Tony Andarian (@AndarianP) header
Tony Andarian (@AndarianP) profile picture

Tony Andarian is a retired computer scientist. Andarian Publishing is his imprint for developing the Sanctum of the Archmage epic fantasy novels and games.

USA
Joined February 2022
Photo by Tony Andarian (@AndarianP)Photo by Tony Andarian (@AndarianP)Photo by Tony Andarian (@AndarianP)Photo by Tony Andarian (@AndarianP)Photo by Tony Andarian (@AndarianP)Photo by Tony Andarian (@AndarianP)Photo by Tony Andarian (@AndarianP)Photo by Tony Andarian (@AndarianP)
Tony Andarian retweeted
An internal post urging the board to consider employee sentiment about Nvidia’s former CEO has drawn more than 1,600 comments, the majority in full support of reinstalling him. buff.ly/iaZuiLF
248
808
207
6,760
522,795
Tony Andarian retweeted
I think something is fundamentally broken inside the AI labs. Let me explain why. Look at the builders. Elon in 2008, Tesla and SpaceX both weeks from death, putting his last dollars on the table. Jensen running Nvidia for years under the motto "we're 30 days from going out of business." Travis, kicked out of the company he built with his own hands. Building a company is a machine for humility. Reality hits you every single day. Customers don't care about your vision. Payroll doesn't care about your ego. The market punishes you the moment you start believing your own story. That's why real founders, whatever you think of them, end up grounded. They've been humiliated by reality enough times to know they can be wrong. Dario's story started well. He left OpenAI at the end of 2020, with a group of researchers, because he didn't like how things were being run there. And on Sam, history proved him right: a board that fired him for not being "consistently candid," the war with Elon over turning a nonprofit into a profit machine, the Scarlett Johansson voice episode. Dario looked at all that and said: not like this. I genuinely believe he was sincere at the start. But I think he got corrupted by two things. The first is hubris. Five years from founding to one of the biggest IPOs in history. When the world validates everything you say that fast, you stop hearing the word no. You never get the humbling years Jensen and Elon got. The second is a deeply collectivist vision of how humanity should be managed. The idea that AI is too dangerous for the many, so a small enlightened group must decide for everyone: who gets chips, which countries, which companies, which models. Jensen summed it up better than anyone: "He thinks AI is so scary, but only they should do it." That's not safety. That's central planning with a moral halo. Now look at the last two weeks. Jensen goes down in a personal scandal. His private life is his business and his board made its call. But look at who was pushing. Anthropic put $40M into a political group that funded super PACs backing lawmakers who then co-signed the letter demanding Jensen explain himself. The man who stood in the way of chip export bans, the man Trump personally called to tell him to fight for his job, is gone. Days before Anthropic's IPO. And Nvidia is one of Anthropic's investors, which makes the whole thing even stranger. I'm not saying Dario orchestrated it. Nobody has proven that. But Anthropic and this administration have been at war over AI policy for a long time, and Jensen was the industry's bridge to this White House. When the lab that preaches humility funds the political machine that ends up taking down its biggest ideological opponent, you're allowed to ask questions. That's the core problem. People who've never been humbled by reality, convinced they're saving humanity, holding the most powerful technology ever built. That's the most dangerous kind of power: the kind that thinks it's virtuous. Builders build. They don't take down other builders.
