The next 6 to 12 months are the ones where you change your life.
But, If you don't understand this little concept on how to prepare yourself for the next bull run, then forget about a 100x....
๐งต
โฅ your wallet is basically your bank statement, except anyone can read it.
Every transaction leaves a trail.
Your balances, trading activity, and even the timing of your moves can be studied by anyone who knows your wallet address.
That creates problems most people overlook.
> What public blockchains expose:
โข Your wallet balances.
โข Your trading history.
โข Your transaction patterns and timing.
> Why it matters:
Others can track and copy your strategies.
Large positions become easier to monitor.
Public activity can expose you to unwanted attention and targeted attacks.
This is where confidential finance becomes important.
The goal isn't to abandon public blockchains. It's to make financial activity more private while keeping the ability to verify what actually matters.
That's the direction projects like @primus_labs are exploring with zkTLS and zkFHE.
You should be able to prove something is true without handing everyone access to the information behind it
Personally, i'll agree that using a public blockchain shouldn't mean making your entire financial life public.
Privacy is about having a choice over what you reveal.
Still early make sure you start earning your XP here: s.kaito.ai/zJlvAyo
So we're getting Primus sooner than later expected..
@primus_labs just dropped a teaser about this NOV likely to be their TGE
I joining primus_labs on @KaitoStudio_
cause the allocation was worth looking at.
0.3% of $PRIMโs total supply is allocated to the campaign, with 0.24% for creators and 0.06% for Kaito stakers.
Thatโs a larger creator allocation than Axisโs 0.25% campaign pool.
Second, thereโs still time to get involved.
Epoch 2 runs until November 21, followed by Epoch 3 from November 22 to December 21.
Points carry across epochs, and only your four best posts count per epoch.
Donโt rush to flood the timeline with low-effort content.
Use the time to understand what Primus is building and publish a few posts that actually explain the tech.
Its zkTLS technology verifies web data without exposing the underlying information, while zkFHE enables computation on encrypted data.
Privacy is becoming a bigger conversation in crypto.
The opportunity here is to understand the technology, contribute something useful, and let the quality of your work speak for itself.
Still early enough to make your entry count.
Make sure you start earning your XP here: s.kaito.ai/zJlvAyo
In less than an hour Fungo Genesis Sealed auction will be live.
3,232 Genesis NFTs, sealed at mint, sharing in @FungoLabs launchpad revenue. Built with FHE on Zama.
And the Genesis NFTs will be share in the revenue generated by the FungoLabs launchpad.
Holders get:
โข 20% of launchpad revenue
โข 5%+ of every token launched
โข 1.11M $fungo per nft tge
Highest bids win.
One thing I like about the $FUNGO X campaign is how simple they've kept it.
No endless farming or spending hours chasing points.
Just put out your own posts by sharing useful updates about @FungoLabs .
The Genesis NFT auction also closes today at 4:30 PM.
Thereโs still time to place a bid if you've been following the collection.
I prefer campaigns that keep participation simple.
How rewards are distributed are what I'll be watching next.
๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ ไบบ retweeted
If you missed out on recent updates this week, hereโs a roundup on what happened this week. โ
โ Binance got hacked for $6.3B.
โ Binance โ Refilled 100% of hacked assets and added a ZK Proof of Reserves.
โ Mercado Bitcoin โ Halted deposits and withdrawals after a hack moved over $40M.
โ Chainalysis โ Lost customer names and emails to a hacker using agentic AI.
โ BTCPay Server โ Urged an update to version 2.4.7 after hot wallet thefts on older versions.
โ Strategy โ Bought 811 BTC for $65.5M, lifting holdings to 849,327 $BTC.
โ Iron fish โ Is shutting down after an inflation bug let an attacker double-spend.
โ Riotโ Cut BTC holdings 79% and signed a $28B, 910 MW lease with an AI lab.
โ Canton โ Got Canton Coin labeled a digital commodity by the SEC.
โ CFTC approved perpetual futures trading on individual US stocks.
โ Solana โ Became home to a Schroders emerging market bond fund.
โ BitGo โ Launched an institutional trading business led by an ex-NYDIG exec.
โ Paragon โ Launched power perps on Hyperliquid, starting with $HYPE
โ BitMart โ Suffered a minor hack, possibly tied to the Mercado Bitcoin attackers.
โ Trump Media moves $342M in Bitcoin.
โ US oil price fell below $100.
โHouse Democrats plans to probe Trump family deals.
โ XRPL activates major security fix.
โ Iphones got drained off $4M+ by opening a link in safari - DarkSword, an iOS exploit kit, is hitting unpatched iPhones on versions 18.4โ18.7.
