Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon) header
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon) profile picture

investigating mind brain and culture–thinker, writer, musician, photographer, remixer

Joined October 2011
Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)Photo by Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds (@bbenzon)
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
2
41
1
189
2,710
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
MASSIVE. MIT researchers showed that GPT-6 Astra can improve another AI model by changing its weights directly, without training. Here, GPT-6 Astra raised Qwen3.5-0.8B from 7.9% to 48.1% on MATH-500 by editing 0.016% of its weights, without training. Astra got Qwen’s weights in a Python notebook, plus a budget of 50 test runs on practice math problems. It saw the model kept repeating itself until it hit its length limit, traced that habit to a single internal signal written by 2 of its layers, and subtracted that signal out of the weights. With the loop gone, the model could finish answers it was already capable of solving. That single targeted edit changed 0.016% of the weights and lifted math accuracy from 7.9% to 48.1%.
We asked GPT-6 Astra to edit Qwen3.5-0.8B weights to improve math. It directly changed only 0.016% of weights, fixing 0.8B's reasoning loops & improving math up to 6x and even instruction following 3x, without gradients or training. We call this Weight-Space Programming: frontier LLMs can now natively read/write neural network weights! 🧵 Blog: rikiyat.github.io/blog/weigh…
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
LLM was given weights explicitly as text in prompt and used code/forward passes (per authors' logs) to ablate Qwen looping direction, a known thinking-mode issue per model card. Primarily fixed repetition in that mode, not general 'natively' improving weights/math. rikiyat.github.io/blog/weight-sp… github.com/RikiyaT/lm_und… huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3.5-0… huggingface.co/RikiyaT/Qwen3.…
88
222
39
1,774
104,699
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
"Theories of Deep Learning" is a 2026–27 mathematics course offered by the University of Oxford that examines the mathematical foundations of deep neural networks. The course consists of 16 freely available lectures covering neural network architectures, nonlinear transformations, convolutional structures, pooling, optimization, dictionary learning, transferability of learned features, adversarial examples, random matrix theory, learning invariances, and more. The lectures explore mathematical theories that help explain how deep neural networks learn and why they perform as they do. I consider this a particularly valuable resource for anyone interested in the mathematics underlying modern AI systems. courses.maths.ox.ac.uk/cours…
7
104
687
28,631
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
The great Terence Tao in the @NewYorker: 'Tao compared learning mathematics to watching “Emily in Paris,” a show that he and his wife enjoyed. “It’s completely ridiculous fluff, but it’s also fun. You learn the tropes, and you can kind of see how it’s going to go,” he said. “But if you’re just given a synopsis of the plot, like, ‘Here’s the premise, and this is what happens’—that’s not the point.” And, if you want to learn how to write your own show, “then it’s not helpful at all.”' newyorker.com/magazine/2026/…
20
54
26
997
155,789
NEW SAVANNA: With the right architecture, 109 million parameters beats 72 billion. new-savanna.blogspot.com/202…
21
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
Yann LeCun was right & nobody in this industry wants to say it out loud. 109 million parameters beat 72 billion. He has spent years saying scale is not the thing that makes a model understand the world. Meta bet the other way. He left in November and started his own lab in Paris. Last Thursday he published the proof. The theory everyone has been running on since 2024 is that if you train models big enough, on text, on images, on sound, they all end up with the same picture of reality inside them. Size does it. Nobody ever proved that part. Randall Balestriero and LeCun proved it. And the proof says size was never doing the work. What does the work is which two things you show a model together. A photo and the caption of that photo are two views of one thing. Models trained on pairs like that get there fast. Two paragraphs pulled from the same document are not two views of one thing. Models trained on those get there slowly and expensively. Next word prediction is the second kind. That is what every chatbot in the world runs on. In their tests the first method reached the same understanding after 21.6 million examples. Next word prediction needed 900 million. And a 109 million parameter text model ended up closer to an image model's view of the world than a 72 billion parameter language model was. 660 times smaller.
271
921
158
6,873
801,471
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
I got to meet the Pope! Report from the Vatican, with highlights from @Pontifex’s terrific speech yesterday and some thoughts of my own: garymarcus.substack.com/p/re…
25
44
11
399
23,841
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
I wasn’t wrong to say @stephen_wolfram is one of the top 3 philosophers of computation of mankind. Well, he demonstrated it with a book. I’m always amazed why there exists computational universality and regenerative universality in the universe and life. It’s impossible not seeing the nature of reality from such existence.
My mother was a philosophy professor in Oxford ... and at age 8 I was fond of declaring "If there's one thing I'll never be when I'm grown up it's a philosopher!" Well, decades later, my science led me to figure out some rather interesting things in philosophy ... and now there's a book of my philosophical essays just published. amazon.com/Ultimately-There-…
7
18
258
18,345
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
Replying to @LH @OpenAI
I would argue that this is a problem with the field - posing questions whose answers do not advance understanding of the physical world - not with OpenAI
3
43
6,809
NEW SAVANNA: OpenAI's Navio-Strokes not possible in the real world new-savanna.blogspot.com/202…
25
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
In lieu of flowers, memorial contributions may be made to: Johns Hopkins Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center Fund    alzresearch.org/giving/ Alzheimer’s Foundation of America Caregiver Resources     alzfdn.org/donate/ Photo Credit: Tommy Garcia
6,676
79,740
17,356
345,534
11,811,879
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
I am deeply saddened to learn of Walter Koenig’s passing. Although we did not know each other well away from the set, we shared the later seasons of the original Star Trek series and the six films that followed. What I observed, and what so many fans have expressed over the years, was a man who genuinely loved the Star Trek community. At conventions, Walter was rarely content to remain behind a signing table. He preferred to be among the people who had kept Star Trek alive for so many decades. That kind of genuine connection is rare, and it will be remembered by everyone who came into contact with him. My condolences to his family, his friends, and the countless fans whose lives he touched.
1,031
5,713
159
63,431
2,074,291
Bill Benzon, BAM! Bootstrapping Artificial Minds retweeted
Anthropic as an organization is a bunch of millenarian fanatics chasing the dream of building Digital God. Anthropic as a potentially megaprofit-earning company is quite another beast. Its executives and engineers have to pretend to be the second to do the first. (1/4)
4
16
134
21,755