Whatever it is the government doesn’t want you to discuss is of the highest public interest
Joined May 2011
- Tweets145K
- Following3.7K
- Followers4.1K
- Likes143K
Pinned Tweet
Because they think it is virtuous to lie. Every time they lie they prove to themselves their own worth, and their sound judgment about the public good. Even when they are relatively nice people like Darren Jones.
John Stone retweeted
Ofcom now wants to force us all to have Digital ID to get online
Under the banner of ‘protecting children’ this government is pushing an assault on privacy & ever worsening free speech
Get involved make your voice heard take a stand
Don’t ID the Internet
Scrap Digital ID a👇
John Stone retweeted
Media aren't immune.
BBC and ITV did not tolerate internal dissent on the safe and effective.
🇬🇧 “[You are] peddling SILLY CONSPIRACY THEORIES.”
VP reporter @WillColeshill ambushes Sky News correspondent John Craig regarding the “safe and effective” Covid vaccinations.
John Stone retweeted
A powerful endorsement of Liz Truss and BANK JOB in The Times:
'Truss still deserves to be taken seriously…She’s also right, I’m afraid, that too few political journalists understand economics: we should have the humility to admit that…There is an impeccable, internally consistent logic to everything she writes.' Patrick Maguire, The Times
Link to BANK JOB and to The Times article here:
Find the book here: amzn.eu/d/0fchTKyK
Read The Times article here: thetimes.com/culture/books/a…
@trussliz @Iromg @RickArmstrong11
John Stone retweeted
Free speech getting worse under Burnham
John Stone retweeted
Joe Rogan just nailed the biggest absurdity of Covid that permanently destroyed trust in “the experts.”
We were told to trust “massive, multi-billion dollar corporations that have the highest criminal fines in all of human history.”
But it went even deeper than that.
The whole pandemic was caused by “the science” we were being told to trust.
“Gain of function’s not doing anything good for us.”
@joerogan @jimmycarr
John Stone retweeted
We are still seeing the injuries & deaths…
Well done Rupert Lowe for calling out the Covid shot democide. We have had excess deaths every year in the Uk since the Covid shot rollout and an over 2 million increase in the number of people on permanent disability.
The same has happened in the US and every country where these bio weapons were administered.
Accountability for their Crimes Against Humanity scares the political puppets and their masters , but now Rupert you have to watch your back even more. God Bless.
John Stone retweeted
Good question. WHEN will the penny drop?
THESE 34 ILL HEALTH SIDE EFFECTS ARE THE REASONS WHY LABOUR ARE EXPANDING WATER FLOURIDATION.
JUST LIKE THEY ARE MANDATING FOLIC ACID.
TIME TO WAKE UP FOLKS.
OUR GOVT IS ATTACKING OUR HEALTH CONTINOUSLY, DELIBERATELY & MALICIOUSLY.
Cornwall, November 6, 2024: Lack of NHS dentists leads to likely fluoridation of water supply
PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION
WHEN WILL THE PENNY DROP?
thepost.uk.com/news/lack-of-…
John Stone retweeted
Pfizer trials, VSAFE, VAERS, and CDC data are a choke point of never ending debate.
Instead, DEMAND INVESTIGATION of individual medical files to determine causation.
John Stone retweeted
The SRA preferred a secondary source,Paul Easter (now an MBE) to a primary source who had video evidence to corroborate, me.
Truth will out.
TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MEANING OF “INVESTIGATION”
1. Does Owen Weatherill understand what an investigation is?
His corporate NPCC statement to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, dated 28 November 2024, gives a substantive explanation at paragraphs 14 and 15: further enquiries directed towards identifying suspects and establishing whether they should be charged, with reasonable lines of enquiry pursued towards and away from a suspect.
Yet on 18 January 2022, he told Chief Constables and Force Duty Gold Officers, concerning CRN 6029679/21:
“I can confirm that currently NO investigation has been initiated.”
The Metropolitan Police record shows an earlier decision to screen the report in, transfer it to CID and allocate it to a detective. Its screening information expressly states “further investigation” and “Proportionate Investigation”.
Those entries require explanation alongside the national assurance.
The underlying activity, its purpose and its chronology must establish the answer.
2. Would Paul Easter understand too?
In his February 2022 report to the SRA concerning Philip Hyland and PJH Law, Easter invoked an alleged inability to distinguish a crime reference number from an open police investigation as grounds for regulatory action.
A crime reference number alone does not establish an investigation. But the evidence now under examination extends beyond the existence of a number.
It concerns recorded police decisions, detective allocation and the activity undertaken.
Before a solicitor’s account is characterised as misinformation, the factual foundation of that criticism should withstand scrutiny.
Fails all around for @sra_solicitors, @FullFact, @PoliceChiefs, @metpoliceuk @MetCC and @DHSCgovuk
They all know why....and so do I...!
John Stone retweeted
Joe Rogan is horrified as Steve Hilton reveals where the 330,000 migrant kids Biden lost actually ended up.
ROGAN: “Holy f*ck!”