โ $ONDO now top tokenization platform, surpassing $4B in TVL.
One thing I like about the $FUNGO X campaign is how simple they've kept it.
No endless farming or spending hours chasing points.
Just put out your own posts by sharing useful updates about @FungoLabs .
The Genesis NFT auction also closes today at 4:30 PM.
Thereโs still time to place a bid if you've been following the collection.
I prefer campaigns that keep participation simple.
How rewards are distributed are what I'll be watching next.
Final hours of the $FUNGO X campaign! โณ
The campaign closes together with the Genesis auction: 06.11.2026, 15:30 UTC.
Make your last posts now and send your 5 best from the campaign page. Posts sent after the close won't count.
The leaderboard will be revealed when the campaign ends, and rewards will be distributed at TGE.
fungolabs.org/launchpad/campโฆ
โฅ most people see 11% APY and immediately want to know how much they can make.
the smarter question is how many things have to go right for you to actually earn it?
> the problem with single-source yield
you deposit, you earn, and everything depends on one strategy.
when it works, everything looks good, but when market conditions change, you discover just how much risk was concentrated in that one source.
> what @grvt_io is doing differently
high yield earn combines returns from four independent sources:
โข real-world asset financing: financing backed by real-world assets.
โข tokenized fixed income: traditional fixed-income exposure brought onchain.
โข crypto credit: lending opportunities within crypto markets.
โข market-neutral strategies: strategies designed to generate returns without relying on market direction.
they don't all work in the same way, which is the point of spreading the yield across different sources.
deposits automatically earn a 3.5% base APY.
from there, users get access to higher-yield opportunities, with the product targeting up to 11% APY.
the part people often overlook
grvt has exposure limits designed to reduce concentration risk across the four yield sources.
this matters because having four strategies is one thing.
making sure one doesn't carry too much of the overall exposure is another.
that's the kind of detail i'd pay attention to when evaluating a yield product.
> what it doesn't mean
- 11% is a target, not a guaranteed return.
the product is not risk-free.
- grvt describes high yield earn as moderate risk.
- diversification can reduce concentration risk, but it cannot eliminate losses.
tradfi yield and crypto yield have largely operated in separate environments.
products that bring them together could make access to different sources of income more interesting.
maintain moderate risk.
Code: 9HW7U3Z
grvt.io/?ref=9HW7U3Z
DYOR. not financial advice.
Earn up to 11% on your savings.
Hereโs how to start on Grvt, in 35 seconds.
Put your savings to work. Deposit into High Yield Earn today: grvt.io/a/g/yvew4y3z
โฅ The biggest raise of the month was bigger than the other nine combined.
Across 10 raises, $1.26B was announced. @Kalshi alone took $1B for prediction markets.
The other $260.9M went to three areas.
Hereโs who got what โ
> AI and computing | $136M
* @NousResearch: $90M for AI research, led by Robot Ventures
* @hyperbolic_labs: $30M for cloud computing power, led by Walden Catalyst
* @luxor: $16M across mining, AI computing and derivatives, led by CMT Digital
> Money infrastructure | $106.9M
* @Spiko_finance: $90M for cash that earns yield and moves any hour of the day
* @0xPredicate: $8M for built in compliance for digital assets
@Mochatradeapp: $4.9M for US stock perps funded with rupees, led by CoinFund
* @BirchHill_io: $4M for regulated US credit onchain, led by Multicoin
> Trading and brokerage | $18M
* @VestExchange: $13M for perps across different asset types, from Portal Ventures
* @spicenet: $5M for onchain brokerage tools, led by dao5
> What the money is backing
* computing power for AI
* regulated ways to hold and move money
* tools that connect regular assets to onchain markets
kalshi makes the total look huge.
But one check doesnโt tell you where the industry is heading. the smaller bets do.
Raising money is the easy part, but the real test is when these teams get real users and real revenue from it.
thatโs what iโll be watching next.
personally, Iโm interested in what @fungolabs is build around its encrypted NFTs than in the mint itself.
The roadmap has three main stages:
1. Genesis collection
3,232 encrypted NFTs.
This is the starting point, with traits kept private rather than displayed openly.
2. Launchpad: Other collections would be able to launch with their traits sealed on Ethereum.
If this works, Fungo could become useful to more than just holders of its first collection.
3. The game : The game is meant to use the hidden traits from the Genesis NFTs.
This is the part I find most interesting.
With FHE, a smart contract can work with encrypted information without needing to reveal the underlying values.
For example, two NFTs could enter a duel. The game could compare their stats and settle the result while keeping those stats private.
That creates a different kind of game mechanic.
