Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD) profile picture

@EmoryUniversity PhD Alumnus | Immunology | Regulatory Medical Writer | Former Scientist-in-Residence @biotechinstitut | Family Man

Georgia, USA
Joined October 2026
Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)Photo by Trizzy (@TrizzyPhD)
Pinning this for reference - where we are versus where we thought we would be. Looking good!
1
3
240
🤯
Prices of Critical Minerals are ballooning outside of China: Eye-Popping Charts and Worrying Increases for the West 👀👇
1
7
Goodness
I'm hearing rumors that the US government is in panic mode when it comes to securing sufficient gallium supply for its industry 🇺🇸
1
19
I'm hearing rumors that the US government is in panic mode when it comes to securing sufficient gallium supply for its industry 🇺🇸
Prices of Critical Minerals are ballooning outside of China: Eye-Popping Charts and Worrying Increases for the West 👀👇
4
5
2
21
1,800
Trizzy retweeted
$AREC RMAP(Responsible Minerals Assurance Process)은 광물의 채굴·구매·제련 과정에서 원료가 책임 있는 방식으로 조달되는지를 검증하는 국제적인 제3자 감사 제도다. ReElement가 TMK의 텅스텐을 공급받아 정제하고, 민간기업에 넘길 때, 공급망(우즈벡)에 대한 신뢰도가 올라간다. ( @Sagint 가 여기서 잘 작동하리라 생각한다.) lnkd.in/p/gjYRuYe9
1
1
8
323
Trizzy retweeted
$RKLB, $AREC: When asked about the stability of the space supply chain, Sir Peter Beck highlighted the continued challenges in securing critical minerals: Yeah, I mean, not so much for us because we are so vertically integrated. We control so much of our own supply chain. For us, probably the things that we worry about are different things than other people who are building satellites and procuring components from us and others worry about. For us, because we are transforming raw materials into finished items, it is more raw materials. There are some critical minerals and whatnot that continue to be a challenge for a number of industries. But I think, as we look across our supply chain, it really devolves all the way down to just raw materials rather than any particular items. Come Jan 1, that problem will become a lot harder! Long $AREC and ReElement.
1
1
18
1,995
Lmaoooooo
Jimmy Butler on IG 😂😂😂
30
$AREC An Unknown exclusive first of its kind! Our brother sits down with Troy Fitrell, CEO of @SagintInc to explain the importance of tokenized traceability. Mind you @ReElementTech is already using this technology. This is the future (and present) of traceability. Bravo Probz!
$AREC: Right now, a trader can buy 1 ton of legit tantalum, buy 4 more tons from smugglers, and photocopy the same certificate 4 times. That's how minerals are tracked today. A PDF. @SagintInc is fixing that. A token can only move with the actual lot, so the photocopy trick stops working. I recently had the wonderful opportunity to sit down with Amb. Troy Fitrell (@tdf_dc), former top US diplomat for Africa and now CEO of SAGINT International, and Non-Executive Director of Ivanhoe Atlantic (@IvanhoeAtlantic). We covered tokenization, the ADI Foundation partnership, a pan-African minerals exchange, and the Jan 1 traceability rules. This interview is a wonderful one, and I highly recommend you check it out. Enjoy - and thanks again to Troy for the discussion! app.tryprism.xyz/p/probzunkn…
3
1
11
680
$AREC @SagintInc @ReElementTech Just had an epiphany, but if traceability is the way forward and globally this is an acceptable methodology to accept product, that may inherently squeeze supply even more and drive up prices b/c unregulated product may be pushed out the market 🤫
2
155
Whoa, whoa, whoa....since when did gadolinium get so expensive ex-China?? Holy moly.
