Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10) header
Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10) profile picture

Eclectic engineer & nanoscientist. researcher @ Sandia Labs. Previously: PhD #nanoelectronics @u_psud; software startup, @stanford ugrad. also❤️ :📸 🏃 🏔 🧬

Joined March 2008
Photo by Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10)Photo by Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10)Photo by Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10)Photo by Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10)Photo by Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10)Photo by Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10)Photo by Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10)Photo by Christopher H. Bennett (@cbennett10)
Interested in how neural networks ought to be trained for emerging, fault-prone analog accelerators? Check out our new pre-print on the topic, "Incorruptible Neural Networks" ( under-review at an ML conference) arxiv.org/pdf/2602.07320 #edgeml #analogaccelerators #analogai
1
3
113
Amazing joint collaborative effort with our team at @SandiaLabs
1
75
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Why neural networks learn at the edge of chaos When you train a neural network, parameter updates aren't normally distributed. They're heavy-tailed—rare large jumps punctuate many small adjustments. This pattern appears across MLPs, CNNs, and Transformers, across MNIST and CIFAR-10, across early rapid learning and late convergence. It's suspiciously universal. Xin-Ya Zhang and Chao Tang argue this isn't a quirk of stochastic gradient descent or mini-batch noise. It's a signature of self-organized criticality, emerging from a fundamental trade-off: the maximum entropy principle pushes the network to explore freely, while a mutual information constraint forces updates to remain task-relevant. Balance these two forces, and you get power-law statistics—the same scaling behavior seen in earthquakes, neuronal avalanches, and financial markets. The evidence is compelling. The power-law exponent stays remarkably stable throughout training, even as loss drops by orders of magnitude. The loss landscape itself shows multiscale structure: exponential smoothness under small perturbations (locally flat basins), transitioning to power-law ruggedness at larger scales. Even the timing of large updates follows heavy-tailed statistics—big learning events cluster together rather than occurring randomly, with exponents around 2.5–2.7. What makes this conceptually satisfying is the theoretical derivation from first principles. Starting from entropy maximization under an information constraint, and using a path-integral formulation of KL divergence through parameter space, the authors recover exactly the observed scaling behavior. No fine-tuning, no ad hoc assumptions. The implications cut deep: neural network learning isn't just optimization—it's a nonequilibrium physical process governed by the same statistical principles that shape complex systems throughout nature. Understanding this could guide the design of more efficient learning algorithms and explain why SGD generalizes better than adaptive methods that suppress large exploratory updates. Paper: pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pn…
14
50
8
302
24,731
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Unlike current AI systems, brains can quickly & flexibly adapt to changing environments. This is the topic of our perspective in Nature MI (rdcu.be/eSeif), where we relate dynamical & plasticity mechanisms in the brain to in-context & continual learning in AI. #NeuroAI
7
84
3
468
24,882
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
In Science, researchers report the observation of dendritic nanotubes in brain tissue from mice and humans. The discovery suggests that the current understanding of the brain’s organization may be incomplete, overlooking a hidden layer of connectivity. Learn more in a new #SciencePerspective: scim.ag/3KFW8Ep
28
330
38
1,376
118,803
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
In this new paper, led by @giovannimarchet, we present a unique theoretical result that provides guarantees for the concrete representational structure expected to emerge in a learning system
Glad to announce our new preprint with C. Hillar, D. Kragic, and @naturecomputes ! arxiv.org/abs/2312.08550 We show via group theory how Fourier features emerge in invariant neural networks -- a step towards a mathematical understanding of representational universality. 🧵1/n
4
52
10
322
64,785
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Paper: TPUv4 system has an optically reconfigurable network to assemble groups of 4x4x4 chips like legos (4x4x12? 16x16x16?). SparseCores help w/ embeddings. TPUv4 outperforms TPUv3 by 2.1x & perf/W by 2.7x, & has 4096 chips so ~10x faster overall. .arxiv.org/abs/2304.01433#
10
114
5
594
157,913
Part of iopscience.iop.org/journal/2…, this topical review from @UT_Dallas, @UTAustin, @usal & @SandiaLabs looks at magnetic topological soliton-based computing systems, highlighting logical and neuromorphic computing with magnetic domain walls and skyrmions. iopscience.iop.org/article/1…
4
2
5
805
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Our January issue is now out, featuring substrate-less nanomesh receptors, non-reciprocal acoustoelectric microwave amplifiers, and a Bayesian machine built with memristors nature.com/natelectron/volum…
9
3
22
9,704
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Excited to announce that our work, Progress Measures for Grokking via Mechanistic Interpretability, has been accepted as a spotlight at ICLR 23! (despite being rejected from Arxiv twice!) This was significantly refined from my prior work, thoughts in 🧵 arxiv.org/abs/2301.05217
I've spent the past few months exploring @OpenAI's grokking result through the lens of mechanistic interpretability. I fully reverse engineered the modular addition model, and looked at what it does when training. So what's up with grokking? A 🧵... (1/17) alignmentforum.org/posts/N6W…
9
82
11
510
259,953
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
I gave a keynote last month at MAIN educational on the future of neuroAI, recording now available youtube.com/watch?v=-Gci9mkR…
1
8
1
57
8,712
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
My seCReT master plan to achieve #NeuralSupremacy is out! rdcu.be/c0J6s I would like to thank my editors at Nature, Luke Fleet, Karl Ziemelis, and Christiana Varnava; my referees, Dilip Vasudevan and four anonymous experts; my writing coach, @whatishealth21;
4
16
3
67
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
Discover our memristor-based Bayesian machine, just published in @NatureElectron ! This is our first completely integrated hybrid memristor/CMOS system, featuring 16 small memristor arrays and >30k transistors nature.com/articles/s41928-0… @C2N_com @INSIS_CNRS @UnivParisSaclay (1/4)
10
41
6
166
22,225
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
The mind is just the current thought, the body is the current sensation, the world is the current perception.
4
78
1
380
35,000
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
The fact we automated human creativity before manual drudgery is fascinating. It is almost enough to make you believe in a teleology of technology: this was contrary to everyone's intentions, but maybe human intentions don't matter, because technology has a purpose of its own.
56
60
20
540
Christopher H. Bennett retweeted
The brain has true random number generators everywhere. Our computers don't. What if they did? onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/…
1
1
4