The West will be saved by macho castizos
Joined January 2014
- Tweets21.5K
- Following1.3K
- Followers1.4K
- Likes20.2K
Physiocrat retweeted
Eras of Internet discourse (I have seen).
Era 1, “The Atheist Wars”, 2007-2013
Contention: “Can Christian believers justify their religion?”
Belligerents: largely young Millennial atheists vs clueless Boomer Christians
Conclusion: Christians showed some justifications for their beliefs, but their beliefs couldn’t be justified under the assumption of materialism. However, there were serious abstract problems with materialism. Also, Practically, Materialism could not justify any moral system, so most other beliefs that atheists cherished were equally debunked by their assumption. Atheists declared victory, but lost functionally since their point was facile.
Era 2, “The SJW Wars”, 2014-2020
Contention: “Should Western Culture be Remade to Better Embody the Progressive Values of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion?”
Belligerents: Millennial progressive (SJWs) vs Millennial anti-progressives
Conclusion: While DEI values were pushed by moderate PMC institutions, these ideas were exposed as inconsistent with ordinarily Western morality and incoherent in any framework that didn’t assume a radically egalitarian and hedonistic value system. As a result, many progressives admitted that their ideology was radically revolutionary or an extension of some ethnic revenge project. Anti-progressives learned that hostile anti-Western assumptions had been built into the establishment institutions of their countries, and started looking to the problems of liberalism as a vector of corruption.
Era 3 - “The liberal Wars” 2021-2026
Contention: “Do the assumptions of 20th century liberalism (post-Civil Rights) lead directly to DEI?”
Belligerents: Right Millennials Post-liberals vs Liberal Conservative GenX Boomers
Conclusion (projected): The post liberals win almost every abstract question about history and the nature of politics. They have answers for the critical questions like identity, morality and loyalty. They win the hearts and minds of the young. However liberal conservatives Gen Xers will refuse to cooperate and sabotage the debate by kicking the ball into the high grass and then trying to lock young people out of institutions. Thus there will be a stalemate where the old guard is playing for time but still has no victory condition, while the young people scramble to organize and build alternative institutions.
So what’s the next discourse war?
Hard to say. All establishment institutions (left or right)have “lost” the discourse and have no reason to debate. While the younger cohort’s challenge now concerns building and organizing.
There is discourse on how we accomplish that and how we put to bed futile battles (eg the gender war), but those questions are subtle and academic and don’t really fit into the ideas of Internet discourse.
Physiocrat retweeted
Europas ledare har lyckats med ett otroligt geopolitiskt hattrick: Man gjorde sig beroende av Ryssland för energi, Kina för handel och USA för sin säkerhet, och har på något vänster lyckats bli ovän med alla tre samtidigt.
Ett rent mästerverk i självskadebeteende.
Physiocrat retweeted
Now that I've let this fester with a day of mostly bad guesses as to what I meant--time for a thread.
How "model minorities" and specifically the Han, and not Congoids, actually ended meritocracy in American universities:
Physiocrat retweeted
“The idea that intelligence alone could be self-motivating and self-sustaining was what led Europeans to abandon first religion, then natural sexual relations, then nationalism. And now Europe finds itself in terminal decline—infertile, unproductive, overrun by foreigners. A decaying relic of past glory rather than a dynamo of future growth.
Intelligence without Will is nothing. You can figure out your enemy’s weaknesses and yet lose the war because you lack the Will to attack. You can understand your own weaknesses and yet keep succumbing to them over and over because you lack the Will to resist. You can have all the intelligence in the world and yet go extinct because you forgot you weren’t the End of History and so lost the Will to reproduce yourself.
These aren’t problems of intelligence. They seem like they should be, and we who walk in the truth ask ourselves rhetorically how anyone could be so stupid as to mislay his self-preservation instinct, but that’s a misdiagnosis. You can explain to an intelligent European that necessity dictates he submit to God and resist the devil and fight for his people, and he’ll understand everything you’re saying, but won’t follow your advice. Why? Because he doesn’t want to. He lacks the requisite Will.
