FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
So I tried $near intents....UI is fucking CLEAN. You you use your device's biometric data or existing passkey as sign in. Set up is literally in seconds then proceed to do swaps or perps as you normally would.
The thing is, people are thinking of $NEAR only as $ZEC beta...and that is indeed one aspect....but the truth is no one actually fucking uses $ZEC and it makes no meaningful revenue.
People ARE using $NEAR intents for private swaps/perps bc you can clearly see the near intents chart going parabolic like @Trader_XO posted this morning. Revenue is going parabolic too.
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
looks like we got faked out with a weekend dump right before clarity act vote tomorrow which we are clearly frontrunning with a pump which is actually just a liquidity grab before selling the news to go lower which is a fakeout to wash out longs before going higher to rinse short
Okay, this is one of the most disgusting things I have ever seen in the Monad trenches.
I honestly do not even know what to say about this, but here is the complete list of wallets that bought the token before the public announcement of the $MONDAK contract address. I’ve also extracted the amount of monad:native each wallet spent to buy the token before the announcement.
The public announcement of the CA was made at 6:01 PM in my timezone, and this shows everything that was bought from the moment the token launched until the contract address was posted on twitter.
This retard, @monalex, who cant even talk properly in english, farming monad community since testnet with shitty useless posts about wallet strength, no useful existence for the community and ecosystem literally scammed you.
I dont know why projects on monad ecosystem choose this mfer as their ambassadors, and how he still have reputation on this chain.
🤖 Made with AI
unavailable
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
Save the Bond Market
Save the Currency
Functioning Capital Controls
Pick 2 Bessent…
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
whitelist submission form live
supply: 4444 office nfts
mp: free
chain: robinhood chain @RobinhoodApp
48 hours.
form: forms.gle/HHK9LG39xsZvVbiH6
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
Goat Street NFT GTD/WL form is now live.
48 hrs for applications.
Supply: 6666
Chain: @RobinhoodApp
MP: Free Mint
Form:
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F…
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
Let's be super fucking clear. The rsETH exploit was a mess bc of bad collateralization decisions by @aave and bad best practice decisions by @LayerZero_Core.
HOWEVER, the true blame lays primarily with the lazy, sleazy morons of @KelpDAO who didnt care enough to protect the money its users entrusted into their hands.
Would love to know what prompted Kelp to migrate *from* MultiDVN to 1/1 config.
Gonna be hard to keep blaming the quickstart guide if it was originally configured correctly...
Replying to @KelpDAO
A ton of this is just completely untrue.
1) Kelp originally used the defaults which were MultiDVN or DeadDVN and manually migrated to a 1/1 config later
2) Almost 100% of the volume on a 1/1 config was rsETH
3) Not using a 1/1 for production applications is mentioned many times in the documentation.
The defaults Kelp is referencing in their screenshot were multiDVN or DeadDVN, which force-rejects an application using the defaults at all and requires them to manually set configuration.
rsETH was originally configured to use the default LayerZero configuration of a multiDVN setup of LayerZero Labs + Google:
Here are the exact transactions where that happens
Ethereum → Arbitrum:
etherscan.io/tx/0xd7c864adbc…
at 2024-02-06 03:09:47 UTC
Ethereum → Optimism:
etherscan.io/tx/0x7075bfe9a3…
at 2024-02-06 03:09:59 UTC
KelpDAO then manually changed these to 1/1 configs:
For the original Feb 6 Ethereum routes to Arbitrum/Optimism, KelpDAO’s Ethereum contract switched from defaults to manual OApp-scoped config on 2024-04-01:
Send-side manual config:
etherscan.io/tx/0x7485c16c9b…
2024-04-01 07:12:11 UTC
Receive-side manual config:
etherscan.io/tx/0x21e967c99a…
2024-04-01 07:12:23 UTC
From this point on, Kelp began deploying all of their configurations as 1/1 configs. Here is Kelp’s deployment on Unichain:
Unichain → Ethereum was opened on 2025-04-01 18:55:41 UTC.
Pathway-open / setPeer tx:
uniscan.xyz/tx/0x31ea2b10a73…
The manual ULN config followed 6 seconds later in uniscan.xyz/tx/0xd8ef5416a53….
During this time the Unichain -> Ethereum and Ethereum -> Unichain defaults were set to DeadDVN which is a contract which makes it impossible for any application to transact without manually configuring their DVNs, this was not possible on the defaults of this pathway.
Here is the code in the DeadDVN (etherscan.io/address/0x747C7…) that specifically prohibits this.
(Screenshot 1)
This is called out many many times in the docs:
1. Integration Checklist — "Do" list
- Last edited: 2025-11-26 (Nazreen)
- Content: "Do: … Use more than one DVN for each production pathway instead of relying on a single DVN."
- File: v2/tools/integration-checklist.mdx:244
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/to…
2. Integration Checklist — "Don't" list
- Last edited: 2025-11-26 (Nazreen)
- Content: "Don't: … Configure only one DVN for a pathway and treat it as production‑ready."
