this video is illegal in the UK" 😭😭😭
29
96
5
3,788
110,315
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
The UK porn ban should scare the shit out of you. The government has decided that face sitting IS on the same level as age play. There is no line to what is and what isn’t acceptable for them, it’s all ‘degeneracy’. At some point, this will come for gay porn as well.
110
1,342
39
11,292
196,623
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
My mistress has just gone to sit on my face and as she did, Burnham appeared at my window and said "can't park there mate"
19
1,274
21
24,234
255,639
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
She needs to be recalled. She has admitted she has no idea how the law she wrote herself, that affects us all, will be applied because she didn’t consult lawyers or experts before putting it forward and voting on it. Flagrant incompetence and abuse of her position.
This quoted post is unavailable.
14
423
4
4,525
68,505
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
They've basically put every onlyfans creator in the country on a government watchlist???
Replying to @JackDunc1
Not seen many people consider this yet. The choice of sentence length gives the gov lawful basis to use the snooping laws to monitor content creators
12
58
2
334
10,330
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
In Scotland and Northern Ireland, only the new strangulation and suffocation pornography offence applies - the new incest and under-16 roleplay offences do not apply Read the Government's guidance here: gov.uk/guidance/crime-and-po…
69
96
167
545
1,190,308
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
there it is. just like the osa was never about protecting kids and all about creating the foundations for digital id, the blowjob laws arent about womens safety but about creating a legal pretext for invasive surveillance
Replying to @JackDunc1
Not seen many people consider this yet. The choice of sentence length gives the gov lawful basis to use the snooping laws to monitor content creators
3
80
453
6,501
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
Adult content creators are going through it right now as a result of the new legislation. Consider tipping a content creator today to help. Avoid DM'ing where possible on socials etc as they're already swamped. Sign any petitions that crop up about the new law
11
142
6
435
23,717
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
Law passed that is so vague it can be used to criminalise people having a video on their phone of them and their partner having oral sex if it blocks the airway for an indeterminate amount of time Putting people in prison for 2 years for facesitting porn Sincerely, stfu, Sonia
The porn-addled of X are an angry bunch 🤪
29
395
1
5,838
106,987
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
Replying to @1030
The changed to the law in Scotland are in the Civil Government (Scotland) Act 1982 so the amendments brought in today 6th Nov.2026 do indeed apply in Scotland as well, just via a different legal instrument as Scotland has its own legal system.
2
2
1
646
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
It’s violating because it encompasses a persons consenting, adult, private relationships, conversations & kinks My bf & I could make a private video together (daddy kink/choking), never share it, but if it’s ever found it might class as making & possession of illegal media
🇬🇧 UK porn ban starts tomorrow (6 Nov 2026) From Friday, possessing or publishing certain types of pornography becomes a criminal offence in England and Wales under the Crime and Policing Act 2026. Banned content includes: • Strangulation or suffocation • Penetrative sex between people who appear related (or are pretending to be related, including some step/foster scenarios) • Adults role-playing as children under 16 Penalties: • Up to 2 years for possession of strangulation or “relative” content • Up to 3 years for the under-16 role-play material • Up to 5 years for publishing any of it
9
136
2
1,410
24,057
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
WARNING: I see @FetLife has updated their policies to: “restrict certain content from being viewed by people in the United Kingdom”. On strangulation and suffocation images they state that: “Pornographic pictures and videos that explicitly and realistically show one person strangling another (applying pressure to their neck) or suffocating them (blocking their breathing by covering their mouth and nose or compressing their chest).” This appears to reference the MoJ Guidance: gov.uk/guidance/crime-and-po… This guidance states that: “We consider that suffocation will generally mean depriving a person of air in a way that affects their ability to breathe.” However, government guidance is not binding on a court in interpreting legislation; and Section 106 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 does not define what constitutes suffocation or strangulation: legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/202… Nevertheless, FetLife’s given examples of what their restrictions on strangulation and suffocation images do not include are: “Breath play done to yourself, Hands resting on someone's neck without applying pressure, Collars, chokers, or necklaces worn without applying pressure to the neck, Rope wrapped around someone's neck without applying pressure, Ball gags or other gags that don't restrict breathing, Hoods or masks that don't restrict breathing, Facesitting that doesn't restrict breathing, Someone sitting or lying on another person's chest without restricting their breathing”. BEWARE: these examples should not be relied upon, since it is for a court to decide, based on the images in question (the evidence) whether a possession or publication offence has been committed.
24
84
14
338
56,357
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
Another thing - all the people who paid for content thats now banned or has even just been deleted as it very vaguely might relate to the censorship laws deserve a refund do they not? Who is handling that? Thats millions of pounds in content gone for creators and customers
19
20
1
274
18,044
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
Putting anyone in jail and registering them as a sex offender for consensual acts between adults should scare a lot more people.
🇬🇧 UK porn ban starts tomorrow (6 Nov 2026) From Friday, possessing or publishing certain types of pornography becomes a criminal offence in England and Wales under the Crime and Policing Act 2026. Banned content includes: • Strangulation or suffocation • Penetrative sex between people who appear related (or are pretending to be related, including some step/foster scenarios) • Adults role-playing as children under 16 Penalties: • Up to 2 years for possession of strangulation or “relative” content • Up to 3 years for the under-16 role-play material • Up to 5 years for publishing any of it
39
1,261
16
10,023
101,648
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
Surely the UK porn ban will just ruin the sex offenders registry. You run into a registered sex offender and now you'll never know if they're a serial rapist or if they just like a bit of consensual choking.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Altough the UK has a sex offender registry (ViSOR), it is not publicly accessible nor does it include offenders of the "UK Porn ban" which is part of the Crime and Policing Act 2026. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violent_a… gov.uk/guidance/crime…
136
1,602
55
42,911
1,261,375
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
Repeal the porn laws 🌽 My leader for @TheEconomist
40
512
24
4,199
136,374
Mike Monsoon (They/Them) $4 JFF retweeted
We’re getting a lot of questions about daddy scenes, and how the recent UK law might affect them. This is our stance, and we are not lawyers and we are not the UK. But as far as we are concerned, these kinds of scenes are fine, and we will not be restricting them. In gay parlance, daddy is an archetype. No different than bear, twink, boy or sir. And calling somebody daddy in a scene does not imply that they are your actual father. And as long as that is clear, we believe these scenes are fine. What is not fine, is a scene where you claim that your actual uncle came over to visit your family and you caught him jerking off and joined him. That is implying it is your actual uncle, and that is what the UK law is prohibiting. There is a lot of nuance here, and we will be doing our best to compile a list of best practices that will be available on our site to our models. So stay tuned for that on Justfor.fans.
22
70
11
562
127,228