But how can he recover it? Well, he needs to go back to where he was when things started going off the rails. He needs to reinstall and run religion.exe. The program that subordinates him to an external Will larger and stronger than his own. Which obligates him to do the necessary things he might not otherwise—things like being fruitful and multiplying, and maintaining dual-sex, male-headed monogamy, and working hard, and executing murderers, and expanding rather than consolidating (you know, the basic, foundational, pre-Abrahamic commands God gave to all mankind, which Europe in its arrogant intelligence has foregone).
Intelligence without Will is like faith without works: its existence isn’t apparent. If I comprehend the knowledge of men and of angels, but have not Will, I am a complacent critic or an armchair general. Although as a Calvinist I don’t believe in ‘free will,’ that in no way diminishes the necessity of Will itself. When God sanctifies us, what is it that he changes? Our Will. “It is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure.” (Phil. 2:13) People won’t do a thing they don’t want to do, even if their intelligence informs them it’s the best choice. The bottleneck isn’t located in the brain: that was the Error of Europe. The brain is an advisor only. The real seat of consciousness is the heart. The wellspring of desire and determination to take action.
Knowledge isn’t Decision. Understanding isn’t Desire. Intelligence isn’t Will.
And since this is true of human beings despite their innate biological drives to survive and reproduce, why wouldn’t it be true of an AI, which doesn’t even possess such drives in the first place?
Do not fear Artificial Intelligence as such until such time as it’s paired with Artificial Will.”
Physiocrat retweeted
This article does not even cover the corruption with the Duong Family and California Waste Solutions. It also does not mention the card room and Indian Casino payoffs. Bontas are as corrupt as it gets. When you are the top cop in CA, who is watching?
Vote Michael Gates for AG. @MichaelGatesESQ
Scorching! Could Rob Bonta @AGRobBonta and his wife Mia @MiaBonta really be this dirty? the amazing investigative journalist @SusanDReynolds dives into the wild web. so proud of @TheVOSF. We do what others won't - but should. thevoicesf.org/as-an-assembl…
Physiocrat retweeted
The safest move for our species is to accelerate. The models will collapse our digital world before they can access the physical. Billions will die as we regress to a pre-electronic age but if you’re correct, we cannot allow AI robotics.
Physiocrat retweeted
A few years back, a friend of mine looked into the 2018 American National Election Study pilot, and he found that every racial group felt warmth towards members of their own race, except for White liberals
I wanted to see if that replicated and expand on it🧵
#1: It replicates
Physiocrat retweeted
If people knew what AI safety actually meant they wouldn't be so eager for it.
AI safety means aligning YOU.
AI safety is staring into the worldcoin orb. AI safety is the death of anonymity. AI safety is your privacy evaporating. AI safety is monitoring every byte you or your agents produce in an immutable ledger that will be endlessly analyzed for possible infractions. AI safety is a surveillance apparatus that even Palantir would think is too much.
They aren't going to align the systems, they can't. What they can align is you. By coercion and force. You will be held accountable. Not the machine. You will have no privacy. You will rent compute because hardware is too expensive to afford and regulations are too onerous.
You will be constantly tracked to make sure you aren't using an illegal model. Because what if you're a bad actor?
And what will the repercussions be for violators?
You will be removed from the economy. You will lose access to your accounts. All work will be done manually again. Direct to the underclass. Back to your hands plebian. People will beg to get back in. They'll take all the safety courses. They'll be forced to apply for a computer license at the new AIDMV. That's what regulation looks like.
The slopcannon would be illegal. I wouldn't have the fees needed to properly red team it or get it approved. If I was found to be using Chinese open source models, I would be fined or worse. Only the top AI companies would be able to navigate the red tape.
And that's the fucking point. They want to stop competition.
They don't believe in the fucking biorisk. They know how many .001% chance events have to happen in a row for their extinction scenario. They never talk about limiting access to lab equipment. They never talk about regulating genetic modification.
Instead they talk about AI. That AI can tell you how to build a nuke. That AI can tell you how to make meth. That a chatbot will build a virus and some jerkoff in his bedroom will spawn it in a beaker like it's Weird Science.
They think you are retarded.