7
33
4
112
5,355
Tony Andarian retweeted
Nvidia is nothing without its people. It now appears the national security allegations may be as fake as Russiagate. If so, Nvidia employees, shareholders, partners, and customers have immense leverage. Whether publicly or privately, collectively or individually, they can approach the members of the board that precipitously pushed for Jensen’s resignation and instead demand that anti-Jensen board members resign. Else mass employee resignations may follow, as may shareholder, partner, and customer suits against anti-Jensen board members for breaching their fiduciary duty. Because the value of Nvidia as an economic entity — for its employees, shareholders, partners, and customers — is obviously far higher if the founder and CEO of what was the most valuable company in world history is reinstated and this coup is defeated. Trillions in capital, the fate of open weight AI, and the global economy itself all hang in the balance. So: if you are e/acc, if you are a techno-optimist, if you support open weight models, or if you just want to rectify a gross injustice — it is legitimate for you to politely press the Nvidia board with every tool at your disposal to reinstate Jensen Huang. Remember how much capital is at stake. For many parties, it’d be worth it to spend millions — or even billions — on any legally permissible tactic that can get anti-Jensen board members to reverse their votes and then step down. Remember also: the kind of spineless NPC board member that would vote against Jensen Huang due to a bad news cycle would likely buckle if subject to even 1/1000 of the scrutiny that poor Jensen has been subject to. Mechanically: step one is to do citizen journalism to determine how each board member voted. Step two is to get the anti-Jensen board members to resign. And step three is the return of the king. OpenAI shows it can be done. There are after all just a few human beings who need to change their anti-Jensen votes, or step down, or both. Their names and duties are public. And they’re meant to be accountable to the shareholders. This analysis by @gemchange_ltd is as good a place as any to start.
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.
115
320
55
2,641
160,691
Tony Andarian retweeted
I analyzed eleven New York Times reports on the Jensen Huang story. Most notably, NYT makes the "spy" claim 30 times in these 11 reports. The original report cites unnamed officials who had been "briefed" on the intelligence. Not who had seen it themselves -- but who had been "briefed". This is a game of telephone with plausible deniability. Nobody named. No specific details of the intelligence used to draw the conclusion that the woman was a spy. Anonymous "officials" "briefed". This was used to try to take Jensen Huang down. When that didn't work, journalists resorted to viciously digging up and scandal mongering about Jensen Huang's other alleged affairs. Then he was removed as CEO. Without an investigation. Without due process. And now officials and intelligence agencies are contesting the New York Times characterization. This is unethical. It is unjust. It is an absolute disgrace. If anyone should resign now, it is Nvidia's board who aggressively removed Jensen Huang without an investigation, after he gave decades of his life to make the company what it is. And any investigation that proceeds from here should involved not just the "spy" claim, but the New York Times -- who has engaged in potentially unethical behavior. Jensen Huang deserves due process -- not mob justice. He deserves respect for everything he has done for technology and America -- not a disgraceful removal after anonymous, unsubstantiated allegations, several parties removed from the source.
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.
161
511
59
2,514
107,681
Tony Andarian retweeted
So let me get this straight… The FBI has been investigating Alice Huang for at least a year, yet STILL cannot establish whether she was acting as a Chinese spy. Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed that neither the DOJ nor the FBI has reached a conclusion. Multiple intelligence sources say there is no evidence proving she knowingly funneled information to Beijing. Even CIA officials aren’t convinced, and officials have reportedly called the spy characterization inaccurate and overblown. Yet Jensen Huang was forced to resign? Are you freaking kidding me? This is an absolute disgrace.
192
460
47
2,704
94,612
Tony Andarian retweeted
What?! So journalists with sketchy motives portrayed rumors from god-knows-who (lobbyists?) as facts sourced from intelligence officials and gaslit the NVIDIA board to push out the founder, CEO, and once-in-generation visionary? This raises serious corporate governance issues.
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.
146
239
17
3,390
86,583
They lied to us. And they did it to cripple one of America's greatest companies, discredit an ally of the Trump administration, and clear away the strongest advocate for open AI models in tech today. Those responsible for this MUST be identified, and held to account for it.
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.
1
1
5
148
This was a setup. They MUST NOT be allowed to get away with it.
Well well well. Now comes CNN to report that US intelligence hasn’t actually assessed that Jensen’s girlfriend is a Chinese spy. So why did the NYTimes, WSJ, Economist all simultaneously print otherwise with zero evidence to support their claims? Who are they working with and for?
1
4
13
417
This is the timeline I want to be on.
Fate loves irony, so what if... - Nvidia fires Jensen - NVDA crashes - Elon hires Jensen, Jensen hires his best lieutenants - SPCX skyrockets, NVDA crashes more - SPCX can now afford to acquire NVDA - Jensen back in seat, NVDA board is out
2
2
44
This morning, the company announced, in this press release, that he had RESIGNED: nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/n… But China Committee Chair Moolenaar released the statement below today, saying that Jensen had been fired. Someone's not telling us the truth. Who?