Players can compete without knowing every detail about the other player's NFT..
If the game works as intended, Fungo has a clear use case for keeping NFT data private..
For now, I'd separate what exists today from what the roadmap promises..
DYOR.
you should check it out :
What happens when an NFTโs rarity is hidden from everyone, including potential buyers?
Thatโs the experiment @FungoLabs is running with its encrypted NFTs.
Each NFT has two layers:
1. The Look:
The artwork is sealed at mint. Only the holder can reveal it, and once published, the reveal is permanent.
2. The Essence:
This holds the NFTโs class, four stats and element. These details remain encrypted.
The NFT and its owner are still public, but the attributes behind the asset aren't. On OpenSea, an unrevealed NFT displays a mark with the status โRevealed: Noโ.
Thereโs also an interesting ownership rule.
When an NFT is sold, the previous holder loses access in the same transaction.
The new holder can activate access with one transaction after roughly 19 minutes (96 blocks).
So the encrypted attributes move with ownership, rather than staying accessible to the previous holder.
The class distribution is:
โ Common: 50.0%
โ Rare: 30.1%
โ Ultra Rare: 14.8%
โ Legendary: 5.1%
What I find interesting is how hiding the attributes changes the way people trade them.
Buyers usually assess rarity, traits and appearance before deciding what an NFT is worth.
Here, some of that information isn't available upfront.
hidden attributes could make discovery more interesting, but they could also make pricing and valuation harder.
I'd want to see how collectors respond when they can verify ownership but cannot inspect the full attributes before buying.
you should check it out : fungolabs.org/launchpad/c/cfโฆ
โฅ 40+ projects are lining up for elysiumโs launch. only a few will still matter a month later.
@Enter_Elysium prepares for its mainnet launch on Nov 9th, competition on other token launchpads is already intensifying.
@Enter_Elysium is built by @Kinetiq_xyz using Arbitrum Orbit and @conduitxyz. new apps get built on it, and the trading still runs through Hyperliquid.
How it works โ
three parts:
โข Elysium: where the apps live (DEXs, launchpads, DeFi)
โข HyperEVM: where things settle and tokens move across
โข HyperCore: Hyperliquidโs order books and trading engine
it aims for 100 ms blocks and uses $HYPE for gas.
the big one is a HyperCore upgrade planned about four weeks after launch.
it would let apps on elysium see live prices, order books and positions directly, which helps market makers price and hedge better.
itโs planned, not live. donโt count on it for day one.
why it could matter
โข new tokens launch
โข people trade them
โข that trading brings liquidity
โข some of it flows back to Hyperliquid
launching tokens is the easy part. the hard part is people still trading them after the rewards stop.
where the money goes
the proposed split of the fees the network earns:
โข 50%: buy and burn $KNTQ
โข 25%: builder incentives
โข 25%: Kinetiq treasury and operations
more trading could also mean more HyperCore fees. none of it is guaranteed.
I grouped the ecosystem by what each category needs to contribute to onchain activity.
โฆ Launchpads and token issuance
@kilnpad, @AscendLaunch, @SignalFam, @oxleydotfun, @MontraXYZ, @ElysiumPump @CorePad_hl, @perpmefun, @Neuriio, @ChainzyLabs, @citadeldotxyz, @Bunnypadfun, @TheKleos_, @obolworld, @Boxa_Elysium,
โฆ DEXs and liquidity:
@HyperFlow_fun, @NestExchange, @HybraFinance, @dawndottrade
โฆ Trading and DeFi:
@Elypact, @Pantheonindex, @Pindar_finance, @truemarketsco
โฆ Derivatives and prediction markets:
@hyperflip_xyz, @speculatexyz, @LiquidictionHL, @Bound_Exchange, @BranchpointXYZ, @outrivexyz
โฆ NFTs and marketplaces:
@kalosfun, @AtlasHL
โฆ Gaming and consumer apps:
@eloscapeHQ, @playelysa, @clashforelysium, @Hyperion_RPG
โฆ Infrastructure and analytics:
@liquidterminal, @ElysiumEco, @Ellytradebot, @Alchemy, @ChainstackHQ, @Quicknode
โฆ Naming:
@ElysiumNames
this is a watchlist, not a promise that all of them will be live on day one. DYOR.
โฆ how to get $HYPE onto elysium
1. deposit USDC into Hyperliquid from Arbitrum
2. move it from perps to spot and buy $HYPE
3. send $HYPE from HyperCore to HyperEVM, and keep a little for fees
when the official bridge is live, bridge from HyperEVM to Elysium
one bridge to watch: blobmeme.com/bridge
testnet numbers only show people are building. they donโt show people are using it.
the first few weeks of mainnet will tell us whether elysium brings in new money, or just moves the same users around.
๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ ไบบ retweeted
What if the next big opportunity on $HYPE isn't another trading platform, but everything being built around it?
โ @Enter_Elysium wants to bring more apps, assets, and liquidity to @HyperliquidX.
Its mainnet goes live November 9.
โข Hereโs what you should know; โ
โ Built by @Kinetiq_xyz using Arbitrum Orbit and @conduitxyz.
โ Elysium is an EVM Layer 2 targeting;
โข 100ms block times
โข 300 Mgas/s throughput
โข $HYPE for gas
It connects Elysium, HyperEVM, and HyperCore to bring applications closer to Hyperliquidโs trading infrastructure.
โข HyperCore's integration
A planned upgrade could let Elysium apps access HyperCoreโs order books, prices, balances, and positions.
This could improve liquidity management and trading efficiency.
โข How demand comes in
The idea is simple:
Token launches โ DEX liquidity โ More traders โ More trading activity.
The real test will be whether these applications attract sustainable demand and liquidity.
โข The Revenue model
Proposed sequencer revenue allocation:
โ50%: funds $KNTQ purchases and burns
โ25%: to builders
โ25%: to Kinetiq's treasury
More activity could also create additional fee opportunities for hyperliquid.
โข Ecosystem Map
โ Launchpads: @AscendLaunch, @SignalFam, @oxleydotfun, @CorePad_hl, @perpmefun, @Neuriio, @ChainzyLabs, @MontraXYZ, @citadeldotxyz, @kilnpad, @Bunnypadfun.
โ NFTs/marketplaces: @kalosfun, @AtlasHL.
โ DEXs and liquidity: @HyperFlow_fun, @NestExchange, @HybraFinance, @dawndottrade.
โ Derivatives and prediction markets: @hyperflip_xyz, @speculatexyz, @LiquidictionHL, @Bound_Exchange, @BranchpointXYZ, @outrivexyz.
โ Trading and DeFi: @Elypact, @Pantheonindex, @Pindar_finance, @truemarketsco.
โ Analytics/infrastructure: @liquidterminal, @ElysiumEco, @Ellytradebot, @arbitrum, @conduitxyz, @Alchemy, @ChainstackHQ, @Quicknode.
โ Gaming/consumer apps: @eloscapeHQ, @playelysa, @clashforelysium, @Hyperion_RPG.
โ Naming infrastructure: @ElysiumNames.
โข How to bridge to elysium with no fees
>deposit usdc on @HyperliquidX and send usdc on $arb to hyperliquid.
> move your usdc from perps to spot, buy hype in the hype/usdc spot market.
> in the hyperliquid app, transfer your hype from hypercore to hyperevm, make sure you keep a little extra for gas.
>then bridge hyperevm to elysium, use blobmeme(.)com/bridge. make sure to remove the brackets in the site "()"
there are actually other bridges like volta which had a 2% fee, but this is the only one currently with zero fees.
โคgoodluck anon, NFA!
๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ ไบบ retweeted
We all thought @arc had been forgotten, but its TVL has been quietly growing while everyone was looking elsewhere.
I went through DefiLlama's data, and @arc is now sitting at roughly $633M in DeFi TVL.
What's even more surprising is where that money is going:
โข @Morpho Blue: $298.5M
โข @aave V4: $184.7M
โข Extended: $106.3M
That's nearly $483M sitting in Morpho and Aave alone, accounting for about 77% of Arc's TVL.
And lending isn't the only activity picking up.
Arc also has around $1.16B in stablecoin supply, with weekly perpetual trading volume approaching $1.9B.
But I wouldn't rush to call this organic growth just yet.
Depositing capital into lending protocols is one thing. Having people actively borrow against it is another.
I'd be watching:
โข how much of that liquidity is actually being borrowed
โข whether trading volume holds up
โข how much capital stays when incentives slow down
@arc may have gone quiet on the timeline, but the numbers suggest people haven't stopped putting capital to work there.
๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ ไบบ retweeted
Your AI agent might be smarter than you, but its payment system is more expensive than yours.
And that's a problem crypto is quietly trying to solve.
How do these agents actually pay for things?
โค The hidden cost of agent payments
AI agents often canโt simply use your personal debit card. They rely on virtual cards issued through their developers or agent startups.
These transactions can be classified as commercial card payments, which often carry higher interchange fees.
In some cases, merchant costs can reach 2.5โ3%.
A $100 purchase could cost a merchant $2.80 instead of $0.27.