🚨 Dysprosium oxide delivered to Europe now trades at roughly 16 times the Chinese price. Microchip, Ford and Regal Rexnord all flag rare earth magnets as a risk in their latest annual reports. Not one of them puts a dollar, a tonne or a share of supply on it. Here is the gap between the price screen and the 10-K 🧵 📊 The price gap, in Benchmark's numbers Benchmark Mineral Intelligence's Q3 2026 review, 25 September: dysprosium oxide CIF Europe rose 150% over the quarter. 📅In September alone it gained 56% to average US$3,500/kg; terbium oxide CIF Europe rose 23% to US$6,745/kg. The ratio that matters: "CIF Europe dysprosium oxide prices are now around 16.3 times DDP China price levels, up from 6.8 times at the end of Q2." Chinese domestic Dy and Tb "continued to retreat from their mid-Q3 highs", which is what widened the gap. Five weeks on, the spread has not closed. SMM, 5 November: dysprosium oxide in Europe US$3,300 to 4,200/kg against US$215 to 220/kg inside China, which is 15 to 19 times; terbium oxide US$7,300 to 8,300/kg; gadolinium oxide US$2,700 to 3,000/kg. SMM's own caveat: the three heavies were "largely in a state of having prices but no available goods", and its European quotes are "for reference only". So the 16× is a thin market's number. It is still the number a non-Chinese buyer is quoted. 🧲 Why it lands on the high-temperature grades 🇺🇸🏛️The US Department of Energy's 2022 supply chain assessment: sintered NdFeB magnets "can have small additions (0.5 to 11 percent) of Dy or Tb that improve the high-temperature resistance to demagnetization", and those heavies are used "primarily in sintered magnets to improve their resistance to demagnetization at temperatures above 120 degrees C". 📊The same report put China at "approximately 92% of global sintered NdFeB magnet manufacturing". Traction motors, generators, aerospace actuators and defence electronics sit in the high-temperature grades. That is where a 16× dysprosium price arrives in the bill of materials. 📄 What three annual reports actually say 🔬🎛️Microchip Technology, 10-K for the year ended 31 March 2026: "China is a predominant producer of many rare earth materials essential to the global electronics industry. In 2025, China imposed and later expanded export restrictions and licensing requirements on certain rare earth elements and related magnets." And on its customers: "export controls on rare earth magnets have previously led certain automotive manufacturers to temporarily suspend operations." 🇺🇸🚗Ford Motor, 10-K for 2025, lists "rare earth minerals (e.g., magnets, neodymium, dysprosium)" among its purchased raw materials, then: "China's restriction on the export of rare earth minerals, which we and our suppliers utilize for a number of components, has impacted (e.g., rescheduling production, changing operating patterns) and caused disruptions in our production operations, increases the risk of future production disruptions, and has increased and may further increase costs (e.g., premium freight and expedited shipping costs to make up for delays in component availability)." 📉🧲Regal Rexnord, 10-K for 2025: "Following the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the US on Chinese goods, China placed export controls on certain rare earth magnets. These restrictions create risk in our supply chain and may increase our costs or limit our ability to produce certain of our products that use rare earth magnets." Its Automation and Motion Control segment commentary goes further than the risk factor: organic growth was "partially offset by... persistent challenges sourcing rare earth magnets, particularly for products serving the medical and defense markets." Three filings, three admissions that the problem has already touched production. No dollar amount, no tonnage, no share of supply in any of them. Regal's line about having "mitigated these tariffs, so as to avoid a material impact" refers to tariffs in general, not to magnets. Ford describes disruptions that have already happened and gives no figure for them. That is not a breach of anything; risk factors are written to be qualitative. It does mean a reader cannot tell from the filings whether the exposure is US$5 million or US$500 million. 