1
2
78
Good. With shareholder help he'll clean out the vipers on NVIDIA's board and reclaim control of the company.
🚨 BREAKING: JENSEN HUANG HIRES POWERHOUSE LAW FIRM PAUL, WEISS. For those unfamiliar, this is no ordinary law firm. Paul, Weiss handles some of the biggest corporate litigation, regulatory battles, and white-collar matters in the country, with high-profile work involving clients such as Goldman Sachs and Qualcomm. Just hours after his sudden resignation, Huang retained two of the firm’s top litigators: Melinda Haag, a former U.S. Attorney, and Walter Brown. It’s important to note that NVIDIA’s board has retained separate legal counsel to conduct its own independent investigation. Paul, Weiss is representing Huang personally. He just brought in some serious legal firepower.
1
1
9
358
So Jensen DIDN'T resign? He was FIRED? On how many levels are we being lied to about this? Time to go scorched earth. The chairman's just provided the admission necessary for an immediate shareholder action for removal for breach of fiduciary responsibility. Fire the bastards.
Chairman @RepMoolenaar released the following statement in the wake of Jensen Huang's resignation from @NVIDIA:
1
1
49
Tony Andarian retweeted
Jensen Huang rescued me from probably living in debt the rest of my life. I was told I was one of just three hires that he approved during the pandemic, during a hiring freeze. I've never spoken to him, and only passed by him in HQ once. His personal life is frankly none of my business. But as a leader, I have yet to meet a better one. Ousting him is financial suicide, and I can only assume there is a hidden ulterior motive because I can't fathom any other reason for destroying the company's value.
775
3,101
203
38,491
1,403,498
Tony Andarian retweeted
In June @NaderLikeLadder emailed Jensen about a crazy idea we had over dinner to make Local AI 10x better on NVIDIA hardware. Jensen replied in 7 minutes. He saw this as important work, and approved a war room for us to work on this at NVIDIA HQ. For a month, NVIDIA HQ was the @exolabs satellite office. We were overwhelmed by the support we got. We were back to back the first week with smart NVIDIANs coming in to our war room to help us. Creators of CUDA, Dynamo, people who built NVIDIA. Long story short with NVIDIA we managed to improve their Local AI playbooks by 9.6x (almost the 10x goal we set out with). We’ll be publishing a whitepaper on this work. We were just a small startup with a crazy idea. Jensen took a bet on us. Jensen cares deeply about Open Source AI and Local AI. I don't believe Jensen is replaceable, he's a 1 of 1 human, but I hope NVIDIA will continue to aggressively support Open Source AI and Local AI, and continue to take bets on small startups with crazy ideas. Thank you Jensen
342
1,569
145
19,643
1,873,591
Tony Andarian retweeted
The US hyperscalers are trying to monopolize and centralize the power of AI, and I think removing Jensen at this stage is part of that effort. Nvidia, with its support for Hugging Face and promotion of open-source AI models, is a direct threat to closed-source AI builders and the powers that be who want to control where, how, and why AI is used. Many world governments are trying to regulate AI, much in the way of regulating weapons and firearms. They see AI in the hands of the "rabble" as too dangerous... and to that end, want to "regulate" GPU and chip purchases much in the same way guns are regulated. EU countries, Australia, and politicians in the US are talking about treating "advanced computing" devices as potential cyber weapons... and rumors about pushing ideas for licenses for GPUs, and how they must be registered with the government. In America, we need a "2nd Amendment" for GPUs and AI models... a "Right to Compute" law, as yes... they will become more powerful than guns. We cannot have a future where AI is controlled only by the few, tuned to censor and control the populace. If that happens, a dystopian world controlled by corporate governance is guaranteed.
20
47
3
219
2,930
They don't have to sue. They just have to vote to remove the board at the next shareholder meeting, replace them with members committed to bringing Jensen back, and then re-hire him. But that depends on Jensen not taking another job or starting another company in the interim. Jensen was obviously pressured to resign by the board. That is why they will NOT be insulated from responsibility or fiduciary duty to the shareholders for what they did. And all that Jensen has to do, if he wants his old job back, is to so much as HINT that he was pushed out by the board. The rest will take its natural course.
