Replying to @braxton_mccoy
It depends on what you find tedious. It's great for automating and managing mundane tasks (eg we have a little meal planner that sends a meal plan and shopping list). You can have it review stuff you're working on help you research projects. Just pick something and start playing around.
Yann LeCun is a perfect example of how, until recently, the right has completely missed the mark on legal immigration. By most metrics he's a model immigrant, but he's also a leftist.
I don't need to import people who call me a racist, fascist, MAGAt. We have enough already!
Replying to @pmddomingos
He is only irritating for racists, fascists, MAGAts, and many other anti-liberals, because he is smart, politically astute, effective, and mostly right.
People who clean their guns more than me: Neurotic losers who clearly have too much time on their hands
People who clean their guns less than me: Reckless and irresponsible fools who are just asking for a mishap
But there is a rather meaningful distinction between American citizens and illegal aliens. See if you can figure it out.
This is the unifying belief of everyone decrying "woke right" and "post liberals" and "the new right".
I'm probably not adding anything new here, but it's really worth stating explicitly that her view is that white people are inherently Nazis and that any majority white, Christian country will eventually devolve into Nazism.
They'll always present these sob stories but never make any concrete suggestions of what the law should be. It's always just, "Well this guy should get to stay." These are the same people who gnash their teeth about the rule of law and the constitution then immediately advocate selective enforcement when it suits them.
So what should the law be? If you're here X number of years with no arrests you get to stay? If you have a family who is here legally you get to stay?
There are many signs that The South is becoming culturally dominant, but perhaps none is bigger than the proliferation of y'all. There was a time not long ago where saying y'all immediately outed you as a country bumpkin, but these days folks all over the US are saying it.
And for good reason, it's a great word! It's a little sad, though, because now it doesn't necessarily indicate to other Southerners that someone is "one of us". It's not so bad, though. There are still other unique ways to use y'all that are clearly Southern, like adding another word to the contraction. Examples are y'all're (you all are) or, one of my personal favorites, y'all'd've (you all would have).
I won't say anything about the proper pronunciations of these two words so as to not give away all our secrets, but real Southerners know.
Can you read? He is literally arguing that we should not detain illegals who are apprehended but have no criminal history. If we are not detaining them, we are, in fact, turning them loose.
Replying to @Docquistador
I'm a little offended you think I haven't already done this.
Replying to @gfygardencenter
I wouldn't mind a decent neighborhood with no HOA, but it's not too bad so far.
Replying to @joelgaines
He definitely might have a pocket knife in there. Now I'm curious.
Replying to @_cobber84
It's fun. My daughter loves skating. My son is starting to like it more.
The men who murdered Mollie Tibbetts and Laken Riley had no convictions for prior crimes before committing their heinous acts. David and his ilk supprt releasing these types into our communities because they haven't committed any crimes.
The idea that we should only detain someone in the country illegally after he commits a crime against an innocent American is evil.
I have the same thoughts about @SlowToWrite (Samuel Sey) that I have with all undocumented (or potentially undocumented) immigrants who are living productive otherwise law-abiding lives in the country.
1) Detention is a last resort, not a first resort.
2) If there is *evidence* that they are flight risk (not just suspicion due to immigration status) use an ankle monitor.
3) Detain them if they've committed felonies or are otherwise a threat to the public.
Oh, and deportation isn't always the right answer. If a person is married to an American, has a job, and has American kids here then it's usually going to be bad for us and for them to deport. We should *want* productive, peaceful people and families in this country.
Border security is very good. We should control who gets in this country and limit immigration to a pace that sustainable, doesn't overwhelm social services, and doesn't overtax communities.
Interior enforcement -- especially when dealing with people who are living productive lives here -- can be more perilous. There's lots of consensus to get rid of criminals. Let's do that and then talk about the folks who are living good lives here in the U.S.
I think the Reagan approach in 1986 (legalization plus more border security) was correct. We failed, however, at border security in the years and decades that followed, and that is a key reason for our present crisis.









