'For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.’ Luke 8:17 ✝️
USA
Joined October 2016
- Tweets10.8K
- Following554
- Followers1.2K
- Likes17.3K
Rachel retweeted
And this is exactly the problem. They keep relying on forensic artifacts to support their conclusions without establishing what those artifacts actually prove.
To be clear, nobody is disputing that mobilesafari.plist contains a record of the 6:24 search. Yet they spend all this time insisting that timestamp proves the search only occurred at 6:24. Then they admit they haven’t seen any testing establishing how iOS 15.2.1 handles repeated identical searches. So how exactly can they rule out an earlier search? Seems like a pretty important detail to establish before treating that timestamp as definitive proof that an earlier identical search didn’t occur, doesn’t it?
Then there’s the discrepancy between Whiffin’s and Hyde’s KnowledgeC exhibits, which they acknowledge but can’t explain.
Perhaps instead of pumping out AI-generated graphics and lecturing everyone else about how to interpret evidence, they should spend some time understanding the evidence themselves. Because the issue isn’t whether those timestamps exist. It’s whether they actually establish the conclusions they keep drawing from them.
Rachel retweeted
I also like @TheEmilySee other videos and pictures showing how 3 or 4 of the days “tailight” was found , there was NO SNOW and sunny!
Rachel retweeted
Kim Fair said she’s screenshotting every one of my posts, so Kim, screenshot this one nice and clear.
I’ve been saying this all along, Allie, Colin, and Higgins are not three separate stories. Their timelines overlap.
If Higgins’ Jeep was where they say it was, Allie should have seen it when she pulled in. Allie Could not tell MSP how Colin was at Fairview ummm well.... colin told us in court Allie drove him!!!!! Higgins should have seen Allie arrive. Colin should have seen Higgins’ Jeep when he came out. This was not some complicated maze. There are only so many ways to get to 34 Fairview.
Yet Allie could not clearly remember the route she took to pick Colin up, and now the filing says Life360 data from Jennifer McCabe’s phone showed Allie did not travel straight home after dropping Colin off and even more importantly, showed no evidence of Allie arriving at or departing from 34 Fairview or Colin’s house on January 29.
So once again, the “simple explanation” is not simple at all.
If Colin left the house exactly how they said he did, why does the data make the story messier instead of clearer?
If Allie picked him up at 34 Fairview, why does the record not cleanly show that?
If Higgins’ Jeep was there, why does nobody’s testimony cleanly account for who saw who?
A normal pickup does not need this much explaining.
Screenshot that.
Rachel retweeted
“Remember the people fighting the battles on the ground Aidan Kearney, Karen Read and others”
@GrantSmithEllis 🐐
Melanie Little a very proud mother taking it all in! 🦈
Rachel retweeted
Norfolk DA Michael Morrissey says his office recognizes the criticism but was constrained by the medical examiner’s ruling that Sandra Birchmore’s death was a suicide.
But at trial, prosecutors said jurors would hear that Norfolk CPAC quickly told the medical examiner there was no foul play and no need to treat Sandra’s death as suspicious. Fanning reportedly said he needed the investigation “like he needed a hole in the head.”
If investigators had already framed Sandra’s death as suicide, serious questions remain about whether the medical examiner was given a fair chance to assess the evidence independently.
Sandra’s family hired their own medical examiner. They should never have had to fight so hard to have her death taken seriously.
Sandra deserved a thorough investigation from the start. Her family deserves answers.
Sandra mattered.
Sandra’s baby boy mattered.
Her family deserved better. #SandraBirchmore
Rachel retweeted
BREAKING NEWS:
Matthew Farwell has been found GUILTY on both charges as to the murder of Sandra Birchmore and her unborn Baby Boy.
The jury deliberated for a total of 15 hours and 30 minutes.
Rachel retweeted
DEADLOCKED?!?!?!?!
FUCK THIS STATE. FOR REAL.
FUCK @MassStatePolice
Fuck Matthew Farwell
Fuck John Fanning
Fuck CORRUPT DEMOTED MSP DL BRIAN TULLY!
Fuck Kate Peter
Fuck Jen McCabe & her entire bloodline
Fuck @netflix
Fuck @SandpaperFilms
Fuck @zorakuettner
Fuck @GretchenVoss64
If you believe that the release of this trailer wasn't carefully timed around Sandra Birchmore's trial, you are seriously naive.
These people are all so sick and I have never been so disgusted with the "justice system" and humanity as a whole, than I am right now.
Praying for Sandra Birchmore, her unborn baby, and her loved ones tonight.
