Elon’s Other Son retweeted
The Electoral College reflects the fact that the US is a republic. The Founders wanted a constitutional system based on the consent of the governed, but they wanted filtering mechanisms so that the will of the people would be channeled towards the public good. And they wanted the role of the states respected.
The EC also guarantees that in an “extended republic” like the US, a candidate cannot just run up the score in one region of the country.
In our time, the EC serves to produce a clearer and more decisive winner (see, eg, Bill Clinton winning 43% of the popular vote but a strong majority in the EC) and focuses election administration in individual states, which reduces complexity in a close race.
We should be doing more to bolster federalism and the role states play, not further weaken them.
There is no reason to change the Electoral College.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Stephen A Smith says Donald Trump called his phone after joining the Bill Maher dinner at White House on his new show with Kevin Garnett
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Isn’t your 200M net worth enough, @RoKhanna? You have to cheat the system too?
Was this sale to help pay for your new 10 million dollar house in Virginia as you prepare for your very, and I mean very, short presidential run?
Well, well, well
Rep. Ro Khanna sold $NVDA right before Nvidia's CEO admitted to having a Chinese spy side piece
He's a member of the following:
- Strategic Competition between the U.S. and the Chinese Communist Party Committee
- Taiwan Caucus
- High Tech Caucus
Apparently, federal agents informed some lawmakers last year that Jensen Huang might be the target of a foreign intelligence operation
He avoided a ~26% dip
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
When I’m wrong, I’m wrong. I thought when unemployment was low, GDP was hi, household income rose, it meant everyone was winning.
Not true.
The American economy has decoupled the economic progress of asset owners from wage earners to such a degree that broad based measures of success are no longer reliable measures of progress.
This single issue of asset ownership vs progress of wage earners will be the defining issue in all future elections.
Other issues will get caught in the interpretation (price of eggs, Iran war, price of gas etc) but the candidate that realizes that those are downstream of asset vs wage earners and gets their messaging focused on it will win.
No amount of money spent in an election or gerrymandering will change this outcome.
That is what I learned on Nov3.
I’m starting to this this podcast is the single most relevant and important podcast to listen to.
All of this is true. Not rage, but facts. And it’s a good thing.
Chamath Palihapitiya admits his blind spot on America's broken two-tier economy
PALIHAPITIYA: "I got it totally totally totally wrong. I got it totally wong."
"I'll go through all the ways in which I got it wrong, but I just want to first acknowledge what my blind spot is. Like most people's blind spots, but I can just speak for myself, it is through the lens of my own lived experience and very narrowly what is in my best interests. And I think what we had was a move away from the culture wars that was very much in my best interest, but I think it was in everybody else's best interests as well. I don't think that was on the ballot. But what I don't think I understood clearly enough, and I think that this election has made extremely clear, is that since COVID, we have moved past political ideology. And I want to say this again: I do not think Democrats or Republicans matter. That is my real takeaway after this election. There is a central block of people that vote the prescient issues of our time."
"It was a gargantuan win for Biden, then it was a gargantuan win for Trump, and then it was a gargantuan win for the Democrats in these midterms. What are these people voting for? I think what they are shouting now—they were trying to signal and now they are shouting—is a broad-based belief that the economy has completely decoupled from reality and is broken. The economic reality in America is broken."
"There is a small percentage of people, the four of us on this pod and all of our friends, who are the asset owners of America. And we have benefited in every weather condition. When rates were zero, we benefited because we were able to build our businesses with very cheap capital. When rates were high, we benefited because we had pricing power. And in every condition in between, whether there were tariffs, whether there were not tariffs, whether there were subsidies, whether there were not subsidies, we've all managed to continue to accumulate and grow assets, but we are few and far between."
"And then there's everybody else who are wage earners, and the structural capacity of the American economy to support and grow wage earners is broken. It's clear. Why do I say that? I do not think, and I disagree with Freeberg, I don't think this has anything to do with socialism. I don't think the far left won particularly more than they were expected. I don't think the far right won particularly more than was expected. This is a complete and total repudiation about the state of the economy. The economy is broken. I have a few charts to support my point of view. Number one, if this was ideological and if ideology mattered, money in politics would have had a more direct impact on the election."
25
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
This is fantastic and honestly it opened my eyes to a better way of looking at the current world and happenings.
Listen. This dude is legit!