Replying to @JOBhakdi
He resigned, so I guess shareholders don't get to sue. But yes, it should have been put to a vote. I don't know why he agreed to resign, perhaps due to embarassment? Or was it a situation where they were going to allow him to resign to save face.
44
Tony Andarian retweeted
I always maintained that Vance's negotiations and MOU with the Mullahs, which Trump endorsed and signed, was modern version of the 1938 Munich Accord. Trump should have finished the war last April or May. He didn't. JD Vance is the person responsible for convincing Trump not to.
Vance's MOU cost Republicans the Senate and House
1
9
4
58
927
Tony Andarian retweeted
I don't know how many Americans realize what they just lost. This isn't a CEO. It's a national treasure. And I'm going to prove to you, step by step, that the Nvidia board's decision goes against the interests of the United States. And that if America wants a future against China, it has to fight to bring Jensen Huang back. A. The AI race is won on compute. That's not an opinion, it's physics. The most powerful models are the ones with the most compute. And most of America's compute runs on Nvidia chips. B. Nvidia's lead is one man's judgment. Jensen is the one who bet on CUDA when nobody believed in it. He's the one who understood before anyone else what deep learning would become. He's the one who pivoted the entire company toward AI, years before ChatGPT. Thirty-three years of decisions nobody else would have made. C. The board prepared no successor. It admits it itself: it's now considering searching for a CEO from the outside. That means months of searching, internal power struggles, cautious decisions. At the exact moment Huawei is accelerating with the entire Chinese state behind it. D. The market has already delivered its verdict. The stock dropped another 10% or so on the announcement. Hundreds of billions of dollars gone. And those dollars are also the retirement savings of tens of millions of Americans. Conclusion: who benefits from this decision? Not America. Not shareholders. Not employees. China. Now let's look at what he's accused of. Yes, Jensen messed up. Twice. That's real. I'm not defending his private life. But he isn't accused of any crime. No one has shown that a single secret leaked. The board itself wrote that it had no reason to believe national security or Nvidia's secrets were compromised. You don't destroy the pillar of America's technology strategy over a moral failing. You sanction it, you tighten oversight, and you keep the man the country needs. And we know exactly how to do it. There's a precedent. In 2018, the SEC went after Elon Musk. Many demanded he leave Tesla. The solution? He gave up the chairmanship, Tesla added independent directors, and he stayed CEO. You know the rest: Tesla became one of the most valuable companies in the world. Nvidia just appointed its first-ever board chair. The oversight structure is there. The only thing missing is the founder. Because founders aren't managers like the others. Peter Thiel laid it out in Zero to One: founder-led companies are capable of long-term planning, of making decisions nobody else would dare to make, and of inspiring a loyalty no hired manager can ever buy. Paul Graham called it "founder mode": when a founder runs the company, the rules of conventional management don't apply. They see things nobody else sees. Steve Jobs is the living proof. Apple's board fired him. Twelve years later, Apple was months from bankruptcy. Jobs came back and made it the most valuable company in the world. How many years were lost? How many products never launched? And recent history has even shown us that a comeback is possible. Three years ago, OpenAI's board fired Sam Altman. Within five days, more than 700 of its 770 employees threatened to leave. Investors applied pressure. Altman came back, and the board was replaced. What was undone in five days at OpenAI can be undone at Nvidia. Employees need to speak up. Shareholders need to speak up. Washington needs to understand what's at stake. Everyone who believes America must win this race needs to say loud and clear that this decision is a historic mistake. You will never find another Jensen Huang. Not in ten years. Not in thirty. There's only one. Bring him back. #BringBackJensen
224
731
52
4,107
183,910
THIS is why they had to take him out.
OpenAI and Anthropic have spent millions lobbying the US Congress to ban open weights. When they formed the "Pace the Frontier" group to push for strict limits on open models, Jensen stepped up right away. He created the Open Secure Alliance to fight back. Look at the list of companies below. Notice how none of the closed frontier labs joined. And today, we lost him.
25