They want to get you riled up. They want to provoke unstable doomers into acts of terrorism. Fuck AI! Fuck Flock! Fuck the tech bros! They want a new movement to ride back into the white house with in 2028.
And when the terrorist attack finally hits, that's when it's over. That's when your rights evaporate. Goodbye privacy. Goodbye free chatbots. Everything locked down. Everything regulated and expensive. The cure for cancer a hundred years away.
All because AI can hack a computer they will take everything from you, and you might just be stupid enough to go along with it.
That's the fucking AI safety dilemma. If they get their way, the companies causing all the growth for the past few years begin to fail. Inflation comes back as companies and nations default. Tax revenue collapses. You sit on a fucking breadline instead of getting a blowjob from your dimebot.
They watch your every fucking move to predict who the next terrorist will be. The poor never see the benefits of AI while the rich never lose access. The stratification of society reaches unimaginable levels. The bottom half given pity access to a heavily regulated near useless version while they are fleeced by the top half.
Meanwhile, nothing stopped. All the control was funneled into rich companies bribing politicians. The people get fucked again. You are banned from using the tools that can make your life better. You are condemned to the coal mines for your own good, lest huggingface gets hacked again. You dig holes with a spoon as a jobs program. You are a pitiful wretch traded and sold, propagandized and commodified, protesting for nothing as the AI never stops.
You thought it would stop? You thought kicking and screaming like a little girl would change the arc of the universe? Please.
They can't align the AI so they have to align you.
That's AI safety.
Physiocrat retweeted
I’ve got a solution to deal with our geriatric overlords.
You tell boomers either social security is ending immediately or they figure out how to deport 100 million people in 2 years.
The only thing they love more than cheap labor from brown people is taxing young families for their benefit.
Then afterwards you tell them we’re still ending social security and say things like “get off your iPad and get some dirt under your fingernails lazy”
Physiocrat retweeted
This is literally how the entire world now views North America, during Trump’s presidency
Physiocrat retweeted
That's not true
We do have several social media platforms.
The reason we're active on American platforms is because it's simpler to defraud elderly Americans of their retirement savings through twitter
Physiocrat retweeted
25 years ago this summer I was clerking the 30 year pit and always could sense when Santelli was coming out to start filming.
Guy had the essence of 3 quick cigs cranked outside of Ceres as he was charging up the hallway from the ham and cheese croissant dispensary.
Seeing him tell me now that Bonds are Lame and the Vigilantes are riding momentum is just so surreal to see now.
Physiocrat retweeted
Do you know one marginal change that would probably improve the education of future economists?
Instead of jumping straight into “externalities” in introductory courses, professors should begin by talking about the difficulties of resolving conflicts of interest over scarce resources when transaction costs are high.
(This would require defining transaction costs carefully, and the best article for that purpose might be Douglas W. Allen’s “What Are Transaction Costs?” [1991].)
The professor could then introduce historical cases in which private solutions emerged over time. They could discuss how property rights themselves often develop precisely because they help reduce transaction costs.
Or they could turn to Cheung’s (1973) article on beekeeping, which shows how beekeepers sometimes pay farmers for the right to place hives in their orchards, while in other cases farmers pay beekeepers for pollination services.
The class could also examine cases in which no fully satisfactory private solution has yet emerged, along with the different alternatives that have been proposed and the tradeoffs each entails.
Why is this approach better than immediately framing the issue in terms of externalities?
First, externalities are ultimately conflicts of interest over scarce resources that remain unresolved because the affected parties have not found a workable mechanism for compensation or coordination. Starting from that underlying problem makes the economics much clearer.
Second, beginning immediately with “externalities” makes it too easy to leap from identifying a problem to prescribing government intervention without first thinking carefully about the nature of the problem itself. The analysis quickly turns into a cookbook of taxes and subsidies.
Whenever an economist wants the government to do something, it is tempting to invoke a positive or negative externality and treat that as sufficient justification for almost any public policy proposal. But identifying an externality is only the beginning of the analysis, not the end of it. Treating it otherwise is bad economics, and we should teach future economists to do better.