Imagine millions of agents making purchases at that cost.
Thatโs a serious problem for merchants.
โค Enter crypto-native payments.
What if agents could pay directly using wallets and stablecoins?
No traditional card issuance, fewer intermediaries, and programmable settlement.
This is where x402 comes in.
Built around HTTP 402 Payment Required, x402 enables internet-native payments, allowing agents to pay for API calls, services, and digital resources programmatically.
Instead of subscriptions, imagine paying for exactly what an agent consumes.
โค The ecosystem is already forming.
I mapped startups building this infrastructure:
Agent cards & tokens: @agentcardhq @prayapayments @getpayos @evervault @basis_theory
Wallets & accounts: @crossmint @openfort_hq @turnkeyhq @1shotapi @HallidayHQ
Banks & networks: @naturalpay @catena_labs @GoKiteAI @PaymanAI + ATXP
Pay-per-call & x402: @daydreamsagents @merit_systems @PayWithLocus + Nevermined, Lava
Trust & identity: @VouchedID @trySkyfire @sapiom @t54ai @Mnemopay
Checkout & merchants: @rye @nekuda_ai @bitrefill @meshpay + Firmly
โค The bigger opportunity
AI agents will need wallets, stablecoins, payment rails, identity, spending controls, and settlement infrastructure.
Thatโs an entirely new financial infrastructure market.
My takeaway:
The next wave of crypto adoption might not come from humans buying tokens.
It could come from millions of AI agents using stablecoins to pay for software, APIs, services, and real-world goods.
Weโve built financial infrastructure for humans.
Now weโre building it for machines.
The killer use case for crypto might not be humans using crypto.
It might be machines.
@BlackRock latest paper on the โmachine-native economyโ lays out why.
โค The thesis is pretty simple:
AI = machine-native intelligence
Crypto = machine-native money
And as AI agents become capable of actually doing things, this starts getting interesting.
Agents wonโt just answer questions. Theyโll call APIs, buy data, hire compute, talk to other agents and even execute transactions.
And theyโll need to pay for all of it and thatโs where things like x402 come in.
Instead of a human pulling out a card every time an agent needs an API, an agent can potentially pay programmatically; including tiny, high-frequency payments.
Thatโs a very different payment environment from the one weโre used to.
But the part I found even more interesting:
โcompute itself could become a financial asset.โ
BlackRock points to $1.1T in projected 2030 revenue across AWS, Microsoft Intelligent Cloud and Google Cloud segments.
As compute becomes scarce and increasingly expensive, you can imagine markets emerging around claims on compute capacity.
An agent could eventually:
โค discover available compute
โค compare price/performance
โค provision it
โค pay for it
โค use it
โค settle everything programmatically
What Iโm saying basically is:
AI agents become economic actors.
And this is where the AI + crypto convergence starts making more sense to me.
If machines are going to participate in the economy, they need machine-readable money, assets and settlement.
The interesting stack is already taking shape:
MCP โ agents access tools/data
A2A โ agents communicate
x402 โ agents pay
Stablecoins โ machine-native money
Blockchains โ settlement
Compute markets โ machine-accessible resources
@AnthropicAI , @Google , @coinbase , @stripe , @OpenAI , @Visa and others are already building pieces of this infrastructure.
The ecosystem is obviously still early.
But the direction is fascinating:
humans โ agents โ agents โ machines โ money โ compute
The next economy may have a lot fewer humans clicking โbuy.โ
What happens when an NFTโs rarity is hidden from everyone, including potential buyers?
Thatโs the experiment @FungoLabs is running with its encrypted NFTs.
Each NFT has two layers:
1. The Look:
The artwork is sealed at mint. Only the holder can reveal it, and once published, the reveal is permanent.
2. The Essence:
This holds the NFTโs class, four stats and element. These details remain encrypted.
The NFT and its owner are still public, but the attributes behind the asset aren't. On OpenSea, an unrevealed NFT displays a mark with the status โRevealed: Noโ.
Thereโs also an interesting ownership rule.
When an NFT is sold, the previous holder loses access in the same transaction.
The new holder can activate access with one transaction after roughly 19 minutes (96 blocks).
So the encrypted attributes move with ownership, rather than staying accessible to the previous holder.
The class distribution is:
โ Common: 50.0%
โ Rare: 30.1%
โ Ultra Rare: 14.8%
โ Legendary: 5.1%
What I find interesting is how hiding the attributes changes the way people trade them.
Buyers usually assess rarity, traits and appearance before deciding what an NFT is worth.
Here, some of that information isn't available upfront.
hidden attributes could make discovery more interesting, but they could also make pricing and valuation harder.