HILTON: “The way Bobby puts it is that Becerra turned HHS into the largest child trafficking operation in history.”
A caseworker told Hilton they were ordered to ignore obviously fake IDs and get the kids out the door as fast as possible.
Their directive was “Speed over safety.” If something happens to the kids, so be it.
One girl was put on a plane, handed off to three strange men, and forced to work 20 hours a day.
ROGAN: “Oh my God, it’s shocking. That’s so evil.”
The kids were given a hotline to call if they were in danger. The problem was getting anyone to answer.
HILTON: “There were 65,000 unanswered calls to the hotline.”
And the people who flagged it? “FIRED.”
ROGAN: “It doesn’t even seem like it could be real.”
When Bobby Kennedy Jr. previously described what happened to these kids, he called it a “huge, huge tragedy.”
KENNEDY: “One guy pretended to be the parent of 42 children. We have no idea what happened to those kids.”
“There was about 60 kids who were sent to one address. When we looked at that address, it was a container, a steel container in the middle of a parking lot.”
“A lot of them were sent to work at slaughterhouses and picking fruits in the fields. They were slaves.”
“It’s a huge, huge tragedy. My agency [under Biden] was the single biggest child trafficker in the world.”
And now Xavier Becerra, the man who presided over all of it, wants to be governor of California.
Steve Hilton is running against him.
John Stone retweeted
TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MEANING OF “INVESTIGATION”
1. Does Owen Weatherill understand what an investigation is?
His corporate NPCC statement to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, dated 28 November 2024, gives a substantive explanation at paragraphs 14 and 15: further enquiries directed towards identifying suspects and establishing whether they should be charged, with reasonable lines of enquiry pursued towards and away from a suspect.
Yet on 18 January 2022, he told Chief Constables and Force Duty Gold Officers, concerning CRN 6029679/21:
“I can confirm that currently NO investigation has been initiated.”
The Metropolitan Police record shows an earlier decision to screen the report in, transfer it to CID and allocate it to a detective. Its screening information expressly states “further investigation” and “Proportionate Investigation”.
Those entries require explanation alongside the national assurance.
The underlying activity, its purpose and its chronology must establish the answer.
2. Would Paul Easter understand too?
In his February 2022 report to the SRA concerning Philip Hyland and PJH Law, Easter invoked an alleged inability to distinguish a crime reference number from an open police investigation as grounds for regulatory action.
A crime reference number alone does not establish an investigation. But the evidence now under examination extends beyond the existence of a number.
It concerns recorded police decisions, detective allocation and the activity undertaken.
Before a solicitor’s account is characterised as misinformation, the factual foundation of that criticism should withstand scrutiny.
Fails all around for @sra_solicitors, @FullFact, @PoliceChiefs, @metpoliceuk @MetCC and @DHSCgovuk
They all know why....and so do I...!
John Stone retweeted
Oh here we are then
“Everyone over 16 may need ID to use social media,” Ofcom says
Ofcom acknowledged that children aged 16 or 17 who “do not yet have a photo ID would likely need to take steps to obtain one”.
The proposal is set out in the regulator’s assessment of four methods it says could be used to enforce the UK’s under-16s ban. They are facial age estimation, passports, digital IDs and bank checks.
Ofcom said: “Given photo ID is either required as part of our recommended methods – or likely to be part of a second check – our assessment acknowledges that those 16- to 17-year-olds that do not yet have a photo ID would likely need to take steps to obtain one.”
Photo ID checks would require a teenager to have a document such as a passport or driving licence so that a live image could be checked against it.
This is a full frontal attack on privacy & imposing digital ID to participate on all of us !
Don’t Id the Internet
Make your voice heard 👇
John Stone retweeted
The electorate aren’t goldfish. Our memories are long enough to recall June 2024, when you declared that trans-identified men with penises should be able to use women’s public bathrooms. It took a Supreme Court ruling to force you to uphold women’s rights, and now you pose as our bold champion? Please.
The time for talk has long passed. This government is putting its money where its mouth is when it comes to supporting women and girls.
We'll back practical action to confine misogyny to the history books - in public services, workplaces, and online.
theguardian.com/society/2026…
John Stone retweeted
I'd be overseeing the scrapping of the Basel approach to bank regulation, the re-introduction of national currencies and sensible quantity of credit policies, which includes moving to a fast and low-cost registration system for new banks that lend for business investment. As I'd oversee the creation not destruction of thousands of banks, I'd deliver double-digit economic growth.
The ECB should give the top job to Richard Werner (@scientificecon), the most consequential economist on the planet since Milton Friedman.
This won’t happen of course because they aren’t serious about fixing their horrendous economic problems.
John Stone retweeted
WHO KNEW BEFORE PARLIAMENT DID?
Bank shares appeared to move on a Bloomberg report about the bank tax rise before the Budget speech.
Treasury Committee chair Dame Meg Hillier has asked the FCA to check for a breach of market-sensitive information rules.
Will we see the answer?