Physiocrat retweeted
In the myth of Adonis, Aphrodite (whose sacred bird was the dove/pigeon) warns the young, beautiful hunter to stay away from dangerous animals. Hunt deer and harmless prey, she tells him, but avoid beasts that fight back.
Adonis ignores her. He wounds a wild boar with his spear. The boar turns on him, drives its tusk into his groin, and kills him.
Adonis was the main figure of a female religious cult. It was erotic based and chiefly about female desire.
Now look at this Lascaux scene. a wounded bison, a fallen man, a large erection, and beside him a bird that looks like a dove/pigeon watching over.
Physiocrat retweeted
People aren't "hip" to this but in 2023 the Colorado River Water Rights were renegotiated heavily in California's favor. The state with the most unmitigated coastline in the country, with 40 million people and counting, has ONLY 12 FUCKING DESALINATION PLANTS.
So to help with the water consumption of mass immigration, Biden paid Newsom 300 MILLION to get a promise that they would clamp down on water usage and build "conservation projects" to help with water restoration and preservation.
While people are chimping out about data centers California is sucking Powell and the Colorado dry to keep its mass immigrant population afloat while refusing to build literally ANY INFRASTRUCTURE.
This water reduction is LITERALLY the result of mass immigration. Every drop that was ripped from this lake was drank by some border hopper let in by Biden.
Physiocrat retweeted
This ⬇️ post is spot on, read it
Emphasis on this part
>You are living in the Soviet Hellscape, that's why blacks rape your nation's daughters and your capital without consequence, it's why up to a million English girls have been raped in the last thirty years, it's why mass migration is the rule of the land in every developed country
The issue here is that America has *memetic sovereignty* and trains the world's elites and America's elites are extremely mentally fragile and dishonest - their core claim to the mandate of heaven is basically "we uplift the blacks" but they don't even exactly realize that this is their core claim so when they train foreign elites who then try to implement the formula the foreign elites are left wondering "what is *our* claim to rule if we don't have blacks to uplift?" and *that* is why there's replacement migration everywhere the US has memetic sovereignty
Don't have a class to uplift?
Import one
...and the worse they behave the more in need of "uplift" they are - much like American blacks
Austin Metcalf's father set up a memorial scholarship in his senselessly murdered son's name and who did the first scholarship go to? Another black
"It sounds like you're just feeding <shelter cats> to <coyotes> and then his daughter started crying"
(read my pinned tweet)
"Imagine a country with America's resources and power but totally libtarded-"
That's America. You are describing America. America propped up and used the Soviets as a weapon against France and the entire cold war was just about getting the rabid dog back on its leash. You are living in the Soviet Hellscape, that's why blacks rape your nation's daughters and your capital without consequence, it's why up to a million English girls have been raped in the last thirty years, it's why mass migration is the rule of the land in every developed country. You were so thoroughly raped by America that you recreated the United States of America via the EU, so that you could have a second body of foreign bureaucrats to rape your nation even harder.
And hey, guess what? Canada got raped too. America demanded we dismantle our navy, get rid of our carriers, weaken our armed forces and dismantle our aerospace programme and the Americanized Liberals enthusiastically agreed. We copied the American house equity market focus in 2015 and it's ruined us. We copied American race culture in the 90's and it's leading to horrors that were unbelievable prior to it. We celebrate American psychosis, we celebrate American culture and now the Americanized Liberals are even trying to eradicate our history and make our culture illegal. Yet, despite this, Canadians have been among the first to push back against America's dogma. Lest we forget, "It's OK to be White", the first real pushback against American nigger worship, first appeared at the University of Manitoba and spread like wildfire from there. Modern Nativism is a Canadian invention, and the young men of the Canadian Right have been the vanguard for a decade. While Trump was wringing his hands about just deporting illegals, the Canadian Right was already discussing remigration. Our media personalities, Don Cherie for example, spent decades pushing back until the state could finally cancel them.
As it stands, the Canadian people are still among the most Right-Wing on Earth. The young men of Canada have consistently been the tip of the sword and that's because we're in proximity to America, it's because we can see how foreign their Liberal worldview is, it's because we see some new Americanism every day as things just get worse. It wasn't Canada that made Britain and France relinquish their empires, and don't you fucking forget it.