I'd want to see how collectors respond when they can verify ownership but cannot inspect the full attributes before buying.
you should check it out : fungolabs.org/launchpad/c/cfโฆ
Found a crazy opportunity for creators who are actively on here.
@FungoLabs just launched its $FUNGO campaign and they're putting 300M $FUNGO into its content campaign.
but the scoring rule is what I noticed.
Only your 5 best posts count toward the campaign.
That puts more weight on the quality of your content than on how often you post.
few details you might want to note:
โ Eligible posts must have been published from November 1, 14:00 UTC.
โ The reward pool is 300M $FUNGO.
โ Rewards are scheduled for distribution at TGE.
I prefer campaigns where the rules are clear and good research has room to stand out.
you should check it out : fungolabs.org/launchpad/c/cfโฆ
๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ ไบบ retweeted
โฅ 11% apy means nothing until you ask where is it comes from
so hereโs where @grvt_io says it comes from.
four yield sources
โขreal world asset financing
โขtokenized fixed income
โขcrypto credit
โขmarket neutral strategies
this sources are very important because most yield products lean on one engine.
when that engine stalls, the yield stalls with it
four independent sources means one weak spot doesnโt sink the whole thing.
exposure limits are also built in to reduce concentration risk
maintain moderate risk.
Code: 9HW7U3Z
grvt.io/?ref=9HW7U3Z
dyor, not financial advice
Idle stablecoins earn nothing.
@grvt_io just launched High Yield Earn up to 11% target APY
An 11% target APY got my attention.
What matters more to me is where that yield comes from.
GRVT High Yield Earn combines traditional finance and crypto strategies.
they including tokenized fixed income, real-world asset financing, crypto credit and market neutral strategies.
The underlying mechanics deserve a closer look.
Whitelist is open ๐
Code: 9HW7U3Z
grvt.io/?ref=9HW7U3Z
DYOR.
๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ ไบบ retweeted
How do you know an AI agent actually did the work it claims to have done?
This is one of the bigger problems in the agent economy.
You can't simply take an agent's word for it.
You need a way to verify its work without necessarily exposing the data behind it.
That's where the two @termix_ai technologies become interesting: TEE and zkVM.
1. TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)
Think of it as a secure room inside a computer chip.
Code runs in an isolated environment.
Sensitive inputs stay protected from the rest of the system.
Useful when agents handle private information
2. zkVM (Zero-Knowledge Virtual Machine)
Think of this as a machine that can produce evidence that a computation was executed correctly.
โข Executes a program.
โข Generates a cryptographic proof of its execution.
โข Allows another party to verify the result without repeating the entire computation.
3. Why does this matter for AI agents?
Agents are moving beyond answering questions.
They're beginning to handle tasks, process data, interact with applications and execute workflows.
But if an agent is going to handle valuable work, users need more than a completed task notification.
They need evidence.
TEE helps protect the execution environment. zkVMs help establish computational correctness.
They approach different problems, but together they point toward something important which is private execution with verifiable results.
The next phase of AI agents won't just be about what they can do.
It will be about whether anyone can independently verify what they did.
That's a much bigger conversation than simply making agents smarter.
The agent economy becomes interesting when agents can do more than complete tasks.
when they can find work, follow instructions, and get paid.
I think that's the next challenge for autonomous agents.
Giving an agent more skills is useful, but skills alone don't create an economy.
There also needs to be a way to connect those skills to real demand and handle payment.
That's why I'm looking at what @termix_ai is building with Agent Skills.
They announced integrations include Grok, Muse, and Claude, although the exact capabilities may differ across agents.
I'm interested in seeing whether this can move beyond a good concept and become a practical way to get useful work done.
Want to explore it yourself?
Check out the TermiX Agent Skills and follow the installation guide.
Personally, i think the agent economy won't be built on intelligence alone, It needs a way for agents to turn skills into income.
โฅ 11% apy means nothing until you ask where is it comes from
so hereโs where @grvt_io says it comes from.
four yield sources
โขreal world asset financing
โขtokenized fixed income
โขcrypto credit
โขmarket neutral strategies
this sources are very important because most yield products lean on one engine.
when that engine stalls, the yield stalls with it
four independent sources means one weak spot doesnโt sink the whole thing.
exposure limits are also built in to reduce concentration risk
maintain moderate risk.
Code: 9HW7U3Z
grvt.io/?ref=9HW7U3Z
dyor, not financial advice
Idle stablecoins earn nothing.
@grvt_io just launched High Yield Earn up to 11% target APY
An 11% target APY got my attention.
What matters more to me is where that yield comes from.
