Love and greed—such interesting concepts in the context of your litigation group's actions. Is it love to destroy lives by exaggerating claims just to instill fear? Tragically, these tactics have been effective. It's a strange form of love that leads to the tragedies caused. Is it love to intentionally target individuals and devastate their lives, filling them with fear and destroying families? The anxiety induced in so many for the slight possibility that creditors might gain a few more dollars—primarily benefiting attorneys—is immense. Was it love or greed that led the litigation group to rely on the likelihood that some people wouldn’t respond, resulting in default judgments that would haunt them for life? Isn’t it strange that the group has become exactly like Alex, devastating lives while rationalizing the behavior? So often is the case that those who have been abused become the abuser, justifying their actions because of the abuse they have suffered. Was it love or greed to allocate millions to attorneys to target innocent people who did nothing wrong? One can only hope that the devastation inflicted on so many, for what is believed to be the responsible course of action, is fully understood. Are the harms and personal destruction of so many truly justified? Undoubtedly, the litigation group perceives itself as justified and those who withdrew their money as culpable, which may soothe consciences. But was it love or greed at play? It’s likely known that creditors stand to receive close to 100% in due time, which means that, due to 502(h), there's little actual benefit for other creditors in the end, despite the immense suffering caused. Yet the process continues, under a belief in moral superiority. Believing to be doing good, the question arises: who’s causing exponentially more harm for a few potential gains? Who should be focusing on more love and less greed? Who has allowed legal power to corrupt and wreak havoc on so many? Understand that while it may seem the ends justify the means, the means themselves are the end for those whose lives have been upended. To harm so many to help little, all while justifying it—it's a tragic shame. The litigation group, unfortunately, leads on a path of destruction but somehow is able to rationalize that it’s worth it. Very strange reasoning.