@stevemiddi1 @TransparencyTF
New: Dame Meg Hillier, Labour chair of the commons treasury select committee, tells MPs she is to write to the Financial Conduct Authority to see if there was a leak of market sensitive information around the Budget. Hillier is intervening after bank shares rose before the chancellor started speaking. In his budget John Healey announced a lower than expected increase in bank tax
John Stone retweeted
🚨 Angela Rayner is expected to appoint an “Islamophobia tsar” by the end of this week, to help enforce the Government’s “anti-Muslim hostility” definition — Islamophobia by another name.
As the Free Speech Union warned from the outset, the definition has been used to silence people who criticise, debate or mock Islam. Those targeted include politicians such as Shadow Justice Secretary @NJ_Timothy, @RupertLowe10 and Reform UK’s @RobertJenrick, as well as private citizens.
It is a state-approved Islamic blasphemy code.
Earlier this year, FSU Policy and Research Director @DavidRoseUK exposed troubling connections between Islamist organisations and all five individuals the Government hand-picked to sit on the working group that drafted the definition.
Now the Government is refusing to say which organisations took part in the consultation that shaped it. @NJ_Timothy submitted a Freedom of Information request and was initially told that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government had deleted every submission — in apparent breach of the Government’s own data policy.
The Department later admitted that it does hold the responses, but it still refuses to say which organisations or individuals took part and influenced the definition.
What is the Government covering up? Did Islamists help to create a state-approved blasphemy code? @AngelaRayner has serious questions to answer.
On Tuesday, the Prime Minister met Muslim community leaders in Downing Street and told them: “We want to counter any form of hatred, discrimination, Islamophobia, wherever we find it.”
Sitting next to him was Akeela Ahmed, one of the five members of the working group. In 2018, she called for the Islamophobia definition published by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims to have “legal power” so that it could be “implemented by the government and the police”.
She later told MPs that Islamophobia “cannot simply be reduced to or restricted to hate crime”, complaining that a columnist could write about a “Muslim problem” without it being treated as Islamophobia, “or simply being seen as free speech”. She also wanted the definition to cover “microaggressions during school runs”.
All of this considered, there is little reason to hope that whoever becomes tsar will be good news for free speech.
Among the frontrunners is Sayeeda Warsi, the former Conservative Party co-chairman and now a crossbench peer. She has refused to distance herself from extremists, claiming that doing so would be “playing by the rules set by the racists”, and has said that the term “Islamist” is “often a fig leaf used by Islamophobes to disguise their bigotry”.
The FSU has launched a legal challenge to stop this definition. Parliament abolished the blasphemy laws in 2008; we will not allow a new one to return under a new name.
Help us stop an Islamic blasphemy law in Britain 👇
The name of the government's highly-controversial 'special representative' to oversee its equally controversial definition of 'anti-Muslim hostility' will be announced this week, ministers told Muslim groups at Downing Street yesterday.
I understand that the shortlist of 12 includes, though is not limited to:
Some of these names have, to say the least, questions over them. Asim, for instance, was sacked as an adviser to the last government after calling for a film about the Prophet Mohammed's daughter to be banned. And the definition itself, as I and others have previously argued, is deeply sinister.
In the hands of some of these people, it could be weaponised to do really serious harm.
✍️ Andrew Gilligan
Article | spectator.com/article/sayeed… | @mragilligan
John Stone retweeted
UK PM John Major personally vouched that there would be no NATO expansion East of Germany: "NOTHING OF THE SORT WILL HAPPEN" he told the Russians. Here is the evidence:
"As late as March 1991, according to the diary of the British ambassador to Moscow, British Prime Minister John Major personally assured Gorbachev, “We are not talking about the strengthening of NATO.” Subsequently, when Soviet defense minister Marshal Dmitri Yazov asked Major about East European leaders’ interest in NATO membership, the British leader responded, “Nothing of the sort will happen."
John Stone retweeted
The look of sheer exasperation on Senator Alex Antic’s face says it’s all.
ATAGI who approved the Covid vaccine for pregnant women in June 2021 now has nothing to say for itself when confronted with the fact Fauci knew 5 months earlier there were concerns over miscarriage and the LNP’s crossing the placenta.
And when Antic confronted them with the 300 miscarriage reports - silence.
It’s clear they have absolutely no interest in looking at the safety profile of any of these shots.
What a disgrace.
John Stone retweeted
@WomensHealthMag learn about folic acid so you stop spreading dangerous misinformation.
John Stone retweeted
Good people have asked me about folic free breakfast cereal.
Happy to report that M&S have "Only 1 Ingredient Corn Flakes"
With just ONE ingredient: CORN!
However "Women's Health" magazine says these M&S corn flakes are NOT good for you because they do NOT contain Gov't DRUGS!
womenshealthmag.com/uk/food/…
@WomensHealthMag
By telling your readers that Folic Acid is a "VITAMIN" you are pushing misinformation.
SYNTHETIC Folic Acid is a LAB MADE.
FOLATE B9 is the natural vitamin found in NATURAL leafy green vegetables.
Check your sources & correct this please.
