Just a guy with a mustache that isn't connected to his beard.
Joined July 2021
- Tweets31.1K
- Following772
- Followers2.3K
- Likes212K
Yann LeCun is a perfect example of how, until recently, the right has completely missed the mark on legal immigration. By most metrics he's a model immigrant, but he's also a leftist.
I don't need to import people who call me a racist, fascist, MAGAt. We have enough already!
People who clean their guns more than me: Neurotic losers who clearly have too much time on their hands
People who clean their guns less than me: Reckless and irresponsible fools who are just asking for a mishap
I'm probably not adding anything new here, but it's really worth stating explicitly that her view is that white people are inherently Nazis and that any majority white, Christian country will eventually devolve into Nazism.
They'll always present these sob stories but never make any concrete suggestions of what the law should be. It's always just, "Well this guy should get to stay." These are the same people who gnash their teeth about the rule of law and the constitution then immediately advocate selective enforcement when it suits them.
So what should the law be? If you're here X number of years with no arrests you get to stay? If you have a family who is here legally you get to stay?
There are many signs that The South is becoming culturally dominant, but perhaps none is bigger than the proliferation of y'all. There was a time not long ago where saying y'all immediately outed you as a country bumpkin, but these days folks all over the US are saying it.
And for good reason, it's a great word! It's a little sad, though, because now it doesn't necessarily indicate to other Southerners that someone is "one of us". It's not so bad, though. There are still other unique ways to use y'all that are clearly Southern, like adding another word to the contraction. Examples are y'all're (you all are) or, one of my personal favorites, y'all'd've (you all would have).
I won't say anything about the proper pronunciations of these two words so as to not give away all our secrets, but real Southerners know.
The men who murdered Mollie Tibbetts and Laken Riley had no convictions for prior crimes before committing their heinous acts. David and his ilk supprt releasing these types into our communities because they haven't committed any crimes.
The idea that we should only detain someone in the country illegally after he commits a crime against an innocent American is evil.
I have the same thoughts about @SlowToWrite (Samuel Sey) that I have with all undocumented (or potentially undocumented) immigrants who are living productive otherwise law-abiding lives in the country.
1) Detention is a last resort, not a first resort.
2) If there is *evidence* that they are flight risk (not just suspicion due to immigration status) use an ankle monitor.
3) Detain them if they've committed felonies or are otherwise a threat to the public.
Oh, and deportation isn't always the right answer. If a person is married to an American, has a job, and has American kids here then it's usually going to be bad for us and for them to deport. We should *want* productive, peaceful people and families in this country.
Border security is very good. We should control who gets in this country and limit immigration to a pace that sustainable, doesn't overwhelm social services, and doesn't overtax communities.
Interior enforcement -- especially when dealing with people who are living productive lives here -- can be more perilous. There's lots of consensus to get rid of criminals. Let's do that and then talk about the folks who are living good lives here in the U.S.
I think the Reagan approach in 1986 (legalization plus more border security) was correct. We failed, however, at border security in the years and decades that followed, and that is a key reason for our present crisis.
People like Neil will get all worked up about Carl Schmitt and the friend/enemy distinction and then literally advocate that we don't enforce laws against people he likes.
At a birthday party at a skating rink and there's a little boy who's around 10 with an incredible blone mullet, camo shorts, and an American flag fanny pack.
Absolute patriot.
The kids might be alright.
When people say the left sees blacks as their pets, this is what they mean.
"He's a good boy," and it's a 14 year old with prior arrests who just committed an armed car jacking.
This is also my own experience. Every time a dog has jumped on me, or nipped me, even drawn blood, it was in the wake of an owner telling me that their dog is well behaved. Dog owners will often insist that their dog is a good dog immediately *after* it has done something to demonstrate that it is poorly trained.
At the hearing regarding the dog that recently attacked my son, the owner protested that his dogs are friendly and well-trained and, “you can ask anybody.”
Presumably by “anybody,” he doesn’t include the people who were complaining to the city that they were attacked by his dog.
Every single dog owner says that they have a good dog. They all think that they have a trained dog. They all think their dogs are well-behaved. They blurt out, “he’s friendly” as their dog bites somebody as if they have Tourette’s.
Hearing this from a dog owner has absolutely zero value.
So far as I can tell, what dog owners mean when they say that their dog is friendly and well trained is that they like their dog. It means nothing more than that.
"Guys, please, let's just continue being gracious losers."
No.
The madness is spreading. theblaze.com/news/blaze-medi…
First ruck in the new neighborhood with plate carrier and assault pack.
Assert dominance.
Let the HOA board know you're not to be trifled with.
Democrats really want you to believe that enforcing our existing laws is unconstitutional but ignoring them is perfectly constitutional.
By his own admission, there are illegals "who have lived in our communities for years, even decades" and that, somehow, every administration in my lifetime neglecting to enforce our laws and allowing this to happen is perfectly constitutional.
But sending them home somehow violates the constitution.
Today, the Fifth Circuit stripped immigrants facing detention in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi of their right to due process. People who have lived in our communities for years, even decades, can now be locked away with no chance to see a judge or ask for bond. It’s a radical departure from decades of legal precedent and violates the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, which protects everyone.
This ruling leaves tens of thousands of people imprisoned without the government ever having to say why. It is wrong, and we will keep fighting.
There's a funny thing about buying your kid new shoes sometimes and you're just like, "These are huge! How are you wearing shoes this big?"
That happened to me this time. They just look gigantic.
