Elon’s Other Son retweeted
The Electoral College reflects the fact that the US is a republic. The Founders wanted a constitutional system based on the consent of the governed, but they wanted filtering mechanisms so that the will of the people would be channeled towards the public good. And they wanted the role of the states respected.
The EC also guarantees that in an “extended republic” like the US, a candidate cannot just run up the score in one region of the country.
In our time, the EC serves to produce a clearer and more decisive winner (see, eg, Bill Clinton winning 43% of the popular vote but a strong majority in the EC) and focuses election administration in individual states, which reduces complexity in a close race.
We should be doing more to bolster federalism and the role states play, not further weaken them.
There is no reason to change the Electoral College.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Stephen A Smith says Donald Trump called his phone after joining the Bill Maher dinner at White House on his new show with Kevin Garnett
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Isn’t your 200M net worth enough, @RoKhanna? You have to cheat the system too?
Was this sale to help pay for your new 10 million dollar house in Virginia as you prepare for your very, and I mean very, short presidential run?
Well, well, well
Rep. Ro Khanna sold $NVDA right before Nvidia's CEO admitted to having a Chinese spy side piece
He's a member of the following:
- Strategic Competition between the U.S. and the Chinese Communist Party Committee
- Taiwan Caucus
- High Tech Caucus
Apparently, federal agents informed some lawmakers last year that Jensen Huang might be the target of a foreign intelligence operation
He avoided a ~26% dip
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
When I’m wrong, I’m wrong. I thought when unemployment was low, GDP was hi, household income rose, it meant everyone was winning.
Not true.
The American economy has decoupled the economic progress of asset owners from wage earners to such a degree that broad based measures of success are no longer reliable measures of progress.
This single issue of asset ownership vs progress of wage earners will be the defining issue in all future elections.
Other issues will get caught in the interpretation (price of eggs, Iran war, price of gas etc) but the candidate that realizes that those are downstream of asset vs wage earners and gets their messaging focused on it will win.
No amount of money spent in an election or gerrymandering will change this outcome.
That is what I learned on Nov3.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
This is fantastic and honestly it opened my eyes to a better way of looking at the current world and happenings.
Listen. This dude is legit!
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Stephen A. Smith GUARANTEES that if Democrats win the House and go after Trump again, they will FORFEIT the White House in 2028.
SMITH: "You really think America wants that NONSENSE again?!"
“If the Democrats pursue impeachment against Trump, I’m GUARANTEEING that a Republican will win the presidency in 2028. You can BOOK IT!"
Smith looks at the Democrat field. Then he looks at Marco Rubio, who he calls “smart as a whip.” His verdict: it doesn’t end well for Democrats.
SMITH: “The person that I believe is the real deal and somebody that the Democrats are going to have a tough time reckoning with, and that is Marco Rubio."
“Imagine, ladies and gentlemen, that instead of having a wildcard president who says what he wants and does what he wants... instead you’re dealing with a candidate who’s bilingual, highly intelligent, very accomplished, very knowledgeable about the issues, who’s younger, far more articulate, and ready to take on Democrats at the drop of a hat because he’s been doing it his entire career.”
“I believe he’s going to be the Republican nominee for the presidency of the United States, and I ain’t gonna front: I ain’t seen a Democrat that can beat him yet."
Stephen A. Smith has voted Republican only once in his entire life (Chris Christie).
When even he looks at Marco Rubio and thinks that’s way better than anything Democrats have, you know they’re in serious trouble.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Neuralink helps a man with ALS order coffee just by thinking. 🧠
He thinks of what he wants to say, and Neuralink's Bloom mobile app speaks for him through his phone.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Holy shit
Replying to @emilyjashinsky @JSweetLI
Update: @FDRLST’s @briannalyman2 asked CBS NY for comment. They confirmed having the full text exchange and choosing to leave “our body our choice” out of the story. (This means NYT likely got the same info from Jane Doe’s camp and made the same choice.) thefederalist.com/2026/10/09…
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
RFK Jr. says pro-vaccine researchers found girls given the DTP shot were 10 TIMES MORE LIKELY TO DIE over the next three months than unvaccinated children.
The girls weren’t dying of diphtheria, tetanus, or whooping cough. However, they were dying of sepsis, respiratory problems, and common infections.
So on paper, it “worked.” Then a pro-vaccine Danish team looked closer and reached an unexpected conclusion: the shot was killing MORE children than it saved.
Girls dying at ten times the rate of the unvaccinated, and the media ignored it. This should be front page news.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
At this same point in 2022 for Pennsylvania,
📈 Republican mail-in ballot requests are ⬆️
📉 Democrat mail-in ballot requests are ⬇️
Are you sitting down?
Republicans are OUTPERFORMING in Pennsylvania this midterm by a historic margin. The media will not show you these numbers. Scott Presler just dropped the data:
In 2022 there were 50,000 fewer Republican vote-by-mail requests, and 90,000 more Democrat vote-by-mail requests
Now, in 2026 Republicans are UP by 50,000 in vote-by-mail and Democrats down by 90,000.
That is a 140,000 swing in the mail-ballot gap versus the last midterm. Republicans are getting out and voting early. We’re beating Democrats at their own game.
The media wants you to think we’re losing so you don’t vote, don’t believe them.
Go vote.
Great work, @ScottPresler
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
This is 8 years old. I remember when Jordan Peterson asked what the consequences and outcomes would be for female sexuality moving into the workplace and universities.
Male biology can slows and shuts off the prefrontal cortex when aroused. Women use this strategy to get men to do stuff, and take dangerous risks for them.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
🇺🇸These idiots can’t think for themselves. But yes let’s secure our elections and PASS the Save America Act. Problem solved.🇺🇸
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
I sat my 7-year-old down and explained to him that dying industries (legacy media, academia, DNC politics) ride algorithmically driven cultural hysterias both because it’s the only way they can stay relevant and because their business models demand it.
He looked up at me and with a tear in his eyes asked, ‘so, for the sake of the journos, the assistant professors, and Dem Politics Inc, we’re obligated to attest to the moral urgency of the hysteria and act completely emotionally dysregulated?’
‘Yes,’ I answered him. ‘Yes, that’s right.’
And then we both sat quietly.
Elon’s Other Son retweeted
Or it could be a recognition that incumbents structure the system to perpetrate themselves in office.
Replying to @RonDeSantis
Sorry, but term limits are no more than an admission that We The People are total failures when it comes to our civic duty to vote, and to be stewards of our Government. I'm guessing the majority of those who want term limits are too lazy to even vote in the mid-terms.





























