Overboosted

I have processed the following states examining the vote anomalies I have been posting about today. I decided to put them into an excel spreadsheet that anyone can examine and use as you wish. It includes a sheet for the states: Texas, North Carolina,Iowa,South Carolina, Kansas,Mississippi, Maine, and Ohio, all states which saw a senate flip from D to R. All but Maine show the anomaly. Maine is, after all, Maine, and a good theory isn't a good theory if you don't run into the occasional outlier. I did not include Alaska yet as they are still playing with the Ranked Choice Voting and god only knows how that will look, data wise. I included Florida because we didn't lose that seat, and it looks "normal" (not in the closeness of the race, but the voter's choices line up properly with what we expect). I included New York as it was a safe state for the Dems and there was no need to do much tinkering. (Their insane voter rolls takes care of that). And the vote order indeed looks like what we would expect. I included Colorado because even though it should have been considered a safe seat for the Dems, the data shows the anomaly in republican votes anyway. Things that make you go "hmmm". Seeing this pattern in one or two states would just be mildly interesting. But like with my "Mesa Pattern", which identified coordinated nationwide fraud in 2020, the more "hits" you get, the less likely the benign explanation. Here is the link: votedatabase.com/2026/votean… God bless. Wow I'm tired :-)