GRVT High Yield Earn combines traditional finance and crypto strategies.
they including tokenized fixed income, real-world asset financing, crypto credit and market neutral strategies.
The underlying mechanics deserve a closer look.
Whitelist is open ๐
Code: 9HW7U3Z
grvt.io/?ref=9HW7U3Z
DYOR.
๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ ไบบ retweeted
So we're getting Primus sooner than later expected..
@primus_labs just dropped a teaser about this NOV likely to be their TGE
I joining primus_labs on @KaitoStudio_
cause the allocation was worth looking at.
0.3% of $PRIMโs total supply is allocated to the campaign, with 0.24% for creators and 0.06% for Kaito stakers.
Thatโs a larger creator allocation than Axisโs 0.25% campaign pool.
Second, thereโs still time to get involved.
Epoch 2 runs until November 21, followed by Epoch 3 from November 22 to December 21.
Points carry across epochs, and only your four best posts count per epoch.
Donโt rush to flood the timeline with low-effort content.
Use the time to understand what Primus is building and publish a few posts that actually explain the tech.
Its zkTLS technology verifies web data without exposing the underlying information, while zkFHE enables computation on encrypted data.
Privacy is becoming a bigger conversation in crypto.
The opportunity here is to understand the technology, contribute something useful, and let the quality of your work speak for itself.
Still early enough to make your entry count.
Make sure you start earning your XP here: s.kaito.ai/zJlvAyo
Most privacy solutions only address part of the problem.
They either hide everything or reveal everything.
Neither is enough when real capital and real decisions are involved.
What's missing is the ability to prove facts without exposing the underlying data, and to compute on sensitive information without decrypting it.
That's the gap Primus is building to address.
Not more secrecy.
Not more transparency.
But a way to keep sensitive data private while making it usable and verifiable.
Primus is building that cure.
How do you know an AI agent actually did the work it claims to have done?
This is one of the bigger problems in the agent economy.
You can't simply take an agent's word for it.
You need a way to verify its work without necessarily exposing the data behind it.
That's where the two @termix_ai technologies become interesting: TEE and zkVM.
1. TEE (Trusted Execution Environment)
Think of it as a secure room inside a computer chip.
Code runs in an isolated environment.
Sensitive inputs stay protected from the rest of the system.
Useful when agents handle private information
2. zkVM (Zero-Knowledge Virtual Machine)
Think of this as a machine that can produce evidence that a computation was executed correctly.
โข Executes a program.
โข Generates a cryptographic proof of its execution.
โข Allows another party to verify the result without repeating the entire computation.
3. Why does this matter for AI agents?
Agents are moving beyond answering questions.
They're beginning to handle tasks, process data, interact with applications and execute workflows.
But if an agent is going to handle valuable work, users need more than a completed task notification.
They need evidence.
TEE helps protect the execution environment. zkVMs help establish computational correctness.
They approach different problems, but together they point toward something important which is private execution with verifiable results.
The next phase of AI agents won't just be about what they can do.
It will be about whether anyone can independently verify what they did.
That's a much bigger conversation than simply making agents smarter.
The agent economy becomes interesting when agents can do more than complete tasks.
when they can find work, follow instructions, and get paid.
I think that's the next challenge for autonomous agents.
Giving an agent more skills is useful, but skills alone don't create an economy.
There also needs to be a way to connect those skills to real demand and handle payment.
That's why I'm looking at what @termix_ai is building with Agent Skills.
They announced integrations include Grok, Muse, and Claude, although the exact capabilities may differ across agents.
I'm interested in seeing whether this can move beyond a good concept and become a practical way to get useful work done.
Want to explore it yourself?
Check out the TermiX Agent Skills and follow the installation guide.
Personally, i think the agent economy won't be built on intelligence alone, It needs a way for agents to turn skills into income.
So we're getting Primus sooner than later expected..
@primus_labs just dropped a teaser about this NOV likely to be their TGE
I joining primus_labs on @KaitoStudio_
cause the allocation was worth looking at.
0.3% of $PRIMโs total supply is allocated to the campaign, with 0.24% for creators and 0.06% for Kaito stakers.
Thatโs a larger creator allocation than Axisโs 0.25% campaign pool.
Second, thereโs still time to get involved.
Epoch 2 runs until November 21, followed by Epoch 3 from November 22 to December 21.
Points carry across epochs, and only your four best posts count per epoch.
Donโt rush to flood the timeline with low-effort content.
Use the time to understand what Primus is building and publish a few posts that actually explain the tech.
Its zkTLS technology verifies web data without exposing the underlying information, while zkFHE enables computation on encrypted data.
Privacy is becoming a bigger conversation in crypto.