🖊️ Where a number already exists Upstream, prices are in writing. MP Materials' 10 July 2025 release: the Department of Defense "entered into a 10-year agreement establishing a price floor commitment of $110 per kilogram for MP Materials' NdPr products stockpiled or sold", alongside a US$400 million purchase of convertible preferred stock. A government has put a hard number on light rare earth supply. No comparable published floor exists for dysprosium or terbium. And defence contractors are about to need provenance all the way to the mine. DFARS clause 252.225-7052 (May 2024 version): "Effective through December 31, 2026, the Contractor shall not deliver under this contract any covered material melted or produced in any covered country." Then: "Effective January 1, 2027, the Contractor shall not deliver under this contract any covered material mined, refined, separated, melted, or produced in any covered country." Covered countries: North Korea, China, Russia, Iran. For NdFeB the clause spells it out: from 1 January 2027 "this restriction includes the entire supply chain from mining of neodymium, iron, and boron through production of finished magnets." A contractor cannot certify that without knowing where the oxide was separated, which is a fact most magnet buyers do not currently hold. 📅 Two dates before the next filing season 📍10 November 2026: the date written into MOFCOM and Customs Announcement No. 70, which suspended China's October 2025 export control package (five additional rare earths and the reach into foreign-made magnets containing Chinese inputs). Both governments have described the broader arrangement as running to 10 January 2027, per MOFCOM's 28 September statement, but Announcement No. 70 still carries its November date, and Environment+Energy Leader notes the legal deadlines had not been formally moved as of late October. • 1 January 2027: the DFARS upstream origin rule takes effect. 📍1 January 2027: the DFARS upstream origin rule takes effect. The April 2025 licensing regime on the seven medium and heavy rare earths, dysprosium and terbium included, was never part of the pause and stays in force either way. Companies drafting their 2026 annual reports early next year will write their supply risk factors with both dates behind them. 👀 Bottom Line 🇪🇺🇨🇳Fact: the Europe-to-China spread on dysprosium oxide went from under 7× to over 16× in one quarter on Benchmark's assessment and sits at 15 to 19× on SMM's November spot quotes. Fact: three large US manufacturers have told shareholders the controls already disrupted production, and none has quantified it. Fact: a US$110/kg floor exists for NdPr; nothing equivalent exists for the heavies. Opinion: the first annual report that states its dysprosium and terbium tonnage, the share sourced outside China and the cost of the premium will set the disclosure standard the rest get measured against, and the 1 January 2027 DFARS rule will force the provenance data to exist whether or not it is published. For the few Western plants producing separated Dy and Tb oxide today, the European number, not the Chinese one, is the price their customers are quoting against. #RareEarths #Dysprosium #Terbium #CriticalMinerals #SupplyChain #Magnets #ExportControls #DFARS #Ford #Microchip #RegalRexnord #China
27
Yeah I felt that ish yesterday. All cap
$QQQ We’re near a bottom in my view as I had said in real time that there’s “CAPITULATION” now being confirmed by major trading desks Capitulation is not something you see at tops and is something you more likely see at lows 😘
1
58
Hahahahaha I'm crying right now 😭 🤣 😂😂😂 Good job MP
Replying to @cekdrew
wow i think it should go down another 25% tomorrow
1
2
346
Haha the narratives that swing this market are something else
AI doomsaying fears hyperbolically far worse than apparent reality
24
$AREC I'd say we are relatively immune to any potential mining regulatory reform (if that narrative is true and pursued). So none factor for us 😏 In other news, let's go green on the day! Lol
3
5
655
Just shows how undervalued and ridiculous things are right now. I can guarantee @ReElementTech is profitable already too. Just madness. Market makers are hell when they're against you.
$AREC One of my USA Rare Earth Refining play gets half it's market cap in non dilutive funding will see many multiples.
1
7
748
$AREC put some pennies together to buy some more just now. Capitulation-like sentiment.
1
7
529
Yeah feels like it
$QQQ $VIX I’m going big at the Banana325SMA on the Q’s at around 650 Valuation on the Q’s forward PE is approaching the DOTCOM crash BOTTOM levels CAPITULATION
27
Just an unreal athletic specimen, and an amazing person. He's going to continue to do unworldly things as long as he stays healthy. Wishing him the best in his career. He's def a favorite of mine in the league.
CAREER NIGHT FOR VICTOR WEMBANYAMA 🚨 🤯 52 PTS (CAREER-HIGH) 🤯 24 REB (CAREER-HIGH) 🤯 8 BLK FIRST PLAYER WITH 50+ PTS, 20+ REB, 5+ BLK SINCE BOB MCADOO IN 1974.
24