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Theres a part of me that thinks Republicans gambled the war in Iran for peace / energy / AI reasons, knowing it could cost them the midterms. And they were ok with that knowing the Dems would spend the next two years reminding us who they are, leading to a sweep in 2028.
Maybe.
Stephen A. Smith GUARANTEES that if Democrats win the House and go after Trump again, they will FORFEIT the White House in 2028.
SMITH: "You really think America wants that NONSENSE again?!"
“If the Democrats pursue impeachment against Trump, I’m GUARANTEEING that a Republican will win the presidency in 2028. You can BOOK IT!"
Smith looks at the Democrat field. Then he looks at Marco Rubio, who he calls “smart as a whip.” His verdict: it doesn’t end well for Democrats.
SMITH: “The person that I believe is the real deal and somebody that the Democrats are going to have a tough time reckoning with, and that is Marco Rubio."
“Imagine, ladies and gentlemen, that instead of having a wildcard president who says what he wants and does what he wants... instead you’re dealing with a candidate who’s bilingual, highly intelligent, very accomplished, very knowledgeable about the issues, who’s younger, far more articulate, and ready to take on Democrats at the drop of a hat because he’s been doing it his entire career.”
“I believe he’s going to be the Republican nominee for the presidency of the United States, and I ain’t gonna front: I ain’t seen a Democrat that can beat him yet."
Stephen A. Smith has voted Republican only once in his entire life (Chris Christie).
When even he looks at Marco Rubio and thinks that’s way better than anything Democrats have, you know they’re in serious trouble.
1
85
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Stephen A. Smith GUARANTEES that if Democrats win the House and go after Trump again, they will FORFEIT the White House in 2028.
SMITH: "You really think America wants that NONSENSE again?!"
“If the Democrats pursue impeachment against Trump, I’m GUARANTEEING that a Republican will win the presidency in 2028. You can BOOK IT!"
Smith looks at the Democrat field. Then he looks at Marco Rubio, who he calls “smart as a whip.” His verdict: it doesn’t end well for Democrats.
SMITH: “The person that I believe is the real deal and somebody that the Democrats are going to have a tough time reckoning with, and that is Marco Rubio."
“Imagine, ladies and gentlemen, that instead of having a wildcard president who says what he wants and does what he wants... instead you’re dealing with a candidate who’s bilingual, highly intelligent, very accomplished, very knowledgeable about the issues, who’s younger, far more articulate, and ready to take on Democrats at the drop of a hat because he’s been doing it his entire career.”
“I believe he’s going to be the Republican nominee for the presidency of the United States, and I ain’t gonna front: I ain’t seen a Democrat that can beat him yet."
Stephen A. Smith has voted Republican only once in his entire life (Chris Christie).
When even he looks at Marco Rubio and thinks that’s way better than anything Democrats have, you know they’re in serious trouble.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Neuralink helps a man with ALS order coffee just by thinking. 🧠
He thinks of what he wants to say, and Neuralink's Bloom mobile app speaks for him through his phone.
Crazy…
Replying to @RRyanMalk
Here are 10 jobs that don't exist yet but could employ millions by 2040:
1. AI companion therapists
2. Brain implant calibrators
3. Climate engineering technicians
4. Synthetic organ fabricators
5. Space habitat maintainers
6. Longevity treatment specialists
7. Robot fleet coordinators
8. Neural privacy guardians
9. Gene editing counselors
10. Quantum network operators
1
49
Hypocrisy. When will we elect serious and honest people?
This is Peek hypocrisy from Elizabeth Warren.
Warren rants about Republicans being funded by billionaires. She’s then asked about Troy Jackson taking donations from 4 billionaires after claiming he’s taken no money from billionaires.
“Really? That’s where gonna make the focus”
39
The bar for elected public servant sinks lower and lower until it includes everyone…
Completely ignorant. And drunk. And half the voters will vote for her.
This is NOT a skit.
Jaime West, a Democrat running for Fayette County Council in Indiana, gave an EMBARRASSING interview where she appears to mumble and rant the entire time.
Is she intoxicated?
35
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Holy shit
Replying to @emilyjashinsky @JSweetLI
Update: @FDRLST’s @briannalyman2 asked CBS NY for comment. They confirmed having the full text exchange and choosing to leave “our body our choice” out of the story. (This means NYT likely got the same info from Jane Doe’s camp and made the same choice.) thefederalist.com/2026/10/09…