Rachel retweeted
Karen Read's defense's affidavit filed January 28, 2025 established that the 2:27am and 6:23am Google searches were made in different Safari search tabs, and thus could not be the same search wrongly attributed to a 2:27am timestamp, per digital forensic extraction + parsing tools.
This is not a tool readout error. It's a fact that inherently refutes the Commonwealth's entire narrative about the incriminating Google searches.
Rachel retweeted
This text exchange between Trooper Michael Proctor and Trooper David Diccico confirms that John O’Keefe’s death wasn’t the first time they had attempted to influence the medical examiners findings.
Trooper David Diccico and Trooper Jeff Kotkowski were veterans at it 💯
Rachel retweeted
DARVO stands for Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender.
It's a manipulation tactic in which someone accused of wrongdoing shifts the focus away from their own behavior and portrays themselves as the victim.
🔸 D — DENY: They deny doing anything wrong, even when confronted with evidence.
🔸 A — ATTACK: Instead of addressing their behavior, they attack the person confronting them. They may question their credibility, motives, or character.
🔸 RVO — REVERSE VICTIM AND OFFENDER: They flip the situation around, portraying themselves as the person being mistreated while making the person who raised the concern look like the aggressor.
Example of DARVO
Person A: "You lied about me and spread rumors."
Person B: "I never did that! You're obsessed with me! You're constantly attacking me, and I'm sick of being bullied by you!"
Notice what happened?
Person B never addressed the original accusation. Instead, they denied it, attacked Person A, and claimed to be the real victim.
DARVO vs. a perpetual victim mentality
Perpetual victim mentality: A recurring pattern of seeing oneself as the victim.
DARVO: A specific defensive pattern used to deflect accountability and reverse the roles of victim and offender.
The biggest takeaway: DARVO can make the person raising a legitimate concern feel like they're the one who did something wrong.
However, not every denial, disagreement, or claim of being mistreated is DARVO. The broader context and evidence matter.
Rachel retweeted
"You know about Sandra's habits now, her life, her happiness at the thought of having her baby, and you know, when the police found Sandra, there was no note, no calls, no messages, not even a message to Matthew Farwell, and when you compare all of that to the defendant's life trajectory at that moment, a married man with a kid being born the next day, a man who had sexually abused Sandra since she was a child, a man who did not go to Sandra's apartment for a clean break up, he went there to clean up his own mess by taking Sandra's life. I ask you to return the only verdicts consistent with the evidence in this trial, guilt beyond reasonable doubt."
"Thank you counsel, we'll take a 20 minute break."
Rachel retweeted
"You saw Sandra's hair. When she was last seen on camera, it was up in a bun. Her body was found, however, with that hair entangled in the ligature. It does not make sense that Sandra would subject herself to added pain by having that ligature ripping at her hair."
The jurors are shaking their heads in agreement and nodding!
Rachel retweeted
You do realize for the HAMs conspiracy to be true, it would take THOUSANDS of people.
You'd have to have...
🔹Karen Read and Aidan Kearney
🔹Attorney's Alan Jackson, David Yannetti, Elizabeth Little, Robert Alessi, Victoria George (who also was a juror), Martin Weinberg and the rest of Read's defense team
🔹Dozens upon dozens of content creators
🔹Hundreds of locals who would stand out consistently to protest the Norfolk County DA's office, Mass State Police, Canton PD and Boston PD
🔹Hundreds, if not thousands, of others who posted online questioning the death investigation of John O'Keefe
🔹Federal Investigators who opened up their own investigation
🔹Dozens of politicians who spoke up about the concerning nature of the case
... you name it!
That's how preposterous and silly this is. And, great question. I don't know understand how the HAMs bought this. 🤪
Rachel retweeted
One of these men ended the life of a young pregnant mother. The other asked questions and raised awareness about framing of Karen Read.
One of these men is facing charges that could result in 90 years of prison. The other is facing ZERO charges from the Commonwealth.
Norfolk County is controlled by criminals. #freeturtleboy #justiceforsandrabirchmore
Rachel retweeted
Karen Read’s (2) trials provided valuable additional evidence to the FEDS.
To be clear, the federal government cannot intervene to prevent a state murder trial.
After they released the “federal materials” under a protective order and the DA still went forward, all they could do was sit back and take notes, and they did.
Adam Deitch will not be our next DA, but that just means the FEDS will have to use the back door instead of the front.
Rachel retweeted
The Duxbury police officer who worked with John O’Keefe, and whose receipt below proving he was Aidan’s original source, not Karen, is an important part of this story.
The narrative suggesting that Karen worked with not only Aidan, but also former U.S. Attorney Josh Levy (who arrested Matthew Farwell) as part of some elaborate conspiracy is ridiculous and desperate.
