jonathan.py šŸ«˜šŸµ (@argparse) header
jonathan.py šŸ«˜šŸµ (@argparse) profile picture

Software engineer with focus on python. Passionate about sustainability and former student of political science. (he/him) @argparse.bsky.social

Frankfurt, Germany
Joined July 2009
Replying to @CAIS @ScaleAILabs
I'm missing open models in the benchmark. I'd like to see those.
7
Replying to @willmcgugan
> And I am deeply unhappy with the people that are currently leading AI are you also putting your money where your mouth is regarding that?
187
jonathan.py šŸ«˜šŸµ retweeted
overheard from friends talking about AI in China, and it’s very alarming - AI short films went massive in China market because of how good the video models are now - the first wave of people who mastered using AI to generate short films and comics made quite some money because they could produce a lot more content than traditional workflows - but within just a few months, everybody and their mom could make equally good short films because all the expertise could be written in a markdown file - when everyone’s more productive, no one actually has an advantage and it’s a race to the bottom. very quickly it became impossible to make money, and everyone’s busier than they were without AI - the only one making money now is companies like bytedance who owns user demand and distribution. they sell ads to creators who pay to get traffic, and eventually ad spend became 80% of those creators’ operating expense, while AI tokens is less than 5% so what are the problems here? 1. there’s no moat if you are creating anything with AI if a human is really good at something, and it’s hard to find more humans who can do the same, they can leverage the scarcity of their skill to get paid very well but if AI is good at something, it will be infinitely replicated, so there’s no scarcity hence you can’t really expect a sustainable business by creating anything with AI 2. more creators created more content people actually liked. that’s a good thing but the economical benefit of that all got absorbed by the distribution platforms there’s a famous chinese poem éčŗ«ē½—ē»®č€…ļ¼Œäøę˜Æå…»čš•äŗŗ - it basically says people who dress well aren’t the people making dresses. that’s exactly what’s happening here if our society doesn’t figure out a better way to distribute wealth, AI will help billionaires become trillionaires while average people become more exhausted than ever
392
878
201
7,970
656,800
bearish on the promised utopia provided by AI I think is the angle he's going for.
1
181
Replying to @sjdedic
"When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure"
60
Depends, perhaps you're using it right? Who's to say that spending more money is the right thing to do?
1
41
Replying to @alper
I think that's fair in a way. Somehow I'd still prefer such a person if I had a choice between them and a capitalist like Musk.
4
Replying to @alper
The working class built today's industry. I wouldn't say that isn't anything. There is both truth and untruth in that you need to use something to critique it. Do you need to have used heroin to critique the use it of it for example?
1
7
Let's agree that money doesn't belong in politics. The money can be spent better elsewhere.
1
221
Replying to @jeresig
Definitely an element of 'slowly boiling frog' in there. Personally I'd encourage usage of open models today. Happy to give a recommendation of a provider if interested.
1
111
Replying to @jeresig
I still feels like this is a choice we're making here (even if collectively). We could make different choices.
1
11
1,362
not really about never using AI again, but firing the CEO for sure.
1
4
109
Replying to @steipete
That business is also owned by a foundation. > Governance for people, not for profit proton.me/foundation So it's not just any corporation..
81
Replying to @jitbit
It'll be interesting to see if this is a true demographic shift having material effect or not. I suspect that they will be 'forced' to use it in some way as soon as they enter the job market.
1,160
Replying to @b1rkh0ff
And what do you think will happen to salaries of SE?
12
Replying to @BocaryStudios
@BocaryStudios Would be interested in seeing link loop on switch.
34