The opportunity here is to understand the technology, contribute something useful, and let the quality of your work speak for itself.
Still early enough to make your entry count.
Make sure you start earning your XP here: s.kaito.ai/zJlvAyo
Most privacy solutions only address part of the problem.
They either hide everything or reveal everything.
Neither is enough when real capital and real decisions are involved.
What's missing is the ability to prove facts without exposing the underlying data, and to compute on sensitive information without decrypting it.
That's the gap Primus is building to address.
Not more secrecy.
Not more transparency.
But a way to keep sensitive data private while making it usable and verifiable.
Primus is building that cure.
๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ ไบบ retweeted
Found a crazy opportunity for creators who are actively on here.
@FungoLabs just launched its $FUNGO campaign and they're putting 300M $FUNGO into its content campaign.
but the scoring rule is what I noticed.
Only your 5 best posts count toward the campaign.
That puts more weight on the quality of your content than on how often you post.
few details you might want to note:
โ Eligible posts must have been published from November 1, 14:00 UTC.
โ The reward pool is 300M $FUNGO.
โ Rewards are scheduled for distribution at TGE.
I prefer campaigns where the rules are clear and good research has room to stand out.
you should check it out : fungolabs.org/launchpad/c/cfโฆ
1/6
10 billion $FUNGO: Who gets how much?
Amounts, tokenomics and claim rules for Genesis NFT, Zama OG and the X Campaign.
Details ๐
๐๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฉ๐ ไบบ retweeted
An AI agent wants to buy $0.10 worth of market data.
The data costs 10 cents, but processing the payment through a conventional card could cost another 30 cents.
Imagine that same agent making thousands of small purchases every day.
Suddenly, the cost of moving money becomes a bigger problem than the service itself.
This is one reason I've been paying closer attention to the ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐๐.
And the numbers are getting difficult to ignore.
According to @chainalysis, x402 recorded approximately 138.5 million cumulative transactions on Base through Q3 2026.
Over 87% of the payments analyzed were worth $0.10 or less.
That's a fascinating payment pattern because AI agents don't necessarily spend like humans.
An autonomous research agent might need to purchase market data, pay for inference, access an API, and run security checks, all within a single workflow.
Charging a conventional checkout fee for every tiny purchase becomes economically inefficient.
๐ง๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐
๐ฐ๐ฌ๐ฎ ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ.
Developed by @CoinbaseDev, x402 allows software to:
โ request a resource
โ receive payment instructions through HTTP 402
โ authorize a payment
โ access the service after verification
Coinbase's facilitator offers 1,000 free monthly settlements, followed by $0.001 per settlement under its published pricing.
But payment settlement is only one part of this emerging market.
I've been following several companies building different pieces of the infrastructure:
โข @CoinbaseDev โ x402 payment infrastructure for machine-to-machine transactions.
โข @crossmint โ Agent wallets, stablecoins, existing card integration, and merchant checkout.
โข @turnkeyhq โ Wallet infrastructure that developers can integrate into agent applications.
โข @evervault and @basistheory โ Secure payment credentials and sensitive-data infrastructure.
โข @nevermined_ai โ Usage-based payments, metering, and x402 settlement for AI services.
โข @Stripe โ Shared Payment Tokens that allow agents to initiate authorized purchases without exposing underlying card credentials.
โข @Visa โ Intelligent Commerce and Trusted Agent Protocol for recognizing and authorizing agent-driven transactions.
โข @Mastercard โ Agent Pay for Machines, combining agent credentials, spending permissions, and multiple settlement rails.
Notice something here?
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ถ๐๐ป'๐ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐๐ฝ๐๐ผ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐.
Itโs about which infrastructure can give machines purchasing power without sacrificing cost efficiency, security, or accountability.
And thereโs still an uncomfortable question:
If an AI agent makes an unauthorized purchase, exceeds its spending limit, or pays for a service that never arrives, who takes responsibility?
Cheap settlement doesnโt automatically solve those problems.
Thereโs also a reason to be cautious about the adoption numbers. Chainalysis identified speculative activity contributing to earlier x402 growth, so transaction counts alone donโt prove sustainable commercial demand.
My expectation is that agent payments will develop across multiple rails:
โธ Stablecoins and x402 have compelling economics for micropayments.
โธ Card networks retain established merchant acceptance and dispute mechanisms.
The infrastructure that connects both while enforcing verifiable spending permissions, could become an important part of autonomous commerce.
AI agents are learning to do work independently. The next challenge is allowing them to pay for that work without losing human control over the money.





