- File: v2/tools/integration-checklist.mdx:251
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/to…
3. Integration Checklist — Defaults are not safe
- Last edited: 2025-09-25 (Tino Martínez Molina)
- Content: "Do not assume defaults are safe for production. Always check explicitly: getSendLibrary, getReceiveLibrary, and getConfig. If these resolve to defaults, confirm whether the defaults are valid for the intended pathway. Unintentional fallbacks to defaults are a common cause of blocked or failing pathways."
- File: v2/tools/integration-checklist.mdx:126-128
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/to…
4. Integration Checklist — Default fallback warning
- Last edited: 2026-02-26 (migration; same wording predates it)
- Content: "Warning: If no configuration is set, the OApp will fallback to the default settings set by LayerZero Labs."
- File: v2/tools/integration-checklist.mdx:222-238
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/to…
5. ONFT Quickstart — Production guidance
- Last edited: 2025-02-20 (Radek Sienkiewicz)
- Content: "DVN Settings: Use multiple DVNs in production to ensure message verification is robust."
- File: v2/developers/evm/onft/quickstart.mdx:700
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/de…
6. ONFT Quickstart — Strong recommendation to configure
- Last edited: 2025-03-10 (Radek Sienkiewicz)
- Content: "We strongly recommend reviewing these settings carefully and configuring your security stack according to your needs and preferences."
- File: v2/developers/evm/onft/quickstart.mdx:366
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/de…
7. Starknet FAQ — "Should I use multiple DVNs?"
- Last edited: 2026-01-21 (Nazreen)
- Content:
▎ Should I use multiple DVNs?
▎ Recommended for production. Multiple DVNs provide:
▎ - Increased security (multiple independent verifiers)
▎ - Resilience (no single point of failure)
▎ - Trust minimization
- File: v2/developers/starknet/troubleshooting/faq.mdx:290-296
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/de…
Here are the exact recommendations we gave KelpDAO when asked about DVNs (typically 2/3)
(Screenshot 2)
Other LayerZero applications speaking on exactly what is advised by the team
nitter.gq/mitchellftracy/status/…
nitter.gq/jasperflux/status/2046…
For how much volume was actually configured on 1/1 here is the exact data.
(Screenshot 3)
We will publish a complete post-mortem as soon as the external security firms have completed it.
A car company sells you a car, the instruction manual says "wear a seatbelt".
You do not wear a seatbelt, and get into a fatal accident.
The car company later adds a feature: the car will not drive if the driver's seatbelt is not fastened.
Is this an admission of guilt?
Are you, the driver, absolved of blame because the car company did not have this feature before, and because other drivers also do not wear seatbelts?
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
Nothing new has been said here “disproves” is wild
Kelp used a system that is supposed to have multiple parties verifying and they had one single point of failure
A very basic anecdote: If you set up a multi sig and make it 1/1 and get drained that’s on you not anyone else
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
Replying to @KelpDAO
A ton of this is just completely untrue.
1) Kelp originally used the defaults which were MultiDVN or DeadDVN and manually migrated to a 1/1 config later
2) Almost 100% of the volume on a 1/1 config was rsETH
3) Not using a 1/1 for production applications is mentioned many times in the documentation.
The defaults Kelp is referencing in their screenshot were multiDVN or DeadDVN, which force-rejects an application using the defaults at all and requires them to manually set configuration.
rsETH was originally configured to use the default LayerZero configuration of a multiDVN setup of LayerZero Labs + Google:
Here are the exact transactions where that happens
Ethereum → Arbitrum:
etherscan.io/tx/0xd7c864adbc…
at 2024-02-06 03:09:47 UTC
Ethereum → Optimism:
etherscan.io/tx/0x7075bfe9a3…
at 2024-02-06 03:09:59 UTC
KelpDAO then manually changed these to 1/1 configs:
For the original Feb 6 Ethereum routes to Arbitrum/Optimism, KelpDAO’s Ethereum contract switched from defaults to manual OApp-scoped config on 2024-04-01:
Send-side manual config:
etherscan.io/tx/0x7485c16c9b…
2024-04-01 07:12:11 UTC
Receive-side manual config:
etherscan.io/tx/0x21e967c99a…
2024-04-01 07:12:23 UTC
From this point on, Kelp began deploying all of their configurations as 1/1 configs. Here is Kelp’s deployment on Unichain:
Unichain → Ethereum was opened on 2025-04-01 18:55:41 UTC.
Pathway-open / setPeer tx:
uniscan.xyz/tx/0x31ea2b10a73…
The manual ULN config followed 6 seconds later in uniscan.xyz/tx/0xd8ef5416a53….
During this time the Unichain -> Ethereum and Ethereum -> Unichain defaults were set to DeadDVN which is a contract which makes it impossible for any application to transact without manually configuring their DVNs, this was not possible on the defaults of this pathway.
Here is the code in the DeadDVN (etherscan.io/address/0x747C7…) that specifically prohibits this.
(Screenshot 1)
This is called out many many times in the docs:
1. Integration Checklist — "Do" list
- Last edited: 2025-11-26 (Nazreen)
- Content: "Do: … Use more than one DVN for each production pathway instead of relying on a single DVN."
- File: v2/tools/integration-checklist.mdx:244
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/to…
2. Integration Checklist — "Don't" list
- Last edited: 2025-11-26 (Nazreen)
- Content: "Don't: … Configure only one DVN for a pathway and treat it as production‑ready."
- File: v2/tools/integration-checklist.mdx:251
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/to…
3. Integration Checklist — Defaults are not safe
- Last edited: 2025-09-25 (Tino Martínez Molina)
- Content: "Do not assume defaults are safe for production. Always check explicitly: getSendLibrary, getReceiveLibrary, and getConfig. If these resolve to defaults, confirm whether the defaults are valid for the intended pathway. Unintentional fallbacks to defaults are a common cause of blocked or failing pathways."
- File: v2/tools/integration-checklist.mdx:126-128
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/to…
4. Integration Checklist — Default fallback warning
- Last edited: 2026-02-26 (migration; same wording predates it)
- Content: "Warning: If no configuration is set, the OApp will fallback to the default settings set by LayerZero Labs."
- File: v2/tools/integration-checklist.mdx:222-238
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/to…
5. ONFT Quickstart — Production guidance
- Last edited: 2025-02-20 (Radek Sienkiewicz)
- Content: "DVN Settings: Use multiple DVNs in production to ensure message verification is robust."
- File: v2/developers/evm/onft/quickstart.mdx:700
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/de…
6. ONFT Quickstart — Strong recommendation to configure
- Last edited: 2025-03-10 (Radek Sienkiewicz)
- Content: "We strongly recommend reviewing these settings carefully and configuring your security stack according to your needs and preferences."
- File: v2/developers/evm/onft/quickstart.mdx:366
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/de…
7. Starknet FAQ — "Should I use multiple DVNs?"
- Last edited: 2026-01-21 (Nazreen)
- Content:
▎ Should I use multiple DVNs?
▎ Recommended for production. Multiple DVNs provide:
▎ - Increased security (multiple independent verifiers)
▎ - Resilience (no single point of failure)
▎ - Trust minimization
- File: v2/developers/starknet/troubleshooting/faq.mdx:290-296
- URL: docs.layerzero.network/v2/de…
Here are the exact recommendations we gave KelpDAO when asked about DVNs (typically 2/3)
(Screenshot 2)
Other LayerZero applications speaking on exactly what is advised by the team
nitter.gq/mitchellftracy/status/…
nitter.gq/jasperflux/status/2046…
For how much volume was actually configured on 1/1 here is the exact data.
(Screenshot 3)
We will publish a complete post-mortem as soon as the external security firms have completed it.
All I can share after launching an OFT is:
- @LayerZero_Core told us to always to use multiple DVNs never just 1
- interop would look very different without a permissionless stack that allows for configurable security
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
How much glue do you have to sniff in order to fud Arbitrum for freezing North Korean hacker funds?
They reduced knock on effects at the heart of some of the most critical DeFi infra in existence
User funds are more important than your performative decentralization platitudes
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
One month after starting the war in Iran, this is the statement of the President of the United States on Easter Sunday.
These are the ravings of a dangerous and mentally unbalanced individual. Congress has got to act NOW. End this war.
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
Whitelist checker and mint link are live!
-> mint.lilstars.xyz/
Connect your wallet to check your eligibility and the phase you are in.
Mint details
Mint time: 23rd of February, 10 AM EST
Mint Price: 1700 $Mon or equivalent 35 USD or below
Team Treasury: 222
Presale: 1128 (50% unlocked, 50% vested)
MintHub by @sappyseals : 222 (sappy.lol/minthub )
Tomorrow, the stars will be born on Monad.⭐️
If you're new and not sure how to bridge to Monad, you can use the bridge powered by @lifiprotocol.
You can also catch a glimpse of our 1/1 pieces by scrolling.
The reveal mechanism will be a digitized blind box experience where you unbox your PFP along with some extra perks 👀
Check your allocation and share in the comments below!
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
monad keeps rolling out some of the biggest builder programs out there
hackathons, monad madness, now nitro
$7.5m invested in startups, no hidden terms, no lockups
ecosystem is key
you still not bullish?
Introducing Nitro, a 3 month project accelerator:
- Funding from top VCs
- Mentorship from industry-leading founders
- $500k per team, distributed on Day 1
If you’re building in crypto, it’s time to compress a year into 3 months.
Applications are live: nitroacc.xyz
FireHaux 🔥 retweeted
For posterity, let us pour one out for @infinex's attempt at a $1b valuation and anyone who believed that it was remotely reasonable.
@MoonrockCapital : I am calling it now, this {Infinex} is going to be one of the most successful and sustainable TGEs of this cycle. And one that future founders will study and try to replicate."
TLDR: This is not 2021 anymore and it genuinely warms me that the crypto markets are starting to view new projects thru a lens of moat and revenue vs hopium.
Replying to @sjdedic
Kain literally dumps the token of his gameFi project from his public wallet along with other team members. The project spent investor money lavishly on open bars and high end real estate rentals. Good luck trying to make him look like a saint with that $1b ico. nitter.gq/crypto_condom/status/1…







































